Tag Archives: Election Fraud

The Stomach Turning ‘Ballot-Harvesting’ That Enabled Democrats To Steal California In 2018

The picture emerging from California’s election is grotesque. How again did Democrats engineer their strange midterm victory in Orange County and in other traditionally Republican areas? In that election, apparently winning Republican candidates were all unseated as the ballots just kept arriving, and arriving, and arriving, until the results flipped. Each and every time. And no such flips happened for Republicans, just Democrats, after they learned that Republicans were winning. And Democrats say it’s just ‘counting all the votes.’

Welcome to ballot-harvesting.

The Daily Caller has an ace report with a video showing just how that’s done:

Attorney Robert Barnes, on Twitter, noted just how problematic that new practice is:

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1069052240256819200 Which is why it’s illegal almost everywhere in the world. California, on the other hand, back in 2016, passed AB1921, a law that actually permits it. Anyone can turn in ballots now, no questions asked, no chain of custody required. Back at the time, Democrats were hollering about low turnout and how getting more turnout was a priority, even though they were running a one-party state at that time, as they are now. They painted themselves as all concerned about ‘democracy’ given the low rates of turnout in their districts, many of which were known asrotton boroughs‘ full of non-citizen voters. But what they really had in mind was ‘ballot harvesting.’ Most of the attention at the time from Republicans was focused on the involuntary registration of voters through the Department of Motor Vehicles, which has led to what was feared: the registration of illegal immigrants. But the bigger thing was going on on the outside, with the mail-in ballots nobody asked for and the apparent real purpose for these unasked for and unwanted ballot, which was … ballot-harvesting.

I sign up for every party mail list in order to read what all political sides are thinking, so I get lots of Democratic Party mail, including polls of members, which I answer, probably horrifying Democrats who open such returned polls, as I tell them to get rid of Obamacare. If they want to know what I think, I tell them. Could the fact that I am on those lists be the reason why I got a mail-in ballot when everyone else in my household gets sample ballots and goes to the polls on election day? Despite my Republican registration, it sure sounds like it.

This signals a grotesquely changed electoral landscape. Turns out the mail-in ballots are all that matters now, because all anyone has to do is harvest, and keep harvesting them, until Democrats get the result they want. I wrote about those lingering questions in the recent midterm here.

‘Count all the ballots!’ has been the Democrat rallying cry. Yet in reality, it was their defense of this sneaky little project, making anyone who doesn’t like it someone who wants to disenfranchise people.

It’s a lie. It’s not about counting all the ballots in the slightest, it’s about selectively counting the ballots of only voters who fill in the Democratic slots. The Democratic operative who called herself ‘Lulu’ in the video clip wanted to collect only the ballot of the voter in the household who had no party affiliation, not the ballots of the Republicans, so it wasn’t about counting all the ballots, it was about counting all the Democratic ballots and the ballots of those on the fence who could be muscled into voting Democrat. She after all, offered to ‘help’ that voter, which we all know means the ballot would be filled out a certain way. Oh and here’s another goodie in this: Ballots can be harvested and mailed even on election day, when the counts are happening and Democrats can see which candidates are performing weakly. The operatives can be dispatched like flying monkeys to those districts to intrude on the private spaces of voters who maybe didn’t want to vote or who were planning to go to the polls in the evening, and ‘harvest’ those votes. And you can bet a certain number of those ballots would be cast by people who were afraid of consequences if they didn’t vote the way that ballot harvester standing at the door wanted them to vote. After all, the harvesters, by coming to the homes, signaled they knew where the voters lived, and theoretically, many of these voters could have been illegal immigrants registered whether they liked it or not by the DMV to vote. Oh, and could the operative have steamed open the ballots to see how those people voted and make sure they were delivering the votes? With zero chain of custody rules, they certainly could.

The specter of involuntary registration, combined with ballot harvesting on the other end really does present some selective voting as well as fraud opportunities. This is the kind of thing that went on in Daniel Ortega’s Nicaragua, where the elections were denounced as fraudulent and unfair by global electoral monitors, which may well be where the California Democrats got the idea.

Democrats have yelled for years about turnout and this was what they came up with. They’ve effectively ended the right to abstain, which up until now, has been an acceptable choice, and like commie place they are effectively making voting compulsory for people who don’t want to vote. Lefties have been yelling for years about turnout, and this is the result: ballot-harvesting, the actual thing they had in mind.

Republicans didn’t know about it. Now they do, and now they will have to set up their own ‘ballot-harvesting’ teams for the next election, collecting only Republican ballots just as Democratic operatives collect only Democratic ballots from people who can’t be bothered to go to the polls, or who have a mail-in ballot they didn’t ask for sitting on their dining room tables.There should be quite some competition for people who aren’t registered to any party, with each side considering those ballots their very own and rushing to ‘harvest’ them first. Pity those guys.

But what we have here is a real corruption of democracy, the end of choice in whether to vote, and the selective ‘harvesting’ of votes as now the new ground game. In the era of 3-D and other high-tech printers, and a very badly run electoral operative, the prospect of ballot stuffing is there, too, now that anyone can turn in ballots with zero chain of custody rules.

It’s not democratic, it’s the sort of thing dictatorships in badly run impoverished countries do, and hey, what a coincidence, California leads the nation in poverty. It’s also the kind of thing United Nations observers and the international community’s usually liberal electoral integrity commissions condemn. Where’s the condemnation for this clearly outrageous practice going on in California and on track to get very, very worse? 

Advertisements

Fox News Confirmed As Controlled Opposition

For good minded folks …

Radio host Dr. Dave Janda says the midterm elections are far from over. Janda says, “There was voter fraud before, during and after the midterm elections. My sources say there was a staggering amount of voting machines that were impounded Monday night before the election on Tuesday because they had pre-set votes in them.

This involved voting machines in all 50 states. . . . Trump had teams out there making sure of the integrity of the vote. That is just some of the voter fraud before the elections. . . . There are a lot of federal officials on the ground. . . . I think this is going to go by the way of the Jill Stein recount event.” Meaning, massive voter fraud will be uncovered in multiple locations across America.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with Dr. Dave Janda from Operation Freedom. Donations: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/ Stay in contact with USAWatchdog.com: https://usawatchdog.com/join/ All links can be found on USAWatchdog.com: https://usawatchdog.com/donations/

***

Fox News Joins CNN In Lawsuit Against Trump White House

 

Fox News said it is supporting CNN’s lawsuit to regain White House reporter, Jim Acosta’s, press credentials.

Election Management Software Company Ownership Discovered In Feinstein Disclosure

 

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/breaking-feinstein.jpg?w=620&h=132

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/dianne-feinstein.jpg?w=252&h=327

 

Diane Feinstein. (May 16, 2016). OGE Form 278 Financial Disclosure 2015. OGE.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2016-05-16-Diane-Feinstein-OGE-Form-278-Financial-Disclosure-2015-filed-May-16-2016.pdf

 

 

 

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/avid-feinstein-1.jpg?w=622&h=436

Moral: Control of Election Rigging Software is good for one’s net worth

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/dianne-feinstein-2.jpg?w=621&h=225

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/richard-blum.jpg?w=280&h=364

 

AVID Technologies, Inc., Co. No. 0000896841. (Accessed Aug. 07,2018). Form 4 Insider Trading. SEC Edgar.

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2018-08-07-AVID-Technology-Inc-Co-No-0000896841-Form-4-Insider-Trading-SEC-Edgar-accessed-Aug-07-2018.pdf

 

 

 

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/feinstein-chart1.jpg?w=621&h=149

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/own-disp?action=getowner&CIK=0000938775

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/blum-capital.jpg?w=622&h=626

https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library/2010-LeaderPlus-Avid-Technology-Product-Brochure-Avid-com-2010.pdf

https://patriots4truth.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/avid-leader-plus.jpg?w=621&h=422

More globalist election rigging systems exposed

Source: Patriots For Truth

***

Senate Democrats Are Circulating Plans For Government Takeover Of The Internet

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_desktop_2x/public/2018-08/2018-08-07_10-51-01.jpg?itok=R2sC08C8

To save American trust in “our institutions, democracy, free press, and markets,” the leaked memo suggests, we need unprecedented and undemocratic government intervention into online press and markets…

Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign

Vladimir Putin made a bombshell claim during Monday’s joint press conference with President Trump in Helsinki, Finland, when the Russian President said some $400 million in illegally earned profits was funneled to the Clinton campaign by associates of American-born British financier Bill Browder – at one time the largest foreign portfolio investors in Russia. The scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community, said Putin, who he said “accompanied and guided these transactions.”

Browder made billions in Russia during the 90’s. In December, a Moscow court sentenced Browder in absentia to nine years in prison for tax fraud, while he was also found guilty of tax evasion in a separate 2013 case. Putin accused Browder’s associates of illegally earning over than $1.5 billion without paying Russian taxes, before sending $400 million to Clinton.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/putin%20looking%20at%20hillary_0.jpg?itok=oem5iDNZ

After offering to allow special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to come to Russia for their investigation – as long as there was a reciprocal arrangement for Russian intelligence to investigate in the U.S., Putin said this:

For instance, we can bring up Mr. Browder, in this particular case.  Business associates of Mr. Browder have earned over $1.5 billion in Russia and never paid any taxes neither in Russia or the United States and yet the money escaped the country. They were transferred to the United States. They sent [a] huge amount of money, $400,000,000, as a contribution to the campaign of Hillary Clinton.  Well that’s their personal case.  

It might have been legal, the contribution itself but the way the money was earned was illegal.  So we have solid reason to believe that some [US] intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions.  So we have an interest in questioning them.

We would expect Putin to show some receipts for such bombshell allegations, while President Trump did not challenge the claims.

Who is Bill Browder?

From a report we noted in February by Philip Giraldi of The Strategic Culture Foundation:

Israel Shamir, a keen observer of the American-Russian relationship, and celebrated American journalist Robert Parry both think that one man deserves much of the credit for the new Cold War and that man is William Browder, a hedge fund operator who made his fortune in the corrupt 1990s world of Russian commodities trading.

Browder is also symptomatic of why the United States government is so poorly informed about international developments as he is the source of much of the Congressional “expert testimony” contributing to the current impasse. He has somehow emerged as a trusted source in spite of the fact that he has self-interest in cultivating a certain outcome. Also ignored is his renunciation of American citizenship in 1998, reportedly to avoid taxes. He is now a British citizen.

Browder is notoriously the man behind the 2012 Magnitsky Act, which exploited Congressional willingness to demonize Russia and has done so much to poison relations between Washington and Moscow. The Act sanctioned individual Russian officials, which Moscow has rightly seen as unwarranted interference in the operation of its judicial system.

Browder, a media favorite who self-promotes as “Putin’s enemy #1,” portrays himself as a selfless human rights advocate, but is he? He has used his fortune to threaten lawsuits for anyone who challenges his version of events, effectively silencing many critics. He claims that his accountant Sergei Magnitsky was a crusading “lawyer” who discovered a $230 million tax-fraud scheme that involved the Browder business interest Hermitage Capital but was, in fact, engineered by corrupt Russian police officers who arrested Magnitsky and enabled his death in a Russian jail.

Many have been skeptical of the Browder narrative, suspecting that the fraud was in fact concocted by Browder and his accountant Magnitsky. A Russian court recently supported that alternative narrative, ruling in late December that Browder had deliberately bankrupted his company and engaged in tax evasion. He was sentenced to nine years prison in absentia.

William Browder is again in the news recently in connection with testimony related to Russiagate. On December 16th Senator Diane Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee released the transcript of the testimony provided by Glenn Simpson, founder of Fusion GPS. According to James Carden, Browder was mentioned 50 times, but the repeated citations apparently did not merit inclusion in media coverage of the story by the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico.

Fusion GPS, which was involved in the research producing the Steele Dossier used to discredit Donald Trump, was also retained to provide investigative services relating to a lawsuit in New York City involving a Russian company called Prevezon. As information provided by Browder was the basis of the lawsuit, his company and business practices while in Russia became part of the investigation. Simmons maintained that Browder proved to be somewhat evasive and his accounts of his activities were inconsistent. He claimed never to visit the United States and not own property or do business there, all of which were untrue, to include his ownership through a shell company of a $10 million house in Aspen Colorado. He repeatedly ran away, literally, from attempts to subpoena him so he would have to testify under oath.

Per Simmons, in Russia, Browder used shell companies locally and also worldwide to avoid taxes and conceal ownership, suggesting that he was likely one of many corrupt businessmen operating in what was a wild west business environment.

My question is, “Why was such a man granted credibility and allowed a free run to poison the vitally important US-Russia relationship?” The answer might be follow the money. Israel Shamir reports that Browder was a major contributor to Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland, who was the major force behind the Magnitsky Act.

***

Crooked Hillary Desperately Tries to Deflect After Putin Drops Bombshell ‘US Intel Helped Move $400,000,000 to Clinton Campaign

https://a.disquscdn.com/get?url=http%3A%2F%2Femmecon.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F06%2Finspirational-trump-putin-meme-64-best-political-memes-images-on-pinterest.jpg&key=4U3q40_b1wUAEbYUfC5Ldw&w=800&h=757https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6dd596e3663f3cdc017cd3e8688397d4b60d8e47ae6f6a7f9a4ca7de547f4dd3.jpg?w=800&h=568https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a4821d3e6bc03dac0d1a1760bfceace00fd2e0b1bf61f1ccb55c313efc1baeb7.jpg?w=800&h=367https://i.imgflip.com/1awc2u.jpg

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/926c88af5fb208a4f121279d75d78fa4745a6b8efa8edeb6a116526e9865e64a.jpghttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/59eb4fbdbc520e6f1d5a243c4af86252ad4fa582f05f5b96e479b74d90d41c8e.jpghttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aa50bdd69d59581a573f7fd3ce912730ac2e92965c1d7a4b59684c8d645c0f0c.gifhttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7e5ce2e0095111a2667289ac551659fecfc1b0e8b95766f13904ded894dd444d.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/854dddf66423120917d549b28b5a7bb60b7bc1f03cbcffa560d21a6550e18a30.jpg

Source: ZeroHedge

Judicial Watch Finds 3.5M More Registered Voters Than Adults In U.S.

In 2017, Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project examined the 2011-2015 data of two groups: the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and the federal Election Assistance Commission.

Deroy Murdock, a Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online, tabulated Judicial Watch’s data and found 462 counties (18.5% of the 2,500 counties studied) where the registration rate exceeded 100%. Altogether, there were 3,551,760 more people registered to vote than the adult U.S. citizens in these counties — enough over-registered voters to populate a ghost-state about the size of Connecticut, according to Judicial Watch attorney Robert Popper.

Here are some counties where registered voters outnumber adult citizens:

  • 101% registration rate in Delaware’s New Castle County.
  • 108% registration rate in Georgia’s Fulton County.
  • 112% registration rate (or 707,475 ghost voters) in California’s Los Angeles County.
  • 138% registration rate (or 810,966 ghost voters) in California’s San Diego County.
  • 154% registration rate in Washington’s Clark County.
  • 162% registration rate in New Mexico’s Harding County, where there were 62% more registered voters than adult citizens.

More troubling still are the numbers of ghost voters in battleground states where Electoral College votes can be decided by incredibly narrow margins:

  • Colorado: 159,373
  • Florida: 100,782
  • Iowa: 31,077
  • Michigan: 225,235
  • New Hampshire: 8,211
  • North Carolina: 189,721
  • Virginia: 89,979

Murdock points out that in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton’s margins of victory in Colorado (136,386) and New Hampshire (2,736) were less than the numbers of ghost voters in those states, while Trump won Michigan (10,704) and North Carolina (173,315) by fewer ballots than ghost voters in those states.

https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/dead-voters.jpg?w=410&h=301

Dead voters account for some of the over-registration rate.

In May 2016, KCBS-Los Angeles reported that 265 dead voters had cast ballots in southern California “year after year.” In October 2016, CBS Chicago compared local vote records with the Social Security Administration’s master death file, and found 119 dead people had voted a total of 229 times in Chicago in the last decade.

Under federal law (1993 National Voter Registration Act; 2002 Help America Vote Act) states are required to maintain accurate voter lists. But the law is ignored and openly flouted:

  • In February 2016, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe (D), a Clinton crony, vetoed a measure to mandate investigations of elections in which ballots cast outnumbered eligible voters.
  • Obama’s Justice Department actually filed a federal lawsuit to stop GOP governor Rick Scott from updating Florida’s voting records by deleting 51,308 dead voters.

Source:  Fellowship Of The Minds

Hillary Didn’t Really Win The Popular Vote

The number one reason Hillary won the popular vote – VOTER FRAUD.  Voter fraud is usually perpetuated in Democrat states in heavily Democrat precincts. There the fraud is heavily insulated from discovery. Those who man the polls are Democrats, the election Commissioners are Democrats, the vote counters and handlers of voting machines are Democrats and the Secretary of State is Democrat. Democrats are notorious for having a blind eye to cheating – as long as it is done in their favor.

So no, Hillary did not win the popular vote.

Source: Lexington Libertarian