NGOs, Think Tanks, Globalist Billionaires, and Multilateral Organizations all conspire to engineer the movement of non-European peoples into Western Europe and America. Their goal: total replacement of White Europeans and Americans in their lands. Primary financiers of this agenda are discussed here…
Some of you need to cease the denial and accept the harsh reality that the left hates you. It’s a fact, as much as the liberal gaslight gang and the conserva-sissy weakhearts deny it. You can tell that leftists hate you by the way that leftists tell you that they hate you.
Take Sarah Jeong, please – hey, the New York Times was happy to get this bitter creep onboard because of her history of virulent racism. The Times saw her hate as a plus, not a negative, an asset, not a liability. You can’t draw any other conclusion – if you take her tweets, trade out the word “white” – man, does she ever hate white people – and toss in some other skin hue you’d have a pink-haired millennial David Duke. And the NYT saw that and said, “Awesome, sign her up!”
You may think you know the deal about her prejudice, but you don’t really know the deal, not until you read the full extent of the Ku Klux Korean immigrant’s portfolio of bigoted tweetery. It’s not merely ugly, stupid, and immoral – it’s downright sociopathic. Yet the flagship of the floundering fleet that is America’s liberal media saw the iceberg and went full speed ahead.
We could go on about how if this was a conservative, he, she, or whatever the “groveling goblin” gender pronoun is, would be history, but we all know there is a double standard. What some of us have been unwilling to accept is why there is a double standard. Well, it’s because the people at the New York Times, and the liberal elite in general, agree with the hateful garbage Jeong and her pals dish out.
Progressives think that it’s okay to hate someone solely because of the color of his skin. They aren’t against racism – they are actively in favor of racism. Sure, they dress up their shameful prejudices with the kind of convoluted nonsense their associate professors of oppression studies taught them as sophomores, but it all comes down to the fact that they hate white people. Of course, they also hate black, Asian, and Latin people too, when such patriots dare embrace conservative values. So, in that way, liberals are equal opportunity racists.
Try this test: Ask a liberal, “Is it wrong to hate someone because of his race?”
Because we are not scumbag losers, we will answer, “Yes.” Liberals will give you a dissertation which eventually boils down to, “No.”
They hate us. They want us dead – just ask Sarah, who wants to “cancel white people,” which sure sounds murdery coming from an ideological heir to Mao, Stalin, and Castro. And apparently, we’re even more terrible because we actually listen to what they say and then dare to draw obvious conclusions. To libs, that’s racist. We’re supposed to ignore what they say to our faces and instead imagine that these are nice people who wish only the best for us as they tell us to die.
The left can’t hide its contempt anymore. Some of them, like that pink-mopped Harvard bigot, don’t even try. And, as my upcoming book Militant Normals: How Regular Americans Are Rebelling Against the Elite to Reclaim Our Democracy points out, in brutal and hilarious detail, Normal people – that is, those of us of all shades of skin hue who refuse to buy into the liberal elite’s sickening racist dogma – tend to take elitists telling them they hate them pretty seriously.
You want to know why we got Trump? Sarah Jeong and her dopey ilk are why we got Trump, and I am thrilled that Jeong got this gig and I am delighted that her idiot pals think the best hill to die on right before the midterms is Mt. It’s-Cool-To-Hate-White-People.
Not the Fredocons though. Those saps. This is a golden opportunity to steal the ball and run up the score, but as usual, these useless goofs seem intent on fumbling. Count on them to fuss and whimper their way into submission when they should be taking the fight to the left. We’re supposed to not “join the mob” and generally give the left a free pass on this latest atrocity, just like we’re supposed to give them a free pass on every other atrocity we’ve endured. Well, hard pass on the free passes.
Leftists don’t get to pull this garbage and just get away with it. Cut the nonsense about “outrage mobs.” Regardless of the principles of True Conservatism™, it’s perfectly okay under actual conservative principles to protest the liberal elite’s public embrace of outright race-based hatred. Hell, it’s mandatory. And this imbroglio is a perfect weapon for us, because it perfectly encapsulates our enemy’s hateful view of us in a way every midterm voter between the coasts is going to understand. We need to wield it like a sledgehammer in anticipation of the upcoming election.
You soft boys can pivot back to your “We’re better than that” pose and go AWOL, again, like you always do. But I say the Sarah Jeong/NYT love affair is a suppository, and I say we start curing the hemorrhoid that is liberalism by giving the left a double dose good and hard right up the progressive tract.
We need to accept the harsh reality that a substantial number of our fellow citizens hate our guts. All the simpering blabber about civility, all the clichés about unity, are all just comforting lies. A bunch of them hate us. They hate us. Hate. And we need to stop pretending the truth right in front of us is not right in front of us.
What do we do? We fight. This is not going to be a single skirmish. This is a campaign, a long and difficult one with the objective of destroying the ideological cancer metastasizing through America’s body politic. Step One: We must ruthlessly attack any manifestation of their hate using all the political and cultural tools at our disposal. We need to make liberal racism painful, so they are incentivized to abandon it. We’re not here to win moral victories. We’re here to win victory victories.
The Reds are murderously serious.
The Whites (color scheme courtesy of the Russian Revolution) had damned well get there.
You have no meaningful political voice.
Those conservative Federal judges McConnell has put on the bench?
They think you are deplorable.
At least half of your fellow FUSAns want you to disappear (while leaving your money behind).
And the poor, insolvent country of your birth is being wiped from existence.
How serious are you?
“Roy Rogers? He doesn’t mean anything. There’s a revolution going on, and it don’t include no Roy Rogers.”-Rosalina Sondoval-Marin
“For God’s sake, don’t disarm. Do not disarm.”-Dr. Gregory Stanton
The Left sings the praises of the “browning of America,” and the Western world as a whole, and looks forward to that glorious day when whites are finally minorities in their own nations with a religious fervor. Why whites becoming a minority in their own homelands is a good thing, and why it is necessary for the precepts of social justice to be fully realized, is never articulated; it’s simply a matter of faith that when the magical day cometh—the Social Justice Judgement Day as it were—the seas will part, an empire will collapse, and peace and tranquility will reign. The expiation of our sins may only be accomplished by a mass blood-letting, the likes of which has been openly, wistfully commented on by no less a personage than televangelist Oprah Winfrey:
As long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, the problem’s not solved… There’s a whole generation, I said this for apartheid South Africa, I said this for my own, you know, community in the South, there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.
In this new, brighter (darker?) future, though, whose money is going to be taken at gunpoint and forcibly re-distributed once they’ve run out of easy-pickings whites? Asians? If the Rodney King riots in the ’90s taught us anything, they better avoid the Korean grocers. Will the Coalition of the Fringes leave their self-generated urban blight and head into the bush to fight the stump-toothed rednecks for scraps? Will their Jewish overlords be spared, or will the darker-pigmented continue to dutifully carry out the SPLC, AJC, and ADL’s anti-white pogroms? Will the New Zion be paradisal or will it quickly degenerate into South-Central Los Angeles on a national scale? Will the dashiki-clad Congressional Black Caucus pass motions like this: “No white man of whatever nation he may be, shall put his foot on this territory with the title of master or proprietor, neither shall he in future acquire any property therein,” or this: “The preceding article cannot in the smallest degree affect white woman who have been naturalized…nor does it extend to children already born, or that may be born of the said women” [sic]? Oh, you thought this was just scare-mongering dystopian fiction? No, no, Fair Traveler, those are Articles 12 and 13 from the 1805 Haitian constitution! Will there be a generous welfare state in New Zion to care for the 92% of white women who have a child or children with a black man out of wedlock, 82% of whom wind up on government assistance? Finally, and perhaps most importantly, what bathrooms will the trans community will be permitted to use? As we know, based on contemporary concerns, that’s infinitely more important than demographic sea change and meta-civilizational imperilment.
“Whiteness” must be diminished—or better still, eradicated. Faith in the new religion of Progressivism remains as strong as ever, and this is its central tenet. Despite all evidence to the contrary, the belief that Western civilization, and its men in particular are, to quote the African-American Studies and sociology professor Saida Grundy, “a problem population,” remains pervasive and deeply entrenched. Considering white men built the modern world notwithstanding, they are also underrepresented in most major crime statistics, as well as, in spite of the media narrative, mass shootings, I’m having a hard time figuring out what exactly this affirmative action hire is referring to with respect to “a problem population.” Additionally, the bastions of white supremacy that are American colleges and universities are statistically safer than the national average (and yes, that includes sexual assault, again contrary to the prevailing narrative). So an inventive, tolerant, non-criminally-disposed population has somehow been framed as the scourge of humanity. Right. Well, something is going to have to supplant “whiteness,” or at least step into its vacuum, something approximating the aforementioned New Zion.
In Afghanistan, women who are raped can be charged with the crime of adultery, which is punishable by death; victims of rape have been known to be publicly lashed in Saudi Arabia and imprisoned in Somalia; husbands may murder their wives with impunity if they are suspected of committing adultery in Egypt and Syria. Margot Wallström dubbed eastern Congo the “most dangerous place on earth to be a woman,” which Chilean-via-Sweden activist Zaida Catalan posthumously proved last year. By some accounts 1,000 rapes are committed daily. Marital rape is legal in the following countries: The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Brunei, Libya, Malawi, Bangladesh, Botswana, Haiti, Ethiopia, China, Iran, Lebanon, Laos, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Zambia, Yemen, Uganda, Syria, Sudan, South Sudan, Tajikistan, Ghana, Indonesia, Jordan, Senegal, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Lesotho, Nigeria, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Egypt, Oman, Myanmar, Morocco, Afghanistan, Algeria, Mongolia, Bahrain, Mali, India (where one-third of men have admitted to forcing their wives into intercourse), Tanzania, or Malaysia; though this isn’t relevant in some of the above nations, spousal rape is concurrent with sharia law, whereby a wife may not refuse her husband unless she is menstruating, in which case she is considered temporarily “impure.” Islamic doctrine also excuses domestic abuse.
In Lebanon, Bahrain, Jordan, Iraq, Tunisia, Tajikistan, Uruguay, Malaysia, Peru, and the Philippines, rapists may be exonerated if they marry their victims. According to official statistics, migrants in Germany, primarily represented by Iranians, Syrians, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Algerians, and Moroccans, committed an average of nine sex crimes—a day. At less than 5% of the population, approximately half of all rapes in Germany are committed by migrants. Over half of all women in Papua New Guinea have been raped, two-thirds have been battered, and up to half of all underage girls are potentially at-risk for sex trafficking. Additionally, girls as young as twelve may be forced into marriage. But go on, tell us again how white males are the problem, Professor Grundy.
Far from dispensing with an artificial construct of “whiteness,” the progressives will realize far too late that, as Lothrop Stoddard wrote one hundred years ago:
The great racial divisions of mankind are the most fundamental, the most permanent, the most ineradicable things in human experience. They are not mere diverse colorations of the skin. Matters like complexion, stature, and hair-formation are merely the outward, visible symbols of correlative mental and spiritual differences which reveal themselves in sharply contrasted temperaments and view-points, which translate themselves into the infinite phenomena of divergent group-life. Now it is one of these basic racial lines of cleavage which runs between “East” and “West.”… The terms “brown race” and “brown world” do connote genuine realities which science and politics alike recognize to be essentially true. There certainly is a fundamental comity between the brown peoples. This comity is subtle and intangible in character; yet it exists, and under certain circumstances it is capable of momentous manifestations.
It’s not going to stop unless we make it stop. Life is not therapeutic, it is tragic. No one gets out alive. These real truths of being—we all die, we all suffer, if we are lucky we may love—are what it means to be human. To struggle against existence is to fight to become something more. The transience of life is both its tragedy and its beauty. So what, we’re just going to purge existence of all discomfort? Hardly. Lobotomizing your culture and wallowing in affluence can only last a generation or two, and then the ghosts of children you never had will eventually see the homeland you failed to defend fall into the grasping hands of the barbarian, soon to fall into disrepair. The old world will be nothing but a memory.
And yet the feminists still decry the patriarchy while their sisters are dragged kicking and screaming into the No-Go Zones to be savagely raped and beaten, their families threatened, their nations in flames. Tolerating the intolerable while being intolerant in the Church of Tolerance, the egalitarian project is more important than family, than homeland, than life—than reality. As Heather MacDonald said, “Science is now a fireable offense because it contradicts feminist ideology,” but feminism itself has, to quote Bruce Thornton, “institutionalized a fundamental incoherence,” willing to sacrifice its own ideology at the altar of DIVERSITY. Feminism has succeeded in creating a bunch of grotesque facsimiles of what men used to be before they all decided they wanted to become women, and in this new paradigm of incongruence, the barbarian strides in, confident and uncowed, slaughtering the braying masses in their pens of “hate speech” and inclusion.
What is the drug? Everybody’s tired of laying down with you, but they do it anyway, the same perfumed wreckage of human beings driven by nothing more than impulse. This is a rather dim view of my fellow man to be sure, but Winston Smith had faith in the proles and look where that got him. In my darker moments, this is where my mind will stray. “Into the abattoir of multi-culturalism with you! This is what you wanted, so by God, now you must live it!” But for that poetic justice, all would need to be lost, and I will fight with every fiber of my being to prevent that from happening. Where to, then?
This is another fun one: Lately I’ve been seeing the populist parties of Europe referred to as “White Nationalist” parties, used obviously as an epithet. The absurdity is of course that a White Nationalist in Europe and a European Nationalist are the same thing. It would be like trying to smear a Nigerian in Nigeria as a Black Nationalist. The bubble-wrapped, ahistorical, and uni-cultural worldview of the egalitarians is fully on display here. Nevertheless, all distinction must be erased by the globalist Leviathan. Joseph Sobran observes (this is worth quoting at length, so forgive me):
We don’t have to choose between Nativism and Alienism. A healthy native is not an all-out Nativist, but rather has a code of hospitality and gallantry that takes into account the position of the alien; and the reasonable marginal member of society is not bound to be a fanatical Alienist, even though there are those who would like to inflame his resentments. Both perspectives have their stories to tell. Both can be accommodated by civility and the rule of law, without privileges for either, although it is a mark of the surprising power of Alienism that its favored minorities do, in spite of majority sentiment, enjoy privileges based on race…One of [Alienism’s] principal targets is “capitalism,” a blanket term for a free economy. Just because it is impracticable to attack all economic transactions at once, liberalism issues a general condemnation of “inequality” while homing in on vulnerable points. By calling the overall distribution of wealth unjust, it authorizes itself to call for state intervention anywhere, without bothering to specify the final distribution it would like to see. Private transactions embody “greed”; state programs of redistribution to liberal client-groups represent “compassion.” In good gnostic fashion, liberalism damns the entire material world; but it redeems selected parts through piecemeal collectivization.
Like any political machine, liberalism passes its booty out among favored dependents, in the guise of succoring victims. Its moral pretensions have been so successful, its claims of idealism so unchallenged, that nobody thinks to call the liberal machinery a system of greed and corruption…One of liberalism’s most successful strategies has been to establish a standing presumption of guilt against the native: his motives are always in question, his racism and bigotry “just beneath the surface.”… SOCIALISM is the pure expression of Alienism. It rejects in principle the entire current and traditional form of society and insists on total transformation. In order to accomplish this, it must replace consent with unlimited state power.
Thus, the state becomes All, for it is Good and Compassionate and Righteous. It is also an un-thinking monstrosity set to annihilating the native and replacing him with a population that, although less docile, is much more inclined to view a totalitarian state not just as good, but for many cultures it is the only kind of state that they can conceive of. There is no tradition of representative democracy in Africa; there are no precedents for republicanism among aborigines or Steppes people or people from the Levant. No, this is a particularly European phenomenon, and even the high-IQ Chinese tend to prefer an “enlightened despot.” With a very few choice exceptions in representative government like modern Japan and South Korea, and these are also still very conformity- and honor-based cultures in many ways, self-governance is the province of Western Man, and he is far too independent and difficult to control. It’s why whites went to Africa and the Americas and Oceania, to escape the clutches of the Old World and forge new societies from the wilderness. Obviously many of these people were themselves slaves, indentured servants, or convicts, but the intrepid frontiersman spirit is what drove the creation of the nations we see today.
This is why, in an increasingly globalized world, the managerial classes of the First World want to replace their populations with the Third World. Everywhere will resemble some shitty mix of Brazil, Nigeria, and Afghanistan, the glories of past civilizations forgotten, our shining city upon a hill nothing but a burned-out and decrepit shantytown.
“They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and saved created things rather than the Creator.” (Romans 1.25)
Cheddar Man Fraud Seeks To Legitimize Replacement of Europeans
Was this what Count Kalergi-Coudenhove had in mind when in 1925 he revealed plans to transform Europe’s racial demographics?
Given that Count Kalergi-Coudenhove was one of the European Union’s founding ideologues it’s worth noting what he said on the matter:
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the current diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.” (Source)
As Kalergi-Coudenhove was also a good friend of Theodore Herzl, one of the founders of modern Zionism, it’s no surprise to find that he also envisaged this “diversity of peoples” would be presided over by a Jewish ruling elite:
“Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It’s not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats.” (Ibid)
Is Kalergi-Coudenhove’s plan coming to fruition?
It’s quite possible that the widespread miscegenation envisaged by Kalergi-Coudemhove was foreordained. However, it may have been originally intended to take place over a span of centuries rather than decades.
There is a crucial difference. Malign forces may have hijacked a divinely preordained process and as with pedophilia, they are taking what should have unfolded naturally at a measured pace and are now forcing it through to fit their own agenda.
And no, I’m not some “white supremacist”. I’m actually from a mixed race background — stretching back generations to the 19th century — but this isn’t a matter of racial pride or prejudice.
What we are seeing unfold here — at an accelerated pace — is social engineering. Social manipulation that is diabolically inspired and meant to establish what Kalergi-Coudenhove described as a new “spiritual nobility of Europe”. With a largely Jewish ruling class served by a mixed-race underclass — and with anyone who disagrees with this dispensation branded as “racists”, and thereby ignored and silenced.
* * *
Exodus: Jews Flee Paris Suburbs over Rising Tide of Anti-Semitism
Simon Kent — Breitbart Dec 15, 2017
French-Jewish families are being forced from their homes in Paris suburbs as Europe continues to be convulsed by levels of anti-Semitism not seen since the end of the Second World War.
The Paris commuter newspaper 20 Minutes documents an “internal exodus” during 2017 of Jews from the Seine-Saint-Denis department, saying it is emblematic of broader concerns that French Jews, like their brothers and sisters across Europe, are finding it increasingly difficult to reconcile their faith with the changing demographics of the continent.
The paper reports that Jews are leaving their homes on the northeastern fringe of Paris to escape the open hostility that French Prime Minister Edouard Philippe on Sunday condemned as “well-rooted.” The newspaper reports:
This ‘internal exodus’ is difficult to quantify, but it is clear that many synagogues of Seine-Saint-Denis have closed, for lack of people. In Pierrefitte, the rabbi has recorded a 50 percent decline in the congregations since his arrival thirteen years ago. A similar story is told in (nearby) Bondy, where attendance on Yom Kippur (the holiest day of the Jewish calendar) has fallen from about 800 to 400 in the last decade.
The Bondy synagogue president saw a “deteriorating climate” of the last 15 years as driving the exodus, “It’s hard to explain, it’s provocations, it’s looks,” he lamented. “There are places where we do not feel welcome.”
His observations mimic those made 12 months before in nearby Raincy, where local Rabbi Moshe Lewin said he feared he could be one of the last Jewish leaders in Seine-Saint-Denis.
“What upsets me is that in some areas of France, Jews can no longer live peacefully, and that just five minutes from my home, some are forced to hide their kippas (skullcaps) or their Star of David,” he said.
The sensation of “not feeling welcome” is nothing new to French Jews. In 2015, journalist Zvika Klein recorded the reaction to his taking to the streets of Paris wearing a traditional kippa. See the result for yourself below:
Klein later points out the irony that Paris today is a city “where keffiyeh-wearing men and veiled women speak Arabic on every street corner” but where “soldiers are walking every street that houses a Jewish institution.”
Sammy Ghozlan, the president of the Jewish communal security organization BNCVA, told 20 Minutes that it was vital “not to underestimate the antisemitism we experience on a daily basis.”
“For a long time, Jews were targeted through their symbols — today, people themselves are targeted directly,” Ghozlan said.
As Breitbart Jerusalem has reported, the experience of Jews in Paris is much the same across the rest of the country. More and more are feeling so unsafe that they now feel they have no other choice but to move to Israel for safety.
They are continuing a trend that has seen tens of thousands of Jews quit the country in the past decade.
More than 5,000 departures were recorded in 2016 on top of the record 7,900 who left in 2015 and 7,231 in 2014. In total, 40,000 French Jews have emigrated since 2006, according to figures cited by AFP.
On the evidence, that number will not be falling anytime soon.
Changing Demographics Could Mean a Hillary Win and Eventual Democrat Dictatorship
Changing demographics mean whites and taxpayers no longer determine the President of the United States
Don’t let the media fool you when they tell you Trump is up 5 to 7 points in the popular vote. Trump is still behind in many polls of the electoral college despite having such a commanding lead in the popular vote. Why? Waves of immigrants are changing the destiny of the United States forever. The Democratic party will be heavily favored in the 2016 election in the electoral college, and the math only gets worse in future presidential elections.
Look for states to increasingly swing to blue and stay that way
All The New Modern Man readers should be concerned in 2016, and especially beyond. Democrats could have a virtual lock on the Presidency very soon, as white people scratch their heads and wonder why their voice no longer counts in elections. Demographic changes intended to dispossess whites from their homeland—a country in which they were 92% of the electorate in 1960, but will be 43% in a few short decades with their offspring representing only 38% of children under 5—mean emboldened Democrats will likely move even farther to the left towards Communism as they soon have a lock on the Senate and House as well.
Despite Hillary’s criminality and investigation by the FBI, despite the low turnout at her rallies, despite her image as a crook and a liar, despite her health issues, despite Trump being up in the popular vote—Hillary was still winning in the electoral college as of Saturday, October 1. She has a landslide 323 electoral votes to Trump’s 215 in this map from Electoral Vote. 270 votes are needed to win the presidency.
Read it and weep: Hillary has a commanding lead in the electoral college as of October 1: Hillary 323, Trump 215
Changing Demographics are the Canary in the Coal Mine
How is this possible? How can such a damaged goods candidate even be competitive, let alone WINNING in the electoral college? Call it the devious plans of globalists coming to fruition. Globalists have been flooding the country with immigrants for decades, and now the country is about to make a permanent electoral swing towards Communism.
Today’s mostly non-white immigrants (i.e. reliable Democrat cannon fodder because of constant divide and rule politics and media propaganda) tend to congregate in the largest cities of the country. States with the most electoral votes have a lot of electoral sway simply because they have the largest cities where all the immigrants – legal and illegal – happen to be.
Even deep red Texas will swing permanently blue in the coming decades as Anglo whites only make up 25% of the population under age 5. Even Texas demographer Steve Murdock admits it’s basically over for Anglos in Texas. These numbers signal the fact the entire Southwest U.S. is becoming an extension of Mexico demographically and culturally. (Whites thinking they don’t have to have dirty little babies and families is catching up with them.)
The weight large cities carry in the electoral college is easily seen when one looks at a county by county breakdown of the vote, which is why bringing in floods of immigrants and “refugees” is so brilliant on the part of social engineers who wish to debase white people at the ballot box. This makes blue states even bluer.
Generally speaking, every county in the country except metropolitan and minority areas voted red Republican in 2012.
In areas where blacks and Hispanics make up majorities or large pluralities of the population, i.e. inner cities, the Southwest, the Black Belt, South Florida, etc. the counties are blue. Even though most counties in a given state may be red, population in metropolitan areas is so large the blue vote effectively cancels out the red vote in the rest of the state.
All the managers of democracy have to do is drown out traditional Americans’ voices in the major cities. The “flyover country” people (i.e. whiteys) then have their preferences nullified at election time.
Rapid demographic change has occurred in the U.S. for the past 40 years, spurred mostly by the decline of the white family and a de facto open door immigration policy
Taxpayers vs. Tax Takers and Demographic Displacement
Here are some maps that illustrate how debased you, the traditional United States worker bee has become from your own nation. If only taxpayers rather than tax-takers voted in the last election, the milquetoast turncoat Mitt Romney would now be president having been elected in a Reagan-like landslide. There would not be people waiting for Obama phones to be distributed.
Further, one must imagine in a nation that looked like the one above electorally Romney would never have been selected in the first place and a hard-assed conservative would have been running and elected in the last election instead of a compromise candidate like Mittens. Moreover, Barack Hussein Obama would never have been elected president in the first place back in 2008, and proceeded to “transform the United States” into a Communist worker’s paradise by destroying it from within.
We also would not have Hillary as a candidate promising to finish flushing America down the toilet. With only taxpayers voting instead of those availing themselves of social welfare programs, the Democrats would be forced to run a more moderate candidate.
People who bear the burden of enriching the treasury vs. those who filch from it vote quite differently. Letting people who contribute nothing to the system vote for freebies and social welfare schemes so transforms the electoral map that Obama was able to reverse this potential landslide and turn it into a defeat for the John Galts of America.
It may shock you to realize the white vote was completely nullified in the last presidential election by changing demographics. If the country looked like it did in 1960, before the treasonous Immigration Act of 1965 was signed into law and feminism killed the flower of family, we would definitely not be on the road to Communism and on the path to have such a lying, sickly piece of crap like Hillary winning the electoral college.
There’s little doubt, a right-wing candidate would have won in an electoral landslide in 2012 rather than the overt Communist we got if the nation hadn’t been so fundamentally changed by social engineers.
Running the numbers, if the population was still 92% white as in 1960 the conservatives would have won by a 400+ vote electoral landslide. As the white slice of the demographic pie gets smaller and smaller this segment of the population can expect to have less and less clout in the voting system. It is perhaps the most ingenious debasement of a people in the history of mankind by a diabolical elite power structure.
Immigration and Women’s Suffrage
What if there was no women’s suffrage? A similar conservative landslide would have played out last election. Moreover, the nation would surely not be one in which 70% of revenues are used in schemes of wealth redistribution, money that men are forced to pay to subsidize their forced removal from the family by Big Daddy Government.
The worst thing is realizing we were warned about this a century ago. A pamphlet published in the early 1900s warning against the social costs of granting women the right to vote (lampooned by modern media) has largely been proven true by the effects we are witnessing today. The pamphlet warned against voting for women’s suffrage for the following reasons:
- BECAUSE it means competition of women with men instead of co-operation.
- BECAUSE 80% of the women eligible to vote are married and can only double or annul their husband’s votes.
- BECAUSE it can be of no benefit commensurate with the additional expense involved.
How is that not an astute summary of exactly what has happened since the suffragettes won. Speaking of “additional expense involved” as RealSexism knows, women avail themselves of Beta male tax money, and even replace his utility by having the government forcefully extract his resources rather than dealing with him directly:
Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Men only spend 40% of what they earn after tax. In contrast women make up 38.5% of all income but control 75% of domestic spending, women on average spend 90% MORE MONEY THAN THEY EARN.
Men pay over 70% of income tax but the vast majority of public spending is on services for women. There is more money spent on breast cancer than lung cancer and prostate cancer combined, despite the fact that lung cancer alone has 3-4 times more fatalities than breast cancer. A man’s chance of getting cancer is 44% and 23% of men will die from cancer, 38% of women get cancer and 19% die. Yet there is vastly more money spent on cancer for women, this is lethal discrimination.
Women pay 60% less tax despite spending 300% more in domestic spending than men. Women also consume two third of public spending, there are 3 times the amount of gender specific health services for women than men despite the fact that for equal increases in health spending a man’s life expectancy rate increases nearly twice as much as a woman’s.
Laughably, leftists claim to want to save the world environmentally while supporting policies that encourage rampant spending, materialism, and consumerism—all driven by women! These are all predictable consequences of a country that marginalizes and demonizes its men at every turn.
It Only Gets Worse From Here
So where does this all leave us? It leaves us in the middle of a situation that’s almost impossible to turn around without a revolution. Men, and particularly white men have been asleep at the wheel for a century as their nation and their voice in it has been repeatedly and steadily undermined. We must begin righting the course of the ship of state by having discussions about our self-interest or be left to wither and die in foolish optimism that somehow our fortunes will be reversed by being Mr. Nice. The New Modern Man warned about where this road leads late last year.
That’s why contemporary Progressivism should really be called Racial Bolshevism. The psycho-political profile is identical: whereas the original Bolsheviks believed that the Communist utopia could not be achieved without the elimination of the bourgeois class, the contemporary Racial Bolsheviks believe that the multi-cultural utopia cannot be achieved without the elimination of white people–especially white men.
Make no mistake, you have very little voice left when it comes to choosing a president. Trump literally may be our last chance to stop America from turning into a grotesque parody of the intentions of the founders. You will effectively have no representation, but you will surely be expected to foot the bill for everyone else’s wishes.
Oh, and if the demographic changes don’t sway the election, voting machines that are designed to be hacked just might. We are in a fight for our very survival as the “deplorables” i.e. the resistance to the New World Order. Trump went around the corrupt system. But, even if he wins the presidency, our battles have only begun. And winning will be no cakewalk.