Watch President Donald Trump address The United Nations General Assembly
Best played at 1.75X or 2X speed.
Watch President Donald Trump address The United Nations General Assembly
Best played at 1.75X or 2X speed.
Watch President Donald Trump PUSH Congress to help pass Senator Dianne Feinstein’s sweeping gun control ban on “assault rifles”, other guns and constitutionally protected due process rights.
Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino appeared on Tucker Carlson TV show tonight to discuss the release of Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence memo.
During the segment Mr. Bongino highlighted his theory that Chairman Nunes memo not only holds references to the DOJ and FBI use of fraudulent FISA702 application evidence, but that the memo also contains compartmented intelligence exclusive to former President Obama’s Presidential Daily Briefings (PDB’s). WATCH:
If true, this exclusive Bongino revelation could be explosive. Let’s explore.
What exactly is “The Nunes Memo”? From all indications it is an outline written by senior intelligence committee staff, with major input from Devin Nunes describing evidence, people and events who conspired back in 2016 and 2017. In essence it is a summary of facts, that Chairman Nunes knows to exist.
No-one actually knows what the underlying supportive material is, because no-one, other than Chairman Devin Nunes, has seen the full material in the context of his reference.
People are *assuming* the memo is heavily written around FISA-702 issues and documents (FISA application, Steele Dossier, wiretaps, surveillance, intercepts etc.), but no-one actually knows what is behind the memo, other than Devin Nunes. There could be much more than just FISA evidence.
Now, as we go forward with this we’ll be lost unless we have a full understanding of the March 2017 outline about “The Nunes Paradox” – SEE HERE – Remember, the issue on March 22nd, 2017 was:
[…] Our research indicates that Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDB’s) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.
The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI. It would be removed from that SCIF system after his review. No systems are connected.
Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”. So the product itself was likely a product for the President, that was not part of the ongoing FBI counter-intel product.
Again, this is why it seems likely it was part of a PDB – unless it was a separate product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intel on something Trump.]
♦ Now, HERE IS WHERE YOU NEED TO PUT ON A “Politics only” FILTER.
Couldn’t Adam Schiff (another gang of eight member) go look at the same intelligence as Nunes did?
Yes. However, purely from the standpoint of politics: why would he?
If Representative Schiff saw the same intelligence that substantiates Nunes he couldn’t keep up the fake outrage and false narrative. Right now Schiff can say anything about it he wants because he hasn’t seen it. If Schiff actually sees the intelligence Nunes saw he loses that ability. He would also lose the ability to criticize, ridicule and/or marginalize Devin Nunes. (read more – Critical to understand)
Back in March and April 2017, it was more valuable, politically, at least initially, for ranking member Adam Schiff never to go look at the same information compiled within the Eisenhower SCIF for Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes to see. Schiff did, eventually, go to see the information, but he waited a week to do so.
Absent of knowledge of the underlying evidence, Adam Schiff could say anything he wanted about Nunes and work to isolate him. Simultaneously, because the information was highly classified, Nunes could never explain it or defend himself. Thus Nunes was stuck in the compartmented intelligence box; that’s The Nunes Paradox.
Sneaky Schiff used a week of Nunes being in this boxed-in position, knowing Nunes could not defend himself, to demand Nunes step aside from the House Intelligence “Russia investigation”. It worked.
However, all the way through to today no-one except Devin Nunes has any idea the totality of what Nunes actually witnessed in March 2017, and what he was later able to connect to that evidence after the FISA Court release (late April 2017) [Nunes could see unredacted FISC opinion], and also overlay evidence provided to the House Intelligence Committee.
However, we have an idea of the earlier evidence Nunes saw from his March 22nd, 2017, statements and we can also overlay the FISA court information .
It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 – however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017. It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coat’s ability to provide information, Chairman Devin Nunes begins reporting his concerns. It was also Dan Coats who declassified the FISA court opinion on April 28th, 2017.
After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was: “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team. Later it was reported the incoming White House National Security Council may have assisted Nunes with information at the Eisenhower SCIF.
1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”
2.) “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”
3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”
4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.
“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”
•“Who was aware of it?”
•“Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
•“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
•“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
•“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”
“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”
Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]
Additionally, there is further evidence that surfaced a week after Nunes expressed his March 22nd, 2017 concerns. April 4th, 2017 Susan Rice appears:
With a general set of narrative ‘talking points’ in hand President Obama’s Former National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, appeared April 4th, 2017, on MSNBC for an interview with Andrea Mitchell. This is the ‘We-Have-To-Respond-phase‘, to the push-back that was an outcome of Evelyn Farkas earlier statements on the same network.
Andrea Mitchell is considered a trustworthy ally of the Clinton/Obama political networks; as such, it is not a surprise to see Mitchell selected as the interviewer. Mitchell’s use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.
You already know the routine. MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice. Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas) The full interview is below:
However, that said, there are some interesting aspects to the interview:
Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”
[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]
“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.
And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”
OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.
This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.
Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:
[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.
In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.
By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)
Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to: “top strategic communications aide”, Ben Rhodes, and “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.
In the interview, Susan Rice defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”, “NSA” ‘ODNI’ etc….
So under Obama’s watch the list of recipients was massive and included Asst. Secretaries of national security departments like the DOJ-National Security Division (John P Carlin) and FBI Counterintelligence Division (Bill Priestap). Massive numbers of administration officials including the DOJ and FBI had access to the PDB.
See where this is going?
Susan Rice is admitting to “unmasking” names within intelligence reports to give her context for how they pertain to the overall briefing material. That briefing material is the PDB. That PDB goes to dozens of political people and political entities, including the DOJ and FBI units investigating candidate Donald Trump.
This is the widespread distribution of intelligence information that former Asst. Deputy of Defense, Evelyn Farkas was discussing. Now, we go back to Farkas’s March 2nd, 2017 MSNBC statement for additional context:
“I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.”
Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.
So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill. … That’s why you had the leaking”.
That right there is the story. With dozens of people with access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of the intelligence report names gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, perhaps did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes, as outlined by Evelyn Farkas who was ultimately one of the recipients of the unmasked intelligence.
Additionally, that same material went directly to the people in the DOJ-NSD and FBI Counterintelligence who were conducting the “Trump Operation”.
The DOJ and FBI officials could comply with FISA-702 “minimization rules” (hiding of U.S. person’s names etc.) knowing full well that the unmasking could be done by the recipient of the FISA-702 source material, which would then be relayed back to the DOJ and FBI officials; the “small group”.
If you know how concentric circle political safety is constructed, you will notice that Susan Rice was then hugging the security of the Presidency. To take Rice down amid all of this unmasking, means to take down President Obama – back in March 2017 this was a safe play on her part.
Reverse the safety. No-one in ideological media or allies in congress were going to allow President Obama to be taken down; ergo, everyone will protect Susan Rice and by extension President Obama. They had no choice.
Back to the interview and note how when shifting from rehearsed talking point (script) to cognitive explanation of Rices’ point , the noun shifts from “U.S. Person” to “U.S. Official”:
“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.
And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”
It’s subtle (like a Freudian slip), but Rice accidentally outlines her filter, her psychological trigger, for when to request the unmasking. She’s looking for the politics behind the intelligence. She’s looking for “U.S. Officials” in masked intelligence reports.
Mrs. Rice then follows up with a “hypothetical example” that is ridiculous as she describes. The example provided (a sketchy dude in mom’s basement) would NEVER reach the level of PDB; it would be pre-filtered, researched and reviewed for value. The PDB NEVER contains such banal information as Rice describes.
The interview goes much further. There is a lot of news in this interview. There is also a tremendous amount of double-speak and self-contradiction; in some cases between sentences that follow each other.
Notice how Susan Rice contradicts herself about what the intelligence community puts into the PDB. Rice states the PDB intel community, those assembling the information, to be very specific: James Clapper (DNI), James Comey (FBI), John Brennan (CIA) and Defense Department (which would be the Pentagon and NSA Mike Rogers), and she states they would never send the President innocuous things unworthy of review (like a dude in mom’s basement):
Summary: In addition to the FISA702 material, and the material given by the current DOJ and FBI to Devin Nunes, there are strong indications the PDB material is part of the underlying information which backstops the Nunes Memo.
Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats likely know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff, despite having read the Nunes memo.
The important part of the House Memo release will be within the *footnotes* and *citations*, and the need to declassify that material will be the next phase in the sunlight.
Now we can see how Nunes brilliantly reversed the Paradox?
With help from a few friends:
A New York makeup artist who accused Donald Trump of groping her in the 1990’s – and whose mortgage was paid off by a donor arranged by Gloria Allred daughter Lisa Bloom, repeatedly solicited then-candidate Trump to become his campaign makeup artist so she could pitch her new line of men’s cosmetics, according to The Hill‘s John Solomon. The story has to be true, because one couldn’t make it up if one tried.
In an October 1, 2015 email – Trump accuser Jill Harth emailed the President’s New York Company headquarters, writing:
“Hi Donald, you are doing a tremendous job of shaking things up in the United States. I am definitely on Team Trump as so many others are.”
“I can’t watch television without seeing you or hearing your name everywhere! It’s a good thing for sure but PLEASE let me do your makeup for a television interview, a debate, a photo session, anything!” Harth wrote, adding “It kills me to see you looking too orange and with white circles under the eyes. I will get your skin looking smoother and even toned.”
Harth also wrote to Trump that she would “sculpt your face” for optimal presentation on high-definition TV sets.
In another email, Harth attempted to meet with Trump in person, offering to be a campaign surrogate who would tell Trump voters how the future president “helped me with my self-confidence and all positive things about how he is with women.”
This latest bombshell comes on the heels of a report by Solomon and Alison Spann in The Hill over Trump accusers who were offered or taken money or other forms of compensation by attorney Lisa Bloom in connection with allegations of sexual misconduct – most of which coincidentally cropped up weeks before the 2016 election.
Harth, in particular, took a mortgage payoff and allowed Bloom to set up a GoFundMe account in her name. As ZeroHedge reported Saturday:
One client of Bloom’s who received money was Trump accuser Jill Harth, who filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against trump in 1997, but withdrew it after Trump settled a separate lawsuit from Harth and her boyfriend for alleged breach of contract when trump backed out of a business deal. After Bloom began representing Harth, she arranged for a donor to help Harth pay off her Queens, NY mortgage, which was recorded as extinguished on Dec. 19, 2016. Bloom also “arranged a small payment from the licensing of some photos to the news media, then set up a GoFundMe page for Harth’s benefit which raised a little over $2,300.
Harth maintains Bloom’s financial incentives had nothing to do with her decision to reignite her claims:
“Nothing that you’ve said to me about my mortgage or the Go Fund Me that was created to help me out financially affects the facts or the veracity of my 1997 federal complaint against Donald J. Trump for sexual harassment and assault,” Harth told The Hill.
In a lengthy response to The Hill, Harth explained “Well, a couple years of therapy helped me deal with Trump’s sexual attacks and the mind games he had played on me for more than a year and move on with my life. In 2015 I was very excited about a new men’s cosmetic product line that I had developed and needed a prominent spokesperson. And after discussions with my business associate she thought Donald Trump would be ideal.”
“I got no response so I abandoned the effort until I saw him on TV at a rally looking worse than ever. He looked like a clown with an orange face and white circles around his eyes. So, I sent another email volunteering to do his makeup for free. Still no response.” –Jill Harth
So, Harth claims Trump groped her in the 90’s in a lawsuit that was mysteriously withdrawn after Trump settled a separate lawsuit with Harth and her boyfriend. Then Harth went through “a couple years of therapy,” before approaching her alleged abuser for a job doing his makeup. After she received no response, Harth took a mortgage payoff and allowed Attorney Lisa Bloom to peddle her story to the country right before the 2016 election.
A totally believable chain of events.
Meanwhile, as the legitimacy of Trump accusers unravels, Bill O’Reilly went on Glenn Beck’s radio show last week to discuss what he claims is the existence of a tape showing a woman being offered $200,000 to accuse Donald Trump of ‘untoward behavior.’ O’Reilly told Beck that it relates to his own sexual assault case, and his lawyer who has listened to the tape says there are at least three crimes contained on it:
O’Reilly: There is a tape, Beck, an audio tape of an anti-Trump person offering $200,000 to a woman to accuse Donald Trump of untoward behavior.
Beck: Is this tape going to be released?
O’Reilly: I may have to go to the US Attorney myself. I don’t wanna have to do that and inject myself into the story, but I had my lawyer listen to the tape. He’s listened to it. There are at least three crimes on the tape. So as a citizen, I may have to do this.
Beck: I will tell you Bill, the first thing that you say – well I’m trying to get it, I’m trying to get it so it can be released. You weren’t talking about getting it for YOU to release it, but it had to be out there. And I think the first time I said to you, I mean, if they don’t – you’ve gotta bring it to the US Attorney.
O’Reilly: Again, it’s in the hands of someone who knows the seriousness of the situation.
Beck: What is their hesitancy?
O’Reilly: You know, I can’t really get into that at this point. But I can tell you that Donald Trump knows about the tape. And I’m, for the life of me, sitting here going “Why on earth are you allowing a movement to try to smear you when you have a powerful – and I mean it’s powerful – piece of evidence that shows that this is an industry. That there are false charges and money changing hands.” It’s so frustrating but I wanted your listeners to know it, it’s there, it’s amazing, and it will change the whole discussion if it ever gets out.
Well, it does seem that the whole discussion has changed in the last week thanks to John Solomon, Alison Spann and The Hill.
JERUSALEM – In response to US President Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as the Israeli capital, the Palestinian National Authority has announced that it will recognize Texas as a state of Mexico since it was violently annexed by the United States in the 1840s.
“The territory north and east of the Rio Grande is very important to the Mexican people,” explained a PNA spokesperson. “Before American settlers showed up and implemented slavery, Mexico oversaw this land. Then, President Polk sent his armies to invade the rest of these Mexican territories, and force the country to give up California, New Mexico, most of Arizona, Nevada, and Utah, and parts of Wyoming and Colorado. We may soon recognize these states as part of Mexico too.”
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says that this is a new approach to Mexican-US relations, and hopes it will help ease the tension between the two countries over security and immigration.
“We understand that the Mexican state of Texas is a sacred place for many large-buckled Americans, but they can rest assured that a two-state solution or a wall was not feasible,” explained Abbas.
“Besides, most people in Texas speak Spanish.”
The Palestinian consulate in Mexico City will soon be moved to Houston to formally recognize the seized territory as part of Mexico.
At press time, President Trump hopes that his recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital will offer a new path for Middle East violence.
Fresh off the heels of a shocking report, published by the Washington Post, that confirmed that the infamous “Russia dossier” was actually funded by both the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, an even more startling revelation has emerged – The Clinton-DNC machine colluded with the Russians to fabricate and spread serious disinformation about Donald Trump in a failed attempt at swaying the election in the favor of Hillary Clinton.
That’s right, in a literal reverse of what the entire mainstream media has fed the American people for over a year, we now have evidence that, either wittingly or unwittingly, the Clinton campaign and the DNC paid for what amounted to disinformation that came directly from “Russian sources”.
Obviously this may seem truly unbelievable to some, but the facts speak for themselves and there is no denying that Democrats paid a shady opposition research company to try and dig up dirt on Donald Trump who then subsequently hired former British spy Christopher Steele. Steele then openly used Russian sources for most of the serious allegations in the “Russia dossier”.
Clinton Lawyer Hires Fusion GPS For Disinformation
According to The Washington Post report, which was later confirmed by Politico, Clinton and DNC lawyer Marc Elias hired the “opposition research” (see disinformation) company Fusion GPS who then outsourced the work to former British spy Christopher Steele who eventually went on to release the “Russian dossier” which was chalked full of disinformation, including lurid sexual allegations against Donald Trump.
The fact that the Clinton campaign would hire Fusion GPS in the first place paints a clear picture of a campaign willing to pay for any dirt on then candidate Donald Trump whether it was true or not. This becomes even more clear when you consider the history of Fusion GPS itself.
As Breitbart reported, “Fusion GPS is not some usual-usual oppo-research firm. Among other things, the company has been accused of being a “Democrat-aligned misinformation firm” aligned with Russia. While refusing to cooperate with congressional investigations, including taking the fifth, Fusion GPS has also been accused of advocating for “the interests of corrupt Russian and Venezuelan officials while hiding its foreign work from federal authorities.”
The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway also noted the serious allegations against the company:
At a July hearing, Senate Judiciary members were told Fusion GPS helped advocate the interests of corrupt Russian and Venezuelan officials while hiding its foreign work from federal authorities.
Fusion GPS has been accused of illegally working as an undisclosed foreign agent and is currently refusing to comply with federal subpoenas for information on its foreign clients.
Fusion GPS also has deep connections to the mainstream media, including the fact that it was literally founded by a team of former mainstream media reporters who have deep connections to those currently in the profession.
Again Hemingway notes:
The principals at Fusion GPS are well-connected to mainstream media reporters. They are former journalists themselves, and know how to package stories and provide information to push narratives. They are, in fact, close friends with some of the top reporters who have covered the Russia-Trump collusion story.
Fusion GPS has placed stories with friendly reporters while fighting congressional investigators’ attempts to find out the group’s sources of funding. Fusion GPS leaders have taken the Fifth and fought subpoenas for information about the group’s involvement with Russia.
Their close friendships with key reporters on these stories have paid huge dividends for the firm, although these friendships and cooperative relationships have not served the public well.
Former Spy Used “Russian Sources” For Infamous Trump Dossier
This is where the story turns from shocking to downright unbelievable, especially when you consider the year long mainstream media disinformation narrative that claims that the Russians helped Donald Trump win the election.
The spook working for Fusion GPS, (which was hired by the Clinton campaign) Christopher Steele, openly bragged about his sources being within the Russian government itself.
Buried deep in a report by Vanity Fair that spends thousands of words trying to pretend that the dossier could be legitimate, is this nugget that paints a picture of direct or indirect collusion between the Clinton team and Russia.
How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.” And both of these insiders, after “speaking to a trusted compatriot,” would claim that the Kremlin had spent years getting its hooks into Donald Trump.
Source E was “an ethnic Russian” and “close associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump.”
After “gathering” the information, Steele was then directed by Fusion GPS to “brief” the media about the Russian government fueled allegations against Trump.
In one, dated May 18, Steele says that he was instructed by Fusion GPS to meet with reporters at various outlets in order to publicize some of the allegations made in the dossier.
It has been widely known that Fusion GPS and Steele were in contact with reporters to discuss the dossier. It has been reported that rumors of the dossier were floating around in Washington, D.C. political and journalist circles for months prior to BuzzFeed’s decision to publish it on Jan. 10.
In the response, Steele’s lawyers state that the former spook briefed several reporters at the end of September at the instruction of Fusion GPS, which was working on behalf of a Democratic ally of Hillary Clinton’s.
The outlets were The New York Times, The Washington Post, Yahoo! News, The New Yorker and CNN.
Steele met once more — and again at Fusion GPS’s instruction — with The Times, The Post, and Yahoo! News. Fusion GPS took part in all of those meetings, Steele’s lawyers say.
“In each of those cases the briefing was conducted verbally in person,” the document reads.
In October, Fusion GPS instructed Steele to brief a journalist from Mother Jones. The interview, which was conducted through Skype, was likely with reporter David Corn.
It doesn’t get any clearer than this. Fusion GPS was paid by Democrats to dig up dirt, that dirt was then supplied by the Russians, and subsequently became a major part of the narrative surrounding Donald Trump and Russia.
“What you clearly have here is the Clinton campaign openly COLLUDING with a foreign country, with the Russians, to fabricate scurrilous lies about Trump, which were then fed to a willing media as a means to affect their news coverage, and by extension, sway the election,” Breitbart’s John Nolte wrote.
Fusion GPS “Was Acting On Behalf Of Russia”
Amazingly, testimony and evidence already exists that Fusion GPS has in the past worked directly for Russia and may have been doing so with the Trump disinformation dossier.
At a Senate Judiciary Hearing in late July, Hermitage Capital Management chief William Browder testified that the company was acting on behalf of Russia after co-founder Glenn Simpson was hired by a person connected to lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya to lobby for the repeal of the Magnitsky Act.
The following exchange between Browder and Senator Lindsey Graham is shocking to say the least.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: This whole story reads like some kind of novel that nobody would buy, it’s got to be fiction, but unfortunately maybe it’s true. Let’s just break down sort of why you’re here. You believe that Fusion GPS should of registered under FARA, because they were acting on the behalf of the Russians?
WILLIAM BROWDER: That’s correct.
SEN. GRAHAM: So, I just want to absorb that for a moment. The group that did the dossier on President Trump hired this British spy, wound up getting it to the FBI. You believe they were working for the Russians?
BROWDER: And in the Spring and Summer of 2016 they were receiving money indirectly from a senior Russian government official.
SEN. GRAHAM: Okay. So, these are the people that were trying to undermine Donald Trump by showing the nefarious ties to Russia. Is that what you’re saying?
BROWDER: Well, what I’m saying with 100% certainty is that they were working to undermine the Magnitsky act and the timing of that.
SEN. GRAHAM: But, the Fusion GPS products apparently as they hired a guy to look into Trump?
SEN. GRAHAM: Right
When you put all the evidence together, keeping in mind that this is only what has been released so far, you can see a clear picture of, at the very least, indirect collusion between the highest levels of the Democratic Party and unknown figures within the Russian government. The scheme was then directly propped up and spread by the mainstream media.
As Nolte so aptly notes, “If purchasing misinformation from Kremlin official as a means to manipulate media coverage and sway public opinion is not colluding with the Russians to rig an election, nothing is.”
California Democrat Representative Maxine Waters held $200,000 in Russia-linked retirement accounts in 2015, even while she hypocritically calls for President Donald J. Trump’s impeachment over his financial connections to Russia, according to her most recently available House of Representatives disclosure documents.
Waters’ cash-grabbing shamelessness has never known bounds. In 2012, she barely squeaked through a three-year House Ethics Committee investigation after abusing her position to funnel $12 million in bailout money to her husband’s bank.
Her Russian investments will surprise no one in her district, where impromptu signs declaring the congresswoman a “poverty pimp” and a race baiter have been popping up for years.
Waters’ 2015 disclosure statement details her family’s investments in BlackRock’s Russia-connected Global Allocation and Balanced funds.
“A Fund may invest in the equity securities of companies that explore for, extract, process or deal in precious metals (e.g., gold, silver and platinum), and in asset-based securities indexed to the value of such metals. … The major producers of gold include the Republic of South Africa, Russia, Canada, the United States, Brazil and Australia. … A Fund may invest a portion of its assets in securities issued by companies located in Russia.”
In the midst of a March meltdown comparing the Trump administration, the Ku Klux Klan and Russia, Waters told her Twitter followers to, “Follow the money.”
— Maxine Waters (@MaxineWaters) March 7, 2017
A Sept. 2015 BlackRock Balanced SEC filing reveals her fund’s $2.8 million in obligations to the Russian Federation.
BlackRock Balanced Russian Federation Obligations (Source: Screenshot, Sept. 2015 SEC Filing)
Farwell Chris …
Followed by two Minutes of Unabashed Praise from the Media after Trump Addressed Joint Session of Congress For the First Time (video)
Wow, this is a little bit stunning. Community activist Quanell X and AM 740 KTRH NewsRadio show host Matt Patrick discuss Donald Trump’s direct and honest appeal to the black community.
Quanell X’s response is NOT what Hillary Clinton wants to hear. Watch:
This is the speech Quanell is discussing:
Following Trump confidant Roger Stone’s allegation that Hillary Clinton might “steal this election” using the Supreme Court, and the Reuters’ poll “tweaks” which sent her to a 7-point lead, Donald Trump is raising the alarm that he “is afraid the election is going to be rigged.”
Just last week, before the Reuters polls were ‘tweaked’, Stone told Milo Yiannopoulous of Breitbart that if there is an “illegitimate” election, then there will be “widespread civil disobedience” and “it will be a bloodbath.”
“I think your audience knows, I think we all know, that in this day and age, a computer can do anything. These voter machines are essentially a computer. Who is to say they could not be rigged?”
“I think we have widespread voter fraud, but the first thing that Trump needs to do is begin talking about it constantly,” Stone said.
“He needs to say for example, today would be a perfect example: “I am leading in Florida. The polls all show it. If I lose Florida, we will know that there’s voter fraud. If there’s voter fraud, this election will be illegitimate, the election of the winner will be illegitimate, we will have a constitutional crisis, widespread civil disobedience, and the government will no longer be the government.”
“So, I mean the dream here, the ultimate ideal is that he wins by such a significant margin nationally that this is unnecessary,” Yiannopoulos concluded. “But it’s interesting to hear you say this, and it’s funny also, because Trump will go there. He will go to the places other politicians wont, and he’s probably the only person to run for president within the last fifty years who would dare to do this, and might even get away with it. It’s remarkable isn’t it how he’s just sort of re-injected reality into politics”.
And now Donald Trump, speaking today in Columbus, Ohio, raised the concern of a rigged election directly… “Bernie shouldn’t have made a deal but he lost [because] it’s rigged… and I am afraid the [national] election is going to be rigged.”
“I think my side was rigged. If I didn’t win by massive landslides, think about what we won in New York, Indiana, California, 78 percent, that’s with other people in the race.”
Trump made similar complaints about a “rigged” process during the Republican primaries. As Roger Stone concluded,
“If you can’t have an honest election, nothing else counts,”
“I think he’s gotta put them on notice that their inauguration will be rhetorical, and when I mean civil disobedience, not violence, but it will be a bloodbath. The government will be shut down if they attempt to steal this and swear Hillary in. No, we will not stand for it. We will not stand for it.”
Just in case you thought things could not get any more obvious among the riggers, does this look ‘normal’?
July 25: Trump was at 48%, Clinton at 45% in CNN/ORC poll.
Today: Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump 52% to 43% in CNN/ORC poll.
Perhaps the biggest swing in a week in US election history?
Emails released under court order Wednesday to Judicial Watch show that in December 2010, State Department technical staff had to disable software on their systems intended to block phishing emails that could deliver dangerous viruses. The reason: The State Department was trying to resolve delivery problems with emails sent from Hillary Clinton’s private server.
Deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin and Hillary both used Clinton’s private server, and as AP reports, both had complained that emails each sent to State Department employees were not being reliably received. “This should trump all other activities” Ken LaVolpe, a senior technical official told other IT employees in a December 17, 2010 email. Days later another email was sent by State Department official Thomas W. Lawrence saying that Abedin was personally asking for an update about the repairs.
After technical staffers turned off security features at the State Department, Lawrence cautioned in an email “we view this as a band-aid and fear it’s not 100 percent fully effective.” State Department spokesman John Kirby clarified that the emails describe “a series of troubleshooting measures to the department’s system, not Secretary Clinton’s system, to attempt to remedy the problem.”
On January 9, 2011, a personal aid with no security clearance was forced to shut down Clinton’s server because he believed “someone was trying to hack us.” The worker then went on to write “we were hacked again so I shut (the server) down for a few min” in what was one of several occasions where email access to Clinton’s blackberry was disrupted because the private server was down according to the documents.
AP went on to add that last year it reported that on August 3, 2011, Clinton received infected emails disguised as speeding tickets from New York. The emails instructed recipients to print the attachments, however opening any attachment would have allowed hackers to take over control of the victim’s computer.
* * *
So to recap, Clinton’s private server was being hacked, and the State Department decided that it was a good idea to disabled security software on its government systems just to allow Hillary and Huma’s emails through. This begs the question of how far the hacking goes, did the State Department just allow hackers unlimited access when it disabled security software to accommodate Hillary?
As a reminder, the State Department did release a report slamming Hillary for ignoring internal guidance that her email set up broke federal standards. Alas, it is clearly too little, too late at this point. Also of note, although Judicial Watch is making headway in gaining access to email documents such as AP reported on above, no further answers will be revealed in the sworn testimony of Brian Pagliano, the man believed to have set up and maintained Clinton’s private server. In a deposition as part of one the civil cases involving Judicial Watch, Pagliano invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination more than 125 times.
This is bombshell announcement! Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) just shared damning news for Hillary Clinton on The Steve Malzberg Show just now:
The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.
“I have friends that are in the FBI and they tell me they’re ready to indict,” DeLay said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”
“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”
Clinton is under FBI investigation for her use of a private server to conduct confidential government business while she was secretary of state. But some Republicans fear any FBI recommendation that hurts Clinton will be squashed by the Obama administration.
DeLay, a Texas Republican and Washington Times radio host, said:
“One way or another either she’s going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another she’s going to have to face these charges.”
Team Hillary is already admitting this will likely happen. Amazingly, the Clinton campaign has been busy accusing Obama’s intelligence Inspector General, Charles McCullough, of coordinating releases of information to help Republicans. (!) McCullough’s investigations found Clinton was sharing documents which were “beyond top secret”… a crime that should not only disqualify Hillary Clinton from the White House, but should carry a lengthy prison sentence!
Here is Tom DeLay sharing the major news:
This might seem a little too “inside baseball” for some, but then again we’re often asked what breadcrumb trails we follow when identifying motives around presidential politics.
Ultimately, understanding the bigger picture, and fully grasping the six year shift in the Wall Street Legislative priority disconnect, will assist readers and researchers to comprehend the motives of the participants in the fully engulfed globalist oligarchy that surrounds U.S. presidential politics.
Many people have yet to accept or make the mental shift needed to understand that Washington DC lawmakers are not your mom/dad’s politicians. Their legislative endeavors are now fully created by Wall Street globalists. Once you understand the legislative priorities of Wall Street, you can see what agenda items will be focused upon by UniParty leaders: Ryan, McConnell, Reid/Schumer and Pelosi.
As previously outlined, Senator Bob Corker was dispatched to Trump Tower on Monday to meet with Donald Trump and get a better understanding of the risk to Wall Street’s Legislative Priority Agenda.
Wall Street and the UniParty political leadership are trying to evaluate whether their current legislative priorities can be maintained with a Donald Trump presidency.
“America First”, the key principle enumerated by Mr. Trump doesn’t seem to align with the DC politburo’s current ideological needs if they are to fulfill the agenda items purchased by Wall Street (Donohue) via K-Street contributions.
After candidate Trump navigated the conversation with Corker, we should not be surprised to see an offering of sorts from the Wall Street legislative team. The tripwire which stems from the Monday emissary meeting would be a Speaker Paul Ryan endorsement. The goal of such an approach is to get Trump moving away from Main Street, and on board with Wall Street’s plan. It will not be successful.
Wall Street doesn’t leave much, if anything, to chance. Unfortunately, due to Donald Trump upsetting their UniParty construct, currently Wall Street is only fully in control of one side of the (legislative/political) coin, Hillary Clinton.
If Trump refuses to allow the legislative priorities of Wall Street to advance (Immigration, ObamaCare, TPP, Monetary Policy, Omnibus etc.), then the power brokers will have no alternative except to attack Trump in order to install a more favorable co-hort, Clinton.
Everything always boils down to the advancement of the Wall Street Legislative Priorities.
Once you understand those priorities, you understand the motives of everyone who is tasked with seeing those objectives reached – everything that’s going on clarifies….
Once upon a time there was a fairy kingdom that lived inside a place called The Beltway, and was surrounded on all four sides by a land called America. The Beltway was aligned with another kingdom called Manhattan, inhabited by disembodied heads that spoke from the walls of bars, and with with yet another closed kingdom called Hollywood, the abode of half-educated narcissists. These kingdoms were in eternal political syzygy, and spoke not with the people of the surrounding lands, of whom they knew nothing. The following is a chronicle of what befell them, and why.
After years of peace, the Kingdoms were taken greatly aback by the rise of the Trump Monster, their surprise being proof that they knew nothing of the surrounding lands. They knew nothing for good reasons, of which there were two. The first was that they passed their lives with each other and among each other and talking to each other and writing about each other and reading about each other behind the high walls of their kingdoms. In organs like National Review and The Weekly Standard they endlessly wrote stories of the form “A soothsayer in Manhattan replies to what some other sayer of sooths said about yet another’s attack on still another magician.”
They had all dwelt in monasteries called Harvard and Princeton, where they learned that they were the wisest of men, and inerrant. They had no idea that they were hated in the strange lands without the walls, which on their maps were drawn as fog with notations such as “Here dwelleth dragons.” They did not know that there were people who agreed not with them. For were they not right about all things?
The other reason for their puzzlement was a powerful spell called “Political Correctness.” This strong magic prevented the outlanders from saying anything that the Three Kingdoms did not want to hear. Anyone who engaged in incantations called “slurs,” which were truthful thoughts about sacred tribes, or who said Inappropriate Things about a certain little country whose only importance was being that little country, was thrown into durance vile. Thus the Three Kingdoms never heard anything they didn’t like, and so believed that almost everyone without the walls loved them. They had scarce an idea what furies were roiling and boiling and stirring under the surface of the Outer Realms.
Now, until the Trump Monster appeared, America was ruled by a pseudo-democracy of one bicephalous party with two names. The Only Party consisted of blackguards and Quislings and pickpockets bought and paid for by the plutocratic oligarchy of large corporations, AIPAC, and the. very rich. These told the two halves of the One Party what to do. Every four years there was played a great tournament in which candidates of the Two Names of the One Party engaged in the most savage combat imaginable. This was to distract the people outside the walls. Afterwards nothing changed and all went on as before, though the division of the spoils shifted a bit.
And in their ignorance and pride the Three Kingdoms engendered a monster called Trump, and it bit them.
The Only Party had always controlled the villeins because it controlled the choice of pretenders to the throne. A pretender gained the Presidency by buying it, and the rich who provided that money controlled as vassals those who accepted their money. The pretenders were as straw and melons sold in a market.
Furthermore, the scribes and oracles of the Kingdoms said aloud only those things that were meet for the surrounding peasantry to hear. The puissant spell of Political Correctness amounted to a societal mute button and prevented the Holy Orders within the Three Kingdoms from noticing what stirred without.
Until the Trump Monster came raging, slouching toward Bethlehem, with which the Kingdoms confused themselves.
And there was afright and desperation and rending of teeth and gnashing of hair for many were the rice bowls threatened.
The darkest of horrors was that the serfs might come to choose the manner of their government. For long years the Bicephalous Party had presided over that most desirable form of democracy, in which the people had no power. This laudable state they had maintained by never talking about anything of substance, such as unending wars in remote lands beyond the edges of the maps, or the importation of slaves from curious and unwholesome countries or the manufactures of all things by foreign dwarves.
A great broil ensured. The people saw for the first time a chance to manage their destinies and rose up for the Trump Monster. Inside the Beltway, the Wise and Good–for did they not so denominate themselves?–were greatly astonished. “What manner of wight can this be?” they asked in wonder. They said that the Trump Monster was beguiling fools, the cracked, and those who represented the worst in America. And the scribes and oracles were sore afraid, for most of the outlying populace appeared to belong to these tribes.
One of the Two Names of the One Party, the Democrats, sent forth a dreadful creature called Hillary to fight in single combat with the Trump Monster. Her very visage turned men to stone, it was said. She was held to be of one blood with Boadicea, Jeanne d’Arc, Lucretia Borgia, and Bonnie Parker.
The Three Kingdoms were at one with her, as she was corrupt, mendacious, criminal, and ugly, as well as suffering coughing fits and dizzy spells. Surely, said the scribes and oracles, any monster must fly screaming from her mere presence.
Yet it seemed that the Trump was no common monster. Every time he was beset by the scribes and oracles of the Beltway, he grew stronger, and a sulfurous smoke breathed from his mouth. With drawn swords the Trump Monster and the crumbling ruin yclept Hillary circled each other.
And beyond the parapets and crenellations of the Three Kingdoms the sky grew darker. Inside the Beltway and in Manhattan, the disembodied heads railed and raged, but with every blast the helots jointed the Trump Monster in larger numbers, for they hated the Insiders. In Hollywood the Half-Educated Narcissists said ever stupider things, but these had not their usual effect.
In their pride the Three Kingdoms had engendered Nemesis, and they watched in terror behind the ramparts as the sky grew darker and strange shapes twisted in the looming clouds and the Trump Monster strode ever nearer, breathing fire.
The chairman of Smartmatic’s board, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, currently serves on the board of George Soros’s Open Society Foundation and has close ties to the billionaire.
The Wall Street Journal dubbed the Republican party’s online adventure on Tuesday as “one of the biggest online votes conducted so far in the U.S.” and the “largest experiment with online presidential voting since 2004, when Michigan allowed Democrats to vote in a party caucus via the Internet.”
The Journal further reported:
Utah residents will have the option of casting ballots in the Republican presidential contest using computers, tablets, and smartphones next week. …
Online “polls” will be open between 7:00 a.m. and 11 p.m. on March 22. Voters will get a receipt that will verify that their vote was recorded correctly. The state party declined to release the number of online voter registrations that it has received. …
“We expect all the jurisdictions across the U.S. to take notice and to look at this experience as something to study and, hopefully, follow,” said Antonio Mugica, founder and chief executive of Smartmatic Group, an election-equipment vendor that is running the Utah election.
Mugica addressed security concerns about online voting, telling the Journal that Smartmatic has security protocols and backups of the election data should a recount be needed. He said he wasn’t aware of any security breaches.
The Journal did not cite the biography of Malloch-Brown, chairman of Smartmatic’s board. That biography is posted openly on Smartmatic’s website, and shows close associations between Malloch-Brown and Soros, a major donor to the Democratic Party and hundreds of liberal and radical-left groups.
The bio states:
Mark Malloch-Brown is a former number two in the United Nations as well as having served in the British Cabinet and Foreign Office. He now sits in the House of Lords and is active both in business and in the non-profit world. He also remains deeply involved in international affairs.
Mark served as Deputy Secretary-General and Chief of Staff of the UN under Kofi Annan. For six years before that he was Administrator of the UNDP, leading the UN’s development efforts around the world. He was later Minister of State in the Foreign Office, covering Africa and Asia, and was a member of Gordon Brown’s cabinet.
Other positions have included vice-chairman of George Soros’s Investment Funds, as well as his Open Society Institute, a Vice-President at the World Bank and the lead international partner at Sawyer Miller, a political consulting firm. He also has served as Vice-Chairman of the World Economic Forum. He began his career as a journalist at The Economist.
Besides formerly serving as vice-chairman of Soros’s Investment Funds and the billionaire’s Open Society Institute, Malloch-Brown is currently a global board member of Soros’s Open Society Foundation.
As further documented in his Smartmatic Group bio, Malloch-Brown also serves on the small board of the International Crisis Group, a Soros-financed international crisis management organization. Soros himself sits on the ICG’s small board.
Besides their worldwide headquarters in London, Smartmatic lists offices in 13 other countries. Their U.S. offices are located in Boca Raton, Florida.
Tuesday’s Utah GOP Caucuses are considered an important test for online voting, which seems poised to expand in future elections. Last month, Microsoft’s vote-counting technology was utilized in the Iowa Caucus.
Obama last week called for future online voting while speaking at the South by Southwest technology and music festival. He said the technology world should debate “how can we create safe, secure, smart systems for people to be able to vote much easier online.”
In a press release, Smartmatic’s Mugica responded directly to Obama’s call for online voting, stating, “President Obama’s call was surprising in only one respect—that it caused a stir.”
“In a world where we can buy a house, take a degree course, and access government services online, it does not make sense that elections don’t use tried and tested technology,” added Mugica. “I agree with the President. The future of democracy is digital.”
In January 2014, Obama’s 10-person Presidential Commission on Election Administration released its recommendations for reforming the U.S. election process, including transitioning to voting via tablet computers and other technologies, as Breitbart reported.
The commission recommended:
Software-only products can be integrated with off-the-shelf commercial hardware components such as computers, laptops, tablets, scanners, printers, and even machine-readable code scanners and signature pad products.
Tablet computers such as iPads are common components of these new technologies. They can be integrated into the check-in, voting, and verification processes in the polling place.
The commission highlighted new technologies in which the voter can “pre-fill” sample ballots at home to be scanned later at the polling place.
The panel dismissed concerns about hacking. The commission stated: “The fact that a tablet or off-the-shelf computer can be hacked or can break down does not mean such technology is inherently less secure than existing ballot marking methods if proper precautions are taken.”
Testimony on how electronic voting is manipulated to fix elections
Shhhh. I’ve just come from a meeting of the Republican Establishment. You know, those guys who want to replace what the voters want with what they want. That Republican Establishment. I’m not supposed to tell you what was said, so don’t quote me. I’ve been to every Republican National Convention since 1964 and I’ve worked the floor in every convention since 1972 including for Ronald Reagan in 1976, the last time we had a contested GOP Convention. So let’s just say I know the ropes.
Despite his historic run in the primaries, Trump will never, repeat never, get the nomination if this bunch can stop him. Forget about them conceding Trump the victory once he gets to the magic 1237 (Fifty percent of the available delegates). They’ve cooked up a strategy to be employed at all costs to steal delegates from Trump so that he’ll fall below the 1237 on the first ballot, and then, before the second ballot to present one of their group (Mitt Romney, call your office) as the Savior of the Grand Old Party. While each state’s individual law governs, most delegates are not bound to the candidate that brought them once the first ballot is over. Stall Trump on the first ballot and the Bush-Romney-Rubio-Kasich-Ryan-McConnell combine can go really to work
Cleveland, ladies and gentlemen, won’t be for the faint of heart.
The insiders have poured over the rules of the Republican Party (well, heck, they WROTE those rules in the first place) and they have found a way to lie, cheat and steal Trump out of enough delegates to force a second ballot. Here is how they plan to do it: Rule 16 (d). This byzantine concoction of legalese, simply put, says that nobody can be a delegate if he is from a state where voters who are not registered Republicans can vote in the Republican primary. Like Massachusetts, where Trump got 22 delegates. Not like New Hampshire, where Democrats and Independents can officially re-register as Republicans going into the polling booth, vote on a Republican ballot, and re-register as a Dem on their way out, all on the same day. But like Arkansas, where Trump racked up 16 delegates.
Let me put it another way: in New Hampshire, Republican primary ballots are only given to registered Republicans, even if the voter registered as a Republican exactly 7 ½ seconds before getting the ballot and switched back to Democrat 12 seconds after he voted Republican. The point is the voter was an official Republican when he got the ballot and voted. Other states omit this nicety and just ask voters which ballot they want when they walk in, regardless of their registration. The GOP bigwigs plan on challenging Trump’s delegates from those states.
Missouri is an example of another opportunity for the establishment to practice chicanery. Missouri’s rules regarding delegate selection are clear and simple to follow: the winner in each of the state’s eight congressional districts gets 5 votes. The winner of the entire state then gets an extra 12 votes. Easy, peasey, right? WRONG. Missouri law doesn’t require county election authorities to report votes by congressional district, only by county. But ever since Baker v. Carr (the “one man, one vote” case) congressional districts don’t mirror county lines, because all 435 congressional districts have to have roughly the same number of people in them, and county lines don’t change as easily as congressional district lines. So, the Secretary of State of Missouri, Jason Kander – The youngest statewide elected official in America – a DEMOCRAT- will make the decision how many delegates to certify to each candidate, Trump, Cruz and Kasich. That sound you hear is of lawyers busily writing lawsuits to file if the county election officials refuse to report by congressional district, and we’ll see what happens in the next few days. But back to the convention steal.
The GOP Kingmakers may argue that Rule 38 – which prohibits states from requiring their delegations from voting as a unit, by a majority vote of all members of their state delegation—could,be interpreted to mean that delegates are not bound at all, even on the first ballot! (However tortured this reasoning is, all you have to remember is that the courts aren’t the ones to interpret these rules, they are going to have the meaning that a majority (there’s that pesky 1237 number) of delegates who survive any challenges to being seated, give to these rules. That brings us now to the mechanics of the steal, which is to say, contests to seating particular individual delegates.
Not later than 22 days before the July convention starts, there will be a meeting of the Standing Committee on Contests, whose membership is drawn from the Republican National Committee (“RNC”…the ultimate party “establishment”) to hear any “contest,” meaning “challenge” to the right of any specific person to be a delegate. These contests must be filed 30 or more days before the planned start of the convention. Then, the Standing Committee makes its recommendation to the full RNC which will have the final say, again, before the convention even begins. However, they don’t have the final say. On the first day of the convention, the Convention Committee on Credentials will meet to hear appeals of the RNC’s decisions. Since this Committee is comprised of ordinary delegates (not necessarily RNC elites) this is where the Big-Shot’s secret plan can come unraveled. That is if Donald’s operatives have these rules, and particularly rules 19-25, memorized by heart and are canny enough to know exactly how and when to use these rules to advantage.
But all is not is lost to The Donald’s cause – far from it. If he is close to the magic number on the first ballot he has the Vice Presidential nomination to barter with on the second. Widespread voter fraud in Texas and Oklahoma and the structure of the ballot in Ohio could sustain challenges before the entire convention to the seating of those delegations. After all, this is precisely how Dwight D. Eisenhower wrested the nomination from Bob Taft in 1952. But make no mistake: the Big Steal is ON.
Roger Stone (StoneZone.com) served as an advisor to the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump and remains a close confidante of the Republican front runner.
“The businessman and political novice, Donald Trump, has built a strong lead in the Republican party primary, and looks the firm favorite to be the party’s candidate in the US presidential election in November,” the unit reports, categorizing his election as a “high impact” risk.
According to the report Trump threatens “free trade,” that is to say globalist domination of markets, and is hostile toward NAFTA, the Bill Clinton era “trade deal” that sucked more than a million jobs out of America and produced a $181 billion US trade deficit with NAFTA partners Mexico and Canada.
“In the event of a Trump victory, his hostile attitude to free trade, and alienation of Mexico and China in particular, could escalate rapidly into a trade war—and at the least scupper the Trans-Pacific Partnership between the US and 11 other American and Asian states signed in February 2016.”
The Rothschild unit expects Trump, if nominated (and the Republican establishment is furiously plotting his demise; see Roger Stone), will lose to hands-on favorite Hillary Clinton, who is backed by the financial elite, in particular the great vampire squid, Goldman Sachs.
Despite the EIU’s certainty Trump will lose, they warn “there are risks to this forecast, especially in the event of a terrorist attack on US soil or a sudden economic downturn.”
However, in the event Trump wins, “innate hostility within the Republican hierarchy towards Mr Trump, combined with the inevitable virulent Democratic opposition, will see many of his more radical policies blocked in Congress—albeit such internal bickering will also undermine the coherence of domestic and foreign policy making,” in other words pose a serious risk to the globalist agenda.
As previously noted the Republican establishment is working hard to undermine Trump.
On Monday Infowars reported on remarks made by Curly Haugland of the Republican National Committee. He said delegates may “vote according to their personal choice in all matters to come before the Republican National Convention, including the vote to nominate the Republican Candidate for President” and disregard voters.
Haugland expanded his remarks on Wednesday. He told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” voters are irrelevant in the selection of a candidate for the presidential nomination. “The rules are still designed to have a political party choose its nominee at a convention. That’s just the way it is. I can’t help it. Don’t hate me because I love the rules,” Haugland added.
Dr Ben Carson is a retired neurosurgeon and Presidential candidate who recently dropped out of the elections. Carson made some amazing comments recently while endorsing Donald Trump at a press conference. 46 minutes into the conference embedded below, Carson explained to the media that he was backing Donald Trump because Hilary Clinton was a cohort of a communist named Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky was a Jesuit trained communist, who was instructed by the Jesuit’s on how to overthrow America by infiltrating the political system. The Jesuit’s have been infiltrating and overthrowing governments for centuries, and they were banned from multiple nations over the years for political intrigue and assassinations. President Obama was trained in Saul Alinsky communist tactics by a Jesuit named Greg Galuzzo. Galuzzo was the director of the Saul Alinsky group called The Gamaliel foundation.
Saul Alinsky wrote a book called ‘Rules for radicals’ that was dedicated to Lucifer (the true god of the Jesuit Order). The book ‘Rules for radicals’ is a blueprint on how to destroy the US constitution and bill of rights, and turn the country into a fascist dictatorship. Rules for radicals is also a training manual for hardcore leftists (the left is controlled by the Jesuit Order) who are now aiding and abetting the Islamic invasion of Europe. The left are being used by the Jesuit Order to destroy the Judaeo-Christian nations of Europe and they want to do the same thing to America. Rules for radicals instructs leftists on how to use hardcore and extreme tactics, to defeat their opponents and force their agenda on people. The UAF (United against fascism) in the UK use these kind of tactics to shut down any criticism of Islam in the UK. The UAF has been linked to a number of radical Islamic terrorists, and it also recieves funding from radical Islamic groups in addition to government funding. Most of the UAF members are college aged communists with some Muslim members. The UAF is in fact a UK government protected and funded street army that violently attacks any group that disagrees with left wing policies and Islam.
All these violent, extreme and aggressive left wing communist groups are controlled by the Jesuit Order. The Jesuit’s are using the left to destroy nations within so they can orchestrate their Islamic invasion of Judaeo-Christian nations and fascist agenda without any opposition. Donald Trump wants to preserve America’s constitution and defend it from an Islamic invasion, so the Jesuit’s are using their Saul Alinsky trained communists (Hilary Clinton and violent protest groups) to stop him. The tactics of the Jesuit controlled extreme left communists is the same in all Western countries. Anyone who opposes: mass Islamic immigration, collapsed borders (for a world government) and financial looting of wealthy Protestant nations; is attacked with violence and intimidation. The well funded extreme left will manufacture hysteria and lies, while shutting down their political opponents with organized violence so their free speech is shut down. Saul Alinsky trained communists are trained in community organizing, which involves shutting down their opponents with organized violence and mass hysteria. President Obama was a Jesuit trained Saul Alinsky community organizer, just like the community organizers who organized the recent violent protest at a Donald Trump rally which resulted in the cancellation of the event. According to my research the chaotic protest which resulted in the cancellation of a Donald Trump event, was organized by Jesuit Saul Alinsky trained community organizers. The extreme leftists involved in the Donald Trump protests are paid to do this according to my research, because the hardcore left are a very well funded movement. The leftists in Europe who violently shut down any protest against radical Islam are also paid to do this as well. In conclusion the extreme left wing communist movement which is funded to defend Islamic domination and a world government is a major tool of the Jesuit Order to ensure the destruction of wealthy Protestant/Judaeo-christian nations.
Carson’s comments sited in this article occur at 46:00
If you do a search on the internet the majority of conspiracy researchers believe that Jews and Zionists are the leaders of the New World Order and Illuminati. Researchers claim that wherever you look in politics and big business there is a Jew who is in control. To the untrained eye Jews seem to be in very important positions of power.
But if you wish to understand the Illuminati and New World Order you need to look at how the Italian Mafia operates. Have you ever seen the movie ‘Casino’ with Robert DeNiro and Joe Pesci? This movie is based on true events. In the movie; the Italian Mafia secretly controls the Tangiers casino in Las Vegas. The Mafia orders a union boss to invest one hundred million dollars into a casino the Mafia controls, as the Mafia are the real controllers of the casino. The Mafia employs academic Jews to manage and direct the casino’s day to day operations (Phillip Green and Frank Rosenthal). On the surface it seems as if the casino is owned and controlled by Jews, but this is not the case at all. In reality these Jews are managing the casino for an Italian crime syndicate, and if they don’t obey the orders of the Mafia they will be shot. The Mafia uses the casino as a money laundering operation and skims millions of dollars from the casino as they truly own it. It has been proven that the Italian Mafia have owned businesses in other people’s names for years. Basically the Mafia gives someone money and tells them to buy a business so that it seems that; that person owns it, but in reality the Mafia owns the business and completely controls it.
Above: An actor in the movie Casino plays the role of a Jew who was made CEO of a Casino that was controlled by the Mafia and Jesuit Order. The Jew is put in the spotlight while the true owners and controllers hide in the shadows.
Above: The Jew Frank Rosenthal hosts his Casino based TV show. Rosenthal was also a senior director of the Tangiers Casino which was owned and controlled by the Mafia and Jesuit Order. Rosenthal was just another educated business manager managing a piece of the Vatican’s empire.
Many conspiracy researchers have pointed to the current US president Barak Obama and his communist training. It is clear that Obama is implementing a communist/fascist revolution in the United States, as his executive orders and desired policies seem to contradict the US constitution. Obama’s executive orders and programs seem to mirror those of communist countries, so it’s clear Obama is following a communist model. Many conspiracy researchers point to Obama’s Saul Alinksy communist training. Saul Alinksy was a famous communist Jew from Chicago who worked for the Jesuits. It has been proven that Obama was politically trained with Saul Alinsky’s communist doctrines, but most people don’t know that Alinsky worked for the Jesuits. Saul Alinksy was just another Papal court Jew who wrote Jesuit communist teachings in books, which were used to train future political leaders who would man the world Jesuit empire. The Jesuits would never put their own names on their communist training books as they hide in the shadows behind others. As discussed; the Jesuits first choice of person to hide behind is a Jew, as it’s the Jesuits intention to blame the Jews for everything.
From 1986 Greg Galluzzo (a Jesuit Priest) was the director of the communist Gamaliel foundation where both Saul Alinksy (until his death in 1972) and President Obama worked. Obama worked as a trainer and consultant at the Gamaliel foundation where he learned Alinky’s communist Jesuit teachings. While Obama worked at Gamaliel it was directed by a Jesuit. It is clear that Obama had some kind of Jesuit training while he worked at the communist Gamaliel foundation from 1985-1988. For at least two years Barak Obama was trained and in submission to a Jesuit (Greg Galluzzo). This is extremely important as this clearly proves the current US President who is doing more damage to the US than any other in history; was trained in politics by a Jesuit (Greg Galluzzo). It is clear that the Jesuit’s at a minimum taught Obama how to destroy the US through: immigration, executive orders and communist ideologies. It is my contention through extensive research that the Jesuits continue to control Obama and most of the world today, as the Jesuits are the leaders and controllers of the New World Order.
The Gamaliel foundation says this about its goals, “Gamaliel’s goal is “to assist local community leaders to create, maintain and expand independent, grassroots, and powerful faith-based community organizations” that have the power to influence political and economic decisions that impact cities and regions.” (Wikipedia)
The Gamaliel foundation was clearly a powerful organization with much political power and it was run by a Jesuit and
trained future Presidents and political leaders, it also was a place littered with communists who were Jesuit trained. Obama was in fact trained by a Jesuit controlled organization before becoming President. But notice how Obama is always connected to the well-known communist Jew; Saul Alinsky. Alinsky is very well known and even famous as a communist and Marxist. Well known musician Ted Nugent has appeared on radio shows such as Infowars a number of times, and has explained how Obama was trained in communism and Marxism by Saul Alinksy doctrines, but what people like Ted don’t know is that it is the Jesuit’s who controlled Alinksy. Alinksy is merely a Papal court Jew. A Papal court Jew is an academically bright Jew who the Jesuit’s and Vatican would employ to manage their finances and businesses. Jews have historically been very good accountants, and the Vatican and Mafia have used them over the years to manage their finances and businesses. But make no mistake; the Jesuit’s and Mafia are in control, if a Jew does not do as he is told, he is simply assassinated or punished. Alinsky worked directly for the Jesuit’s and the Jesuits trained Obama in Marxism and communism as ordered by the Jesuit Greg Galluzzo. The relationship between Galluzzo, Alinksy and Obama, shows us how the Jesuit controls nations and political leaders by using the Jew as a buffer to disguise their control of nations. The Jesuits are extremely cunning and intelligent and they rarely make mistakes, but by placing the Jesuit Greg Galluzzo as director of the Gamaliel foundation, they clearly showed that they controlled both Alinsky, Obama and the Gamaliel foundation. The protocols of the learned elders of Zion are also a Jesuit created book. The protocols were originally written as a book called, ‘The secret instructions of Borg Fontaine.’ The instructions of Borg Fontaine were written by the Jesuit Order as instructions on how to take over the world, however the book was later re-formatted, edited, renamed and put in public circulation to further blame the Jews for what the Jesuit’s were doing. I’m certain Saul Alinksy’s communist books were written by the Jesuit’s (and Alinksy maybe helped with the publication and editing), and the Jesuits then put these books in circulation to train political leaders such as Obama. When citizens get angry about what is happening to their country they would connect Alinsky with Obama and then blame the Jews on everything (This is what the Jesuits want you to think). Fortunately we can link the Jesuit’s to Obama and Alinsky through Greg Galluzzo and the Gamaliel foundation, and we can know it is the Jesuit’s who are behind America’s political turmoil.
The Jesuit’s need someone to take the blame if the New World Order and Illuminati is ever exposed and attacked, and that’s why the Jesuit’s create the illusion that Jews are in control when this is not the case. Most Jews are great citizens and are not involved in any New World Order conspiracy, and even many of the Jews working for the Jesuits are just trying to make a living by working in: business, politics and banking. Many of these Jews have worked hard in school and are just trying to make a living with their University degree and education, and because these Jews perform well in University, they are picked out by the Jesuits (who control and own many of the top Universities in the USA and abroad), and they are employed to man the Jesuit world empire. Obama was definitely picked out by the Jesuit’s to control the United States for the Jesuit Order. According to former Jesuit, Alberto Rivera, the Jesuits controlled the communist political party in Spain, and it seems they are implementing a full communist revolution through Obama; to gain even more control over the USA.
One Jewish name constantly accused of controlling the New World Order is the Rothschild family, but if you actually study the history of the Rothschild’s and observe their historical titles in old encyclopaedia’s, you will see that the Rothschild’s have merely been accountants and bankers for the Vatican and Jesuits. The Rothschild’s have been known historically as very educated and reliable bankers and accountants. They were often hired by Kings and Nobles to manage their finances because of their accountancy skills. After the Rothschild’s demonstrated their skills in finance, they were employed as Papal court Jews by the Vatican and Jesuit Order and became known as Vatican treasury guardians. If you look at the Rothschild’s official title throughout history they were known as ‘the guardians of the Papal treasury’. Many historical encyclopaedias’ document the Rothschild’s as being guardians of the Papal treasury. The Rothschild’s continue to manage the Vatican’s wealth today with a Jesuit sword over their heads.The Rothschild’s are merely accountants. But the Jesuit’s in their demonic wisdom push the Rothschild’s and many other Jews to the front of finance and politics; so the Jews will be blamed for everything. Pushing Saul Alinsky as Obama’s key influence will be used as a pretext to persecute Jews when things get bad in the US, but people need to research deeper and see that Alinsky merely a front man for the Jesuit Order. Jesuit Greg Galluzzo was Obama’s boss, mentor and political trainer.
According to some researchers such as Eric Phelps, when the immigration and communist policies start destroying America, the Jesuit’s will raise up a right wing fascist government that will blame Jews for the unrest and begin persecuting them. It seems the seeds being sown in the alternative media about Jews being the leaders of the New World Order may be used as a pretext to start persecuting and killing Jews. Although the Jesuit’s use some token Jews to manage their finances and businesses, the Jesuit’s consider the Jews as an obstacle to Papal world supremacy and wish to exterminate them. Former church of Satan leader and high level Illuminati programmer, Michael Aquino (also a top NSA officer), has strong Nazi beliefs and has engaged in Satanic rituals which sought to summon spirits connected with Nazi leaders. It seems a Nazi type fascist government which persecutes Jews, true Christians and libertarian’s is the goal of the New World Order. According to people such as Eric Phelps, once the Jesuit’s use Obama and other controlled politicians to bring in Muslim extremists and other hostiles to wage civil war in the United States; the Jesuit’s will then use this crisis to raise up a Nazi right wing government which will blame the Jews for the crisis. This Nazi right wing government will confiscate guns and suspend the US constitution while being cheered as heroes as they round up and kill the Muslims; this Nazi government will then blame the Jews for all the problems and demand persecution of the Jews. Meanwhile the Jesuit’s are laughing in the background as the Jews get blamed for their conspiracy, and their right wing Nazi government has more control over the USA and its citizens then it ever did. Once this Jesuit controlled government exterminates the Muslims in the USA and imprisons and persecutes the Jews, they will then start persecuting any Christian who doesn’t worship the Pope. With confiscated guns and a suspension of the US constitution following a civil war with Islam in the US, the Jesuit’s will be able to begin a new Roman Catholic inquisition in the United States. The US will come under complete Jesuit control. When Hitler ruled Germany through the Nazi party it was governed through a right wing fascist government. Right wing fascism is communism as it involves complete government control over every area of life, and it also involves persecuting anyone who it perceives as a threat to its power. Obama is preparing the US for a communist right wing fascist government through his executive orders and legislations, which he was trained to implement by his Jesuit master, Greg Galluzzo.
Once the Islamic civil war and other government orchestrated problems breakout in the US, the Jesuits will implement a full takeover of the US through: FEMA, Department of Homeland Security (originally founded by a Jesuit volunteer corps member) and an international police force which adheres to UN law (The Vatican’s Knights of Malta have observer status on the UN council) as opposed to the US constitution. It has also been said that the Jesuit’s and New World Order may even stage a mock UFO/alien invasion of the US as a pretext to implement martial law. As you study the Jesuit and Greg Galluzzo connection to President Obama, understand it is the Jesuit’s who are pulling the strings of these various conspiracies.
The Mafia is a Jesuit controlled organization as even former Mafia boss Tony Gambino admitted on radio (the Arctic Beacon show), that the Jesuit Order and Vatican controlled the five Mafia families of New York. Gambino began exposing the Jesuit and Mafia connection after his wife and children were killed in a car bomb. The Jesuit’s rule the Illuminati and other secret societies just like they rule the Mafia; they put Jews at the front of their affairs while they secretly rule behind the scenes. Many of these Jews just want a legitimate job after completing their education, but are often forced to work for the Mafia (controlled by the Jesuits) as accountants and CEO’s. Other well educated Jews are forced to work as senior bankers for banks and corporations controlled by the Jesuit New World Order. It seems nothing has changed for hundreds of years; the Vatican continues to rule and hires its Papal court Jews to count its money. The New World Order is a Jesuit and Vatican conspiracy.
No child (or student, or poor person, or grandchild, or debt holder, or healthy person, or retiree, or African American, or family, or homeowner, or renter) left
Now that is a legacy.
Infowars reporter Richard Reeves is on the ground in Iowa gauging the public’s reaction to the laundry list of candidates.
At a rally yesterday, Donald Trump sent a shot down the bow of Neocons who want endless war. Establishment candidates such as Jeb, Hillary, and Obama have proven their ineptitude regarding effective combat and have failed to secure victory causing further destabilization in the Middle East.
Alex Jones interviews leading presidential candidate Donald Trump on The Alex Jones Show.
“I’ve resisted the idea that Donald Trump could and would become the Republican nominee,” writes GOP strategist Alex Castellanos in an email assessment of the presidential race. “Unhappily, I’ve changed my mind.”
Castellanos, who once said flatly that “Trump is not going to be the nominee,” writes “the odds of Trump’s success have increased and been validated in the past few weeks.”
The key indicator, Castellanos says, is the fact that Trump dipped in the polls and now appears to be rising again. “In my experience, that tells us something important,” Castellanos explains:
Republican voters went through a period of doubt about Trump, an understandable window of buyer’s remorse. They went shopping for someone else — but returned, finding no acceptable alternative who could match Trump’s bad-boy strength and his capacity to bring indispensable change. … Fearing they have only one last chance to rescue their country, they found no one else as big as their problem.
“In my experience, once voters doubt but return, doubting again is less likely,” Castellanos concludes. “A candidate’s vote hardens.”
Castellanos, who played a key role in Mitt Romney’s 2008 campaign, believes either Trump or Ben Carson will win the Iowa caucuses. If it’s Trump, Castellanos sees him going on to win New Hampshire and then the nomination. Even if Carson wins Iowa, Castellanos sees a strong chance of Trump winning New Hampshire and then going on to take the nomination.
If Trump wins Iowa and/or New Hampshire, Castellanos sees a “desperate GOP establishment” trying to settle on an “anti-Trump,” perhaps Marco Rubio, to bring Trump down. But that would be a very difficult task. “History is not kind to candidates who play the long game,” Castellanos writes. “No GOP nominee in modern history has failed to win either Iowa or NH. Period.”
Castellanos believes that will remain the case in 2016. And for those who say there is still plenty of time left for the race to change in all sorts of ways, Castellanos disagrees. “Time is running out. Benghazi hearings, a debt fight, Halloween, Putin kicking over our lemonade stand a couple of times, Thanksgiving, Christmas, then one quick month until we start voting Feb. 1st. This race is solidifying and there isn’t much time left for it to change. As Yogi Berra might have said, ‘what comes later happens earlier than it used to.'”
Notice the message held up for Trump in the picture that says: ‘The Organization Of Iranian American Patriots fully supports Donald Trump for the President Of The United States’
“Wallace and Fox News are obsolete”
During his daily press briefing Friday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest responded to comments a man made calling President Barack Obama a non-American Muslim at a Donald Trump campaign rally.
“My first observation is, is anyone really surprised that this happened at a Donald Trump rally?” Earnest asked. “I don’t think anyone who has been paying attention to Republican politics is at all surprised. … The reason for that is the people who hold these offensive views are part of Mr. Trump’s base.”
The incident occurred when Trump, the front runner in the Republican presidential primary, took questions from the audience at a rally in New Hampshire Thursday. A man who was in attendance asked Trump about Muslims in the US.
“We have a problem in this country — it’s called Muslims,” the man said. “We know our current president is one.”
The man then said of Obama, “You know he’s not even an American — birth certificate, man!”
In the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election, Trump repeatedly raised widely debunked conspiracy theories that Obama was not born in this country.
At the rally, Trump implied that he did want to discuss Muslims, but he never addressed or refuted the man’s claim about the president.
“We need this question, this is the first question,” Trump said.
When the man responded that his main question was about alleged “training camps” and how we might be able to “get rid of” those camps, Trump gave a generic answer.
“We’re going to be looking at a lot of different things, and a lot of people are saying that and saying that bad things are happening out there. We’re going to be looking at that and plenty of other things,” Trump said.
Trump subsequently released a statement saying that rather than Obama’s religion or birthplace, “the bigger issue is that Obama is waging a war against Christians in this country.”
Yet Obama goes on forever about being a Muslim in this video
Whiskey Tangos never lie about their nature. Why does the Obama?
Is Donald Trump a stooge for Hillary Clinton? Is he a plant, a ringer to sink other Republican candidates who actually have a chance of defeating Hillary?
It looks like Trump and it acts like Trump – energetically eviscerating opponents, impervious to their attacks. The honey badger seems like the perfect metaphor for Donald Trump and his rampage through the Republican primary field, where he now tops the polls.
The GOP inner circle were hoping for a dull, boring campaign, ending in the anointment of the dweebish Jeb Bush or some other candidate with the “new, improved Hispanic appeal” that they keep hoping (forlornly) will reverse the demographic slide of the GOP. That plan has now been ripped to shreds, like an unlucky snake in the jaws of the honey badger. Even if they could find some way of stopping Trump, the man has already left his mark on the 2016 Presidential Race by tapping into the rising ethnocentric tide of American politics, something that is hardly likely to dissipate when the liberal left is engaged in a massive culture war against White identity.
Another characteristic of the honey badger is that it leaves plenty of scraps for jackals and other petty scavengers. If Trump doesn’t make the final cut, which Republican unworthy will be the jackal snapping up the morsels left by the mighty honey badger?