Tag Archives: Muslim

Muslim Who Tried To Behead Washington State Cop Was From Dadaab Refugee Camp Ghetto

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2010/11/12/world/africa/12dadaab_map/12dadaab_map-articleInline.jpg

In case you missed the update from World Net Daily about the “man” who sliced open a police officers head in Kennewick, Washington over the weekend (when everyone was busy focused on Charlottesville), here we learn that Hussain Hassan was from the UN’s Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya. 

So much for screening—either security or mental health!

https://drc.ngo/cropup/primaryimagefullwidth/media/1664757/news_17_04_15.jpg

https://singularthings.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/8-dadaab-dagaheley-quartz.jpg?w=1245&h=700

https://i2.wp.com/s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/styles/embed/public/2011/06/28/120905-a-somali-refugee-child-carries-her-sibling-at-the-dagahaley-camp-in-da.jpg

https://singularthings.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/1-zaatari-refugee-camp-dezeen.jpg?w=981&h=700

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Environment/Pix/columnists/2011/3/24/1300976791951/Dadaab-refugee-camp--Soma-007.jpg?w=620&q=20&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&dpr=2&s=9ff9e45052a575186928fe400153a14b

https://singularthings.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/4-zaatari-metro.jpg?w=1988&h=1310

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2010/11/12/world/DADAAB2/DADAAB2-jumbo.jpg

https://www.diretube.com/uploads/articles/f6b09487.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/scd.infomigrants.net/media/resize/my_image_big/3197be710bcf7b63dd23a017dd589673dbff1f82.jpeg

Source: Refugee Resettlement Watch

 

 

How To Properly Beat Your Wife

This is quite a recent lecture, delivered on January 31, 2017 by an accepted Islamic authority.  The ideas presented here are not the hysterical rantings of some extremist who is not really a Muslim.  Far from that, the sheikh calmly cites the specific Quranic scripture which authorizes Muslim men to beat their disobedient wives.

Of course, this kind of rhetoric is centuries old.  So is the Muslim practice of beating one’s spouse who does not please him.  These are not controversial ideas in the World of Islam.  They are common accepted practice.  The wife-beating material, along with a lot more information about Muslim violence directed at females, has been presented for public education in Western Civilization – in books and videos – countless times – by many, many present-day authorities on mainstream Islam.

Mainstream Islam.  Not some kooky, radical version of Islam that perverts and hijacks the real Islam for non-Islamic purposes.

Remember that?

But, look.  Back to beating one’s wife.  This is it.  This is Islam, as real as it gets.

So, I ask you:  What’s the problem?  How much clearer can it be?  Why can not our educated Western political and military leaders grasp these simple, basic misogynistic Islamic concepts as easily as every Muslim grasps them?

What is the problem?  Knock knock.  Hello?  I can’t hear you.  What is the problem?

Source: Here’s The Right Side Of It

 

CNN Host Slams America’s Greatest Olympian Ever For Not Being Black, Muslim Woman

Michael Phelps may be the greatest Olympian the world has ever known but for CNN host W. Kamau Bell, he is just a “tall, successful, rich white guy” who clearly didn’t “need the honor” of being chosen by his athlete peers as America’s flag-bearer. Instead, Bell exclaims, Ibtihaj Muhammad, a woman, an African-American and a Muslim to boot, should have been chosen because “right now America has enough tall, successful, rich white guys hogging the spotlight trying to make America great.”

After Phelps was chosen by his fellow Olympians, the U.S. Olympic Team tweeted proudly….

But, as BizPacreview.com reports, liberals wanted U.S. swimmer Michael Phelps to give up the honor of carrying the American flag and leading his country’s athletes at the opening ceremony for the Rio Olympic games Friday night.

He’s the wrong color and the wrong sex.

W. Kamau Bell, host of CNN’s “United Shades of America,” described the swimming sensation as a “tall, successful, rich white guy” who clearly didn’t “need the honor.”

“With 22 Olympic medals, you are already the most decorated athlete in Olympic history,” he said.

But American fencer Ibtihaj Muhammad is a different story…

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/08/07/20160807_phelps_0.jpg

…a woman, an African-American and a Muslim to boot.

“Muhammad carrying the flag would be much bigger than your one moment,” Bell writes. “It would be a symbol for our country in this moment when we are mostly known for one of the most contentious, controversial, scandal-ridden, hateful, xenophobic, jingoistic, and just generally unlikable presidential elections in recent memory. This is at a time when we could use some more symbols of unity and togetherness.”

Bell referred to Muhammad as “a one-stop inclusion shop due to her race, sex and religion. Phelps, on the other hand was something else entirely.

“No offense, but right now America has enough tall, successful, rich white guys hogging the spotlight trying to make America great,” he said, in an obvious reference to Donald Trump.

“No offense”… but sadly it appears the supposedly apolitical Olympic Games has been hijacked by the liberal agenda – under the guise of fairness, so you can’t argue with that, right? – to further the divide in today’s identity politics.

Perhaps when Ibtihaj has won dozens of Olympic medals over a 20 year career, she will also get the opportunity… or perhaps a black, muslim swimmer will emerge who is gender-uncertain and slightly disabled to topple the crown of liberal queen?

olympics

Source: ZeroHedge

McCARRAN-WALTER ACT OF 1952

Here’s an interesting historical fact that would seem to indicate that many, if not most, of the people we elect to go to Washington don’t have the slightest idea of what laws already exist.

https://centinel2012.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/jihad-june-2016.jpg?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

I did not know of this until now.  It’s been law for over 60 years….

Isn’t this interesting!

The Bottom line is interesting.

Interesting Bit of Legislative History – MacCarran Walter Act of 1952

Trump was recently severely criticized for suggesting that the U.S. should limit or temporarily suspend the immigration of certain ethnic groups, nationalities, and even people of certain religions (Muslims).

The criticisms condemned such a suggestion as, among other things, being Un-American, dumb, stupid, reckless, dangerous, and racist.

Congressmen and Senators swore that they would never allow such legislation, and the president called such a prohibition on immigration unconstitutional.

As Gomer Pyle would say, Surprise, Surprise, Surprise !!!

It seems that the selective immigration ban is already law and has been applied on several occasions. Known as the McCarran-Walter Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 allows for the “Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by the president”.

Whenever the president finds that the entry of aliens or of any class of aliens into the United Stateswould be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

https://disturbeddeputy.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/knock-knock.jpg?w=446&h=584

The act was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did more.  He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he deported a bunch.  Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas, 15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States in 1979. (And they say it cant be done?)

It is of note that the act requires that an applicant for immigration must be of good moral character and “attached to the principles of the Constitution”.

Since the Quran forbids Muslims to swear allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, technically, all Muslims should be refused immigration.  

Authenticated at:

http://library.uwb.edu/static/USimmigration/1952_immigration_and_nationality_act.html

Saudi Arabia: Panel of Scientists Admits Women are Mammals, yet ‘Not Human’

Riyadh | In an unprecedented ruling, a panel of Saudi scientists has concluded that women are actually mammals, granting them the same rights as other mammal species such as camels, dromedaries and even goats.

https://i0.wp.com/worldnewsdailyreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/saoudien-science.jpg

The verdict, which fell just hours before the International Women’s Day, is considered “historic” by some experts and advocacy groups for women’s rights.

“This is a great leap forward for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia,” concludes Jane Austin, spokeswoman for the Women’s Liberation Action Network. “It may seem too little, too late, but it is truly a milestone event for all women in the region,” she says, visibly excited. “From now on, women will be considered as members of the mammal class, whereas before women shared the legal status of an object, similar to that of a home appliance,” she admits.

Jillian Birch, spokeswoman at Amnesty International, said she is optimistic about the future as women will no longer be considered as “soulless objects” but as fully fledged mammals.

“Soulless objects”

The recent verdict could completely upset all laws currently enforced in Saudi Arabia believes Jillian Birch, spokeswoman at Amnesty International.

“This verdict shows the incredible progress the women’s rights movement has made in the past 50 years,” she admitted in a press conference this morning. “Finally, women will no longer be simply considered as objects without souls, but as full-fledged mammals, with the same rights as other animals of their species such as camels and goats,” she said, visibly emotional. “Women are still far from being considered 100% human, but their condition will improve drastically with this decision,” she firmly believes.

Unprecedented Verdict

The verdict, which fell like a ton of bricks on the Saudi state, has clearly not found unanimous support among religious authorities and the political elite, concede experts.

“It could create significant turmoil in the current legal state of affairs and the judiciary system of Saudi Arabia,” says political analyst specialized in the Middle East, Anthony Bochstein. “If before women had the same rights as a chair or a table and were seen more as individual property, they now have an equivalent status to certain animal species, and thus must receive, at the very least, feeding, watering and be conferred a minimum of attention and respect, which was not the case previously,” he explains.

According to the expert panel that ruled on the matter, women are still devoid of a soul but have been shown to possess qualities common to the mammal species, which would explain their ability to procreate and breastfeed, as well as why they are equipped with seven cervical vertebrae, a characteristic unique to the mammal species.

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/theyre-with-me.jpg?w=945

Source: World News Daily