Tag Archives: Google

Google Executive Admits Election Meddling to Prevent Trump Winning in 2020

Brags: Congress “can pressure us but we’re not changing”

A Google executive has been caught on camera admitting that the search giant is manipulating its algorithm to prevent Trump winning re-election in 2020.

Jen Gennai, head of ‘Responsible Innovation’ at Google, was filmed by Project Veritas admitting that Google is using AI and algorithmic manipulation to meddle in the next presidential election.

She speaks of “putting that line in the sand” to ensure “fairness,” before acknowledging there are, “People who voted for the current president who do not agree with our definition of fairness.”

“We’re also training our algorithms if 2016 happened again… would the outcome having been different?” asked Gennai, adding, “We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”

Speaking about the 2020 presidential election, Gennai said “they’ve been working on it since 2016 to make sure we’re ready for 2020,” with the implication clearly being to prevent Trump from winning re-election.

Gennai even dismissed the power of Congress to keep Google in check, bragging, “We got called in front of Congress multiple times….like they can pressure us but we’re not changing.”

Gennai then challenges any attempt to break up Google by explaining, “It will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

“There’s this facade about what they’re doing, but what they’re actually doing, what the employees are actually seeing inside the company is different,” a separate anonymous whistleblower told Project Veritas.

According to the whistleblower, Google is a “highly biased political machine that is bent on never letting someone like Donald Trump come to power again.”

According to Robert Epstein, Google algorithmic manipulation can shift millions of votes in national elections.

Google is clearly engaging in massive election meddling and should be investigated by lawmakers immediately.

Source: by Paul Joseph Watson | InfoWars

 

Advertisements

It Only Costs Google $20 Million A Year To Control The U.S. Government

Google has fired six of its largest lobbying firms in an attempt to overhaul its global government affairs and policy operations amid greater government scrutiny of its business, according to the Wall Street Journal. Over the last few months, the company has changed its roster of lobbying firms, as well as its Washington policy team, and lost two senior officials who helped build its “influence operation” into one of the largest in the nation’s capital. The company had been paying about $20 million annually for lobbying, and the firms that Google has now let go made up about half of that cost.
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/goog.png?itok=jDgdszSh

The shake up is part of a “continuing modernization” of Google’s influence operation and it comes at a time when government scrutiny has never been more of a factor. The Justice Department is reportedly getting ready to conduct an antitrust investigation into the company and Congress and state attorneys general are also reviewing its practices. Some politicians are even calling for the company to be broken up.

And so Google is taking the paltry $20 million per year that it has been using to control the government and trying to reallocate it. Among those who are no longer working for the company are “Charlie Black, a longtime Republican strategist, and firms that have relationships with senior Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill, including Off Hill Strategies LLC, which has ties to fiscally conservative Republicans.”

People familiar with the restructuring say that it helps reflect the company’s global reach and will help it deal with regulators and lawmakers across regions and markets. The moves are also seen as a shake up by Google’s new head of policy and government relations, Karan Bhatia. 

Bhatia was brought in last summer to serve as Google’s VP of Policy and Government Relations and, since then, he’s been reassessing the company’s lobbying needs. Susan Molinari, a former Republican congresswoman, stepped down as Google’s head of Washington operations last year and the company has yet to name a successor.

Another executive leaving Google during the shake up is Adam Kovacevich, who ran the firm’s public-policy division. He led the company’s campaign to head off a 2012 FTC investigation into anti-competitive tactics and also helped launch several advocacy groups to help promote public policy matters that benefited the company.

In 2006, Google was spending about $800,000 on lobbying and had four firms on retainer. By 2018, the company had 100 lobbyists across 30 firms and spent $21.7 million to lobby Washington. This sum made it the largest spender on lobbying among US corporations, despite the relatively small dollar amount for the massive tech giant.

The company also spends millions on donations to think tanks, political entities, universities and other third-party groups that generate data and host conferences that help Google shape the debate into its business practices.

Meanwhile, Google employees helped the company become one of the largest sources of donations to the Democratic Party and candidates like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. In the 2018 elections, Google’s employee funded PAC donated $1.9 million to political candidates in both parties. Employees of the company donated a total of $1.6 million to Clinton’s 2016 campaign and after Obama took office in 2012, Google and its lobbying team “scored a string of victories” in Washington, like fending off the FTC from an anti-trust case.

Google also won favorable net neutrality rulings from the FCC and secured favorable legislation on self driving vehicles.

But over the last few years the company has continued to hit headwinds from both sides of the aisle while its public image has taken a beating over privacy concerns and critics claiming that it fails to police content. 

The new lobbying structure has regional leaders in the US, Canada, Asia, the Pacific, Europe and countries that the company views as emerging markets. It also includes teams that will continue to lobby governments in areas like privacy and handling controversial content.

Source: ZeroHedge

This Weeks Major Google Outages Meant Some Nest Users Couldn’t Unlock Doors Or Use AC

https://images.fastcompany.net/image/upload/w_1153,ar_16:9,c_fill,g_auto,f_auto,q_auto,fl_lossy/wp-cms/uploads/2019/06/p-1-that-major-google-outage-meant-some-nest-users-couldnt-unlock-doors-or-use-the-ac.jpg

If you’re a Google user, you probably noticed some trouble last night when trying to access Google-owned services. Last night, Google reported several issues with its Cloud Platform, which made several Google sites slow or inoperable. Because of this, many of Google’s sites and services–including Gmail, G Suite, and YouTube–were slow or completely down for users in the U.S. and Europe.

However, the Google Cloud outage also affected third-party apps and services that use Google Cloud space for hosting. Affected third-party apps and services include Discord, Snapchat, and even Apple’s iCloud services.

But an especially annoying side effect of Google Cloud’s downtime was that Nest-branded smart home products for some users just failed to work. According to reports from Twitter, many people were unable to use their Nest thermostats, Nest smart locks, and Nest cameras during the downtime. This essentially meant that because of a cloud storage outage, people were prevented from getting inside their homes, using their AC, and monitoring their babies.

For Google’s part, the company says a “network congestion issue in eastern USA” was causing the problems and that those issues have now been resolved as of 4 p.m. PT on Sunday. Still, the downtime of their Cloud Platform goes a long way to showing what can happen in an age when smart home technology requires always being connected to the cloud.

Source: By Michael Grothaus | 1 minute Read via Fast Company

Google Tracks Your Location and Shares It With Police, Even When Your Phone is Off

Even if you disable GPS, deactivate phone location tracking, and turn off your phone, it’s still possible for Google and the NSA to monitor your every move.

https://themindunleashed.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/google-tracks-your-location-police-phone-off.jpg

Over the last two decades, cell phone use has become an everyday part of life for the vast majority of people around the planet. Nearly without question, consumers have chosen to carry these increasingly smart devices with them everywhere they go. Despite surveillance revelations from whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, the average smart phone user continues to carry the devices with little to no security or protection from privacy invasions.

Americans make up one of the largest smartphone markets in the world today, yet they rarely question how intelligence agencies or private corporations might be using their smartphone data. A recent report from the New York Times adds to the growing list of reasons why Americans should be asking these questions. According to the Times, law enforcement have been using a secret technique to figure out the location of Android users. The technique involves gathering detailed location data collected by Google from Android phones, iPhones, and iPads that have Google Maps and other Google apps installed.

The location data is stored inside a Google database known as Sensorvault, which contains detailed location records of hundreds of millions of devices from around the world. The records reportedly contain location data going back to 2009. The data is collected whether or not users are making calls or using apps.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) says police are using a single warrant—sometimes known as a “geo-fence” warrant—to access location data from devices that are linked to individuals who have no connection to criminal activity and have not provided any reasonable suspicion of a crime. Jennifer Lynch, EFF’s Surveillance Litigation Director, says these searches are problematic for several reasons.

First, unlike other methods of investigation used by the police, the police don’t start with an actual suspect or even a target device—they work backward from a location and time to identify a suspect,” Lynch wrote. “This makes it a fishing expedition—the very kind of search that the Fourth Amendment was intended to prevent. Searches like these—where the only information the police have is that a crime has occurred—are much more likely to implicate innocent people who just happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Every device owner in the area during the time at issue becomes a suspect—for no other reason than that they own a device that shares location information with Google.”

The problems associated with Sensorvault have also concerned a bipartisan group of lawmakers who recently sent a letter to Google CEO Sundar Pichai. The letter from Democrats and Republicans on the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee gives Google until May 10 to provide information on how this data is used and shared. The letter was signed by Democratic Representatives Frank Pallone and Jan Schakowsky and Republicans Greg Walden and Cathy McMorris Rodgers.

Google has responded to the report from the Times by stating that users opt in to collection of the location data stored in Sensorvault. A Google representative also told the lawmakers that users “can delete their location history data, or turn off the product entirely, at any time.” Unfortunately, this explanation falls flat when one considers that Android devices log location data by default and that it is notoriously difficult to opt out of data collection.

No matter what promises Google makes, readers should remember that back in 2010, the Washington Post published a story focusing on the growth of surveillance by the National Security Agency. That report detailed an NSA technique that “enabled the agency to find cellphones even when they were turned off.” The technique was reportedly first used in Iraq in pursuit of terrorist targets. Additionally, it was reported in 2016 that a technique known as a “roving bug” allowed FBI agents to eavesdrop on conversations that took place near cellphones.

These tools are now undoubtedly being used on Americans. The reality is that these tools—and many, many others that have been revealed—are being used to spy on innocent Americans, not only violent criminals or suspects. The only way to push back against this invasive surveillance is to stop supporting the companies responsible for the techniques and data sharing. Those who value privacy should invest time in learning how to protect data and digital devices. Privacy is quickly becoming a relic of a past era and the only way to stop it is to raise awareness, opt-out of corporations that don’t respect privacy, and protect your data.

Source: by Derrick Broz | The Mind Unleashed

‘Be Evil’: Google Bans VPN Ads Helping Chinese Circumvent Censorship

Google is once again helping the Chinese government and its Orwellian control over the flow of information. 

Earlier this month, evidence emerged suggesting that Google has continued to develop the “Dragonfly” censored search engine despite claiming they had abandoned it after an internal revolt.

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/dragonfly.png?itok=hLq-A0hj

Now, ZDNet reports that Google has banned ads for virtual private network (VPN) products targeting Chinese users – citing “local legal restrictions.” 

VPNs are the only way Chinese users can circumvent draconian internet filters which have blocked sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Gab, Instagram, Reddit, Discord, WhatsApp, WikiLeaks, Google and Gmail. Blocked news websites include Zero Hedge, BBC, Bloomberg, Reuters, WSJ, NYT and Business Insider. 

“It is currently Google Ads policy to disallow promoting VPN services in China, due to local legal restrictions,” Google said in a Wednesday email. 

The email was received and shared with ZDNet by VPNMentor, a website offering advice, tips, and reviews of VPN products.

The company said Google prevented its employees from placing Google search ads for the Chinese version of its site. ZDNet

https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/vpn%20block.jpg?itok=MOQIbA32

In January 2017, Beijing cracked down on VPN services – requiring that all providers active in China register for authorization from the CHinese government. In July, China forced Apple to remove all VPN apps from its App Store. After that, a “full-out ban on all VPNs was imposed on March 31, 2018,” according to ZD – though some apps continued to function regardless. 

Nonetheless, Chinese officials are now using the ban to go after users caught using VPNs. The first fine for using a VPN product was issued earlier this year to a Guangdong.

Despite banning consumers from using VPN apps, China remains one of the top sellers of VPN technologies. A November 2018 study found that almost 60 percent of the top free mobile VPN apps are run by companies with Chinese ownership or based in China.

We wonder if Google employees will protest yet another example of helping China to keep its citizens in the dark?

Source: ZeroHedge

***

“Evil Is Fine Now”: Google Ditches “Don’t Be Evil” in Company Code of Conduct

https://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/headlines/google-logo-devil.jpg?itok=ELoUPwRD

Queen’s Privy Council Infiltrates Facebook To Destroy MEGA, Brexit And Take Control Of Google’s Project Dragonfly

Chief propagandist Sir Nick Clegg was Lord President of the Privy Council for five years, directed Christopher Steele and Stefan Halper, joins Facebook to run global affairs and communications

Sir Nick’s aunt was a lifelong spy mistress to some of the world’s most infamous socialists: H.G. Wells, Maxim Gorky and Guy Burgess (Cambridge Five)

As a Brit and Facebook officer, Sir Nick is proof of foreign interference in the U.S. midterm election as well as Facebook interference in British elections

Project Dragonfly is building a censored search tool for the planet that secretly monitors you 24x7x365

Contributing Writers | Opinion | AMERICANS FOR INNOVATION  | Oct. 25, 2018, Updated Oct. 28, 2018 | PDF | https://tinyurl.com/y9bpylbd
https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/0e25f-nick-clegg-knighted.jpg

Fig. 1—Privy Council Lord President (2010-2015) Nicholas William Peter CLEGG (“Sir Nick”). He was nominated for a knighthood by Queen Elizabeth on Dec. 30, 2017 and actually knighted on Mar. 07, 2018.

See Sir Nick’s definitive biography, timeline and conflicts of interest.

FACEBOOK DAMAGE CONTROL: Within months he began negotiating with Facebook CEO Mark E. Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl K. Sandberg “over the summer” to become vice-president of global affairs and communications (chief propagandist). These desperate negotiations appear to have occurred concurrently with Zuckerberg’s and Sandberg’s disingenuous Congressional testimony. On Oct. 19, 2018, Sir Nick was appointed at Facebook. It appears that Clegg’s pecadillos may hasten Facebook’s decline into further immorality.

Leo McKinstry. (Mar. 08, 2018). LEO MCKINSTRY: Nick Clegg gets a knighthood despite destroying his party and costing taxpayers billions. Daily Mail.

Carole Cadwalladr. (Oct. 21, 2018). If you’re on the side of democracy Nick Clegg, why are you going to work for Facebook? The Guardian.


(Oct. 25, 2018)—On Oct. 19, 2018, Facebook announced that Sir Nick Clegg was appointed vice-president of Global Affairs and Communications.

Clegg’s appointment comes amidst widespread and unprecedented Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Google blacklisting of politically conservative sites including Dennis Prager, Alex Jones, David Knight, Gateway Pundit, Western Journalism, Tommy Robinson, Roger Stone, President Trump’s Facebook page, Matt Bracken, Mark Dice, Milo Yiannopoulos, Breitbart, Infowars, Sibel Edmonds, Newsbud, Right Wing News, Anti-media, Natural News, Sarah Palin, Stefan Molyneux, Pamela Geller and Diamond & Silk.

Clegg arrives in the wake of uniformly arrogant testimony from Mark E. Zuckerberg, Sheryl K. Sandberg and Jack P. Dorsey before Congress several weeks ago.

Nick Clegg: Groomed for globalism

Clegg’s bloated biography (33-pages on Wikipedia) oozes globalism. He has never held a real job. He has only ever worked in groomed globalist EU and Privy Council politics his entire life.

He attended a notorious private school named Caldicott Preparatory School where he was the Head Boy (Prefect) (1980-1983). During that time, it is now known that his Head Master, Roland Peter Wright, and some of the staff had engaged in decades of pedophilia at Caldicott. Clegg claims he knew nothing about the ritual sodomy of his schoolmates by the Caldicott staff. These facts only came to light after the documentary Chosen in 2008. After Caldicott, Clegg was prefunctorily whisked off to Cambridge University for a degree in social anthropology. After Cambridge, he immediately went to work for the European Union. This is a similar schooling pattern for many in the Queen’s Privy Council. See Crimeline re. Cambridge involvement in global corruption.

Click here to see Nicholas William Peter CLEGG. (Oct. 24, 2018). Biography, Timeline & Conflicts of Interest. Americans for Innovation. (Raw *.xlsx spreadsheet). See also Fig. 7 below.

After an internship with the notorious Marxist Christopher Hitchens, Clegg teamed with people like Larry H. Summers and Sheryl K. Sandberg to press the establishment of corrupt Russian oligarchs to push the globalist takeover agenda at the same time as George Soros was allowed by the Bank of England and the Privy Council to crash the U.K. pound and pocket $1.4 billion overnight (Sep. 17, 1992) for their WAM (walking around money).

Clegg then worked in various positions at the European Union and the World Trade Organization (WTO) feeding cash to control the ex-Soviet oligarchs that he and Summers had created (2003-2005).

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/Royal_Arms_of_the_United_Kingdom_Privy_Council.jpg

Between 2005-2015 Clegg was a member of Parliament and leader of the Liberal Democrat party. During that time he served as Deputy Prime Minister in the government of David Cameron.

Between 2010-2015, Clegg was Lord President of the 600-person Queen’s Privy Council. During this time his political priorities sounded uncannily similar to socialist Bernie Sanders. Free tuition. Free public shares in banks. Hold the 1% accountable. Handouts for the poor. None of these priorities gained traction and were the subject of popular sarcasm, including the song “Nick Clegg says I’m sorry.” See Fig. 5 below.

Clegg recruits (Preys Upon?) Innocent Young Londoners for JP Morgan Chase

On Jul. 23, 2015, Clegg was appointed director of The Social Mobility Foundation Co. No. 05488354, Charity No. 1115888. On paper, their mission is to give education and life chances to disadvantage young people in Greater London. However, their financial statements indicate that this foundation is little more than a London recruit-em-young-and-innocent tool for J.P. Morgan Chase and the Privy Council.
Bookmark: #clegg-jpmorgan | https://tinyurl.com/yc7r2xcv


https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/social-mobility-funders-2015.jpgFig. 2The Social Mobility Foundation Co. No. 05488354, Charity No. 1115888. MP Nick Clegg appointed director Jul. 23, 2015


https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/branson-richard-charles-nicholas.jpg https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/soros-george.jpg

On Jul. 24, 2015, while still an MP, Nick founded OPEN REASON with donations from globalist fascists George Soros’ Open Society Initiative and Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Group. (Definition of fascism: the government aligns with selected corporations and allows them to monopolize an industry in exchange for that corporation paying tribute to the tyrannt and doing his/her bidding.)

All in the Family: Branson’s grandfather was Sir George Arthur Harwin Branson. His grandfather was a judge of the High Court of Justice and a member of the Privy Council. So, grandson Richie was himself schooled in the ways of global corruption.

Clegg also started RADIX GROUP LIMITED to “reimagine Europe,” along with numerous globalists. Bookmark: #clegg-open-reason | https://tinyurl.com/yckrsb6j


https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/soros-donation-to-nick-clegg.jpgFig. 3OPEN REASON Co. No. 09701919. MP Nick Clegg founded Jul. 24, 2015.
Bookmark: #nick-clegg-takeover | https://tinyurl.com/yauhjkha


Sir Nick Clegg just took control of global MSM propaganda via Facebook

Fig. 4Douglas Gabriel, Michael McKibben. (Oct. 25, 2018). AIM cats find another British swamp rat – YUCK! American Intelligence Media, Americans for Innovation. https://youtu.be/IAFp3-xMxmA | (Raw *.mp4 video file). Bookmark: #nick-clegg-sorry-song | https://tinyurl.com/y8zjfdc6


“[Sir] Nick Clegg says I’m Sorry”

Fig. 5Nick Clegg. (Sep. 19, 2012). The Nick Clegg Apology Song: I’m Sorry (The Autotune Remix). The Poke. https://youtu.be/KUDjRZ30SNo | (Raw *.mp4 video file).

A year before Clegg was unseated as MP (Jun. 08, 2017), his “glam” Spanish lawyer wife Miriam was appointed director of UBS Limited bank (Sep. 06, 2016). Suspiciously, she was immediately appointed chair of the powerful audit committee. UBS is a Facebook underwriter.
Bookmark: #miriam-clegg-ubs | https://tinyurl.com/ycffezc5


https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/miriam-clegg-ubs-limited.jpgFig. 6Miryan [Miriam] Mercedes Gonzalez Durantez (CLEGG). (Accessed Oct. 23, 2018). Appointed Representative (AR), Approved Persons, Controlled functions, Ref. No. MMG01076, SMF11, Chair, UBS Limited Audit Committee (Start: Sep. 06, 2016), SMF12 Chair, UBS Limited Reumeration Committee (Start: Jul. 18, 2018). Financial Conduct Authority, Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority.
Bookmark: #clegg-anti-brexit-book | https://tinyurl.com/y9k3byye


On Oct. 12, 2017, Clegg published How To Stop Brexit (And Make Britain Great Again).

This is Nick’s book cover (right):
https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/how-to-stop-brexit.jpg

On Dec. 30, 2017, Clegg was knighted in a puzzling move since he was a failed MP and left his Liberal Democrat Party in tatters.

On Jul. 18, 2018, UBS Limited (Swiss) bank made now Lady Miriam Clegg chair of the compensation committee. UBS is a Facebook underwriter.

Then three months later, on Oct. 19, 2018, Sir Nick was appointed as Facebook’s vice-president of global affairs and communications.

The purpose of Sir Nick’s Facebook appointment in the days before the U.S. midterm elections is beyond suspicious. His involvement is foreign meddling in both U.S. and UK elections by Facebook.

Sir Nick directed  the “Dirty Dossier” as leader of the Privy Council

As Lord President of the Privy Council (2010-2015), Sir Nick directed the world’s top propagandists at SCL (Strategic Communications Laboratories aka Cambridge Analytica). This included key British conspirators in the totally discredited “dirty dossier” Christopher Steele (MI-6), Sir Richard Dearlove (MI-6) , Stefan Halper (dual UK-US citizen, FBI, State Department, DoD, C.I.A.), warlord Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie and election-rigger Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, Alexander Downer, Joseph Mifsud (MI6), Sir Andrew Wood (MI6) and others. See Crimeline re. Cambridge involvement in global corruption.

Facebook’s, the Privy Council’s and Sir Nick’s attempts to consolidate the globalist propaganda system are evidently threatened by MAGA, Brexit and Project Dragonfly.

Sir Nick: sent in to destroy MAGA, Brexit & unify Project Dragonfly globally

Therefore, the Queen’s Privy Council evidently was compelled to send Sir Nick as their clean up man to Facebook. For them, the coming MAGA and Brexit votes need to be neutralized. So, they sent their chief propagandist to keep control of the narrative for the globalist Atlantic Council—the Privy Council’s U.N. public face.

Sir Nick’s biography and timeline below shows that he is a dedicated monarchist, a globalist in bed with the likes of George Soros, and he’s an enemy of American and British national sovereignty. It is outrageous that such a person should be put in charge of Facebook’s global MSM propaganda machine. He must be stopped. As people come to realize just how bad he is, he will be stopped.

Readers are encouraged to read the primary evidence confirming the information we have presented by following the embedded links to the source documents.

Sir Nick’s fiduciary duty to disclose all prospective Facebook conflicts of interest

Readers should also note that as an officer of an AMERICAN public company, the Business Judgment Rule says that Sir Nick has a fiduciary duty to disclose all of his potential conflicts of interest—which would include the names included in this biography and timeline, including all current and former members of the Queen’s Privy Council. Such a list should certainly disqualify Nick from being involved in ANY Facebook business.

Readers are encouraged to forward this post and Nick’s biography to all public officials and decision influencers in both America and Britain.

Global Menace

It is clear that Sir Nick Clegg is a global menace who has never worked a day in his life, and has been groomed since youth as an instrument of globalist tyranny.

Bookmark: #nick-clegg-biography | https://tinyurl.com/y9tbzlle

Sir Nick Clegg’s definitive biography, timeline & conflicts of interest

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-10-24-Nicholas-William-Peter-Clegg-Biography-Timeline-prepared-Oct-24-2018.jpgFig. 7—Nicholas William Peter CLEGG. (Oct. 24, 2018). Biography, Timeline &Conflicts of Interest. Americans for Innovation. (Raw *.xlsx spreadsheet).


Call to action:

We must protect the vote. Now. We cannot allow these criminals to hijack any more elections. Free and fair elections are the property of the citizens in this Republic, not the government. We have gone to sleep. Now that we are awake, we must take action across this country in the coming weeks to protect the 2018 midterm elections.

We must ensure an unbroken bipartisan chain of custody. That should be your rallying cry. This will essentially eliminate the imminent danger from rigged electronic voting machines. Back to the future: (1) Paper ballots, (2) Inked thumbs, and (3) Unbroken bipartisan chain of custody! It is really that simple.

In addition, God-fearing citizens of the United States and the world must call upon President Trump and loyal American leaders to de-fund the feeder systems used by these SES corrupt-ocrats.

Ask President Trump to write the check to Leader Technologies for their Miller Act Notice so they can help implement new technologies that respect Constitutional privacy and property and help implement a truly Free Press.

Mr. President: De-fund these Criminals and Fund The Miller Act Notice

Mr. President, please pull the plug on these corrupto-crats and their illegal funding streams. Since they are all based on fake values, no real services will be affected.

In addition, write the Miller Act Notice check to Leader Technologies for 18 years of unpaid use of their revolutionary social networking invention—which these Privy Council criminals (Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie and Lord Mark Malloch-Brown) have hijacked with the Senior Executive Service (SES) to takedown the American Republic.  This will generate new cash streams to free up our economy from the globalist stranglehold.  This will also empower Leader Technologies and other actually creative people in America to fix our foundering ship of state.  See Leader Technologies files trillion dollar bond lien on the U.S. Government.

One Miller Act Notice check starts the ball rolling, Mr. President.

In addition, Leader shareholders have proposed a win-win solution to the collapse of the American Free Press, as well a large new revenue source without raising taxes. Leader principals are willing to funnel these payments back into establishing a truly Free Press. See Leader proposes trillion dollar fed revenue while lowering taxes.

Source: American’s For Innovation

Google CEO Tells Senators That Censored Chinese Search Engine Could Provide “Broad Benefits”

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has refused to answer a list of questions from U.S. lawmakers about the company’s secretive plan for a censored search engine in China.

https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2018/10/GettyImages-1004833876-CROP-1539363493.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&q=90&fit=crop&w=1440&h=720Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In a letter newly obtained by The Intercept, Pichai told a bipartisan group of six senators that Google could have “broad benefits inside and outside of China,” but said he could not share details about the censored search engine because it “remains unclear” whether the company “would or could release a search service” in the country.

Pichai’s letter contradicts the company’s search engine chief, Ben Gomes, who informed staff during a private meeting that the company was aiming to release the platform in China between January and April 2019. Gomes told employees working on the Chinese search engine that they should get it ready to be “brought off the shelf and quickly deployed.”

According to sources and confidential Google documents, the search engine for China, codenamed Dragonfly, was designed to comply with the strict censorship regime imposed by China’s ruling Communist Party. It would restrict people’s access to broad categories of information, blacklisting phrases like “human rights,” “student protest,” and “Nobel Prize.”

The Chinese platform was designed to link people’s searches to their phone number, track their location, and then share that data with a Chinese partner company. This would make it easy to track individual users’ searches, raising concerns that any person in China using Google to seek out information banned by the government could be at risk of interrogation or detention if security agencies were to obtain copies of their search records.

In his letter to the senators, dated August 31, Pichai did not mention the word “censorship” or address human rights concerns. He told the senators that “providing access to information to people around the world is central to our mission,” and said he believed Google’s tools could “help to facilitate an exchange of information and learning.” The company was committed to “promoting access to information, freedom of expression, and user privacy,” he wrote, while also “respecting the laws of jurisdictions in which we operate.”

After The Intercept first revealed Dragonfly in early August, Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and Marco Rubio, R-Fla., demanded information from Pichai. They called Dragonfly “deeply troubling” and said it “risks making Google complicit in human rights abuses related to China’s rigorous censorship regime.” Launching the censored search engine would be “a coup for the Chinese government” and set “a worrying precedent for other companies seeking to do business in China without compromising their core values,” they wrote in a letter that was also signed by Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Ron Wyden, D-Ore.; Cory Gardner, R-Colo.; and Robert Menendez, D-N.J.

Pichai did not answer nine specific questions the senators asked, including, “Which ‘blacklist’ of censored searches and websites are you using? Are there any phrases or words that Google is refusing to censor?”

Instead, Pichai wrote, “Google has been open about our desire to increase our ability to serve users in China and other countries. We are thoughtfully considering a variety of options for how to offer services in China in a way that is consistent with our mission. … [W]e can confirm that our work will continue to reflect our best assessment of how best to serve people around the world, as set forth in our mission and our code of conduct. Of course, should we have something to announce in the future, we would be more than happy to brief you and your staff on those plans.”

Warner told The Intercept he was “really disappointed with Google’s response,” which he said “failed to provide any information” about the censored search engine plan. “Any effort to get back into China could enable the Chinese government in repressing and manipulating their citizens,” said Warner. “Google owes us some honest answers, or it risks losing the trust of Congress and the public.”

Google launched a censored search engine in China in 2006, but stopped operating the service in the country in 2010, citing Chinese government efforts to limit free speech and hack activists’ Gmail accounts. At that time, Google co-founder Sergey Brin said he was “particularly sensitive to the stifling of individual liberties,” due to his family’s experiences in the Soviet Union. Brin told the Wall Street Journal that “with respect to censorship, with respect to surveillance of dissidents,” he saw “earmarks of totalitarianism [in China], and I find that personally quite troubling.”

The effort to relaunch a censored search engine in China was a closely guarded secret within Google. A team of about 300 staff — 0.35 percent of Google’s 88,000-strong workforce — was briefed about the project, which began in early 2017. When details about Dragonfly were publicly exposed, the news spread through the company’s offices across the world, and many Google employees were disturbed by the details. More than 1,400 staff signed a letter demanding an independent ethics review of the plan, and at least five Google employees have since quit the company in protest, including Jack Poulson, a former senior research scientist. “I view our intent to capitulate to censorship and surveillance demands in exchange for access to the Chinese market as a forfeiture of our values,” Poulson told Google bosses in his resignation letter.

Google did not respond to a request for comment on this story.

Source: by Ryan Gallagher | The Intercept