Utica, NY “is gone”
Cryptocurrency has arrived like an armada of cockroaches that the bankers cannot control. The bankers can not touch them; they can not take them away from the rest of us. Why do you think Fedcoin is going to be a possible alternative? Because they can’t remove cryptos so they are going to join in and try to contaminate the good ones like Bitcoin. But that is not going to work. As soon as you get a gold backed cryptocurrency, start the countdown, it’s game over.
Bitcoin in particular is serving something as a proxy for currency in a very constructive manner. Once one of these turn into a gold backed crypto, the entire game changes. If Russia and China backed their currencies with gold, do you think that would have an effect on the USD? Hell yea. So when a gold backed crypto is launched or eight of them, one from every continent, do you think that is going to have an effect on the shabby cryptos? Yea, but it will be worse than that. This would have an effect on all paper and FOREX currencies because we are not in the infancy stage of cryptocurrency anymore. We’re in the adolescent stage and it becomes adult hour when gold backing is introduced. That’s when it will be game over for the criminal banksters.
Times have become very dangerous right now for the US dollar’s primary role among the currencies because all the wars have terminally compromised it’s integrity. The dollar isn’t supported by international oil and gas trade so much anymore as it is supported by aggressive military action with war crimes on a global scale and the people are sick of it. This is a very tenuous situation for a global reserve currency.
1. Know Your Rights
In any encounter with the police, a Judge will be looking after the fact at whether the police had a right to stop you in the first place. This is because the 4th Amendment of the Constitution says that you have a right as a citizen to freely go about your business unless the police can show they had a belief you were engaged in criminal activity.
What the police have to show to a Judge later depends completely on whether the Judge finds that you were being “arrested”, ‘detained’ or were ‘free to leave’.
If the police arrest you, they have to show they had ‘Probable Cause’ to believe you were committing a crime. On the other hand, the police will probably argue that they weren’t arresting you but just ‘detaining’ you. A ‘detention’ is a situation where the police stop you briefly while they investigate a crime but haven’t arrested you yet.
In a detention, the police have a much lower burden of proof. They only have to show a “reasonable suspicion” as to why they were detaining you. Or the police may argue that their entire contact with you was just a “consensual encounter” where you were free to go at anytime. In a consensual encounter, they don’t really need to justify why they stopped you because they were just talking to you and you were “free to leave”.
2. Remember the Key Phrases
The first question out of your mouth should be, ‘Am I being detained?’ Then, ‘Why? What am being stopped for? Am I free to go, or am I under arrest?’ Memorize this. Repeat it out loud: ‘Am I being detained? Why? Am I free to go, or am I under arrest?’
Your job in this situation is to keep calm and cool. Be respectful but clear and firm in what you are saying. It is completely reasonable (and legal) to ask why you are being stopped and whether you are free to go. By asking from the start if you are under arrest or free to leave you are forcing the officer to tell you exactly what is happening and whether you are a suspect.
3. Miranda Rights Myths vs. Reality
One of the most common urban myths out there is that the police have to read you your Miranda rights or the arrest gets thrown out of court.Not true. The police don’t have to read you these rights. In fact, the police have the right to completely lie to you in any interview. The only time they have to read Miranda rights is if:A) You are under arrest
B) They want to use a statement you made after being arrested in court against you.The Right against Self Incrimination is in the Bill of Rights for a reason. USE IT. You should NEVER give a statement to the police without a lawyer. Period. No exceptions.In the above scenario, questions like “whose backpack is this?” should be answered with a firm, “Officer, I am choosing to remain silent. I want a lawyer.”
4. Do not give the authorities consent to search you
One other major Constitutional right you have is the right to be free from an unlawful search of your person and property.
So let’s say you are in a Festival when the police approach you. They won’t let you leave and ask for permission to search your backpack. (Obviously, security has a right to search you as you enter a festival and go through their initial security screening.)
Cops always make it seem like you’re some kind of a criminal if you express the slightest hesitation about having your property searched without a warrant. You can expect to hear an ‘If you have nothing to hide, why can’t we search your stuff?’ type of verbal approach from the cops.
Know this: If the police is asking you permission to search you or your property, it usually means they know they are making an illegal search. Let that sink in for a second. When the police ask you ‘Can I search this bag?’, they KNOW they are asking you to let them make a search they are not legally entitled to make.
My advice? Respectfully tell the police officer, “I’m not giving you consent to search my property.” If they ask what you have to hide, don’t argue with them. Simply say again, ‘Officer, I’m sorry I’m not giving you consent to search my person or my property. If I’m free to leave I’d like to leave. If not, I’d like a lawyer please…’
At this point, they can still search you if they have probable cause, but what you’ve done with your statements is make them declare their reason for doing so and force them to show they are legally entitled to search you.
5. Document the Encounter
The best thing to happen to Civil Liberties was the invention of the cell phone camera and YouTube. Just bear in mind, cops will do just about anything to avoid having you upload your video of them on YouTube or on Social Media. This is an area where your own comfort level has to dictate how far you push it. Legally, since you are in a public place you are completely entitled to film and record what is happening. But cops will sometimes argue that you are “interfering with an investigation” and threaten to arrest you. Or if you have had anything to drink they will suddenly decide that you are “publicly intoxicated” and try to arrest you. As a Festival Buddy you have to decide if you can safely film what is happening. That’s because your other job as FB is to stay out of custody and post bail and let your buddy’s family know he just got arrested.
I suggest that you say the following if cops order you to turn off your camera:
“Officer, I’m not interfering with you in any way. I am just documenting this arrest. This is a public place and I’m entitled to record this”.
While making this statement, I would make a show of backing up and getting out of the way to prove that you are not interfering but just observing.
If things get crazier, be sure to get footage of the cop screaming “turn that camera off” before you turn it off. Everyone (You Tube, Media, Juries, Internal Affairs) loves footage of cops screaming “turn off that camera” to a calm person who is doing nothing but saying “I’m not interfering, just watching to make sure you are following the law.”
David Loy, the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union in San Diego and Imperial Counties, talks to KPBS about whether you have to answer border patrol agents when they ask you questions at the border.
A Canadian province has passed a law that gives rights to the government to take away children from families that don’t accept their kid’s chosen “gender identity” or “gender expression”.
The law, which replaces old laws governing child protection, foster care and adoption services, instructs all child services and judges, to take into consideration a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.”
Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said “I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently.”
“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.”
The old law used to allow parents to “direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” The new bill, however, amends such rights of the parents.
It now emphasizes a child’s “identity and allows parents only to “direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.”
Ontario children and youth advocate Irwin Elman celebrated the bill and said it signals a “paradigm shift” and creates a “child-centered system of service” with “the commitment to anti-racism and children’s rights.”
Jack Fonseca, a political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, meanwhile, criticized the new law.
“With the passage of Bill 89, we’ve entered an era of totalitarian power by the state, such as never witnessed before in Canada’s history. Make no mistake, Bill 89 is a grave threat to Christians and all people of faith who have children, or who hope to grow their family through adoption.”
The child services in Ontario, Canada got into hot water back in April after it removed two foster children from a Christian couple’s home because they said no to lying to the girls that the Easter bunny is real, The Christian Post reported.
Derek Baars, one of the foster parents, said “We have a no-lying policy” after being told by a child support worker that they must tell the girls, aged 3 and 4, that the Easter bunny is real because it’s an important part of Canadian culture.
“We explained to the agency that we are not prepared to tell the children a lie. If the children asked, we would not lie to them, but we wouldn’t bring it up ourselves,” he added.
The overly creepy chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, John Podesta, is trying to quickly convert $40 billion of her money into gold, diamonds, and artwork. Not long after the New York Times accidentally exposed Hillary’s connections to Russia, James Comey was fired. But now with the possibility of a new FBI director, the eerie Podesta begins conversions of the Clinton Foundation’s assets.
Spirit cooking freak, John Podesta, is one of the most disturbing humans on earth and he is now helping Hillary Clinton convert her assets so they cannot be seized. It could be speculation of course, but not even a month ago, the New York Times detailed their ties with Russia and even went so far as to blame Putin for Hillary’s loss. Perhaps this all ties together.
In March, Mr. Putin’s spokesman said that Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak met with members of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign several times while she was running for president in 2016. Further, the campaign never disclosed the number or nature of these secret meetings. Mrs. Clinton and her associates can cry themselves hoarse that there is neither smoke nor fire here, and that Putin was behind her election loss. But all in all, the known facts suggest an unusually extensive network of relationships with a major foreign power. Anyone who cares about the credibility of the American electoral process should want a thorough investigation. –Investors.com
Not long after the New York Times made the mistake of ousting Hillary Clinton and her ties to Russia, James Comey was fired. Since President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, longtime Democrat operative and Clinton loyalist John Podesta began quickly converting Clinton Foundation assets for one reason. He’s been buying up art, gold, and diamonds, and spreading them out all over the world before those assets are seized by a new FBI director. John Podesta is in a frenzy to unload $40 billion from the Clinton Foundation.
Independent journalist George Webb said, “What you’re dealing with is Trump could go get [those] 40 billion dollars right now and seize those assets. So before a new FBI director is named — [Acting FBI Director Andrew] McCabe knows all about the $40 billion — you start moving this stuff to gold, diamonds, artwork and so forth, and you put it in your network . . . out into as many different countries as possible, so it’ll be so difficult to actually go seize. You have a contractual issue or an international issue every time you try to get some of this stuff that’s been moved. The money right now is being moved by John Podesta to artwork, diamonds, and gold.”
As of right now, speculations are all that we have because the entire government isn’t going to implicate themselves. But it does appear that the American public is being played from all sides. One thing is certain, this all ties together and Webb is certain this has to do with the death of Seth Rich. Webb sees the Seth Rich murder as just a small part of a much bigger picture of high-level racketeering by Hillary Clinton, her minions and whoever she’s fronting. It’s an outrageous amount of money that’s been amassed over some twenty years and Webb intends to put all the pieces together.
Is it getting more difficult for the corrupt politicians to hide from the public? Or does the media make it easy by continuing to cover for the most corrupt Democrats in history? It doesn’t take a genius to put all this together based on the information at hand. So why does the media insist on covering for certain politicians while a large segment of the American population keeps their heads buried in the sand? Podesta is hiding a lot of secrets not only about himself but about the Clintons as well. Hopefully, with time, the corruption will all be revealed. But don’t count on the mainstream media to put this together.
By Dawn Luger The Daily Sheeple
So this last weekend – mid Ramadan (but the UK authorities are adamant that has nothing to do with it) – yet another series of well coordinated attacks in London. The timing was on cue, and the technology was primitive, yet the effect was successful. The weapons were simple: Aggression, Motor Vehicles, and Knives. Unless the nanny-state wishes to now castrate the aggression out of all males, prohibit all sharp instruments in an Okinawan-like decree, and force everyone to use public transportation, the ability of the state to prevent the next one is ridiculously impossible as long as the culture that advocates such things is allowed to roam free in the west.
That last bit is out of the hands of normal people like us, yet we are the ones that will stand at the front line of the effects of the political decisions made by those in charge. And we will either stand as ready sacrifices to the death cult, or as combatants. Britain seems to have already chosen out of their self-imposed helplessness. Soon the west, and Europe in particular, will either find its warrior heart and embrace the old ways, or it will be bent over the table and given its fate.
In this article, which I am certain will upset the “martial arts” guys, I will discuss the reality of facing a jihadist with a knife bent of “stabbing anyone they see”. I will discuss “The Jihadist Vehicle Attacks” later.
So here we go –
1). Forget The Fantasy Of Empty Hand Defenses:
Do not think for one minute that your secret Jujitsu or Kung Fu methods will guarantee you winning against a dedicated, motivated, young and fit jihadist armed with a big knife intent on killing you. Add to that his expectation of dying that day…add to that his accomplices, also armed with knives, and you get a clearer picture. And winning does not mean 7 out of 10 in the drills at the dojo…it means we want a solid chance at a 100% success rate because anything less means that you die. Your chances may be better if you have devoted your entire life to nothing but full contact martial arts training (and if your adversaries are unskilled)…but otherwise…unarmed against the knife is a very foolish match to go into.
2). Instead Of Going Jackie Chan, Use A Weapon:
Yes, I know…it may mean violating the rules. As I have said…and it is almost a cliche now…we live in a time of war and we must make adjustments to the reality and accept that the authorities cannot prevent these events from taking place. So if you live in a free state, carry a firearm with you – EVERYWHERE. Ignore the sign if there is one saying you cannot. If you live in a not so free state, carry a firearm with you anyway and always obey the speed limit. If you live in a country intentionally bereft of any warrior culture, see item three.
3). Always Be Armed No Matter The Rules:
“But Gabe…we live in (insert oppressed socialist state or nation here) and we can’t even buy a picture of a gun here”.
A modern, educated man with a set of nuts in his bag will always figure out a way to be armed. No guns? OK, get your own knife. Knife versus knife is a far better proposition than unarmed versus knife is it not? My God, at the very least get a big fat stick that you can claim is a cane and that you can crush skulls with. It really is not that difficult if there is courage, and a will, and a defiant heart that denies the state’s right to control your destiny.
“But Gabe, the rules say I cannot have guns, knives, sticks, anything that could possibly be used as a weapon and they are about to pass laws banning ill will”.
When you cannot live in safety, and in obedience to the established law, a learned man will happily become a scofflaw. If you disagree with that, I really have nothing for you. Sorry…good luck.
4). Learn To Be Violent:
This is why I am not impressed with the majority of martial arts training. Too much sport. Too much esoteric spiritual stuff. Not enough violence. We need more “martial”, and less “art” – as it were. I expect that today, the Monday after the London Bridge attack, the martial arts schools in the UK (and USA) will be filled with eager soccer moms and football dads (cricket-moms and rugby-dads?) looking for the easy solution to this problem. And they will be taught esoteric stuff intended for the “perfection of character”, or stuff developed for winning a match somewhere.
What they need is to be taught to physically destroy their opponent, crushing windpipes, smashing skulls, breaking bones. The “real karate” that so few schools even understand much less teach. But again, see item 1. I have trained in hand to hand stuff since I was ten years old and I would prefer to not face against a knife empty handed.
5). Learn Preemption:
It is 2017. Are we already forgetting that there is a true social-religious-political culture living in the west…in truth invited by the west, that seeks to supplant western culture by force and attrition with its own culture? If you see a couple of strong young men, that look like they just got off the boat from Afghanistan moving aggressively toward you with knives in their hands – do we really need to have a time out to explain what their intentions are for you?
This is the time to draw and shoot each one of them to the ground, not running or hiding.
6). Keep Alert:
All the weapons and willingness to violence will not help you in the least if you are asleep at the bar. The first part of all this is staying alert. Sit where you can see the exit, have your back covered or have an equally alert associate watching it. Look around constantly and know who is moving and what is happening. Don’t want to live like that you say? Well, western nations, you should have thought about that before you invited the death cult into your country, or voted for fools that did so. You live in a time of war and you will either deny it and hope you are not selected by the next jihadist, or you accept reality and prepare to meet him.
That is all. There are no secret techniques to defend against the knife by physically frail and empty handed males. It takes violence and weapons. And in that order.