https://old.bitchute.com/video/8kmYsgCpTmUA/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ygox6bSScg
https://youtu.be/7ygox6bSScg?si=auEkvz28qmEPDPYv

The Origin of Israeli Political Satanism and Its Impact in the Middle East

In the Gospel of St. John chapter 8, Christ has an interesting discussion with the Pharisees during which they literally deny everything Christ proposes and instead erect something of their own making. Namely, they are the seed of Abraham and that they somehow have the special DNA to prove it.

St. John specifically uses the term the Jews to refer to the Pharisees or anyone who categorically and deliberately denies his mission on earth by claiming that they are the seed of Abraham. The Jews indirectly try to tell Christ that he cannot tell them what to do.

Christ of course could not accept their claim and said that the Pharisees cannot be God’s people by rejecting him. Moreover, Christ told them elsewhere that by rejecting him, they also rejected the Old Testament. Because as Christ declared, Moses wrote of Christ and spoke of him.

Christ who represents logic, reason, harmony, morality, etc. eventually told the Pharisees that their father is Satan. Christ says, “You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

John 8:44. The Pharisees could not accept Christ’s claims. Enraged, they sought to kill him on the spot. In fact, they immediately picked up stones to execute him, though he quickly escaped. If St. John is correct in presenting Christ as the logos that is the embodiment of logic, reason, harmony, morality, and order.

Then the Pharisees represent the antithesis of that logos, the antichrist. In this sense, the Pharisees embody unreason, illogicality, disharmony, chaos, immorality, and disorder. Everything that stands in opposition to the moral structure of the universe.

Moreover, if Christ is correct in declaring that the Pharisees father is Satan, then it follows logically that any individual or group that traces its theological lineage to Pharisaic doctrine participates at least spiritually in that same rebellion.

From our previous documentary, we established that rabbitic Judaism, the dominant form of Judaism after the destruction of the second temple, emerged from pheriseic tradition. This tradition eventually produced a foundational text known as the Talmud, which can rightly be described as antichrist in the strictest theological sense.

As Peter Schaefer of Princeton University notes in his book Jesus in the Talmud, certain passages portray Christ in highly offensive and blasphemous ways. One of which claims that he is burning in hell in excrement and that those who follow his teachings will suffer a similar fate.

As we noted in our previous work, it was historically inevitable that the early followers of Christ would find themselves in a cosmic and theological conflict with the heirs of this tradition. Any serious examination of this issue that fails to acknowledge or worse deliberately ignores the centrality of the Talmud in shaping post-temple Jewish identity risks missing the entire trajectory of religious and historical development.

While numerous thinkers in recent years have attempted to grapple with this issue, some have mistakenly attributed it to flawed Jewish DNA, while others, such as Lohanu have focused their critique on the Old Testament or Torah, identifying it as the true source of historical and political discord. These arguments, however, have been evaluated and found insufficient. For a more comprehensive critique, readers are encouraged to consult the work of Jonas E. Alexis, which will be referenced at the end of this brief documentary.

This central topic must be analyzed with care, intellectual honesty, and moral clarity. If we are to understand the conflict, we must examine its roots. So to return to our main point, any individual or group that deliberately and consciously seeks to follow the traditional teachings of the Talmud, particularly in its rejection of Christ, aligns itself with a theological framework that is by Christ’s own words satanic.

This is not a matter of mere opinion, but a logical and historical deduction rooted in the gospel account, particularly John 8. The modern state of Israel, particularly under leaders such as Benjamin Netanyahu, often presents itself as the defender and promoter of this Talmudic tradition. As such, it serves as a contemporary illustration of this deeper spiritual conflict. This becomes particularly clear when Benjamin Netanyahu declared in 2014 that the Talmud would serve as quote the legal system of Israel. His exact words were quote, “We will legally define the Talmud as the basis of the Israeli legal system.”

Such a bold statement is pregnant with meaning. If the Talmud defines the legal and moral foundation of the Israeli state, then it follows based on certain Telmutic texts that the Goyem and non-Jews are viewed as secondary or utilitarian at best. In this framework, if the Goyem serve Jewish interests, such as when Donald Trump gave Israel a geopolitical green light in regard to Iran, they can be instrumental. But if they oppose or challenge any policy of the Israeli regime, they may be seen as obstacles to be removed.

This disturbing dynamic is vividly unfolding in our world today, especially in Gaza where we are witnessing the systematic destruction of an entire population while much of the world looks on. The late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef expressed this Talmudic view with chilling clarity when he stated, “Goyam were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world, only to serve the people of Israel. With Gentiles, it will be like any person. They need to die. But God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die. They’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life to work well for this Jew.”

How did this Talmudic rabbi arrive at such conclusions? They are rooted in the Talmud, a body of rabbitic literature that in many respects diverges sharply from the ethical framework of the Torah or Old Testament. Over the centuries, even critical Jewish scholars such as Hinrich Gretz have acknowledged that the Talmud poses serious moral and theological problems, particularly in its treatment of non-Jews. Some passages instruct Jews on how to deceive or take advantage of [ __ ] which has led to ongoing controversy and historical conflict. We address this issue in depth in our previous documentary.

Suffice it to say here that whenever Jewish communities adopt and apply the more radical teachings of the Talmud, tension with non-Jewish societies tends to follow because no people group welcomes being deceived or treated unjustly. In that sense, the Talmud in its most ethnosentric and exclusivist interpretations can be described as both anti-goyem and in a theological sense satanic.

This dynamic helps explain how someone like Benjamin Netanyahu has managed to deceive Western audiences for more than two decades. His tactics rely not only on political maneuvering, but also on a worldview shaped at least in part by a Talmudic ethos. Consider the historical record. In 1992, Netanyahu warned that Iran would develop nuclear weapons within 3 to 5 years. That claim proved to be false. Yet, in 1993, he repeated the same prediction as though the international community had forgotten. This narrative crafted and promoted by the Israeli regime was designed to undermine diplomatic efforts between Iran and Western nations.

Despite repeated exposure of these fabrications, Netanyahu has continued to propagate them with impunity, largely because of unwavering support from the United States. Washington’s backing has emboldened Israeli policy, giving Netanyahu the confidence to threaten or even initiate military action against Iran under the pretense of national security.

Iran throughout its modern history has expressed a consistent interest in developing nuclear power for civilian use. However, Netanyahu and the Israeli regime have repeatedly and deliberately framed this effort as a covert plan to develop nuclear weapons. This distortion serves a broader agenda of fear-mongering and geopolitical manipulation.

Notably, Iran is a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, NPT, which allows for international inspections and monitoring of its nuclear facilities. In stark contrast, Israel has never signed the NPT and refuses to allow inspections of its own nuclear arsenal, an arsenal that most experts agree exists despite official ambiguity.

This double standard reveals the depth of Israel’s strategic duplicity. Israel, a nuclear armed state, expresses open terror at the thought of Iran merely having nuclear capability, not necessarily for weapons, but for civilian energy. This persistent anxiety reflects a deeper psychological condition, a regime that lives in fear of accountability. Like a thief who panics at the sight of a police officer, Israel’s leadership exhibits constant paranoia over being challenged or exposed. One could say the same about Benjamin Netanyahu, whose posture toward Iran often borders on hysteria. Even some within Israel’s own intelligence establishment have grown weary of Netanyahu’s tactics.

When he delivered what many viewed as a fear-driven, manipulative speech to the US Congress, former Mossad chief Mayor Dagan did not mince words. He called it [ __ ] Dagen further warned that Netanyahu’s policies were not only dangerous, but could also lead to the collapse of the Zionist project altogether. He stated plainly that such strategies would pave the way to apartheid and ultimately end the Zionist dream.

The Obama administration grew so frustrated with Netanyahu’s constant dishonesty and aggressive posturing that some officials reportedly referred to him bluntly as a chicken [ __ ] Yes, you heard that correctly. Netanyahu was viewed as a chicken [ __ ] by members of the Obama administration. Yet, even this blunt label was a relatively mild way of expressing their deep frustration.

In truth, many see Netanyahu as a ruthless, reckless, and diabolical leader, one who seems never satisfied unless he is advancing his agenda at the expense of countless lives, willing to sacrifice others blood for the sake of the so-called state of Israel. Perhaps Mir Dagen was more accurate than he ever imagined because no diabolical system can rule the world forever.

The logos, the principle of reason, truth, and justice will ultimately prevail, drawing people of conscience, and intellect to its side. This dynamic was evident during the conflict between Israel and Hamas in October 2023 when Israel propagated extreme and inflammatory claims such as Hamas allegedly beheading and hanging dozens of Israeli babies and slitting their throats for sport. Another widely circulated accusation was that Hamas was stuffing children into ovens, claims that have been questioned and challenged as fabrications designed to demonize and justify harsh retaliatory actions.

These categorical lies were perpetuated by the Israeli Defense Forces and Benjamin Netanyahu himself. The falsehoods were even endorsed by former President Joe Biden. And the Zionist Western media wasted no time spreading this misinformation widely. For instance, the Daily Mail described the claims as holocaust, plain and simple. Similar narratives appeared in the Times of London, The Metro, CNN, Fox News, and other outlets. Biden went so far as to assert that he had personally seen confirmed pictures of terrorists beheading children.

Yet, instead of challenging this bold statement, NBC News described the report and images as merely unverified. Netanyahu’s Twitter account amplified the allegations by posting graphic images purportedly confirming the killing of infants, claiming he had shared this material with US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.

What makes this episode particularly disturbing is that the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs initially displayed pictures of burned infants as evidence only to later delete them, effectively admitting the images were fabricated. Israeli journalist Ish Cohen also deleted a post sharing testimony from a military officer who claimed to have found the bodies of hanged babies. Cohen later admitted, “Why would an army officer invent such a horrifying story? I was wrong.” This raises the question, why would such categorical lies be invented?

One disturbing explanation is found in certain interpretations of the Talmud, which some claim teaches that Jews may deliberately deceive [ __ ] to advance Jewish interests. This belief, rightly or wrongly attributed, has fueled ongoing distrust and conflict.

In any event, all those claims were eventually revealed to be fabrications of the Israeli regime, which later effectively admitted to their falsehood. By December 2023, the Israeli newspaper Harretz reported that Benjamin Netanyahu had lied to Joe Biden and too much of the world about these allegations. The report stated Netanyahu’s claim to Biden that Hamas took dozens of children, tied them up, burned them, and executed them also proved false since there is no evidence that children from several families were murdered together.

Now, if someone like Netanyahu can deliberately lie about key issues in a conflict with Hamas, would you seriously trust his bold claims about Iran? Consider this. If you were interested in buying a car and went to a dealer, say General Ford, and quickly realized the dealer lied about the product, would you go back to that same dealer when buying your next car? Anyone with even a shred of common sense would know it’s unwise, if not downright foolish, to do so.

So, how is it that Netanyahu continues to perpetuate one lie after another without facing any real consequences, especially from his primary enabler, the United States of America? The sad truth is that Israel has been systematically slaughtering innocent children and babies in Gaza for decades. While Joe Biden and the entire Zionist influenced media consistently defend the regime by insisting it is merely protecting itself from terrorist attacks.

Yet, if the logos represents truth, harmony, order, morality, and the ultimate destiny of justice, then the Israeli regime’s victories are always temporary. Every step they take, no matter how much they believe they are winning, only brings them closer to their inevitable downfall, because lies and satanic actions can never triumph in the long run.

Though the Israeli regime currently wields significant influence over the United States, it cannot maintain dominance indefinitely. A recent poll published by the Washington Post revealed that out of 1,000 Americans surveyed, only 25% support going to war with Iran, while 45% are strongly opposed to such a conflict. It is reasonable to infer that this 25% reflects the influence of the neoconservative agenda, the Israeli manipulation within both major US political parties and Zionist leaning media outlets that persistently demonize Palestinians and other innocent people in the Middle East. In other words, the forces of good have always been stronger than those of evil, even when evil appears to triumph temporarily.

In 2014, Slate magazine declared, “Young Americans are more critical of Israel than their parents, and tomorrow’s Republican leaders may not be quite as ironclad in their support of the Jewish state as today’s are. Today, a growing number of younger Americans are distancing themselves from the Israeli regime, and even many former supporters are stepping back.

For example, after Tucker Carlson was fired from Fox News, he began engaging in more serious journalistic work, including interviews with Vladimir Putin and openly criticizing America’s unconditional support for Israel. Similarly, Joe Rogan has started to question the established narratives about Israel and Jewish influence, signaling a shift in public discourse. In short, there are now enough voices willing to challenge the political Satanism that continues to trample on virtually every moral law in the political sphere. What we need now is a serious politician who will consistently uphold moral and political law and order. Someone capable of silencing the satanic regime, driving the world toward a hellish existence.

We are already witnessing the decline of Christian Zionists who for years defended Israel, demonized critics as anti-semites and remained silent about the countless Palestinian babies and innocent children killed by the Israeli regime over the past three decades. Michael L. Brown is a notable example. After years of publicly defending Israel and positioning himself as an honest seeker of truth, Brown was exposed amid a torrent of sexual misconduct allegations that revealed a very different side of the man behind the so-called line of fire ministry. Evidence surfaced showing Brown engaging in inappropriate behavior, including sexing, advising another man’s wife not to have sex with her husband, and inappropriate physical contact with a young woman while married and in his 40s. When confronted, Brown attempted to deny the allegations and even distanced himself from longtime supporters who spoke out with his wife reportedly backing him up. At one point, his lawyer issued cease and desist letters to critics.

This summary sheds light on what is truly happening beneath the surface. Brown once appeared in conversation with E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars, discussing Jones’s thesis in the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit. During this dialogue, Brown’s central argument, especially regarding the definition of the Jew in St. John’s Gospel, was a classic example of intellectual dishonesty. We have documented this in our film, The Synagogue of Satan, available on this channel.

After multiple complaints from numerous individuals, Brown’s own line of fire ministry finally showed some integrity by conducting a thorough investigation into the allegations. They even hired a third-party investigator who found Brown guilty of sexual abuse. The third party investigator Firefly declared that Brown engaged in sexually abusive misconduct. Such a finding should have been grounds to shut down the so-called ministry. However, Brown insisted on returning to radio shows and continuing his ministry as if nothing had happened. In other words, Brown, much like Martin Luther before him, essentially became his own pope, answerable to no one, and unwilling to accept that he should be disqualified.

Brown has shown again and again his unwavering Zionist stance, and has labeled anyone who questions Jewish behavior as anti-Semitic. For example, on his Line of Fire radio program, he said of Candace Owens, “Candice Owens has drunk the anti-Semitic Kool-Aid.” In a tweet, he invited Owens to engage in a dialogue, saying, “Candice, please, let’s talk privately or publicly.”

Thank God Owens didn’t waste her time on people like Brown. The recent sexual abuse verdict has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is not an honest broker. He uses his radio platform to promote the Israeli regime and routinely labels anyone who disagrees with him on the Israeli issue as an anti-semite. He refuses to accept the truth, even when confronted by multiple witnesses, including his own friends. So, how could Candace Owens possibly convince him of anything?

In a 2024 op-ed titled The Hoax of Denying the Reality of Replacement Theology, Brown directly accused Protestant writer Gary Demar of echoing anti-semitic rhetoric. Demar, author of Last Days Madness, rejects the essentially Zionist idea that the Jews remain God’s chosen people and that the modern state of Israel represents the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. Brown had numerous close friends and colleagues in the Protestant world, including James White of Alpha and Omega Ministries, and Mike Winger, a popular YouTuber who also plays the anti-semitism card, a label that’s been thrown at virtually anyone who condemns the actions of Israel or criticizes Jewish influence in various parts of the world.

So, what did people like White and Winger have to say about the sexual allegations against Brown? Did they use their platforms to rebuke him publicly and forthrightly? No, both remained silent despite the fact that Winger in particular shed tears for the victims of Ravi Zacharias, another sexual predator who went to his grave without ever apologizing to any of the women he abused. On his YouTube channel, Winger not only wept for Zacharias’s victims, but also publicly threw Zacharias’s books into a trash bin. Has Winger issued a similar public denouncement of Michael Brown? No. He merely stated that Brown had asked him to defend him against those who made the allegations. As far as we know, that’s all we’ve heard from Winger.

James White’s case is even more telling. He practiced boxing with Michael Brown and appeared with him on multiple programs and shows. You see, it was easy for people like Winger and White to condemn someone like Zacharias. After all, as far as we know, he wasn’t a close friend of theirs. But Michael L. Brown, a man who has written almost as many books as Zacharias and shares close ties with both of them, their silence speaks volumes about their character and priorities.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that a satanic force is at work in the political realm, one that has taken much of the West captive through manipulation, deceit, and blatant lies. The Israeli regime is a manifestation of that satanic power. And like all such forces, it cannot rule forever. As E. Michael Jones puts it, logos is rising and there is no need to live in fear or despair. Align yourself with Logos. Live according to practical reason and ultimate truth. And you will see that although evil may appear to reign in our modern age, it will not triumph in the end. Logos will prevail over satanic powers. It is only a matter of time.

My encouragement to people of reason is this. Do not live in fear. As Alexander Solzanitsen said long ago, one word of truth outweighs the world. In other words, if you have truth on your side, it doesn’t matter if the world is falling apart. You will prevail in the end.

Wherever you are, if truth is with you, light the beacon so that others may see it. Do not be afraid. You can make a difference in the world. Just as Froto and Sam made a difference in JRR Tolken’s The Lord of the Rings, so too can you.

Stand up, put on the armor of truth, and fight to the end. Let us end with the words of the great Russian thinker himself, Alexander Solsniten. Our way must be never knowingly support lies. Having understood where the lies begin, step back from that dangerous edge. Let us not glue back the flaking scale of the ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb. And we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away. And that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.

***

Israel and US Scorn ICJ Ruling Against Starving
Civilians as Method of Warfare

The IDF Can’t ‘Protect’ Palestinians From
Settler Attacks…Settlers Are IDF Auxiliaries

Lynch Mobs, Arson, Slaughter of Herds…
West Bank Faces Unprecedented Israeli Violence

Gaza health workers report almost no medical
aid entering the Gaza Strip

Absurdly, Israel says Hamas is the one violating
terms – This is a ceasefire? Day 18

Drone views show scale of destruction across Gaza
after two years of US-Israeli war on Palestinians

Israeli planes hit Gaza in Mockery of
US-brokered ceasefire

UN expert says Western nations share blame for
Gaza genocide, calls UN ‘more and more irrelevant’

Slain Palestinian journalist’s brother says new
findings over killing reveal US coverup

UN Human Rights Office Warns Israeli ‘Settler’
Violence in West Bank Is ‘Surging’