Tag Archives: Dianne Feinstein

Kavanaugh Vs. Feinstein – Flawless Victory

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/justice-kavanaugh-2.jpg

(Tom Luongo) Yesterday’s dramatic cloture vote to push SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh to a final confirmation vote is one of those political moments of pure victory.  It was messy and it was tense, but the ultimate outcome was better than I could have ever originally expected.

Because it’s pretty clear to me that we’re looking at the kind of big operation run on the Democrats and the Soros Group to expose not only their tactics, the classic “Nuts and Sluts” shaming technique, but also in the process crush certain powerful members of the Democratic party which have been the conduit through which ‘the Resistance’ has driven our political process to the point of no return.

Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation was supposed to create the kind of uproar that would have Kavanaugh withdraw well before any of the dots could be connected by Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley and others.

The rapid succession of accusers was supposed to overwhelm the news cycle with outrage porn and the Republicans were supposed to fold like they always have in the past.

But we’re well beyond that point.  I’ve been warning about this since Trump began rising in the polls.  He out-Alinsky’s the Alinskyites and by doing so gives spine to the spineless and energizes a frustrated conservative/libertarian base of voters to go after these obviously corrupt, venal, power-mad freaks that run both the GOP and the DNC.

So, to me, it looks like some form of ‘operation’ was run on Feinstein and the Democrats here.  That the chum that was Brett Kavanaugh — young, rich, white, successful, etc. — they couldn’t ignore.

Like flies to a bug zapper they flew too close to the light and were fried unmercifully.  Feinstein knows she’s done.

Feinstein’s done.  The woman should have been arrested for treason after the scandal about her driver working for the Chinese broke earlier this year.  But, we should be able to connect a dot or two here and see that that was used as leverage against her to hold Blasey-Ford’s accusation until the most politically-damaging moment.

Wait for the fall-out from this.  The Republicans had a win/win situation on their hands here as long as Kavanaugh was 1) not guilty and 2) willing to endure the process.

It looks like he was able to do both.  Because if the Democrats force a failure of the vote, it will energize people to go to the polls in numbers unheard of for a mid-term election.

Or, if the Republicans finally fight back the way they are supposed to, then they 2) energize the base to finally crush these venal scumbags that so richly deserve it.

One of the two major parties has to fail for the Swamp to truly be Drained.  Old power structures within the Senate and House need to crumble.  Diane Feinstein is staring (with tears in her eyes) at censure, being stripped of her seniority and possible forced retirement.

All of those relationships get shattered. There are ripple effects up and down the lobby circuit in D.C.

What’s sad is that they really thought the rules hadn’t changed.  And if I’m right that this was an operation planned from the beginning to frame Kavanaugh with a known liar, not only Ford but Julie Swetnick as well, then by the time this is done everything in Washington will look very different over the next six months.

George Soros and Tom Steyer will have to spend even more money on their next losing battle.  And at some point, the situation in D.C. will turn against them far enough for asset seizure and possible imprisonment.

image

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/dopl3btvaaa3deq.jpg

Source: ZeroHedge

Introducing Feinstein’s Red Pilled Republican Challenger

WOULD YOU VOTE THIS MAN INTO THE US SENATE?

Patrick Little is a Marine running for the Senate in California against Dianne Feinstein. He is currently running SECOND to her, yes, he is the top Republican candidate, but the party is disavowing him. Patrick was recently red-pilled and is burning all his bridges as he speaks the Truth as he understands it.

Here is another video of him. Keep in mind that he is a candidate for the US SENATE, and Youtube has placed this video in “Limited State”, meaning that you can’t comment, can’t like, can’t share, and it won’t be recommended. You can’t find it unless you are specifically searching for it. This is outrageous that they can censor a candidate for Senate, no matter what his views are.

Here is Patrick Little’s description of himself:

My name is Patrick Little, and I am running for US Senate in California.

I’m a Mainer by birth, a husband by choice, an experienced IT engineer, and a USMC veteran of Afghanistan.

I am fighting for US Citizens in California, and my campaign platform will be re-posted on this site.

I have been censored off from social media after trying to start a discussion about the jewish supremacist control of many critical institutions of the United States and her government.

I am the only America First Candidate in California.America First is a slogan coined by Charles Lindbergh.Lindbergh, and his millions-strong America First Committee, attempted to prevent our entanglement in the European War of Liberation from the lying jewish press and the zionist bankers.

It embodies the original intent of the foreign policy of the Founding Fathers:

To keep our country from being caught up in foreign entanglements.

No more wars for Israel. No more of Feinstein’s jewish supremacist wars for Israel.

Here is what the San Francisco Chronicle says about him in a recent story:GOP leaders would love to have one of their own facing Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein on the November ballot. Unless that GOP candidate is Patrick Little, a neo-Nazi from Albany who is running a strong second in a recent poll.


“I am the only America First candidate in California,” Little proclaims
on his website. “No more of Feinstein’s Jewish supremacist wars for Israel.”

Aghast at the possibility of being represented by a Senate candidate whose platform calls for “limiting representation of Jews in the government” and making it U.S. policy that the Holocaust “is a Jewish war atrocity propaganda hoax that never happened,” California Republican leaders were quick to denounce Little.

“Mr. Little has never been an active member of our party. I do not know Mr. Little and I am not familiar with his positions,” Matt Fleming, a California Republican Party spokesman, said in a statement. “But in the strongest terms possible, we condemn anti-Semitism and any other form of religious bigotry, just as we do with racism, sexism or anything else that can be construed as a hateful point of view.”

Little, who bills himself on the ballot as a “civil rights advocate,” is well on the way to his 15 minutes of national fame, mostly at the expense of a state Republican Party that hasn’t been able to recruit a serious candidate for one of the nation’s most visible political offices.

The party’s dismay also doesn’t explain how Little, who according to Federal Election Commission records hasn’t reported raising a nickel for his campaign, was backed by 46 percent of Republicans in the poll that SurveyUSA did for a number of California television stations, including KPIX in San Francisco.

The poll put Feinstein way in front with 39 percent support. She was followed by Little at 18 percent, with Los Angeles Democratic state Sen. Kevin de León and San Diego Republican businessman Roque “Rocky” De La Fuente tied for third at 8 percent. The top two finishers in the June 5 primary advance to the fall general election.

De La Fuente, by the way, is also running for the U.S. Senate in Florida’s Aug. 28 GOP primary, after unsuccessfully seeking the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016 and then becoming the Reform Party nominee for president.

The poll, which was conducted online April 19-23, found Feinstein and Little in a virtual tie, 29 to 28 percent, among Central Valley voters, with Little pulling support from 42 percent of those who say they are conservatives.

The poll of 520 likely voters had a margin of error of plus or minus 5.5 percentage points.

SurveyUSA, which has polled the Senate race three times this year, listed Little among its six leading candidates in the most recent poll because of how he performed in the earlier surveys, Jay Leve, president of SurveyUSA, said in an email. There was one other Republican among the six — De La Fuente.

“For the first time, there is clarity on (Feinstein’s) likely November opponent,” pollsters said in their report on the survey. “It is Republican Patrick Little, who today polls at 18 percent overall, but whose rural coalition is strong enough that he ties Feinstein in California’s Central Valley.”

Little’s platform isn’t all about anti-Semitism. He also calls for nationalizing Google, Twitter “and all other natural monopolies in the IT industry,” and banning all lobbying groups, “except nonprofit lobbies that work to protect the Bill of Rights.”

Expect his campaign to be a topic of discussion — anguished discussion — at this weekend’s state Republican Party convention in San Diego.

— John Wildermuth

Here is his website https://littlerevolutiondotus.wordpress.com/.

It looks like The Powers That Be have a little problem on their hands. Would you vote for this man?

Source: The Burning Platform

***

What Is Zionism? And Why I’m a Proud Anti-Zionist – Video Compilation

 

Senate Bill Would Let FBI Read Your Emails Without A Court Order

The 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act would deal a blow to privacy by making government surveillance easier.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and Vice Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) shoving the 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act through.

Better watch what you put in email.

The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday approved a bill that would make it easier for the government to read what you’re writing online.

The 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act, if enacted into law, would let the FBI obtain email records without a court order. All the agency would need is a National Security Letter, which lets the FBI get information from companies about their customers without alerting the person being investigated. Currently, the FBI can access phone records that way, but not emails.

The bill is the latest move by the federal government to shore up its powers when it comes to surveilling citizens. The government has been battling Apple and other tech companies for more access to data stored on devices. Law enforcement argues it can’t fight crimes unless it has access to information on mobile gadgets. Technology companies and rights groups argue that features like strong encryption, which scrambles data so it can be read only by the intended recipient, are needed to keep people safe and protect privacy.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and Vice Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Tuesday in a joint statement that the 2017 Intelligence Authorization Act makes it easier for the government to keep Americans safe.

“The threat of terrorism remains high, so it’s vital that we provide intelligence agencies with all the resources they need to prevent attacks both at home and abroad,” Feinstein said.

But Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the lone dissenting voice on the 15-member Senate committee, vowed to work on reversing the “dangerous provisions.”

“This bill takes a hatchet to important protections for Americans’ liberty,” he said in a statement. “This bill would mean more government surveillance of Americans, less due process and less independent oversight of US intelligence agencies. Worse, neither the intelligence agencies, nor the bill’s sponsors have shown any evidence that these changes would do anything to make Americans more secure.”

Now that the bill has passed in the Intelligence Committee, it next will be considered by the full Senate.

by Shara Tibken | CNET