Tag Archives: Gun Control

What Seizure Of 10,000 Illegal Firearms Look Like

http://i2.wp.com/shtfplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/seized-guns-spain-3.png?w=500

Have you ever seen a deactivated firearm and thought to yourself, “I wonder if I can restore that piece to its former glory?” Obviously that’s super illegal in pretty much every country, which is why you probably quickly disregarded that fantasy.

Of course, there are always people who are willing to take that risk, especially if they can make a lot of money doing it. It’s a fairly common practice among arms dealers in the black market. A deactivated firearm is often just a few modifications away from a functioning firearm, so these pieces are ideal for underground gun manufacturers who want to get most of their gun parts without raising any eyebrows.

One such criminal operation was busted in Spain earlier this year. Spanish authorities managed to capture 10,000 illegal firearms that included rifles, machine guns, and handguns, as well as 400 grenades. Five people associated with the gang that owned these weapons were arrested in January after that massive stockpile was captured. The police have said that some of these weapons were “capable of shooting down aircraft.”

Since you’re probably a normal person who doesn’t spend a lot of time around black market gun runners, here’s what 10,000 firearms looks like:

http://i2.wp.com/shtfplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/seized-guns-spain-2.png?w=560

http://i1.wp.com/shtfplan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/seized-guns-spain.png?w=500

The operation was run under the guise of a historical weapons workshop. They legally bought deactivated weapons online, restored them, and then sold them on the black market all over western Europe. They also used a sporting goods store as a front for their distribution operation, and they had equipment to create forged certificates of reactivation.

All told, the weapons confiscated by the police are believed to be worth around 10 million euros. Given the current state of Europe, the authorities fear that there is a serious risk of these kinds of restored weapons falling into the hands of terrorists.

It just goes to show, the law can only do so much to keep firearms out of the hands of these people. Even in the heart of western Europe where gun laws are incredibly strict, the outlaws will always find a way.

By Daniel Lang | SHTFplan.com

Diplomatic Carry

Is it right for “officials” to maintain the right to keep and bear,
when we the people, their employers, cannot?

In this country, the people are the sovereigns and government is the servant.
It’s time to put force behind those words.

Discretionary carry
May issue carry
Shall issue carry
Right to Carry
Discreet Carry
Freedom to Carry
Constitutional Carry
Diplomatic Carry

THE SECOND, SECOND AMENDMENT

Officials travel armed. When a contingent of our officials visits any other country, they bring armed personnel in classic right-to-bear-arms manner. Life is dangerous and the ability to protect yourself is a reasonable and prudent thing, a fundamental human right of existence, a moral imperative. So they go armed. It’s only rational. Hillary and similar bring along enough firepower that if some of their group go one way while some head off in another, they’re both covered.

The same is true in reverse. When an ambassador from Trashcanistan comes to the United States, discreetly armed bodyguards accompany the party at all times, “laws to the contrary notwithstanding.” That’s lawyer-speak for “their right to carry supersedes any other rules,” or in plainer English, “We’re above those laws.” The ambassador might decide to personally carry too. I’m guessing Hillary does not.

There’s this whole “second system” of gun possession and carry here domestically, another layer of rules on top of the common ones you must follow, operating quietly with people in the know cooperating.

Where are the laws for this exception to every gun law on the U.S. books? How does this special class of people exempt themselves from laws controlling the rest of us?

https://i1.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/lawsfor.jpg

No one is harmed by their exemption. In fact, community safety increases, because assaults on those armed people are naturally deterred, even defensible if needed. Should we the people maybe have Diplomatic Carry too? Is a diplomat’s life truly at more risk — or worth more — than any “commoner”? How does this comply with equal protection under the law?

Local authorities understand implicitly that these armed folks aren’t going to randomly shoot people, or settle arguments with gunfire, the same as you and me when we’re armed. They enjoy proper respect (even if they come from regimes that don’t deserve it). We on the other hand have rights denied haphazardly, even with Constitutional Carry. As good as it is, Constitutional Carry is not enough.

Americans need and deserve the next step, Diplomatic Carry.

The body politic moves slowly. After several decades of experience, police nationwide understand and operate just fine within a framework of millions of people traveling armed. As the number of people carrying arms for crime control has increased, assaultive crimes have decreased. The media generally calls this “a surprising decrease in crime that has the experts baffled.” All these people are walking around armed, expressly to forestall crime, and the media can’t understand why crime has dropped. But I digress.

Oh sure, armed forces within the U.S. — from local police to secretive agents our government is now filled with — keep a watchful eye on the armed diplomats, as well they should. They also provide backup in the event of need. The same as for us.

But in the big picture, diplomats have less need for an ever-present armed escort than the public. A rare few diplomats face death at the hands of the mobs. Thousands of citizens are murdered each year. Who needs protection more?

The freedom of Diplomatic Carry, a concept many of us can easily grasp, is mind boggling to the great unwashed. So insulated from any truth about firearms, victims of television and the government-run school system, they have imbedded ignorance that is hard to shake. Destructively misinformed kids and teachers compound the problem. I digress again.

Now, Diplomatic Carry is not going to happen overnight. Many voices will be raised in objection to such freedom.
And unfortunately, some opposition will come from people who consider themselves firearms enthusiasts. Establishing everyone’s uninfringed freedom to carry is scary, at least to some. But that’s OK. Real freedom is a house high on a hill.

Diplomatic Carry is a paradigm shift. A window into a world that could be, and ought to be, a lofty goal. Your right to your life and its protection cannot morally be denied. It is denied only by force, and there is only one viable countermeasure to force unfortunately, in this best of all possible worlds, and that’s countervailing force. I don’t like it, but there it is.

Diplomatic Carry is a new level of autonomy, of personal sovereignty. It raises the bar. In this country, the people are the sovereigns and the government is the servant. How do you justify the servants carrying arms if the masters cannot?
The only consistent position for free people to take is this:

Anything short of Diplomatic Carry is infringement.

Source: Western Rifle Shooters Association

Government Will Never Confiscate Your Guns Because You’ll Just Hand Them Over.

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic01.nyt.com%2Fimages%2F2015%2F10%2F22%2Fworld%2Faustraliaguns%2Faustraliaguns-master1050.jpg&sp=a5b7be738d67b00b94380d41ad8121a4

The world does not care about you.

And the transnational socialists want you and yours first in slave chains, then dead.

Them.

Or you.

Got it?

I see and hear a lot of talk about how a national gun registration and/or confiscation would be the trigger that would spark a second American Revolution, as patriots rise up to resist the jackbooted thugs who are going door-to-door taking away people’s arms.

I have bad news for everyone who’s waiting for national registration or a mass confiscation so they can get their armed rebellion on: a national database of gun owners already exists, and a national confiscation effort will never happen. Ever. Instead, you’ll hand over your firearms peacefully. All of them, even the ones you paid cash for to some random guy on Armslist in the dead of night.

Here’s a look at how it will play out in our not-too-distant future.

The NSA Knows Who You Are and What You Have

Second Amendment supporters have been so focused on this one little corner of the Bill of Rights that they’ve let the Fourth Amendment, which is supposed to protect citizens against unreasonable search and seizure, turn into dead letter.

The surveillance state that got started under Clinton picked up steam under Bush II, and Obama has expanded it even further. The NSA is tracking everyone, all the time, and they’re hooked into Facebook, Google, Amazon, and every other piece of web-based software that you’ve been using to shop for accessories for that AR you paid cash for (which your wife doesn’t even know you have).

If you don’t believe me, go read this article about just how much detailed info one private company, Facebook, has on you, including your web surfing, shopping, and even your driving and walking habits. Now think about the fact that the NSA is even less constrained by the law (and has way more resources) than Facebook and has access not only to Facebook’s detailed profile of you but to profiles created by many other sources, from your credit card company to your health insurance provider.

Oh sure, you may have gotten your hands on a few guns that would be impossible to trace, even by the NSA. Maybe you inherited a long gun from your grandpa, or maybe you met a guy in a gun show parking lot and paid cash and then never Googled anything related to that gun. So here’s a question for you: how many people like you exist, and how many of those type guns are suitable for urban combat against AR-15s with state-of-the-art optics? I know which of my guns are probably totally “in the black,” and I can’t imagine trying to mount an insurgency with any or all of them.

The fact is, most guys who have the kind of hardware suitable for a Civil War 2.0 have been shopping on Gunbroker or Armslist, and/or have filled out FFL paperwork like law-abiding citizens. I seriously doubt there’s enough firepower totally hidden from the NSA to sustain any kind of real rebellion.

So the registration ship has sailed. They know what you have and where to find you. Now, here’s how they’re going to get you to turn it over without a fight.

Hitting You Where It Hurts

When the government outlaws semi-automatic firearms, they won’t send cops or troops door-to-door to take them. No, first they’ll send out letters saying they know what you have, and that you have to turn it over by a given deadline or face a penalty.

It’ll be up to you to prove that you’re clean, and that you’ve handed over everything. They’ll have a list, and if they think you’re still holding, they’ll hit you with asset freezes.

Imagine not being able to get any money out of your bank account or from your credit cards, because your assets are frozen. The federal and state governments already do this if you owe back taxes–a simple letter to your bank, and all of your cards stop working. (Here’s an account from one of our editors of how this actually happened to him.) The bank doesn’t care about you, and they don’t have the interest or resources to find out if the government’s claim against you is bogus. No, they’ll just freeze your assets until you get things sorted with the government and the government tells them to unfreeze it all.

The other thing they’ll do is take your children.

Do you think Child Protective Services is going to let your children live in a house with potentially dangerous firearms? No way. Your kids will get picked up at school and taken into custody, and a social worker will show up at your door with the cops. Only when a thorough search has been conducted and the authorities are completely satisfied that your property is 100% gun-free will they let you see your little ones again. After all, we have to protect the children.

You’re not going to shoot at those cops, either, because then your kids will just end up in the foster system as wards of the state.

Not Nearly Enough for a Revolution

Oh, I’m sure there are folks reading this who are so off-grid that none of the above can touch them. Their guns are totally invisible to the NSA, their assets are all in the form of cash and physically held precious metals, and their kids are home-schooled on a well-guarded ranch.

But is that blessed group big enough to overthrow a determined US government? No, it ain’t.

The measures outlined above–a de facto gun registration database courtesy of the NSA and its private-sector allies, asset freezes for non-compliance, and the threat of CPS visits that hold your children hostage–will be sufficient to take well over 90% of the lawfully held guns out of civilian hands, all without firing a single shot.

The bitter truth is this: there will be no confiscation shock troops for you and your buddies to shoot back at, and we will discover too late that the rights-defenders’ fantasy–of one, crystal-clear moment when it’s time for everyone to rise up as one and take it all back–has been the establishment’s biggest ally and freedom’s deadliest enemy.

Why do you think they’ve let you have guns for this long? Because those guns have given you a false sense of security and kept you from doing something truly dangerous, like mass-organizing to pull all your money out of the big banks and to vote out the incumbents.

So if you’ve sat idly by, fondling your firearms and watching the surveillance state expand while your paycheck shrinks, relying on your gun stash to bail you out when things hit bottom, then the joke’s on you. You’ve already lost the war, and when you hand over your weapons it’ll be the last (and mostly symbolic) step in a process of total subjugation that slipped up and swallowed you while you were distracted with building your gun collection.

You may hate me and everything I’ve said here, but deep down, you know I’m right.

Update: A number of commenters are misreading this article. The headline doesn’t say I’ll hand them them over — it says you will. And yeah, I’m trolling you a bit with the tone of this piece by saying what you “will” and “won’t” do, but it’s because I’m trying to slap you awake. The main point that’s being made is this: if you’re waiting for a door-to-door confiscation, or even a national gun registry, then you’ll be waiting forever. Folks who like to talk about a causus belli will need get more creative in coming up with a “bright line”, because the ones so many of you are waiting for won’t ever appear. If this article has spurred you to think more clearly about what the end of liberty might actually look like, and about what you’ll do under scenarios other than the classic door-to-door confiscation scenario, then it has done its job.

By Bilj | All Outdoor


How Google and Facebook Will Turn the Nation Against Gun Owners

https://i2.wp.com/www.alloutdoor.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/big-brother-1984-660x393.jpg

You probably think Facebook and Google are throwing off geysers of money by dominating an industry known as “online advertising”, but those of us who’ve spent time on the inside of this beast know the industry by its true name: mass behavior modification.

It’s only a matter of time before these two companies openly go on the attack against American gun ownership, and when they do, they’ll form a foe far greater than any we’ve faced before. If you don’t believe that they can turn the tide of public opinion on firearms, a tide that lately seems to be going in our favor, then you’re not paying attention.

Consider the following three articles:

Go ahead and click through to the above. I’ll wait. Just skim them for now, but when you get a moment definitely go back and read them. They’re not from your favorite conspiracy site, and the people sounding the alarm have impeccable, mainstream academic credentials. You may think you’re immune to most of the techniques outlined above, but you’re not. And even if you were, what matters is that the country as a whole is not immune, not by a long shot.

To understand just how effective these manipulation techniques are, you need only consider how large Facebook and Google’s profits have grown based on their ability to get users to buy things via advertising. These companies’ ability to alter user behavior on a mass scale has been validated again and again by the one entity that you just can’t fool, and whose judgement isn’t clouded by political agendas: the market.

First They Came for the Jihadis, Then the Right-Wingers…

With all of this in mind, consider the very latest news on Google’s Jigsaw project, which is a deliberate use of all of its tools and techniques for the purposes of explicitly political behavior modification–first against would-be jihadis, and next against right-wing “radicals”.

GOOGLE HAS BUILT a half-trillion-dollar business out of divining what people want based on a few words they type into a search field. In the process, it’s stumbled on a powerful tool for getting inside the minds of some of the least understood and most dangerous people on the Internet: potential ISIS recruits. Now one subsidiary of Google is trying not just to understand those would-be jihadis’ intentions, but to change them.

Jigsaw, the Google-owned tech incubator and think tank—until recently known as Google Ideas—has been working over the past year to develop a new program it hopes can use a combination of Google’s search advertising algorithms and YouTube’s video platform to target aspiring ISIS recruits and ultimately dissuade them from joining the group’s cult of apocalyptic violence.

The Intercept reports on Google’s plan to turn the aforementioned tool against right-wingers:

A GOOGLE-INCUBATED PROGRAM that has been targeting potential ISIS members with deradicalizing content will soon be used to target violent right-wing extremists in North America, a designer of the program said at an event at the Brookings Institution on Wednesday…

“We are very conscious — as our own organization and I know Jigsaw are — that this [violent extremism] is not solely the problem of one particular group,” Frenett said.

“Our efforts during phase two, when we’re going to focus on the violent far right in America, will be very much focused on the small element of those that are violent. The interesting thing about how they behave is they’re a little bit more brazen online these days than ISIS fan boys,” Frenett said.

He noted that this new target demographic is more visible online.

“In the U.K., if someone in their Facebook profile picture has a swastika and is pointing a gun at the camera, that person is committing a crime,” Frenett said. “In the U.S., there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. So we found that when we’re looking for individuals that are genuinely at risk of carrying out violence, that they’re relatively open online.”

Adnan Kifayat, head of global security ventures at Gen Next Foundation, said he is optimistic about applying the ISIS approach to North America. “Our interest is in countering extremism … particularly in the homeland,” he told The Intercept.

Taking all of the above into account, what comes next is crystal-freaking-clear: a coordinated, private sector, mass behavior manipulation campaign aimed at stigmatizing and suppressing gun ownership and disguised as an effort to “do something” about the “gun violence epidemic” and “right-wing extremism.”

When the CDC was in the heyday of their smear campaign against guns, a PR effort that a prominent CDC official likened to the public campaign against smoking, that was just the warm-up. Those guys with their billboards and their op-eds were just pikers compared to the power of Google and Facebook.

When these two private sector behemoths, who know everything about you and who are wildly successful in using that knowledge to manipulate you, turn their sights on the “public menace” that is guns, then you’ll long for the days when the anti-gun movement was mostly just sad astroturf groups funded by a single New York billionaire. These companies can flip national elections, state and local elections, and public attitudes, all in secret and without spending nearly the kind of (traceable) money that Bloomberg does.

I don’t know what to tell you to do about it. I’m just warning you that it’s coming. These companies will begin to manipulate public opinion on gun ownership, and it will have an impact. It’s going to be up to us to figure out how to counter it.

By Bilj | All Outdoor

 

Obama Forgives 107 Gun Felons Amid Calls for Stricter Gun Control

Despotic regimes always employ criminals and misfits as force multipliers against law abiding citizens.

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheorbo1.files.wordpress.com%2F2014%2F01%2Fobama-is-mb.jpeg&sp=431ed9e9692e1fbc71b3836880cfd66d

President Barack Obama has forgiven 107 federal inmates who were convicted of gun crimes during his administration while at the same time pushing for stricter gun controls, according to a story in The Washington Times.

According to the Times report, of those 107 who were either pardoned or had their sentences commuted, their dealings with a gun included:

  • Using firearms while dealing drugs;
  • Carried firearms despite felony convictions;
  • Caught lying to gun dealers;
  • Carrying firearms with registration numbers removed.

Yet this is the President who repeatedly calls for reform to keep guns out of the wrong hands.

“This is the most incredible hypocrisy,” Erich Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America, told the Times. “The president has commuted the sentences of dangerous criminals who were convicted of gun-related charges. But then, he does everything in his power to block law-abiding gun owners from purchasing firearms.”

The Times reports Obama has forgiven a total north of 600 federal inmates, more than his nine predecessors combined. And just last week gave this explanation as to why.

“Our focus really has been on people who we think were overcharged and people who we do not believe have a propensity towards violence,” the Times quoted Obama.

Apparently 107 felons who carried guns while selling drugs don’t count as having a propensity for violence.

“On one hand, the Obama administration is attempting to limit law-abiding Americans from exercising their Second Amendment right and protecting themselves from harm,” Sen. Richard C. Shelby, R-Ala., told the Times. “On the other hand, the president will let criminals with firearm-related offenses off easy.”

https://i1.wp.com/libertyblitzkrieg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Screen-Shot-2016-01-05-at-3.37.16-PM-768x365.jpg

source: Rifleman III Journal

Related:

Americans Practice ‘Irish Democracy’ By Ignoring Unconstitutional Gun Laws

Obama: Time to Disarm Americans So They’ll Die Faster

Obama Administration Says America’s Legal Gun Owners Are a Threat, But ISIS is No Threat At All

How The FBI And DOJ Criminalize Honest Citizens While Allowing The Criminals In Washington To Get Away With Treason

 

Libertarian VP Candidate William Weld: AR-15s Can Be “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and Handguns Are “Even Worse”

https://i1.wp.com/www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/billweldgun-hillary.jpg

Even the Libertarian ticket is sold out to suck up Republican votes in an attempt to swing things Hillary’s way.

Take Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson’s vice presidential running mate William Weld.

https://i1.wp.com/www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/061207_building_nau_comm.jpg

The man was not just a signatory but a main chairman on the Council on Foreign Relations’ North American Union document, and he has personally described Hillary as an “old friend” he used to share an office with when they were investigating Watergate together where they formed a “lifelong bond” (see video below).

Now he’s also talking like Hillary when it comes to “scary” guns.

Via Red Alert Politics:

“The five-shot rifle, that’s a standard military rifle; the problem is if you attach a clip to it so it can fire more shells and if you remove the pin so that it becomes an automatic weapon, and those are independent criminal offenses,” Weld said. “That is when they become, essentially a weapon of mass destruction. The problem with handguns probably is even worse than the problem of the AR15.”

Weld also said he believed no one on a terrorist watch list should be allowed to purchase guns, even though, as the Huffington Post pointed out, it isn’t too hard for an innocent person to end up on the list.

Not exactly a very pro-freedom position from the Libertarian Party.

Indeed.

As Bearing Arms put it:

So according to Weld, I can take an old military rifle like a Mosin Nagant… attach clips to it… pull a pin… and then it will turn into a chemical, biological or radioactive weapon capable of causing widespread death and destruction.

Yep. Sounds like Weld wants to pander fear liberal left-style and destroy the 2nd Amendment just as much as his lifelong pal Hillary does.

by Melissa Dykes | The Daily sheeple

 

Hillary: “When I Win, We Will Start By Recalling All Rifles That Hurt People. We Must Stay Safe.”

https://i1.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/lawsfor.jpgLet this be as clear as day: Hillary Clinton will come for our guns. That is not a theory or a wild idea. She has said it, her aides have been caught on camera saying it, and she will do it if she is elected in November. We must never forget that.

When our Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they specifically made the Second Amendment to give the people a guaranteed right to bear arms and protect themselves. If the Amendment wasn’t that important, it wouldn’t have been so close the beginning.

At the Democratic National Convention, Hillary Clinton said: “I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns.” Well, she is a liar; just like Obama.

Come And Try To Take Our Guns AWAY!

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/screen-shot-2015-12-07-at-9-28-09-am.png?w=432&h=396

Clinton lies to the public about her true plans to abolish the Second Amendment, but the centerpiece of her campaign will be gun reductions. This is just another example of Clinton not understanding the American people, civil liberties, and the rights afforded to us under the Constitution.

Clinton thinks it is a bigger deal to take our guns away rather than addressing a real issue: abortion. She should be forbidding people from aborting children unless there are extenuating circumstances like rape or incest.

In the 1994 congressional elections and the 2000 presidential contest, Democrats ran a pro-gun control platform, and it destroyed them. So, now they claim “out loud” that they respect the Second Amendment, but once elected, they try to ban our right to protect.

Every time a tragedy happens in this country, what do Obama and Hillary say? They argue we need to reduce and take away guns. How about they spend time trying to address people with mental illnesses rather than trying to take away law-abiding citizens rights?

The Second Amendment Is In Place To Protect Us From People Like Hillary Clinton

https://riflemaniiijournal.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/hillary-bin-laden1.jpg?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

Last time I checked, it was jihadi terrorists or Black Lives Matter thugs that are shooting places up, not common, law-abiding Americans.

This year, Hillary Clinton has decided she will campaign on being anti-Second Amendment. This was a losing strategy in 1994 and 2000, so she can take that approach if she wants. Hillary is commonly on the wrong side of history.

Hillary’s 2016 platform mentions “the rights of responsible gun owners” but says nothing about the extent of those rights or the legal basis for them. There is no “half” or “partial” right to the Second Amendment—We The People control the entire part of.

We are legally allowed to protect ourselves from the government and any enemy when dictators like Hillary Clinton try to use the government to take away our protection.

Clinton’s Vision For Our Weapons

https://dailycrusadernewsdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/hillary_clinton_testimony_to_house_select_committee_on_benghazi1.png?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

The Second Amendment’s excision from the Democratic platform is consistent with Clinton’s opinion that District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 case in which the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to armed self-defense, was “wrongly decided.”

At the very least, that position means Clinton thinks the Second Amendment doesn’t guarantee the right to use guns for self-defense in the home, since the law overturned in Heller made it impossible to exercise that right.

But Clinton’s disagreement with the Supreme Court seems to go even further. In an interview last June, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pressed her to say whether “an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right.” She repeatedly dodged the question.

“If it is a constitutional right,” Clinton said, “then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulation.” That is nothing more than political correctness. She is all but only admitting she does not believe people have a constitutional right to firearms but that even voters who do believe that should be OK with her gun-control proposals.

She wants to ban so-called assault weapons, repeal the federal law that shields gun suppliers from legal liability for criminal misuse of their products, create new categories of people who are legally disqualified from owning firearms, and extend the federal background check requirement to all gun transfers.

Imagine how unsafe we would all be if the criminals had guns but the law-abiding people didn’t? Or, now that we have 13 million illegal aliens in this country and more Syrian refugees are coming, do we not have the right to protect ourselves anymore? Hillary doesn’t think we need protection. Remember, she argues Islam is peaceful.

In other words, Clinton wants to restrict the kinds of guns Americans can legally buy, take away people’s constitutional rights without due process, and block gun purchases by consumers, people with nonviolent felony records, and anyone who was ever forcibly treated for suicidal impulses. These are not policies that someone who takes the Second Amendment seriously would favor.

Let me fill you in on a secret: a majority of the mass shootings that have occurred in this country would NOT have prevented under Hillary or Obama’s gun control legislation’s. Obama and Hillary are using these poor families’ situations to push for gun control measures.

If after all of this you still don’t believe me, here is a Clinton delegate admitting her grand strategy while being filmed. The delegate had no idea she was being recorded, so she spoke freely. She is close to the Clinton campaign, too, by the way. She knows what the real plan is.

The time is now, folks. We cannot allow this woman to take over our country and trample on the Constitution. If she wins, we will live in a country that allows 13 million more illegal aliens into this country, more Syrian refugees, and she will try to limit our Second Amendment. Share this everyone you know so that if she wants to come and take our guns, she’ll have to come down here and get them herself. We won’t go out without a fight!

https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fteapartystickerstore.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Fcopy-bitter-clinger-rectangle-copy-960-x-288.jpg%23bitter%2520clinger%2520960x288&sp=3afe6b715b7b8e0dc9ccb5024dedaed1

Source, NWO Report