Tag Archives: electronic voting fraud

Roy Moore Recount Is ON: What you need to know (video)

https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi1.wp.com%2Fmoralmatters.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F12%2Felectoralcollege-button.jpg%3Ffit%3D620%252C620&sp=f6603ca8e8730f742253c2289163480c

The Recount of the Alabama Senate Race is ON. Multiple levels of election fraud being uncovered. After nearly an entire precinct in a black neighborhood in Birmingham was tossed out this morning by the Alabama Secretary of State for widespread and rampant voter fraud, estimates have Roy Moore in the lead by more than 300 votes. The 421st precinct racked up nearly 26K votes for Doug Jones, mostly with brand-new voter registrations, in an area with only 1100 residents. The widespread fraud and corruption is the new method of winning elections for Democrats, who have little to no actual support in America anymore outside of the 4 cities they all seem to live in.

This isn’t Chicago we’re talking about, however…it’s Alabama. There’s no way some Democrat beat a fine, upstanding public servant like Roy Moore, who has been a faithful Alabamian all his life. Police say they are also ready to make hundreds of arrests just as soon as the DA files charges. They could stem anywhere from voter fraud, a 3rd-degree felony, to falsification, a 1st-degree misdemeanor, landing hundreds if not thousands of criminals in jail for a year or more. The method of fraud was fake IDs, which is ironic since Democrat oppose voter ID laws because they are “too expensive” for people living in poverty in minority neighborhoods. The Alabama Secretary of State’s office says it will refrain from certifying the election until a recount can happen.

* * *

Roy Moore Recount Day Two Progress and Correction

It is Day Two in the Judge Roy Moore Alabama Vote Count. My first video on the subject had an error in it. So here is me saying “I was mistaken!” “I was wrong” plus some information that has broken since.

* * *

Watch Liberals Rejoice Over Stealing Elections

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/doug-jones-hillary-600x381.jpg

* * *

Alabama Voter Fraud Cover-Up, Court Allows Ballot Record Destruction (video)

https://reclaimourrepublic.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/vote-fraud-dem-stein-recount.png

 

 

 

California ☭ Exposed For Having 11 Counties With More Registered Voters Than Voting-Age Citizens

The Election Integrity Project California provides a list of 11 California counties that have more registered voters than voting-age citizens.

In addition, Los Angeles County officials informed the project that “the number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.”

The Election Integrity Project California, Inc. has joined Judicial Watch, Inc., a non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C., in sending a National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”) Section 8 notice of violation letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

NVRA Complaint Excerpts

Dear Secretary Padilla:

From public records obtained on the Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”) 2016 Election Administration Voting Survey (“EAVS”), and through verbal accounts from various county agencies, eleven (11) counties in California have more total registered voters than citizen voting age population (CVAP) calculated by the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey. This is strong circumstantial evidence that California municipalities are not conducting reasonable voter registration list maintenance as mandated under the NVRA.

This letter serves as statutory notice that Election Integrity Project California, Inc., a registered non-profit corporation in California, and Judicial Watch, Inc., will bring a lawsuit against you and, if appropriate, against the counties named in this letter, if you do not take specific actions to correct these violations of Section 8 within 90 days.

The following information explains how we determined that your state and the counties named are in violation of NVRA Section 8 and the remedial steps that must be taken to comply with the law.

1. Eleven California Counties Have More Total Registered Voters Than Citizen Voting Age Population

Based on our review of 2016 EAC EAVS report, the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California total active and total inactive voter registration records, California is failing to comply with the voter registration list maintenance requirements of Section 8 of the NVRA. For example, a comparison of the 2011-2015 U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, and the most recent California active and inactive voter registration records shows there were more total registered voters than there were adults over the age of 18 living in each of the following eleven (11) counties: Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). Our own research shows that the situation in these counties is, if anything, worse than the foregoing data suggest. For example, we contacted Los Angeles County directly this past June. At that time, county officials informed us that the total number of registered voters now stands at a number that is a whopping 144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age.

2. The NVRA Requires You to Undertake Reasonable Efforts to Maintain Accurate Lists of Eligible Registered Voters

3. Failure to Comply with NVRA Subjects You to Lawsuits and Financial Costs

In passing the NVRA, Congress authorized a private right of action to enforce the provisions of the NVRA, including Section 8. Accordingly, private persons may bring a lawsuit under the NVRA if the violations identified herein are not corrected within 90 days of receipt of this letter.

4. Avoiding Litigation

We hope you will promptly initiate efforts to comply with Section 8 so that no lawsuit will be necessary. We ask you and, to the extent that they wish to respond separately, each county identified in this letter, to please respond to this letter in writing no later than 30 days from today informing us of the compliance steps you are taking. Specifically, we ask you to: (1) conduct or implement a systematic, uniform, nondiscriminatory program to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of a change in residence; and (2) conduct or implement additional routine measures to remove from the list of eligible voters the names of persons who have become ineligible to vote by reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal conviction, and to remove noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.

5. Production of Records

Finally, pursuant to your obligations under the NVRA,15 your office and, to the extent that they keep records separately from your office, each county named in this letter, should make available to us all pertinent records concerning “the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency” of California’s official eligible voter lists during the past 2 years. Please include these records with your response to this letter.

I hope that the concerns identified in this letter can be resolved amicably. However, if we believe you do not intend to correct the above-identified problems, a federal lawsuit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against you may be necessary. We look forward to receiving your prompt response.

Sincerely,
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
s/ Robert D. Popper
Robert D. Popper
Attorney, Judicial Watch, Inc.

Here is the full six-page NVRA Letter to California Secretary of State, Alex Padilla.

By Mike “Mish” Shedlock

California Touchscreen Machine Gives Sanders Vote To Another Candidate

The shocking footage shows a citizen walking up to the machine and attempting to vote for Sanders two different times, with each vote being credited to a candidate named Michael Steinberg.

A disturbing video from a polling location in Alameda County, California is an example of what might be a Smartmatics or Diebold type machine programmed to flip the vote without anyone allowed to examine or verify the software code  settings. Smartmatics and Diebold are part of the UniParty DC regime – and provide the electronics to Brasil, Britain, France, Syria, Venezuela, Utah (that is how Ted Cruz won over TRUMP, even though his polls showed 20% max, prior to the election). Populist candidates have no chance, neither does the “public”.  George Soros is close friends with the Chairman of Smartmatics and provides the machines for “FREE” to any gubbermint wanting to be the winner.  Diebold is part of the CIA.

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2-b.examiner.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fimage_content_width%2Fhash%2Fba%2Ff9%2Fbaf9687e8ff9b0ab6b68651076ed04cc.jpg%3Fitok%3DQUGK8cMF&sp=141bea4f6aa16f896d5a7e6229341566

https://tensmiths.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/politicians.jpg?w=420

Federal Election Commission Refuses to Release Computer Security Flaws Study

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is refusing to release an internal study of its vulnerable computer network, which Chinese hackers infiltrated two years ago.

The Center for Public Integrity, which revealed the hacking from October 2013, filed a Freedom of Information Act request to see a nearly $200,000 study performed by an outside company, SD Solutions, but the FEC rejected the request. That study reportedly discusses the security flaws in the FEC computer network and provides recommendations for fixing them.

FEC Chairwoman Ann Ravel told the center it would not publish the study because “the concern is that it contains information that details potential vulnerabilities.”

The agency is moving forward with fixing its computer problems. The center learned that commissioners moved last month to hire an outside firm to implement the study’s recommendations, but the agency has not yet decided whom to hire. The FEC has approved spending about $400,000 on the upgrades.

The Chinese cyber attack reportedly crippled the commission’s systems that inform the public about the billions of dollars raised and spent each election cycle by candidates, parties and political action committees.

Before the attack, other audits had raised concerns about the FEC’s computer system. “Without adopting and implementing National Institute of Science and Technology minimum security controls, the FEC’s computer network, data and information is at an increased risk of loss, theft, manipulation, [and] interruption of operations,” according to contractor Leon Snead & Co.’s 2012 report. The FEC’s response was that its “systems are secure.”

by Noel Brinkerhoff for AllGov