Who or what has been stealing my chickens?
it seems that Hillary Clinton’s lesbianism is now being openly discussed. I think most people have at minimum assumed that she was a lesbian all along, or at least for many years now, so I suspect this will be yet another example of the 36 hour news cycle and effeminate indifference of the populace shrugging off yet another huge indicator.
“Hillary Clinton is a dyke. Yeah, also water is wet. So?”
Remember, as we discussed in the Diabolical Narcissism video, all sexual perversions are derivative of the overarching super-pathology of Diabolical Narcissism. Hillary Clinton, being a full-blown psychopath, was almost guaranteed to be monstrously sexually perverted.
This seems a good time to revisit a very hard truth that Christians need to face. We believe that the Bible is the inerrant, Divinely Inspired Word of God. We believe that the first five books of the Old Testament, the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses, are inerrant and Divinely Inspired and contain the Divine Law given by God to Moses under the Old Covenant. In this Law, it is clearly stated that homosexuality is a CAPITAL OFFENSE.
We have to ask ourselves, and ask ourselves precisely as believing, orthodox Christians, “WHY?”
WHY is homosexuality a crime meriting the death penalty?
The reason is because of the psycho-spiritual evil that all sexual perversion is derived from, and the clear and present danger that such people present to other individuals and to society at large. Homosexuals and all sex perverts are dangerous to the point of meriting execution by the state precisely because they are, by definition, Diabolical Narcissists to some degree. Hillary Clinton isn’t a psychopath because she is a lesbian. She is a lesbian secondarily because she is a psychopath primordially. The fact that she is a sex pervert CLEARLY POINTS to her murderousness, or at minimum the CAPACITY FOR MURDEROUSNESS. And she is a murderer. The Clintons have been having people killed for decades. As I wrote extensively on years ago now, Ambassador Chris Stevens was murdered by Hillary Clinton and company in order to attempt to cover up, or at least silence a key player in Clinton’s gun-running and arming of the Musloid Brotherhood – agitated and heavily influenced by Hillary’s lesbian concubine and high-ranking Musloid Brotherhood operative, Huma Abedin. Do you see how these things all tie together? Further, the very MANPADs that Clinton/Abedin/Washington sent to the New Caliphate via Benghazi with Ambassador Chris Stevens as the point man, were almost certainly used to shoot down a Russian passenger jet over SYRIA as retaliation for Russia’s actions in Syria. Remember that? This is why Russia is gearing up for open hot war with the former U.S. in Syria. The hot war has technically already begun – it just isn’t “open” yet. My commentary on that from November of ARSH 2015 HERE.
You might ask how I can say that ALL sex perverts, ALL homosexuals are “murderous”. Oh, quite easily. Remember, people who go through life seeking to murder other people’s SOULS are murderers too. Remember, satan, who Our Lord called, “a murderer from the beginning”, (John 8: 44), is not known for PHYSICALLY killing human beings himself. The murderousness of satan is about the eternal, unending murder of the soul. If you haven’t already, read my essay, “HELL: So Much Worse Than You Can Possibly Imagine“.
Sex perverts are soul-murderers, and remain in the domain of soul murder, and generally on a micro level – that is to say the people immediately surrounding them – family members, spouses, “friends”, sex partners, coworkers, students, etc. Relatively few are, like Hillary Clinton, involved in physical murder. Hillary Clinton’s Diabolical Narcissism is of the most severe variety, what we refer to as “psychopathy”, and thus she is an Alpha Narcissist, very much desirous of personal power, all the way up to the national and even global level.
HOWEVER, this micro dynamic is also being discussed of late with regards to Hillary Clinton, specifically with regards to Vince Foster. Now I’m not entirely convinced that Vince Foster committed suicide, but I did find it interesting that FBI investigators openly discussed Hillary Clinton’s obscenity-laden raging tirades and degrading verbal abuse of Vince Foster as the reason for Foster’s suicide. Think about that. The FBI suspected that Hillary Clinton literally drove Vince Foster to suicide, or at least proffered it as the explanation for the suicide angle. As I mentioned in the big DN video presentation at the 01:12:06 mark, many DNs fantasize about hurting someone so badly that they commit suicide. In particular, DNs will fixate of people who LOVE THEM as primary objects of their murderous hatred. A woman reader who was involved with a DN man, after breaking free and asking the man WHY he did all of the truly evil things to her that he did, got the following answer from him: “I need to hurt the people who love me.”
Vince Foster was clearly attached to Hillary, dedicating his entire career to her service, and it is has long been rumored that Vince Foster and Hillary Clinton were sexually involved (most lesbians are bisexual and have sex with men, generally as a means of control and/or manipulation).
Hillary Clinton should have been executed by the state (under anti-sodomy statutes) a long time ago for her sexual perversion, precisely so that the broad society would have been protected from her DN psychopathy. Now she should be executed after arrest, speedy trial, conviction and being offered the sacraments, for her myriad crimes against humanity and peace, which have been allowed to eclipse her capital offenses against nature.
The point is, had she been executed by the state for her sexual perversion, as is called for in the inerrant and Divinely inspired Word of God, the broad society would have been spared some or all of her crimes against humanity.
If enough of these people had been identified and dealt with as they should have been, the Constitutional Republic wouldn’t have been overthrown, and the descent into the Kayfabe that we are all now witnessing might never have happened.
So long as a culture keeps telling itself that sexual perversion does not matter, that culture is doomed, and doomed to rule by psychopath despots, almost all of which are sex perverts of one stripe or another.
A former high-level CIA officer has come forward and blasted American government policy of “utilizing terror groups” abroad and confessed that intelligence services create terror incidents in the U.S.
As the American mainstream slowly wakes up to the fact the U.S. government are using the worlds most notorious Islamic terror groups to destabilize sovereign nations, more and more deep state whistleblowers are coming forward claiming U.S. intelligence services not only utilize terror groups abroad, but also create domestic terror incidents at home to “manipulate and control the masses.”
“Most terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum.”
Jay Syrmopoulis reports:
Many people are confused as to what a false flag attack entails. A commonly held misperception is that there is no actual incident/event and it was all staged, but this definition is critically flawed, as a false flag attack actually describes a covert operation that is designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by entities, groups, or nations other than those who actually planned and executed them.
An example of a false flag attack is Operation Northwoods, which was a proposed operation against the Cuban government that originated within the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) of the United States government in 1962. The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other U.S. government operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to justify a war against Cuba. The proposals made it all the way to the president’s desk, where they were rejected by John F. Kennedy.
Many people believe the attacks of 9/11 to be a false flag event, perhaps orchestrated by U.S. intelligence services or an entity that operates above the level of government entities (commonly referred to as the deep state/military industrial complex.)
The alleged purpose of this false flag attack was to justify the invasion of other countries, and usher in a heightened state of “national security,” precipitating the curtailing of civil liberties in the name of “safety.”
In turn, the citizens of a state falsely believe that engaging in murderous wars are wholly justified and gladly accept new and intrusive security measures to protect the society. This often results in a false sense of patriotism that people have been indoctrinated into believing due to their skewed perception of reality. Subsequently, men and women join the military machine with good hearts, believing that they are serving in the name of freedom and fighting terrorism — when what they are actually doing is the complete opposite.
“The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the United States.”
The reality is that people are participating in fabricated wars based on lies and misinformation sold to the public as truth.
Changing Demographics Could Mean a Hillary Win and Eventual Democrat Dictatorship
Changing demographics mean whites and taxpayers no longer determine the President of the United States
Don’t let the media fool you when they tell you Trump is up 5 to 7 points in the popular vote. Trump is still behind in many polls of the electoral college despite having such a commanding lead in the popular vote. Why? Waves of immigrants are changing the destiny of the United States forever. The Democratic party will be heavily favored in the 2016 election in the electoral college, and the math only gets worse in future presidential elections.
Look for states to increasingly swing to blue and stay that way
All The New Modern Man readers should be concerned in 2016, and especially beyond. Democrats could have a virtual lock on the Presidency very soon, as white people scratch their heads and wonder why their voice no longer counts in elections. Demographic changes intended to dispossess whites from their homeland—a country in which they were 92% of the electorate in 1960, but will be 43% in a few short decades with their offspring representing only 38% of children under 5—mean emboldened Democrats will likely move even farther to the left towards Communism as they soon have a lock on the Senate and House as well.
Despite Hillary’s criminality and investigation by the FBI, despite the low turnout at her rallies, despite her image as a crook and a liar, despite her health issues, despite Trump being up in the popular vote—Hillary was still winning in the electoral college as of Saturday, October 1. She has a landslide 323 electoral votes to Trump’s 215 in this map from Electoral Vote. 270 votes are needed to win the presidency.
Read it and weep: Hillary has a commanding lead in the electoral college as of October 1: Hillary 323, Trump 215
Changing Demographics are the Canary in the Coal Mine
How is this possible? How can such a damaged goods candidate even be competitive, let alone WINNING in the electoral college? Call it the devious plans of globalists coming to fruition. Globalists have been flooding the country with immigrants for decades, and now the country is about to make a permanent electoral swing towards Communism.
Today’s mostly non-white immigrants (i.e. reliable Democrat cannon fodder because of constant divide and rule politics and media propaganda) tend to congregate in the largest cities of the country. States with the most electoral votes have a lot of electoral sway simply because they have the largest cities where all the immigrants – legal and illegal – happen to be.
Even deep red Texas will swing permanently blue in the coming decades as Anglo whites only make up 25% of the population under age 5. Even Texas demographer Steve Murdock admits it’s basically over for Anglos in Texas. These numbers signal the fact the entire Southwest U.S. is becoming an extension of Mexico demographically and culturally. (Whites thinking they don’t have to have dirty little babies and families is catching up with them.)
The weight large cities carry in the electoral college is easily seen when one looks at a county by county breakdown of the vote, which is why bringing in floods of immigrants and “refugees” is so brilliant on the part of social engineers who wish to debase white people at the ballot box. This makes blue states even bluer.
Generally speaking, every county in the country except metropolitan and minority areas voted red Republican in 2012.
In areas where blacks and Hispanics make up majorities or large pluralities of the population, i.e. inner cities, the Southwest, the Black Belt, South Florida, etc. the counties are blue. Even though most counties in a given state may be red, population in metropolitan areas is so large the blue vote effectively cancels out the red vote in the rest of the state.
All the managers of democracy have to do is drown out traditional Americans’ voices in the major cities. The “flyover country” people (i.e. whiteys) then have their preferences nullified at election time.
Rapid demographic change has occurred in the U.S. for the past 40 years, spurred mostly by the decline of the white family and a de facto open door immigration policy
Taxpayers vs. Tax Takers and Demographic Displacement
Here are some maps that illustrate how debased you, the traditional United States worker bee has become from your own nation. If only taxpayers rather than tax-takers voted in the last election, the milquetoast turncoat Mitt Romney would now be president having been elected in a Reagan-like landslide. There would not be people waiting for Obama phones to be distributed.
Further, one must imagine in a nation that looked like the one above electorally Romney would never have been selected in the first place and a hard-assed conservative would have been running and elected in the last election instead of a compromise candidate like Mittens. Moreover, Barack Hussein Obama would never have been elected president in the first place back in 2008, and proceeded to “transform the United States” into a Communist worker’s paradise by destroying it from within.
We also would not have Hillary as a candidate promising to finish flushing America down the toilet. With only taxpayers voting instead of those availing themselves of social welfare programs, the Democrats would be forced to run a more moderate candidate.
People who bear the burden of enriching the treasury vs. those who filch from it vote quite differently. Letting people who contribute nothing to the system vote for freebies and social welfare schemes so transforms the electoral map that Obama was able to reverse this potential landslide and turn it into a defeat for the John Galts of America.
It may shock you to realize the white vote was completely nullified in the last presidential election by changing demographics. If the country looked like it did in 1960, before the treasonous Immigration Act of 1965 was signed into law and feminism killed the flower of family, we would definitely not be on the road to Communism and on the path to have such a lying, sickly piece of crap like Hillary winning the electoral college.
There’s little doubt, a right-wing candidate would have won in an electoral landslide in 2012 rather than the overt Communist we got if the nation hadn’t been so fundamentally changed by social engineers.
Running the numbers, if the population was still 92% white as in 1960 the conservatives would have won by a 400+ vote electoral landslide. As the white slice of the demographic pie gets smaller and smaller this segment of the population can expect to have less and less clout in the voting system. It is perhaps the most ingenious debasement of a people in the history of mankind by a diabolical elite power structure.
Immigration and Women’s Suffrage
What if there was no women’s suffrage? A similar conservative landslide would have played out last election. Moreover, the nation would surely not be one in which 70% of revenues are used in schemes of wealth redistribution, money that men are forced to pay to subsidize their forced removal from the family by Big Daddy Government.
The worst thing is realizing we were warned about this a century ago. A pamphlet published in the early 1900s warning against the social costs of granting women the right to vote (lampooned by modern media) has largely been proven true by the effects we are witnessing today. The pamphlet warned against voting for women’s suffrage for the following reasons:
- BECAUSE it means competition of women with men instead of co-operation.
- BECAUSE 80% of the women eligible to vote are married and can only double or annul their husband’s votes.
- BECAUSE it can be of no benefit commensurate with the additional expense involved.
How is that not an astute summary of exactly what has happened since the suffragettes won. Speaking of “additional expense involved” as RealSexism knows, women avail themselves of Beta male tax money, and even replace his utility by having the government forcefully extract his resources rather than dealing with him directly:
Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Men only spend 40% of what they earn after tax. In contrast women make up 38.5% of all income but control 75% of domestic spending, women on average spend 90% MORE MONEY THAN THEY EARN.
Men pay over 70% of income tax but the vast majority of public spending is on services for women. There is more money spent on breast cancer than lung cancer and prostate cancer combined, despite the fact that lung cancer alone has 3-4 times more fatalities than breast cancer. A man’s chance of getting cancer is 44% and 23% of men will die from cancer, 38% of women get cancer and 19% die. Yet there is vastly more money spent on cancer for women, this is lethal discrimination.
Women pay 60% less tax despite spending 300% more in domestic spending than men. Women also consume two third of public spending, there are 3 times the amount of gender specific health services for women than men despite the fact that for equal increases in health spending a man’s life expectancy rate increases nearly twice as much as a woman’s.
Laughably, leftists claim to want to save the world environmentally while supporting policies that encourage rampant spending, materialism, and consumerism—all driven by women! These are all predictable consequences of a country that marginalizes and demonizes its men at every turn.
It Only Gets Worse From Here
So where does this all leave us? It leaves us in the middle of a situation that’s almost impossible to turn around without a revolution. Men, and particularly white men have been asleep at the wheel for a century as their nation and their voice in it has been repeatedly and steadily undermined. We must begin righting the course of the ship of state by having discussions about our self-interest or be left to wither and die in foolish optimism that somehow our fortunes will be reversed by being Mr. Nice. The New Modern Man warned about where this road leads late last year.
That’s why contemporary Progressivism should really be called Racial Bolshevism. The psycho-political profile is identical: whereas the original Bolsheviks believed that the Communist utopia could not be achieved without the elimination of the bourgeois class, the contemporary Racial Bolsheviks believe that the multi-cultural utopia cannot be achieved without the elimination of white people–especially white men.
Make no mistake, you have very little voice left when it comes to choosing a president. Trump literally may be our last chance to stop America from turning into a grotesque parody of the intentions of the founders. You will effectively have no representation, but you will surely be expected to foot the bill for everyone else’s wishes.
Oh, and if the demographic changes don’t sway the election, voting machines that are designed to be hacked just might. We are in a fight for our very survival as the “deplorables” i.e. the resistance to the New World Order. Trump went around the corrupt system. But, even if he wins the presidency, our battles have only begun. And winning will be no cakewalk.