Tag Archives: Hillary Clinton

Why Does Hillary’s Health Keep Coming Up?

(Ted Noel) In August of 2016 I was persuaded, somewhat against my will, to publish an assessment of Hillary Clinton’s obvious health problems. I had been content to complain about politics over the lunch table with friends, but once I was convinced that Hillary is probably afflicted with Parkinson’s disease (P.D.), I had little choice. I also had little to lose, because I had been retired too long for the Feds to claw back anything I had earned from them.  If a Parkinson’s sufferer were to occupy the White House, America would be in great danger, because Parkinson’s dementia causes severe problems with reasoning. The stakes were too high for me to remain silent.

As my first exercise in video, one would have expected the project to flop.  But because Hillary was an object of intense interest with lots of public video of her medical signs, it went viral.  It had over two million views within twenty-four hours.  But it was never “trending” on YouTube. Cat videos with one twentieth the audience did “trend.”  Even today, I can’t find the video on YouTube unless I go through the Creator Studio for my library.  Surprise, surprise, surprise!  (But you can with the hyperlink above!)

During the campaign, I did a number of follow-up videos, including “How to Prove Me Wrong.” Of interest, no one made a serious effort to prove me wrong. No alternate explanation for her obvious oculogyric crisis during the balloon drop at the Democrat National Convention or the Parkinson’s disease Levodopa-induced dyskinesia at the “Iced Chai” episode has been brought forward. Instead, critics simply argued that there was nothing to see there. A reporter with no medical knowledge decried me on Snopes.com as “unethical” for presenting a serious discussion of an obvious medical disorder. I won’t try to refute his word salad, but he simply does not understand that Parkinson’s is a disease with no diagnostic tests and is diagnosed largely from publicly observable characteristic movements.

At the September 11 Ground Zero event, Hillary had an episode that clearly matched a common P.D. phenomenon known as a “freeze.” In essence, a visual stimulus causes the brain to go into a “reset” mode, locking up the body in a rigid posture.  As soon as the reset is complete, everything returns to normal. This can take a few seconds or several minutes.  Zdenek Gazda’s video clearly demonstrates this, and I discussed it in my “Ground Zero Analysis.”

After the campaign, at Harvard’s Kennedy School rehash, Robby Mook complained that social media stories that Hillary was unwell had turned many voters away from her. Given that my videos had a much larger audience than any others, I may properly expect that his anger was pointed at me. 60 Minutesdeclared that I was “fake news” but made no attempt to contact me. They would have discovered a careful physician who presented only verifiable material.  I wasn’t a conspiracy theorist the way Snopes put it. And Sean Hannity’s producer was able to find my cell number without difficulty. I guess simple gumshoe footwork is beyond the Left’s capabilities.

As time has passed, numerous members of my audience have requested updates. While I thought Hillary had become yesterday’s news, she continues to pop up with more clear evidence of her difficulties. Perhaps the greatest evidence was her book, What Happened. I had earlier posted a discussion of Parkinson’s Dementia, explaining how it progressively impairs the sufferer’s ability to reason. But I dismissed creating any new content since that question had been covered. This was simply a further demonstration of how large a bullet we had dodged.

Then Hillary had her “broken toe.” Her public explanation didn’t pass the smell test.  Later, while traveling in India, she had a videoed fall that presented a classic example of Parkinson’s gait disturbance and was a fair facsimile of a provocative test for P.D. Hillary just couldn’t get herself out of the public eye.

As time has passed, numerous observers have noted that she hired Omar the Tentmaker as her fashion consultant. When a small bump was observed under her Ozark Trail drape, I was asked again about its identity. But since there was room for an AK-47 with multiple magazines and grenades under that visibility screen, no conclusion was possible.

Then Hillary showed up at a public function with a barely concealed back brace. Perhaps she thought that since her political future was zero, it wouldn’t matter whether she showed her frailty. But public interest would not go away, and this was almost certainly a way to deal with camptocormia, a forward slump that P.D. sufferers can develop.

As the political world moves forward, the Arkansas harridan finds herself unable to go quietly into that dark night. She continues to comment, offering new and unconvincing reasons why she lost in 2016.  With the uninspiring character of the current Democrat presidential field, suddenly, we are faced with speculation of her riding to the “rescue” of her party.

We know that Elizabeth Warren’s “Medicare for All” cannot be funded. Bernie Sanders’s tax rate of 94% can’t pass. Paddy O’Rourke’s gun confiscation can’t be done without house-to-house searches. But these will seem like the sober ruminations of careful policy wonks when Hillary’s mind, unfettered by the bounds of normal sanity, claims that everyone who doesn’t agree with her is a “Russian asset.”

Democrats have enough problems with Sleepy Joe, who most likely has elements of senile dementia, and Princess Pelosi, who probably has mixed-pattern dementia and dyskinesia tardive masked by Botox. What would their options look like with Hillary? P.D. creates a major cognitive problem. During “on” states, the P.D. sufferer looks normal. We see that in Hillary’s selective public appearances. But “off” states happen without warning, and the victim will have a mind that acts as though it were running in glue. A change of subject means a complete restart when the discussion returns to its origin.

Other problems arise. Various visual stimuli, such as camera flashes and crossing halls, can lead to freezes and injuries. During the 2016 campaign, we saw Mrs. Clinton managing her lack of stamina by using surrogates.  She showed up in person only every third day or so.

In short, while some Democrats may have a nostalgic desire to see Hillary back on the stump, it’s a desire born of denial. She lost badly for multiple reasons, including her physical ailments. Time has not been kind to her.  Her mind is good at recitation, but not reasoning. That does not bode well for her as a candidate.

We should be so lucky.

Source: by Ted Noel | American Thinker

Hillaryland: The Saddest Place On Earth

Authored by Daniel Greenfield via Sultan Knish blog,

They say that Disneyland is the happiest place on earth, but Hillaryland must be the saddest.

What is Hillaryland? It’s a social network “aiming to connect all the people who’ve worked for Hillary Rodham Clinton during her more than 40 years of public service.” It’s run by “volunteers” and offers a plain white $15 Hillaryland tote bag which it claims that it’s selling “at cost” and “not for profit”.

How the might have fallen.

Once upon a time, Hillary and her people gaslit the country on the big issues. Now they’ve gone from Benghazi to trying to convince a declining handful of suckers that $15 is the cost price for a tote bag.

Hillaryland is the sad successor to Clintonworld networks like the Clinton Foundation which connected world leaders, foreign criminals and a prospective president. The alumni network is now a joke. The Clintons will never hold public office again. Hillaryland isn’t an alumni network, it’s a political leper colony run by “volunteers” too dumb to realize that the S.S. Slick Willy will never rise again.

Hillaryland promotes such promising ventures as ‘Nasty Women Serve’ which holds an annual Hillary Rodham Clinton Day of Service. The highest level of service in Hillaryland is hosting a “house party” on November 8, which is National Hillary Day, also known as the day of Hillary’s downfall and defeat. The party will have, “in the true spirit of HRC — some Chardonnay” and will go on “until the wine runs out”.

 

Only Nazi war criminals in Argentina have sadder and more pathetic reunions than Hillary minions.

 

Nazis and potheads have 4/20 to get high. Hillary fans have 11/8 to get drunk on white wine. And both of them even blame the Russians for the defeat of their miserably corrupt murderous regimes.

And where’s Madame Fuhrer?

Hillary stopped by the Venice Biennale, the umbrella organization that includes the Venice Film Festival, allegedly a favorite stalking ground of old Clinton pal, Harvey Weinstein, to attend the exhibit of “HILLARY: The Hillary Clinton Emails.”

For an hour, Hillary sat in a replica of the Oval Office pretending to read her own emails as part of an art project. To make her humiliation more complete, HILLARY was staged at the Despar Teatro Italia, a former theater turned into a supermarket. Confused shoppers watched a former American presidential contender pretending to be the President of the United States in an Italian supermarket.

There’s your chicken, your canned tomatoes and your pasta. Upstairs is a crazy lady who thinks she’s the President of the United States. Go easy on the chardonnay, you don’t want to end up like her.

Even Lady Macbeth went mad with more dignity than Hillary Clinton.

The Oval Office recreated in an Italian supermarket is only the second most famous piece of eponymous Hillary art. The National Museum of Women in the Arts also features a 6-foot-tall painting of a black fabric swatch named Hillary gifted to it by Heather and Tony Podesta. Heather and Tony have since split up. And Tony, a Hillarylander, got caught up in the Russia scandal and shut down his lobbying operation.

Sic transit gloria clintonmundi.

Hillaryland and the Italian supermarket presidency cast a dim light on Hillary’s prospects. What do you do when you run out of Chardonnay and ways to market yourself to an audience that no longer cares?

Audiences turned up their noses at Bill and Hillary’s theatrical appearances. The real Bill and Hillary flopped and so did fictional versions of them played by John Lithgow and Laurie Metcalf in Hillary and Clinton. Everyone, including Italian supermarket shoppers, want Hillary to go away. But she won’t go.

 

 

After churning out way too many books, Hillary is back with The Book of Gutsy Women: Favorite Stories of Courage and Resilience. This one is supposedly co-written with Chelsea, but just sounds like a revamp of Chelsea’s collection of She Persisted books which seem to have the same premise and theme.

This just means another Hillary Clinton book tour that nobody asked for and nobody actually wants.

Nevertheless, Hillary’s desperation tour will still be coming to such world-renowned locations as the Women’s Club of Ridgewood, NJ (no books will be signed), the United Methodist Church in Denver, CO, and the San Ramon Valley High School gym. Next stop, a random Appleby’s in Great Forks.

What’s the point of all this?

Jeffrey Epstein is dead, Ed Buck is in jail, and Harvey Weinstein is tapped out. The money has to come from somewhere. Even if it means sitting dead-eyed and drunk in a high school gym while Chelsea launches into an enthusiastic explanation of how Rachel Carson made the world safe for malaria.

But it’s not as if the Clintons really need the money. Their greed is as compulsive as all their vices.

Hillary Clinton loathes other people, but is incapable of existing without them. She can’t do what every other contender did and go away because she has nowhere to go. There’s a mansion in New York, but it has too many mirrors. And at night, she might start wandering and muttering, “Out, damned spot.”

And she won’t be talking about the neighbor’s dog who committed suicide in a local park.

Desperate and malicious, Hillary’s restless spirit wanders the nation and the world, haunting random supermarkets, gyms and colleges. To paraphrase her inspiration, Karl, a specter is wandering D.C. That’s where Hillary showed up to George Washington U to claim that she only lost Wisconsin because of Republican voter suppression. It had nothing to do with her failure to campaign in Wisconsin.

Meanwhile, only 300 people turned out to hear her latest set of pathetic excuses and lies.

“I was the first person who ran for president in more than 50 years without the protection of the Voting Rights Act,” she whined.

The Voting Rights Act had been put into place to stop Democrat voter suppression in segregated states in 1965. Not to protect Hillary. It had nothing to do with why a rich white Democrat lost Wisconsin.

Who actually invited Hillary to rant at GWU? Who else? Hillary Clinton. In Defense of American Democracy, the conference at which Hillary spoke was sponsored by Onward Together. Her own group.

Hillary told attendees that the crisis caused by her defeat requires “national soul searching.”

Would you have “risked arrest to demand votes for women or bled on the Edmund Pettus Bridge to demand voting rights for all?” she demanded.

Why would anyone get arrested or bleed for Hillary? They’re not even coming to hear her speak.

Just like they didn’t bother turning out to vote for her.

 

Hillary wants to fight a war until the last Hillarylander, but nobody would sacrifice a bunion for her, let alone their life and liberty to see that the flag of Hillandia flies proudly over a burning White House.

That’s what happens when you live in your own imaginary echo chamber of wealth and power.

Hillary claimed that Republicans had prevented American Indians on reservations from voting for her. But maybe they were just saving their votes for Elizabeth Warren, the first Cherokee president.

The only thing democracy needs defending from is Hillary Clinton.

The 2016 election was not hijacked by the Russians, Facebook or UFOs. It was nearly hijacked by Clinton operatives who spread false claims that Trump was a Russian agent that her campaign manufactured and paid for, and then passed along to government officials who used it as a pretext to spy on the opposition. Hillary began her rise with Watergate and ended her career by trying to recreate Watergate.

And now it’ll be on to the next stop in her endless self-humiliation world tour.

Hillary’s election hijacking failed and the only way she’ll ever be president is in an Italian supermarket.

#neverpoopypants

Source: ZeroHedge

Why Were Over 30,000 Secretary Clinton Emails Blind-Copied To A Chinese Company?

All but four of the 30,490 emails from Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized email server were forwarded to a private Google email address featuring the name of a Chinese company, according to documents released on Aug. 15.

Virtually every email which was sent to and received on the Clinton server was forwarded to “carterheavyindustries@gmail.com,” the documents show.

Frank Rucker, the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) investigator who spotted the anomaly, searched Google for “Carter Heavy Industries” and came up with results for Shandong Carter Heavy Industry Co., Ltd, a Chinese manufacturer of excavators and heavy machinery, according to the documents.

Rucker and ICIG attorney Jeanette McMillian told the FBI about the anomaly on Feb. 18, 2016, at a meeting which included Peter Strzok, who had just taken over as the section chief heading the probe. Rucker told Congress that Strzok was “aloof and dismissive” and didn’t ask many questions.

Strzok has since gained notoriety for text messages he exchanged with FBI attorney Lisa Page, with whom he was having an extramarital affair. The pair expressed bias against then-candidate Donald Trump and in favor of Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign.

McMillian told Congress that her understanding of the Carter Heavy Industries email address was that it was a “drop box” to which the emails from the Clinton server were sent in real time.

Even if you didn’t address an email to this address, the email went to it anyway,” McMillian said.

McMillian and Rucker were interviewed by the Senate Finance and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees on Dec. 4, 2018, in response to media reports that cited anonymous sources claiming that China gained access to Clinton’s emails. The committees released unclassified versions of those transcripts (pdf) along with several sets of supporting documents on Aug. 14.

The documents include several emails from Clinton and her staffers with message metadata showing the Carter Heavy Industries email address as a recipient.

Inspector General Inquiry

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz was aware of the ICIG’s referral to the FBI but did not address it in his 568-page report on the FBI and DOJ handling of the Clinton-email inquiry. Horowitz had promised Congress a year ago to look into and report on what the FBI did to investigate the matter. The newly released documents include the results of Horowitz’s inquiry in the form of an April 9, 2019, letter to senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)

In the letter, Horowitz and Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson write that the Carter Heavy Industries email account was created by Platte River Networks employee Paul Combetta, who managed Clinton’s email server.Combetta allegedly created the Carter Heavy Industries email on Aug. 20, 2012, to serve as a “dummy email.” Combetta then used the email in order to transfer messages archived on Clinton’s second private server to the Platte River Networks server in early 2014.

What Combetta did with the email account between 2012 and 2014 and who else had access to it before and after the transfer remains a mystery. Neither the DOJ or the ICIG inspector generals provide any details on whether the FBI ever examined the matter.

Combetta’s use of this email account is addressed in Horowitz’s report, although it is referred to as a “dummy email” instead of revealing the actual address. Horowitz and Atkinson do not explain how Combetta came to pick the email address. Combetta’s lawyer told Horowitz that the Carter Heavy Industries email was a made-up name and that Combetta had no connection to Shandong Carter Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.

Combetta, through an attorney, refused to be interviewed by the DOJ inspector general about the matter, according to the letter. He also said he had no documents responsive to subpoena about the issue.

Horowitz wrote that his office did not find any evidence to contradict the claims of Combetta’s lawyer.

“Accordingly, other than the similarity discussed above between the dummy email address and the name of a Chinese company identified by the former ICIG analyst and former Inspector General McCullough during a Google search, the ICIG and the DOJ OIG are unaware of any information that links Combetta or the dummy email address that he created with the Chinese government or a Chinese-owned company,” Horowitz and Atkinson wrote.

Source: by Ivan Pentchoukov | ZeroHedge

FBI Conducts Smash-N-Grab-N-Bury Evidence Raid at Home of New Clinton Foundation, Uranium One Whistleblower

The FBI conducted a six-hour raid on the home of a recognized Justice Department whistle blower who had confidentially submitted documents related to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the Daily Caller, citing the whistle blower’s attorney. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Uranium-One-Scandal.jpg?itok=DtJz06zk

The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.

The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. –Daily Caller

“The bureau raided my client to seize what he legally gave Congress about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One,” said the whistle blower’s lawyer, Michael Socarras – adding that he considered the FBI raid on his client, Dennis Nathan Cain, an “outrageous disregard” of whistle blower protections. 

Cain – a former FBI contractor, was faced with sixteen federal agents during the November 19 raid on his Union Bridge, Maryland home, according to Socarras. The raid was authorized on November 15 after federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher of the US District Court for Baltimore signed a court order. 

The special agent who led the raid alleged that Cain possessed stolen federal property, and demanded entry to his home, Socarras added. 

“On Nov. 19, the FBI conducted court authorized law enforcement activity in the Union Bridge, Maryland area,” said FBI spokesman Dave Fitz, adding that the agency had “no further comment.” 

Cain told the agents at his doorstop that he was a recognized and protected whistle  blower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, and that DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz had recognized his status, according to Cain’s attorney. 

Cain further told the FBI agent the potentially damaging classified information had been properly transmitted to the Senate and House Intelligence committees as permitted under the act, Socarras said. The agent immediately directed his agents to begin a sweep of the suburban home, anyway.

Frightened and intimidated, Cain promptly handed over the documents, Socarras told TheDCNF. Yet even after surrendering the information to the FBI, the agents continued to rummage through the home for six hours. –Daily Caller

After asking and getting my approval to do so, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had a member of his staff physically take Mr. Cain’s classified document disclosure to the House and Senate Intelligence committees,” Socarras told the Caller, adding “For the bureau to show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistle blower who gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law.” 

According to Socarras, Cain came across “potentially explosive information while working for an FBI contractor,” after which he met with a senior member of Horowitz’s office at a church close to the White House, where he delivered a cache of documents. 

Cain sat in a pew with a hoodie and sun glasses, Socarras said. Cain held a double-sealed envelope containing a flash drive with the documents. The IG official met him and, without saying a word, took the pouch over Cain’s shoulder and left. –Daily Caller

The Whistleblower Protection law requires the Inspector General to share potentially damaging information with the attorney general, who at the time was Jeff Sessions. According to Socarras, two law enforcement officials directed the documents to the Senate and House Intelligence committees for review, which were hand delivered by an IG official. 

“I cannot believe the Bureau informed the federal magistrate who approved the search warrant that they wanted to search the home of an FBI whistle blower to seize the information that he confidentially disclosed to the IG and Congress,” said Socarras. 

The FBI has yet to discuss the matter with Cain’s attorney despite the raid. 

“After the raid, and having received my name and phone number from Mr. Cain as his lawyer, an FBI agent actually called my client directly to discuss his seized electronics,” said Socarras. “Knowingly bypassing the lawyer of a represented client is serious misconduct.

Source: ZeroHedge

 

“They All Look The Same” – Hillary Cracks Racist Joke After Booker/Holder Mix-Up

Being the paragon of political-correctness and queen of virtue-signaling opportunism, Hillary Clinton sat down with Recode’s Kara Swisher this weekend to answer questions about just how evil and awful conservative opponents have been in the last few months.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-10-29_13-48-53.jpg?itok=neWfLym_

The conversation began normally, with Clinton hypocritically toeing the progressive line of identity politics by explaining how each of the groups are different but can be managed by the same liberal movement:

What’s often called political correctness is politeness,” Clinton said.

“It’s not being rude and insulting to people. It’s respecting the diversity that we have in our society,” she said.

The Democratic Party is a much more diverse political party, attracting people who are African-American, Latino, LGBT, whatever the reason why people feel more comfortable where they are taken in, where they are included as part of a political movement or party.”

“And I don’t think it’s politically correct to say we value that. And I don’t want to go around insulting people. I don’t want to paint with a broad brush every immigrant is this, every African-American is that, every, you know, other person with different religious beliefs or whatever – that’s childish.”

The conversation began normally, with Clinton hypocritically toeing the progressive line of identity politics by explaining how each of the groups are different but can be managed by the same liberal movement:

What’s often called political correctness is politeness,” Clinton said.

“It’s not being rude and insulting to people. It’s respecting the diversity that we have in our society,” she said.

The Democratic Party is a much more diverse political party, attracting people who are African-American, Latino, LGBT, whatever the reason why people feel more comfortable where they are taken in, where they are included as part of a political movement or party.”

“And I don’t think it’s politically correct to say we value that. And I don’t want to go around insulting people. I don’t want to paint with a broad brush every immigrant is this, every African-American is that, every, you know, other person with different religious beliefs or whatever – that’s childish.”

Childish, indeed. Insulting, indeed.

Just 30 seconds later, as Swisher asked:

“what do you think of Cory Booker… saying ‘kick them in the shins,’ essentially…” incorrectly recalling Eric Holder’s recent comments.

Which Clinton quickly corrected:

“Well that was Eric Holder…”

Adding, rather extraordinarily,

“Yeah, I know they all look alike,” Clinton joked, triggering howls of laughter from the apparently mind-numbed audience.

 

Sorry Hillary, we don’t think they look anything alike? Or did u mean all black people?

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-10-29_13-32-00.jpg?itok=FxrZhpr8

Finally, we have one question – what would have happened if Trump said it?

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/2018-10-28_19-12-25_0.jpg?itok=88F9vVXA

As The American Mirror’s Kyle Olsen concludes so eloquently, Hillary Clinton appears to benefit from her progressive privilege – it is the only thing that protects her from getting the ‘Roseanne treatment’, and not being dismissed in disgrace.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/screen-shot-2018-10-31-at-10-50-49-am.png

Source: ZeroHedge

Chicoms CC’d On Hillary Clinton Emails All Along

Were 18 To 20 CIA Sources Killed Or Imprisoned Because Hillary Clinton’s Emails Were Being Hacked In Real Time By China?

This is a scandal so huge that it could blow all of the other Clinton scandals totally out of the water. It is being alleged that 18 to 20 CIA sources were either killed or imprisoned in China from 2010 to 2012 because the Chinese were reading all of Hillary Clinton’s emails as soon as they were sent or received. At the time, Clinton was using a private email server in conjunction with her duties as Secretary of State, and even though that was highly illegal Clinton was never charged with anything. But now we have learned that a Chinese company had hacked Clinton’s private server and was getting all of her emails in real time. That Chinese company was “part of an intelligence operation”, and that means that the Chinese government was also receiving all of Hillary Clinton’s emails. During the exact timeframe when these hacked emails were being received by the Chinese, “18 to 20 CIA sources” were either killed or imprisoned by China. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out how that happened.

Let’s break this down one step at a time.

We just learned that there is a Chinese company that claims that it successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s private email server and has a copy “of every single email” that she either sent or received after the hacking took place…

A Chinese company that claims to have hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server reportedly has a copy of every single email the former presidential candidate sent and received afterward. The Chinese state-owned company inserted a code that forwarded all Hillary’s emails to them, and Donald Trump is already demanding that this is investigated.

According to reporting done by The Daily Caller, the Chinese state-owned firm operating in the Washington D.C. area wrote code that was then embedded in Hillary’s private server and generated a “courtesy copy” for almost all her emails. Those were then forwarded to the Chinese company.

This story was originally broken by the Daily Caller, and they also reported that this hacking was done “as part of an intelligence operation”…

A Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails, two sources briefed on the matter told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The Chinese firm obtained Clinton’s emails in real time as she sent and received communications and documents through her personal server, according to the sources, who said the hacking was conducted as part of an intelligence operation.

This means that China was literally “reading Clinton’s mail” whenever it was sent or received.

The pieces of the puzzle are really starting to come together.  Last month, U.S. Representative Louie Gohmert stated that the ICIG had discovered that nearly every single one of the emails on Hillary Clinton’s private email server had been sent to a “foreign entity”

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican, said at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing. He did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia.

Now we know that the identity of that foreign entity was China.

Wow.

Hillary Clinton began serving as Secretary of State very early in 2009, and her final day as Secretary of State was February 1, 2013.

During that precise timeframe, “18 to 20 CIA sources” were either killed or imprisoned by the Chinese.  The following comes from Reuters

China killed or imprisoned 18 to 20 CIA sources from 2010 to 2012, hobbling U.S. spying operations in a massive intelligence breach whose origin has not been identified, the New York Times reported on Saturday.

Investigators remain divided over whether there was a spy within the Central Intelligence Agency who betrayed the sources or whether the Chinese hacked the CIA’s covert communications system, the newspaper reported, citing current and former U.S. officials.

The source of the intelligence breach is no longer a mystery.

It was Hillary Clinton.

Of those “18 to 20 CIA sources”, at least a dozen were put to death.  Here is more from Reuters
The Chinese killed at least a dozen people providing information to the CIA from 2010 through 2012, dismantling a network that was years in the making, the newspaper reported.

One was shot and killed in front of a government building in China, three officials told the Times, saying that was designed as a message to others about working with Washington.

This is the reason why we have a law that is supposed to prevent those that handle classified information from using email servers that are not secure.

People can end up dead when classified material is handled in a cavalier fashion, and that appears to be exactly what happened in this case.

But instead of being held accountable for this, Hillary Clinton will have a really good chance of winning the Democratic nomination if she decides to run again in 2020.

And if that happens, and if things don’t go well for President Trump the next couple of years, Clinton would likely be the next president of the United States.

https://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/server-access.png

Putin Claims U.S. Intelligence Agents Funneled $400 Million To Clinton Campaign

Vladimir Putin made a bombshell claim during Monday’s joint press conference with President Trump in Helsinki, Finland, when the Russian President said some $400 million in illegally earned profits was funneled to the Clinton campaign by associates of American-born British financier Bill Browder – at one time the largest foreign portfolio investors in Russia. The scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community, said Putin, who he said “accompanied and guided these transactions.”

Browder made billions in Russia during the 90’s. In December, a Moscow court sentenced Browder in absentia to nine years in prison for tax fraud, while he was also found guilty of tax evasion in a separate 2013 case. Putin accused Browder’s associates of illegally earning over than $1.5 billion without paying Russian taxes, before sending $400 million to Clinton.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/putin%20looking%20at%20hillary_0.jpg?itok=oem5iDNZ

After offering to allow special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to come to Russia for their investigation – as long as there was a reciprocal arrangement for Russian intelligence to investigate in the U.S., Putin said this:

For instance, we can bring up Mr. Browder, in this particular case.  Business associates of Mr. Browder have earned over $1.5 billion in Russia and never paid any taxes neither in Russia or the United States and yet the money escaped the country. They were transferred to the United States. They sent [a] huge amount of money, $400,000,000, as a contribution to the campaign of Hillary Clinton.  Well that’s their personal case.  

It might have been legal, the contribution itself but the way the money was earned was illegal.  So we have solid reason to believe that some [US] intelligence officers accompanied and guided these transactions.  So we have an interest in questioning them.

We would expect Putin to show some receipts for such bombshell allegations, while President Trump did not challenge the claims.

Who is Bill Browder?

From a report we noted in February by Philip Giraldi of The Strategic Culture Foundation:

Israel Shamir, a keen observer of the American-Russian relationship, and celebrated American journalist Robert Parry both think that one man deserves much of the credit for the new Cold War and that man is William Browder, a hedge fund operator who made his fortune in the corrupt 1990s world of Russian commodities trading.

Browder is also symptomatic of why the United States government is so poorly informed about international developments as he is the source of much of the Congressional “expert testimony” contributing to the current impasse. He has somehow emerged as a trusted source in spite of the fact that he has self-interest in cultivating a certain outcome. Also ignored is his renunciation of American citizenship in 1998, reportedly to avoid taxes. He is now a British citizen.

Browder is notoriously the man behind the 2012 Magnitsky Act, which exploited Congressional willingness to demonize Russia and has done so much to poison relations between Washington and Moscow. The Act sanctioned individual Russian officials, which Moscow has rightly seen as unwarranted interference in the operation of its judicial system.

Browder, a media favorite who self-promotes as “Putin’s enemy #1,” portrays himself as a selfless human rights advocate, but is he? He has used his fortune to threaten lawsuits for anyone who challenges his version of events, effectively silencing many critics. He claims that his accountant Sergei Magnitsky was a crusading “lawyer” who discovered a $230 million tax-fraud scheme that involved the Browder business interest Hermitage Capital but was, in fact, engineered by corrupt Russian police officers who arrested Magnitsky and enabled his death in a Russian jail.

Many have been skeptical of the Browder narrative, suspecting that the fraud was in fact concocted by Browder and his accountant Magnitsky. A Russian court recently supported that alternative narrative, ruling in late December that Browder had deliberately bankrupted his company and engaged in tax evasion. He was sentenced to nine years prison in absentia.

William Browder is again in the news recently in connection with testimony related to Russiagate. On December 16th Senator Diane Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee released the transcript of the testimony provided by Glenn Simpson, founder of Fusion GPS. According to James Carden, Browder was mentioned 50 times, but the repeated citations apparently did not merit inclusion in media coverage of the story by the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico.

Fusion GPS, which was involved in the research producing the Steele Dossier used to discredit Donald Trump, was also retained to provide investigative services relating to a lawsuit in New York City involving a Russian company called Prevezon. As information provided by Browder was the basis of the lawsuit, his company and business practices while in Russia became part of the investigation. Simmons maintained that Browder proved to be somewhat evasive and his accounts of his activities were inconsistent. He claimed never to visit the United States and not own property or do business there, all of which were untrue, to include his ownership through a shell company of a $10 million house in Aspen Colorado. He repeatedly ran away, literally, from attempts to subpoena him so he would have to testify under oath.

Per Simmons, in Russia, Browder used shell companies locally and also worldwide to avoid taxes and conceal ownership, suggesting that he was likely one of many corrupt businessmen operating in what was a wild west business environment.

My question is, “Why was such a man granted credibility and allowed a free run to poison the vitally important US-Russia relationship?” The answer might be follow the money. Israel Shamir reports that Browder was a major contributor to Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland, who was the major force behind the Magnitsky Act.

***

Crooked Hillary Desperately Tries to Deflect After Putin Drops Bombshell ‘US Intel Helped Move $400,000,000 to Clinton Campaign

https://a.disquscdn.com/get?url=http%3A%2F%2Femmecon.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F06%2Finspirational-trump-putin-meme-64-best-political-memes-images-on-pinterest.jpg&key=4U3q40_b1wUAEbYUfC5Ldw&w=800&h=757https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6dd596e3663f3cdc017cd3e8688397d4b60d8e47ae6f6a7f9a4ca7de547f4dd3.jpg?w=800&h=568https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a4821d3e6bc03dac0d1a1760bfceace00fd2e0b1bf61f1ccb55c313efc1baeb7.jpg?w=800&h=367https://i.imgflip.com/1awc2u.jpg

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/926c88af5fb208a4f121279d75d78fa4745a6b8efa8edeb6a116526e9865e64a.jpghttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/59eb4fbdbc520e6f1d5a243c4af86252ad4fa582f05f5b96e479b74d90d41c8e.jpghttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/aa50bdd69d59581a573f7fd3ce912730ac2e92965c1d7a4b59684c8d645c0f0c.gifhttps://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7e5ce2e0095111a2667289ac551659fecfc1b0e8b95766f13904ded894dd444d.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/854dddf66423120917d549b28b5a7bb60b7bc1f03cbcffa560d21a6550e18a30.jpg

Source: ZeroHedge

Former CIA Officer: Clinton “Involved In Biggest Treason In History”

Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says what Hillary Clinton did with her charity and Uranium One while she was Secretary of State was a crime for the history books.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Kevin-Shipp-CIA-200x300.jpg?itok=Nol2CjqU

Shipp explains, “Hillary Clinton used this to launder money in foreign banks so it wasn’t subject to U.S. laws, congressional subpoenas or FOIA demands for the evidence.  This was done to launder this money globally into the Clinton Foundation so the U.S. government could not examine it at all.” 

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/CASH.jpg?itok=dleDZJKX

Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller was the head of the FBI while the Uranium One deal was being done by Clinton and the Russians.  One fifth of U.S. uranium production was bought by the Russians in a deal Clinton pushed and approved.  The Clinton Foundation received more than $140 million from some of the same Russian players who were involved with Uranium One.  Why didn’t Mueller stop the deal?  Shipp says,

Mueller is either a complete moron, which he is not, or he overlooked the biggest counterterrorism cases in U.S. history.  It involved Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One and, of course, the destruction of all the emails and evidence and her secret server, and on and on and on it goes, and he (Mueller) ignored it all.” 

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/Trick-or-Treat.jpg?itok=41dJGFAk

How did she get away with obvious crime?  Shipp says,

The most bizarre thing is the people who protected her from clear felonious activity and violations of the Espionage Act.  James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, was protecting her and leaking things to the media and lying.  You had John Brennan, Director of the CIA, protecting her by starting a false investigation (on Trump) and stirring things up with this (false/unverified) dossier.  You had James Comey, Director of the FBI, protecting her…

Then, you’ve got Peter Strzok protecting her, and now it appears the United Kingdom GCHQ was using NSA information to target Donald Trump and protect Hillary Clinton.  You have to ask yourself what kind of power or connections does this woman have to get all of these members of the Deep State, Shadow Government to risk their own criminal penalties to protect her and try to get her elected?  That is the Shadow Government.  That is the Deep State.  That is what is so chilling about this whole thing…

“This is deep. This is dark. This is as dark as it gets, and this is the biggest espionage case involving government officials in the history of this country.”

Shipp also points out that, this time, it will not be business as usual for the “Deep State and Shadow Government.”  They are going to be brought to justice because Shipp says, “indictments are coming because of Donald Trump coming into the White House from the outside.  Trump cannot be bribed.”    

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with former CIA Officer Kevin Shipp of ForTheLoveofFreedom.net.

(To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here)

Source: ZeroHedge

 

Recent Lawsuit Outs Maine Democrat Party Money Laundering For Clinton Campaign

Maine’s Democratic Party illegally conspired with 32 other state party branches to break election finance laws, by unlawfully funneling $84 million into Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. The dirty donations were first wired to state parties, then instantly transferred straight back to Democratic National Committee headquarters. Every cent came back cleaned, starched and neatly pressed, according to a new lawsuit in the state.

“That makes this entire money laundering operation a scheme to circumvent base contribution limits,” attorney Dan Backer notes. The plot allowed wealthy Democrats to “make massively excessive six-figure contributions through straw entities on paper in order to deliver them to Hillary Clinton’s control.” That isn’t good. According to Backer, “It is exceedingly illegal to have done so.”

Backer’s most recent suit, filed in Maine, goes beyond his earlier efforts, bypassing the Federal Elections Commission entirely to hold the Maine Democratic Committee directly responsible. The suit is expected to turn up the heat on the FEC at the same time, through the added public attention.

Backer first made headlines in December by filing a formal complaint with the FEC outlining the details of what he uncovered. After months went by without a response, he filed suit against the FEC in a Washington, D.C. federal court.

Backer is hoping to compel the agency which investigates and enforces laws related to political fundraising to actually do their jobs and investigate the Democratic state committees.

In an interview with Maine Public Radio about the most recent suit, Backer explained how the Maine Democrats conspired with Hillary’s campaign “to exploit rules that allow state party committees to transfer unlimited sums between one another.”

Because huge wire transfers to and from the national campaign and the state level branches aren’t scrutinized, the Democrats were able to “circumvent individual donor limits and funnel the cash back to Clinton’s principal campaign committee.”

It is obvious that the whole thing was a smoke and mirrors magic show because “the state committees never had custody of the money.”

During the 2016 campaign, the joint fundraising committee “Hillary Victory Fund” went around to big donors asking for big checks. Under the rules, a donor can bundle up the maximum allowable contribution, for every possible candidate they can donate to, in one single check.

Theoretically, the money is meant to benefit all of the candidates the same as if each donation were made one-by-one. Legally, anyone can contribute $2,700 to any individual candidate.

Not only that, they can donate $10,000 all at once to every state party and another $33,400 to a national party.

Everyone involved “should be worried,” Backer warns. “They’re all looking at significant legal jeopardy.”

Along with Democratic party officials, there are quite a few big names on the hot seat. Steven Spielberg, Calvin Klein, even Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandburg all made questionably large bundled donations.

HVF held dinners at George Clooney’s house, and concerts with Elton John, where Democratic-leaning donors could write one convenient six-figure check and HVF would handle the details. Some stars donated more than $400,000.

What really happened is that all of it went directly to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Early in 2016, the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting uncovered evidence that “the money the party received from big donors was almost immediately transferred to the Democratic National Committee.”

When it goes out as fast as it comes in, how could it be “used,” they asked.

“The quick transfers raise questions about the state committees’ participation in the joint fundraising agreement, which are billed as arrangements that mutually benefit its participants. Yet little of the money donated to the Maine Democratic Party stayed there.”

Their reporting was backed up by FEC transaction records.

One shady transaction showed how $3 million went from the Hillary Victory Fund to the Maine Democratic Party. Almost immediately, 2.4 million went right back out to the DNC. “It’s unclear how the leftover money was spent.”

In another Maine transaction, “transaction data showed the state party sent a $15,000 donation to the DNC before it arrived from the Hillary Victory Fund.”

Backer explains the significance of these exchanges as “the money was papered to make it look like it passed through state committees.”

“On the very same day each of these transfers supposedly occurred, or occasionally the very next day, every single one of those state parties purportedly contributed all of those funds to the DNC,” the federal lawsuit alleges.

Attorney Paul Ryan and his Common Cause “finance transparency group” has gone toe-to-toe with Backer in the past but this time agrees that what the Democrats were up to was wrong.

“There’s a lot of smoke here. There may be a fire,” he told local Maine news media. “There may be some actual violations of federal campaign finance law.”

“At a bare minimum,” he insists, “the FEC needs to open an investigation.”

While Ryan agrees there was wrongdoing, he says that focusing on the transactions misses a bigger infraction. He notes that Donna Brazile admitted publicly in her book that while she was chairwoman, “the DNC was basically run from Clinton’s campaign headquarters.”

To Ryan, that means that Hillary Clinton was controlling the spending. “For me, that looks like illegal or coordinated spending,” he declared.

All these shenanigans are something that the Department of Justice should also be looking at Becker points out. What the Democrats did is “4,000 times the magnitude” of the Dinesh D’Souza case. He was convicted in 2012 for “a strawman donor scheme.”

Can you see the ‘blue wave’ for what it is now?

https://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/blue-toilet-water.jpg

Source: By Mark Meganan | Conservative Daily Post

AP News Tries To Cover Up Clinton Links To Sex Cult

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/allisonmack-1200x630.jpgAllison Mack court appearance

The Associated Press is running a full-court press to block any reporting on the associations between Bill and Hillary Clinton and NXIVM, the sex cult that sees its leaders Keith Raniere and Allison Mack standing trial for sex trafficking.

At a recent court hearing, former Smallville star Allison Mack avoided eye contact with fellow defendant Keith Raniere, the manipulative cult leader who allegedly had Mack and other women under his spell during his years of unencumbered alleged sex crimes. Mack’s possible plea deal could lead to incarceration for Raniere — who is being held without bail — and could collapse the entire house of cards around NXIVM that involves the Clintons and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand.

https://i1.wp.com/uniteordie-usa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Keith-Raniere-NXIVM-Bill-Hillary-Clinton-Global-Initiative.-768x880.png

The AP is trying to discredit the well-documented NXIVM-Clinton axis by focusing on just one Internet story about the case, from a site that is not well known. This is a common tactic by the mainstream media — pretending that an entire controversy was caused by one blog post and then trying to smear everyone who reports on the controversy because that one blog post was wrong.

Here’s how the AP, re-printed by the New York Daily News, tries to whitewash the Clinton element of this scandal: “The article on nyeveningnews and other sites declares that Mack “confessed that she sold children to the Rothschilds and Clintons during her time in the child sex cult…The alleged Clinton connection in the story is based on something that isn’t true. It claims that Seagram’s liquor fortune heiresses Clare and Sara Bronfman, who are followers of Raniere, are members of Bill Clinton’s foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, which requires a $15,000 membership fee. A spokesman for the foundation tells The Associated Press they haven’t donated any money or made a required “commitment to action” to the Global Initiative.”

Latest: Why Was A Clinton Donor Funding ‘Human Experiments’ At A Sex Cult?

That one random article aside, the sex cult’s Clinton links are actually everywhere, not to mention links to New York senator and prospective presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand, whose father worked for the depraved cult.

The cult actually hacked Hillary Clinton’s emails, adding them to the long list of nefarious organizations that accessed Clinton’s private communications during her scandal-plagued public service career.

The Times-Union reported in 2015 (hat tip Mike Cernovich):

“Clare W. Bronfman, an heiress of the Seagram Company business empire, allegedly implanted a “key logger” virus on the computer of her late father, Edgar M. Bronfman Sr., so officials with the NXIVM corporation could secretly monitor his emails, including his exchanges with world leaders and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, according to court records.”

The extraordinary allegations are attributed to Kristen M. Keeffe, who was part of the inner circle that ran NXIVM, a “human development” organization that has been described by one expert as an “extreme cult.” The accusations by Keeffe are contained in a transcript of a telephone conversation that took place last March between Keeffe and Barbara J. Bouchey, a former NXIVM executive board member who is facing computer trespassing charges in Albany that accuse her and three others of improperly accessing the corporation’s website.”

Times-Union passage ends

Interesting. You know what else is interesting?

Charles Hurt reported that in the spring of 2007, “executives and top associates…along with their family members” donated $29,900 to the Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential campaign.

Longtime Clinton friend and fundraiser Richard Mays, an Arkansas lawyer, was active with the New York sex cult.

Mays had an extensive videotaped conversation with the cult’s leader Keith Raniere — who has been arrested for sex trafficking alongside his protégé, Smallville actress Allison Mack, and whose cult allegedly branded women with his initials. That interview was part of the “Keith Raniere Conversations” program, available on his website.

Mays reportedly had “intensive classes with Raniere,” whose Nxivm cult was previously called Executive Success Programs.

Mays has long been linked to the Clintons, and Bill Clinton appointed him to the Arkansas Supreme Court. New York magazine once described him as “a Clinton friend and one of Hillary’s top fund-raisers.”

Kirsten Gillibrand has also taken money from the group’s high-profile socialite member, and her father actually worked for the cult.

PageSix reported: “Nxivm’s biggest financial supporter, Seagram heiress Clare Bronfman, contributed $2,400 to Gillibrand’s 2010 special-election campaign, records show.”

https://s16-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi2.wp.com%2Ffrankreport.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F01%2Fcb.jpg%3Fresize%3D1320%252C877%26amp%3Bssl%3D1&sp=f7b8ca265a5d968ef2074d8b27b1954b
Clair Brofman

PageSix also reported: The lawmaker’s [Gillibrand’s] dad, Doug Rutnik, worked as an attorney for Nxivm for four months in 2004 at a rate of $25,000 per month. “When he wanted to quit, he was falsely sued” on dubious grounds, said one source. “He ended up paying them back the $100,000 he’d been paid and signing a confidentiality agreement.’”

At least one woman from the cult says she was branded with Keith Raniere’s initials. Here is a bizarre video that Keith Raniere made with Allison Mack, where he made her break down in tears.

https://s14-eu5.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FDcNfXn_V4AAYJvk.jpg&sp=ac7ca15c511bb8213b8e88cfd3b7192a

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DbqwRgpV0AAWW3z.jpg

Source: By Patrick Howley | Big League Politicks

Trump Palace Coup d’état Exposure Widens

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/13a41-putin2bpopcorn.jpg

***

Sunday Talks – Explosive Interview With Devin Nunes…


Chairman of the House Intelligence Community Devin Nunes appears on Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the
origin of the counterintelligence operation, that began in July 2016, against the Trump campaign.

Last week the FBI releases the original “electronic communication” (EC) documents, that underpinned the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation.  The first half of this interview contains some stunning information: the raw intelligence product within the EC did not come through official intelligence channels.

Meaning, the origin of the 2016 counterintelligence operation, which was specifically started by CIA Director John Brennan sharing his ‘raw intelligence product’ with the FBI, was not an official product of the U.S. intelligence community. Brennan was NOT using official partnerships with intelligence agencies of our Five-Eyes partner nations; and he did not provide raw intelligence -as an outcome of those relationships- to the FBI.

The questions, many of which are rhetorical against the backdrop of political motives, become: if the EC is not based on official intelligence from U.S. intelligence apparatus or any of the ‘five-eyes’ partners, then what is the origin, source and purpose therein, of the unofficial raw intelligence? Who created it? And why?

As we begin to ponder the ramifications and answers to the questions in the first half of this interview, we must remember that CIA Director John Brennan gave congressional testimony last year where he explained how he delivered the raw intelligence product itself.  We spotted this issue, and Brennan’s obfuscation therein, a year ago, when Brennan first gave his testimony.

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/devin-nunes-11-w-rosenstein-wray-horowitz-huber-fisa.jpg

On May 23rd, 2017, Former CIA Director John Brennan gave very specific testimony to congress where he noted he provided the raw intelligence to FBI Director Comey – FULLSTOP.

Listen carefully to the opening statement from former CIA Director John Brennan May 23rd, 2017, during his testimony to congress.  Pay very close attention to the segment at 13:35 of this video of Brennan’s testimony:

Brennan: [13:35]  “Third, through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”

“Again, in consultation with the White House, I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”

“Given the highly sensitive nature of what was an active counter-intelligence case [that means the FBI], involving an ongoing Russian effort, to interfere in our presidential election, the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…

In the last paragraph of the testimony above, remember Brennan is describing the creation of the Clinton-Steele dossier and how it was used to generate a fraudulent October 21st, 2016 FISA Title-1 Surveillance Warrant against U.S. Person Carter Page.  In hindsight, and against the known facts from research, we can clearly identify the need for the FISA warrant.  The FBI and larger team of co-conspirators needed to have a retroactive legal basis for the political surveillance that was happening long before the warrant was issued.

That unlawful foundational FBI surveillance, which happened prior to October 2016, included the use of unauthorized FISA-702 queries of the NSA and FBI database for political opposition research by contractors.  Again, much like the unofficial origin of the raw intelligence that began the July 2016 counterintelligence op, the FISA(702) abuse was simply more ‘unofficial’ use of the intelligence apparatus.

It was the FBI (Comey) and ODNI (Clapper) generating the intel reports, including the Presidents’ Daily Briefing (PDB).

The CIA provided raw intel, to start the operation, and the FBI and DOJ-NSD (National Security Division) generated the raw monitoring intelligence from the characters identified by the CIA, FBI, DOJ-NSD and approved by FBI FISA warrant submissions.

The FBI were running the counter-intelligence operation and generating the actual reports that were eventually shared with the White House, Susan Rice and the Dept of Justice.  Those reports, or interpretations of the report content, were leaked to the media by political operatives in the IC (and specifically FBI) throughout the deployment of the “insurance policy”.

During the time James Comey’s FBI was generating the intelligence reports, Comey admitted he intentionally never informed congressional oversight: “because of the sensitivity of the matter“.

John Brennan was smartly (and intentionally) positioning himself out of the picture from the perspective of the illegal acts within the entire process.  ODNI James Clapper while rubbing his face and scratching his head had taken the same route earlier.  That would leave James Comey, Andrew McCabe and the small group within the DOJ-NSD and FBI.  The CIA and DNI wanted all fingerprints to be from DOJ and FBI.

In his May 2017 testimony, Director Brennan goes on to say the main substance of those Gang of Eight briefings (2016) was the same as the main judgements of the January 2017 classified and unclassified intelligence assessments published by the CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA (intelligence community).

That January reference was the infamous 17 agencies report, from CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), FBI (Comey) and NSA (Rogers), all who had confidence -except Rogers-  according to the report, that Russia was attempting to interfere in the 2016 election. The intelligence report was finished January 4, 2017, the day before the White House meeting with Comey, Brennan, Clapper, etc. and documented by Susan Rice.

Now, a critic might think that Brennan is informing congress on one thing (Russian investigation), and Comey due to his March 20th admissions (Trump investigation), is NOT INFORMING congress on another.  However, that angle is rebuked by Brennan’s own testimony that his specific intelligence product (CIA) was given to the FBI who were exclusively in charge of the “counter-intelligence investigation“.

What’s happening here in May 2017 is actually John Brennan creating his defense, and positioning James Comey as the primary person who is to blame for any outcome therein.  In May 2017, deploying the “insurance policy” was still plausible – but it was becoming less likely to succeed.  Reader Dan encapsulated what Brennan was trying to do nicely in this paragraph: [Note, this is from Brennan’s perspective as he attempts to exit liability]

[…] Brennan gave Comey the investigative product -which had nothing to do with the Trump team – and Comey used it to carry out Obama, Hillary, and Susan Rice’s dirty work for them. Of course Brennan was in on the whole thing and is now saving his own skin by saying ” I briefed ya’ll on everything I had with regards to Russia, anything additional that arose please talk to my buddy Comey”.

CIA Director John Brennan was making James Comey own the “Counter-Intelligence ‘Muh Russia’” claims about the Trump campaign. As a consequence, Brennan was trying to make Comey the fall-guy for a Robert Mueller investigative outcome in case everything fell apart and their deployment of the “insurance policy” failed.

Brennan knows there’s no ‘there’ there.

The entire construct of the “Russian Investigation” was the political use of manufactured intelligence, used to create an investigation in order to weaken, perhaps eliminate, President-Elect Trump or President Trump.  This was their “insurance policy”.

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/strzok-and-page-3.jpg

However, there simply was no ‘there’ there because there’s no substantive evidence to support a “Trump Campaign Collusion Narrative”.  Eventually, all avenues to prove the existence of something, that doesn’t exist, hit a dead end.

Knowing this was a likely outcome, in May 2017 John Brennan realized that someone has focused attention on Comey’s March 20th admission to congress that the FBI intentionally kept congress in the dark during the construct of the counter-intel narrative.

Congress was kept in the dark during this phase because the narrative can only thrive with innuendo, rumor, gossip etc.   The appearance of the investigation itself was the political need; the substance was non-existent and immaterial to the creation of the narrative.

If Comey notified congress, via the Gang of Eight oversight, the counter-intel narrative would have been harder to manufacture as details would have to be consistent.  That’s the benefit to keeping any oversight away while creating the politically useful narrative.

In May 2017, CIA Director John Brennan, facing the looming reality the underlying Russian ‘collusion evidence’ being non-existent, was trying to give the appearance that he briefed congress on larger Russian election interference issues.  However , the trouble for Brennan is his own admission that these issues were the underlying principle for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation.  Brennan specifically says he gave his intelligence product to the FBI.

Brennan was attempting to create plausible deniability for his role in a constructing a political narrative; a false narrative.

Again, May 23rd, 2017, WATCH THE RETREAT:

It’s not accidental this Brennan retreat is being facilitated by a member of congress John Brennan admits to briefing last year.  Gang-of-Eight member, Adam Schiff.

BACKSTORY

Now keep in mind, with this interview by Chairman Devin Nunes highlighting there was no official intelligence apparatus used in the creation of the “raw intelligence” passed on by CIA Director John Brennan; and understanding the HPSCI is directing investigative inquiry toward the State Department; and knowing that President Trump has just nominated his own head of the CIA to become Secretary of State; …is it a surprise to see the political leadership of the Democrat Party attempting to block Pompeo?

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/christopher-wray-mike-pompeo-dan-coats-lt-gen-robert-ashley-adm-michael-rogers-robert-cardillo.jpg

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/pompeo-and-trump.jpg

***

 

Hillary Clinton Suffers 90% Cut In Recent Speaking Fee

After embarrassing herself and creating yet another obstacle for Congressional Democrats to overcome later this year during a disastrous trip to India earlier this month, Hillary Clinton is taking a massive 90% cut to her typical speaking fee for an engagement at one of New Jersey’s most prestigious universities.

And no – it’s not Princeton.

Clinton made her less-than-triumphant return to the Garden State on Thursday to deliver a talk about American democracy and her role in shaping the the American woman’s place in political life, according to NJ.com.

Rutgers will pay Clinton $25,000 from one of its endowments – ensuring that no tuition money will be used for the payment.

The event will be hosted by the Rutgers Eagleton Institute of Politics and will be held at Rutgers Athletic Center in Piscataway. The event is – unsurprisingly – sold out.

Clinton famously charged $300,000 for a speech at another prestigious state school – UCLA – back in 2014, with a fee of $250,000 generally accepted as the norm.

Clinton has made three public appearances in New Jersey since her defeat in the 2016 presidential election. She campaigned for then-candidate (and now governor) Phil Murphy back in October. She also returned with her husband for another pro-Murphy event later that month.

She also traveled to Montclair for a book signing in September as part of her “What Happened” apology tour.

Source: ZeroHedge

Clinton-Linked Cult Leader Who Hot-Branded Women Is Arrested For Sex Trafficking

Keith Raniere, the co-founder and leader of a secretive self-help cult called NXIVM who was run out of Arkansas when Bill Clinton was governor has been arrested by the FBI in Mexico and charged with sex trafficking. Raniere fled to Mexico last November after U.S. authorities began interviewing “witnesses and victims” linked to NXIVM, however finding him proved elusive after Raniere began using “end-to-end encrypted email and stopped using his phone.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/_100578972_keithraniere_0.jpg?itok=6mNbIE0W

Shortly before Raniere was arraigned in a Texas courtroom, the FBI raided the Saratoga County, NY home of NXIVM co-founder, Nancy Salzman – who was alleged to be storing large amounts of cash at her residence, brought over the border following NXIVM training sessions in Mexico.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/inside-nxivm-cult-e198a3b7-0510-4e7f-a538-a8002405b14f_0.jpg?itok=8tC9my-L

While NXIVM describes itself as a self-help business that has helped thousands of people “reach their potential” through various courses, the women’s-only “inner sanctum” led by Raniere is known as ‘DOS’, which whistle blower Frank Parlato – a Buffalo-area businessman who worked for the cult, says stands for “dominus obsequious sororium” – Latin for “master over the slave women”. Once they are a member – or “slave” – they are allegedly encouraged to recruit new women into their “slave pods”, stop dating, and be on call 24 hours a day to their “master”.

DOS reportedly required female members to give their recruiter – or “master,” naked pictures or other compromising material which could be used as blackmail before being branded with Raniere’s initials below the hip using a cauterizing iron.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/brand_close.jpg.size-custom-crop.1086x0_0.jpg?itok=-v4LCegm

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/attachment2-1_0.jpeg?itok=xMHChif_

Sarah Edmondson, one of the participants, said she had been told she would get a small tattoo as part of the initiation. But she was not prepared for what came next.

Each woman was told to undress and lie on a massage table, while three others restrained her legs and shoulders. According to one of them, their “master,” a top Nxivm official named Lauren Salzman, instructed them to say: “Master, please brand me, it would be an honor.

A female doctor proceeded to use a cauterizing device to sear a two-inch-square symbol below each woman’s hip, a procedure that took 20 to 30 minutes. For hours, muffled screams and the smell of burning tissue filled the room.

I wept the whole time,” Ms. Edmondson recalled. “I disassociated out of my body.”New York Times

Of note, Smallville actress Allison Mack who played Chloe Sullivan is (or was) allegedly a “master” in the cult, and required to obey orders from Raniere – including finding women to sleep with him. 

Mack would require that prospective “slaves” place compromising collateral into a Dropbox account — one of whom was India Oxenberg, the daughterr of Dynasty actress Catherine Oxenberg – who met with prosecutors in New York and presented evidence against

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/gettyimages-147578726_0.jpg?itok=mmAnOhpw

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/screen-shot-2017-11-08-at-10-22-21-pm_0.png?itok=LEEU-0V8

NXIVM Funding and the Clinton connection

As Rolling Stone reported in November, “In 2010, Vanity Fair published “The Heiresses and the Cult,” a detailed account of Seagram heiresses Sara and Clare Bronfman‘s immersion in NXIVM; the sisters reportedly gave up approximately $150 million of their trust fund to help fund the alleged cult.” 

And in a 2007 article by the New York Post entitled “Hillary’s $30,000 fans are her “cult” following,” journalist Charles Hurt notes that Raniere was run out of Arkansas after Bill Clinton’s then-attorney general, Winston Bryant, charged the cult leader and two others with fraud and business deception. 

While Raniere paid fines in both New York and Arkansas in the case, over a decade later NXIVM executives proceeded to donate $29,900 to Hillary Clinton’s presidential 2006 campaign – and at least three NXIVM officials are “invitation-only” members of the Clinton Global Initiative

On March 14 and April 13, records show, more than a dozen contributions poured into Clinton’s coffers from NXIVM, an executive and group-awareness training organization led by Brooklyn-born Keith Raniere, 47.

Most were from first-time political donors, each giving the $2,300 maximum.

Three of the March and April Clinton pledges came from Raniere’s most high-profile followers: Seagram heiresses Clare and Sara Bronfman, and Pamela Cafritz, daughter of D.C. A-listers Buffy and Bill Cafritz.

Hillary isn’t the only Clinton NXIVM officials are attracted to.

At least three of them – group President Nancy Salzman and the Bronfman sisters – are members of Bill’s charitable organization, the Clinton Global Initiative. Membership is by invitation only and requires at least a $15,000 donation per person for one year. –New York Post

Prosecutors say Raniere was uncooperative when immigration officials arrested him in Mexico – while women he was staying with “chased the car in which the defendant was being transported in their own car at high speed.” 

Raniere is expected to be transferred to New York authorities following Tuesday’s Texas court appearance. During their request that he be held without bond, federal prosecutors said he “has spent his life profiting from his pyramid schemes and has otherwise received financial backing from independently wealthy women.”

He faces a mandatory minimum of 15 years in prison if convicted of the sex trafficking charges, according to federal prosecutors – who say he poses a “significant risk of flight” due to his “access to vast resources,” and his “long-standing history of systematically exploiting women through coercive practices for his own financial and sexual benefit.” 

What is it with Clinton supporters and cults?

Source: ZeroHedge

Hillary Falls Twice As Wogs Scramble To Help Her Overcome Flight Of Stairs

Hillary Clinton does not have the best luck with obstacles – however it has nothing to do with her health, we’re being told again.

While navigating down a flight of approximately 15 stairs at Jahaz Mahal in New Delhi, India on Monday, Clinton began to fall about halfway down. As wogs scrambled to assist the former Secretary of State, she lost control again – her left foot shooting forward while her right leg crumpled beneath her. 

Hillary’s double stumble down the relatively benign flight of stairs comes one day after she said Trump supporters “didn’t like black people getting rights,” or “women getting jobs” during a discussion at the India Today Conclave on Sunday. 

Madame Citizen’s fall from grace was the latest in a long line of stair-related issues Hillary has suffered throughout her long and lucrative career. During an August 2016 campaign stop in South Carolina, a state she lost, Clinton struggled to ascend yet another unassuming flight of stairs.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/hillary-clinton-sc-reuters-640x480_0.jpg?itok=UM2JZWLS

And in 2011 – after successfully making it up a flight of stairs, Clinton was assaulted by a doorway threshold – mercilessly tripping her as she attempted to board her plane in Yemen. 

In June 2009, a little more than six months after losing her first bid for White House, Clinton fractured her elbow while on her way to see President Obama.

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/gettyimages-88629633_0.jpg?itok=ppZQwyxR

While no stairs were involved, Hillary Clinton infamously fainted during a memorial on September 11, 2016 before being chucked into a van and rushed to daughter Chelsea’s Manhattan apartment.

Clinton’s campaign said she was recovering from pneumonia – which she had no problem breathing into this little girl’s face for an “I’m fine!” photo-op. 

* * *

Blooper reel and commentary: (you knew this was coming)…

https://aim4truthblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/hillary-fall.jpg

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/c23b8-hill31118.jpg

Hillary’s neuropathology–Hillary is losing her mind literally

Hillary Clinton’s not so mild brain trauma

Hillary Clinton has right frontal lobe epilepsy! Video analysis and medical literature review

Hillary Clinton has post-concussion syndrome; and this is why it matters

Dural sinus thrombosis–Hillary had it–and the damage it may have done

Drip, drip, drip, drip: Hillary’s incontinence–make that a double

Sexism, misogyny and Hillary’s neuropathology

Source: ZeroHedge

FBI Informant Testifies How Russians Bragged That the Clintons Would Deliver the Uranium Sale

The lawyer for FBI informant William Campbell said that her client has told congressional committees that the Russians “bragged that the Clintons’ influence in the Obama Administration would ensure CIFUS (Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States) approval for [the] Uranium One deal.”

And, added attorney Victoria Toensing, her client “was right.”

Before CIFUS, on which Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sat, approved the Uranium One deal, nine investors in Uranium One gave the Clinton Foundation a combined total of $145 million.

The deal called for the United States to allow Russia to purchase 20 percent of our uranium reserves, giving Russia access to vastly more uranium than we have.

Campbell testified that Russia’s goal was to achieve global hegemony over the supply of uranium.

The Russians sought the Uranium One deal very aggressively.

In the years before it came up for CIFUS approval, Russia deployed 10 spies in the United States with a single mission: To get close to Hillary Clinton to get her to approve the Uranium One deal.

Fortunately, the FBI uncovered the nest of spies one year before the deal came up for approval. (The Bureau acted to arrest the spies when it did because one of them had risen to a high position in a company owned by Hillary’s finance chairman.)

Then, to seal the deal, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin arranged for former president Bill Clinton to address the Renaissance Bank in Moscow, an institution closely connected to the Kremlin.

The ex-president was paid a fee (personal income for him and his wife, the secretary of state — in their joint checking account) of $500,000.

To try to keep word of the Uranium One deal under wraps and to bury the story about the Russian spies, FBI Director Robert Mueller arranged for the suspects to take plea bargains admitting to minor offenses and then spirited them out of the country quickly — in a prisoner exchange with Russia — before the media could interrogate them. The spies were arrested during the Labor Day weekend and sentenced over Christmas to minimize media coverage.

The Uranium One investigation has great salience in today’s news since the two attorneys who oversaw the investigation into the sale were current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and recently ousted Deputy Director of the FBI Andrew McCabe.

Mueller, as FBI director, was in ultimate charge.

https://i0.heartyhosting.com/www.nationalenquirer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/donald-trump-robert-mueller-corruption-F.jpg?resize=540%2C400&ssl=1

Rosenstein and McCabe need to be investigated to determine if their handling of the Uranium One case was designed to shield Hillary.

Clinton’s role in the uranium sale only gained public notoriety after author Peter Schweizer exposed it in his 2015 book, “Clinton Cash.”

Source: By Dick Morris | Western Journal

If You Believe Donald Trump Is Satan, You Can Convince Yourself Of Absolutely Anything


Dan Bongino Has a Theory Devin Nunes Memo Contains References To Obama PDB’s and FISA Documents…


Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino appeared on Tucker Carlson TV show tonight to discuss the release of Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence memo.

During the segment Mr. Bongino highlighted his theory that Chairman Nunes memo not only holds references to the DOJ and FBI use of fraudulent FISA702 application evidence, but that the memo also contains compartmented intelligence exclusive to former President Obama’s Presidential Daily Briefings (PDB’s).  WATCH:

If true, this exclusive Bongino revelation could be explosive. Let’s explore.

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/dan-bongino-tucker-carlson.jpg

What exactly is “The Nunes Memo”? From all indications it is an outline written by senior intelligence committee staff, with major input from Devin Nunes describing evidence, people and events who conspired back in 2016 and 2017. In essence it is a summary of facts, that Chairman Nunes knows to exist.

No-one actually knows what the underlying supportive material is, because no-one, other than Chairman Devin Nunes, has seen the full material in the context of his reference.

People are *assuming* the memo is heavily written around FISA-702 issues and documents (FISA application, Steele Dossier, wiretaps, surveillance, intercepts etc.), but no-one actually knows what is behind the memo, other than Devin Nunes.  There could be much more than just FISA evidence.

Now, as we go forward with this we’ll be lost unless we have a full understanding of the March 2017 outline about “The Nunes Paradox” – SEE HERE Remember, the issue on March 22nd, 2017 was:

[…] Our research indicates that Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDB’s) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.

The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI. It would be removed from that SCIF system after his review. No systems are connected.

Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”. So the product itself was likely a product for the President, that was not part of the ongoing FBI counter-intel product.

Again, this is why it seems likely it was part of a PDB – unless it was a separate product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intel on something Trump.]

♦ Now, HERE IS WHERE YOU NEED TO PUT ON A “Politics only” FILTER.

Couldn’t Adam Schiff (another gang of eight member) go look at the same intelligence as Nunes did?

Yes. However, purely from the standpoint of politics: why would he?

If Representative Schiff saw the same intelligence that substantiates Nunes he couldn’t keep up the fake outrage and false narrative. Right now Schiff can say anything about it he wants because he hasn’t seen it. If Schiff actually sees the intelligence Nunes saw he loses that ability. He would also lose the ability to criticize, ridicule and/or marginalize Devin Nunes. (read more – Critical to understand)

Back in March and April 2017, it was more valuable, politically, at least initially, for ranking member Adam Schiff never to go look at the same information compiled within the Eisenhower SCIF for Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes to see.  Schiff did, eventually, go to see the information, but he waited a week to do so.

Absent of knowledge of the underlying evidence, Adam Schiff could say anything he wanted about Nunes and work to isolate him. Simultaneously, because the information was highly classified, Nunes could never explain it or defend himself. Thus Nunes was stuck in the compartmented intelligence box; that’s The Nunes Paradox.

Sneaky Schiff used a week of Nunes being in this boxed-in position, knowing Nunes could not defend himself, to demand Nunes step aside from the House Intelligence “Russia investigation”.  It worked.

However, all the way through to today no-one except Devin Nunes has any idea the totality of what Nunes actually witnessed in March 2017, and what he was later able to connect to that evidence after the FISA Court release (late April 2017) [Nunes could see unredacted FISC opinion], and also overlay evidence provided to the House Intelligence Committee.

However, we have an idea of the earlier evidence Nunes saw from his March 22nd, 2017,  statements and we can also overlay the FISA court information .

It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 – however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017. It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coat’s ability to provide information, Chairman Devin Nunes begins reporting his concerns.  It was also Dan Coats who declassified the FISA court opinion on April 28th, 2017.

After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was: “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.  Later it was reported the incoming White House National Security Council may have assisted Nunes with information at the Eisenhower SCIF. 

WATCH:

1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”

2.) “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”

3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”

4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

•“Who was aware of it?”

•“Why it was not disclosed to congress?”

•“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”

•“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”

•“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]

Additionally, there is further evidence that surfaced a week after Nunes expressed his March 22nd, 2017 concerns. April 4th, 2017 Susan Rice appears:

With a general set of narrative ‘talking points’ in hand President Obama’s Former National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, appeared April 4th, 2017, on MSNBC for an interview with Andrea Mitchell. This is the ‘We-Have-To-Respond-phase‘, to the push-back that was an outcome of Evelyn Farkas earlier statements on the same network.

Andrea Mitchell is considered a trustworthy ally of the Clinton/Obama political networks; as such, it is not a surprise to see Mitchell selected as the interviewer. Mitchell’s use of wording carefully guides Susan Rice through the narrow path of self-incrimination by providing plausible deniability for verbal missteps.

You already know the routine. MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice. Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas) The full interview is below:

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/susan-rice-4.jpg

However, that said, there are some interesting aspects to the interview:

Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”

[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.

This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.

Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to: “top strategic communications aide”, Ben Rhodes, and “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

In the interview, Susan Rice defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”, “NSA” ‘ODNI’ etc….

So under Obama’s watch the list of recipients was massive and included Asst. Secretaries of national security departments like the DOJ-National Security Division (John P Carlin) and FBI Counterintelligence Division (Bill Priestap). Massive numbers of administration officials including the DOJ and FBI had access to the PDB.

See where this is going?

Susan Rice is admitting to “unmasking” names within intelligence reports to give her context for how they pertain to the overall briefing material. That briefing material is the PDB. That PDB goes to dozens of political people and political entities, including the DOJ and FBI units investigating candidate Donald Trump.

This is the widespread distribution of intelligence information that former Asst. Deputy of Defense, Evelyn Farkas was discussing. Now, we go back to Farkas’s March 2nd, 2017 MSNBC statement for additional context:

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/evelyn-farkas.jpg

“I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.”

Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more. We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the Hill. … That’s why you had the leaking”.

[Link to Farkas MSNBC Interview and Transcript]

That right there is the story. With dozens of people with access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of the intelligence report names gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, perhaps did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes, as outlined by Evelyn Farkas who was ultimately one of the recipients of the unmasked intelligence.

Additionally, that same material went directly to the people in the DOJ-NSD and FBI Counterintelligence who were conducting the “Trump Operation”.

The DOJ and FBI officials could comply with FISA-702 “minimization rules” (hiding of U.S. person’s names etc.) knowing full well that the unmasking could be done by the recipient of the FISA-702 source material, which would then be relayed back to the DOJ and FBI officials; the “small group”.

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/kathryn-ruemmler-lisa-monaco-susan-e-rice.png

If you know how concentric circle political safety is constructed, you will notice that Susan Rice was then hugging the security of the Presidency. To take Rice down amid all of this unmasking, means to take down President Obama – back in March 2017 this was a safe play on her part.

Reverse the safety. No-one in ideological media or allies in congress were going to allow President Obama to be taken down; ergo, everyone will protect Susan Rice and by extension President Obama. They had no choice.

Back to the interview and note how when shifting from rehearsed talking point (script) to cognitive explanation of Rices’ point , the noun shifts from “U.S. Person” to “U.S. Official”:

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.

And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess its significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

It’s subtle (like a Freudian slip), but Rice accidentally outlines her filter, her psychological trigger, for when to request the unmasking. She’s looking for the politics behind the intelligence. She’s looking for “U.S. Officials” in masked intelligence reports.

Mrs. Rice then follows up with a “hypothetical example” that is ridiculous as she describes. The example provided (a sketchy dude in mom’s basement) would NEVER reach the level of PDB; it would be pre-filtered, researched and reviewed for value. The PDB NEVER contains such banal information as Rice describes.

The interview goes much further. There is a lot of news in this interview. There is also a tremendous amount of double-speak and self-contradiction; in some cases between sentences that follow each other.

Notice how Susan Rice contradicts herself about what the intelligence community puts into the PDB. Rice states the PDB intel community, those assembling the information, to be very specific: James Clapper (DNI), James Comey (FBI), John Brennan (CIA) and Defense Department (which would be the Pentagon and NSA Mike Rogers), and she states they would never send the President innocuous things unworthy of review (like a dude in mom’s basement):

Summary: In addition to the FISA702 material, and the material given by the current DOJ and FBI to Devin Nunes, there are strong indications the PDB material is part of the underlying information which backstops the Nunes Memo.

Devin Nunes, Admiral Mike Rogers and ODNI Dan Coats likely know exactly what Nunes has seen and where all of the underlying evidence is located. No-one else does, including Adam Schiff, despite having read the Nunes memo.

The important part of the House Memo release will be within the *footnotes* and *citations*, and the need to declassify that material will be the next phase in the sunlight.

Now we can see how Nunes brilliantly reversed the Paradox?

With help from a few friends:

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/congressional-hearing-rogers-coats.jpghttps://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/nunes-priestap-baker-strzok-ohr-comey-mccabe.jpg

 

Hillary Clinton Fantasizes About Being President On Earth 2.0


Hillary Clinton really wants to be president — even if that means blasting off from Earth to do so.

The failed Democratic candidate recently talked with Now This, a liberal online news outlet, where she pined for a presidency.

While discussing a variety of topics, Clinton envisioned leaving Earth and venturing Earth 2.0, where that planet apparently faces the same issues as the actual Earth.

“We went to another planet with Hillary,” the caption reads as Clinton and Now This, Nico Pitney fired off a series of topics.

“People joke about Earth 2.0, where you are president,” he told a giggling Hillary.

Regarding Earth 2.0’s North Korea, Clinton said she would have “full on diplomatic pressure” to solve the crisis with the portly dictator Kim Jong-un.

Clinton said if she was in charge, she would be “putting as much money as it took into enforcing the laws we already have” on guns, and added she would want “universal background checks.”

After answering a question about the opioid crisis, a handler attempted to cut off the interview.

“I fear we have to end it here,” the voice of her off camera handler said.

“Okay,” Pitney responded.

“You want one more? I’ll be short — one more. Because I like being on Earth 2,” Hillary said.

Pitney then asked Clinton what she would do about Russia.

“If I had been president, or on Earth 2.0, where I am,” Hillary said she would have an “independent commission” look into the alleged Russian “hacking” of the presidential election.

“I worry about ’18. I worry about 2020 because this is the first time we’ve even been attacked and not imposed any real consequences on our adversary,” Clinton asserted, ignoring moves by Congressional Republicans and the Trump administration to impose new sanctions on Russia since the election.

* * *

Back on Earth 1.0, the L.A. Times reported in late October:

The Russian government on Friday accused the United States of displaying “hostility” as the Trump administration belatedly took the first steps toward imposing new sanctions to punish Moscow for interfering in the 2016 presidential election.

In early August, after considerable delay and with minimal fanfare, President Trump signed into law a measure that required the new sanctions, which target individuals and firms with ties to Russian defense and intelligence agencies.

Under the law, companies that “knowingly engage in a significant transaction” with people or firms on the list could be subject to U.S. sanctions after Jan. 28.

By Kyle Olson | The American Mirror

Attorney: Hillary Could Be Charged With At Least 13 Crimes

“Somebody’s got to go to jail” over Uranium One & Trump dossier scandals

https://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/261017hillary.jpg

Attorney Gregg Jarrett says that Hillary Clinton could be charged with at least 13 different crimes for her involvement in the Uranium One scandal and the Trump ‘peegate’ dossier.

Asked by Fox News host Sean Hannity how many crimes Hillary could be charged with, Jarrett responded, “13 potential crimes committed by Hillary Clinton, she’d be charged for six anti-corruption – they were all felonies.”

She could also be charged with racketeering for using her charity as a criminal enterprise and then you’ve got all of the email crimes – two of them under the espionage act and two additional.”

Jarrett also said Clinton could be facing prison for her involvement in colluding with Russia to pay for the infamous ‘peegate’ dossier on Trump.

“You can’t pay a foreign national relative to a political campaign and it appears she did – and the DNC – hid it – in their disclosure reports, which could also be criminally charged,” said the Attorney.

Questions surrounding Hillary’s culpability for both the Uranium One scandal and the peegate dossier are mounting, despite the media’s best efforts to bury both issues.

A Federal Elections Committee complaint asserts that the Clinton campaign violated campaign finance law when it hid payments to opposition research firm Fusion GPS to investigate ties between Trump and Russia.

The Department of Justice has also cleared an FBI informant to testify on the Uranium One bribery scandal, which was given the green light by both Hillary Clinton and Robert Mueller’s FBI.

Meanwhile, Hillary’s former campaign spokesman Brian Fallon admitted during an appearance on CNN that Hillary “may have known” about the dossier that was intended to smear Trump.

By Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com

What Difference At This Point Does It Make Hillary?

The house of cards upon which the Obamas and Clintons built the Trump-Russia connection has finally collapsed on cable TV, main stream media.

… but wait, there is much, much more.

In the last week, the Russian collusion story has collapsed. Well, not exactly collapsed: there was collusion with Russian officials, but it was all done by the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Obama Administration. They were aided and abetted in covering it up by the FBI under the leadership of Robert Mueller and James Comey. The only thing slightly unclear is whether these FBI leaders were active participants in their agency’s help in covering up what may be the biggest scandal in American history or clueless dupes.

As it turns out, in 2010, the FBI knew that the Russians were systematically engaged in bribery and extortion to increase their ownership of North American atomic energy resources. But that FBI investigation was put on hold long enough for the U.S. to approve the sale of 20 percent of its uranium reserves to the Russian company, Rosatom. Coincidentally, Rosatom investors donated $145 million to the Clinton Foundation – and Russia paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech, double his normal fee. Actually, the FBI investigation was put on hold entirely until 2014, when the “Russian Reset” had clearly tanked. Mueller was head of the FBI when the investigation was put on hold. This is not just a smoking gun; it is a blazing pile of rocket launchers.

In a separate revelation later in the week, it turned out that the phony dossier that was used to accuse Donald Trump of collusion with Russians was instigated, bought and paid for by the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Their contractor worked with Russian officials to dummy up the charges. These stunning revelations were not broken by Fox News, but by the left-leaning capitol hill newspaper, “The Hill” and the far-left “Washington Post.” And so it turns out that the shrill accusers were simply accusing their opponents of doing a vastly watered-down version of what they had been doing for years – and dummying up the evidence to give it plausibility.

It has been a rough few weeks for the anti-God left. Those accusing others of colluding with Russia were the ones actually colluding with Russia – for profit and to affect the outcome of the election. Now the establishment media, which a few months ago was shrieking that Donald Trump Jr. was guilty of treason for taking lunch with a Russian, then walking away from her offer, is absurdly arguing that taking over a $100 million and giving away America’s nuclear resources…and working with Russian agents to dummy up a fake dossier to discredit an opponent is just business as usual. The establishment media has made it clear to all but the most clueless that it has become the press office and crisis management center for the Democratic Party.

Meanwhile, in Hollywood, after decades of lecturing normals about how benighted we are and uncaring about women’s rights, a “New York Times” story on Harvey Weinstein has unleashed a gusher of allegations and hard evidence that Hollywood is the home of predators and pedophiles – and that even those who may not have actively participated were complicit in covering it up. The Hollywood left has been busy ‘leftsplaining’ to us that it is a systematic problem and we are all to blame. No, Hollywood, it’s not us; it’s you. The meltdown in tinseltown has helped me understand why so many actresses are so shrill about how rotten men are. If, in their bubble, they imagine that men in Hollywood are the kindest towards women’s sensibilities, no wonder they avoid all men in flyover country like Dracula avoids garlic. They should get out to flyover country, go to an NRA meeting, maybe even a church service.  They’ll be astonished to discover that here in the Heartland, we treat women with respect – like real people rather than as mere things for our pleasure.

We must remember that much of the anti-God left actually believes the smears they launch at us. Former National Public Radio CEO Ken Stern was astonished, after spending a year among conservatives, to discover most of his prejudices against them were based on ludicrously inaccurate stereotypes. Without neglecting to hold those who have tried to weaponize the legal system against their mere political opponents, let us never forget that we are called to evangelize our opponents by showing them the true face of Christianity and normalcy.

With the pretenses and fantasies of the anti-God left in full collapse, Special Prosecutor Mueller will unveil his first indictments in the “Russian collusion” case against Trump on Monday. It is bizarre. After last week’s revelations, whoever Mueller indicts, he ought to be listed as a co-conspirator, not a prosecutor, even if those indicted are Democrats who actually DID collude with Russians. If, feeling the ground crumbling beneath them, this is a last-ditch effort by the anti-God left to get their mojo back, by brazening and bullying it out, it will make for a VERY perilous moment – and may launch a genuine crisis of massive proportions.

A month and a half ago, NFL players decided to double down on their open contempt for America and its soldiers and cops, figuring the fans had nowhere else to go. Now the TV ratings of and attendance at NFL games is in free fall. An attempt to double-down on the phony Russian collusion charges against the Trump administration the very week after it was revealed that all the collusion has come from the left will lead to a Constitutional crisis at best, the beginning of violent civil strife at worst. We are nearing a perilous Rubicon. Normal Americans are, to use a favorite leftist expression, woke.

Whatever comes, remember that God has a plan. We are called to be a Godly people, neither tolerating nor enabling the assaults from the left, nor striking out in frustrated vengeance. All things ARE being revealed.

By Charlie Johnson | charliej373

 

Bombshell: Hillary Clinton And The DNC Colluded With Russia In An Attempt To STEAL The Election From Donald Trump

Fresh off the heels of a shocking report, published by the Washington Post, that confirmed that the infamous “Russia dossier” was actually funded by both the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee, an even more startling revelation has emerged – The Clinton-DNC machine colluded with the Russians to fabricate and spread serious disinformation about Donald Trump in a failed attempt at swaying the election in the favor of Hillary Clinton.

That’s right, in a literal reverse of what the entire mainstream media has fed the American people for over a year, we now have evidence that, either wittingly or unwittingly, the Clinton campaign and the DNC paid for what amounted to disinformation that came directly from “Russian sources”.

Obviously this may seem truly unbelievable to some, but the facts speak for themselves and there is no denying that Democrats paid a shady opposition research company to try and dig up dirt on Donald Trump who then subsequently hired former British spy Christopher Steele. Steele then openly used Russian sources for most of the serious allegations in the “Russia dossier”.

Clinton Lawyer Hires Fusion GPS For Disinformation

According to The Washington Post report, which was later confirmed by Politico, Clinton and DNC lawyer Marc Elias hired the “opposition research” (see disinformation) company Fusion GPS who then outsourced the work to former British spy Christopher Steele who eventually went on to release the “Russian dossier” which was chalked full of disinformation, including lurid sexual allegations against Donald Trump.

The fact that the Clinton campaign would hire Fusion GPS in the first place paints a clear picture of a campaign willing to pay for any dirt on then candidate Donald Trump whether it was true or not. This becomes even more clear when you consider the history of Fusion GPS itself.

As Breitbart reported, “Fusion GPS is not some usual-usual oppo-research firm. Among other things, the company has been accused of being a “Democrat-aligned misinformation firm” aligned with Russia. While refusing to cooperate with congressional investigations, including taking the fifth, Fusion GPS has also been accused of advocating for “the interests of corrupt Russian and Venezuelan officials while hiding its foreign work from federal authorities.”

The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway also noted the serious allegations against the company:

At a July hearing, Senate Judiciary members were told Fusion GPS helped advocate the interests of corrupt Russian and Venezuelan officials while hiding its foreign work from federal authorities.

Fusion GPS has been accused of illegally working as an undisclosed foreign agent and is currently refusing to comply with federal subpoenas for information on its foreign clients.

Fusion GPS also has deep connections to the mainstream media, including the fact that it was literally founded by a team of former mainstream media reporters who have deep connections to those currently in the profession.

Again Hemingway notes:

The principals at Fusion GPS are well-connected to mainstream media reporters. They are former journalists themselves, and know how to package stories and provide information to push narratives. They are, in fact, close friends with some of the top reporters who have covered the Russia-Trump collusion story.

Fusion GPS has placed stories with friendly reporters while fighting congressional investigators’ attempts to find out the group’s sources of funding. Fusion GPS leaders have taken the Fifth and fought subpoenas for information about the group’s involvement with Russia.

Their close friendships with key reporters on these stories have paid huge dividends for the firm, although these friendships and cooperative relationships have not served the public well.

Former Spy Used “Russian Sources” For Infamous Trump Dossier 

This is where the story turns from shocking to downright unbelievable, especially when you consider the year long mainstream media disinformation narrative that claims that the Russians helped Donald Trump win the election.

The spook working for Fusion GPS, (which was hired by the Clinton campaign) Christopher Steele, openly bragged about his sources being within the Russian government itself.

Buried deep in a report by Vanity Fair that spends thousands of words trying to pretend that the dossier could be legitimate, is this nugget that paints a picture of direct or indirect collusion between the Clinton team and Russia.

How good were these sources? Consider what Steele would write in the memos he filed with Simpson: Source A—to use the careful nomenclature of his dossier—was “a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure.” Source B was “a former top level intelligence officer still active in the Kremlin.” And both of these insiders, after “speaking to a trusted compatriot,” would claim that the Kremlin had spent years getting its hooks into Donald Trump.

Source E was “an ethnic Russian” and “close associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump.”

After “gathering” the information, Steele was then directed by Fusion GPS to “brief” the media about the Russian government fueled allegations against Trump.

As The Daily Caller noted in July:

In one, dated May 18, Steele says that he was instructed by Fusion GPS to meet with reporters at various outlets in order to publicize some of the allegations made in the dossier.

It has been widely known that Fusion GPS and Steele were in contact with reporters to discuss the dossier. It has been reported that rumors of the dossier were floating around in Washington, D.C. political and journalist circles for months prior to BuzzFeed’s decision to publish it on Jan. 10.

[…]

In the response, Steele’s lawyers state that the former spook briefed several reporters at the end of September at the instruction of Fusion GPS, which was working on behalf of a Democratic ally of Hillary Clinton’s.

The outlets were The New York Times, The Washington Post, Yahoo! News, The New Yorker and CNN.

Steele met once more — and again at Fusion GPS’s instruction — with The Times, The Post, and Yahoo! News. Fusion GPS took part in all of those meetings, Steele’s lawyers say.

“In each of those cases the briefing was conducted verbally in person,” the document reads.

In October, Fusion GPS instructed Steele to brief a journalist from Mother Jones. The interview, which was conducted through Skype, was likely with reporter David Corn.

It doesn’t get any clearer than this. Fusion GPS was paid by Democrats to dig up dirt, that dirt was then supplied by the Russians, and subsequently became a major part of the narrative surrounding Donald Trump and Russia.

“What you clearly have here is the Clinton campaign openly COLLUDING with a foreign country, with the Russians, to fabricate scurrilous lies about Trump, which were then fed to a willing media as a means to affect their news coverage, and by extension, sway the election,” Breitbart’s John Nolte wrote.

Fusion GPS “Was Acting On Behalf Of Russia”

Amazingly, testimony and evidence already exists that Fusion GPS has in the past worked directly for Russia and may have been doing so with the Trump disinformation dossier.

At a Senate Judiciary Hearing in late July, Hermitage Capital Management chief William Browder testified that the company was acting on behalf of Russia after co-founder Glenn Simpson was hired by a person connected to lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya to lobby for the repeal of the  Magnitsky Act.

The following exchange between Browder and Senator Lindsey Graham is shocking to say the least.

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM: This whole story reads like some kind of novel that nobody would buy, it’s got to be fiction, but unfortunately maybe it’s true. Let’s just break down sort of why you’re here. You believe that Fusion GPS should of registered under FARA, because they were acting on the behalf of the Russians?

WILLIAM BROWDER: That’s correct.

SEN. GRAHAM: So, I just want to absorb that for a moment. The group that did the dossier on President Trump hired this British spy, wound up getting it to the FBI. You believe they were working for the Russians?

BROWDER: And in the Spring and Summer of 2016 they were receiving money indirectly from a senior Russian government official.

SEN. GRAHAM: Okay. So, these are the people that were trying to undermine Donald Trump by showing the nefarious ties to Russia. Is that what you’re saying?

BROWDER: Well, what I’m saying with 100% certainty is that they were working to undermine the Magnitsky act and the timing of that.

SEN. GRAHAM: But, the Fusion GPS products apparently as they hired a guy to look into Trump?

BROWDER: Yes.

SEN. GRAHAM: Right

BROWDER: Correct.

When you put all the evidence together, keeping in mind that this is only what has been released so far, you can see a clear picture of, at the very least, indirect collusion between the highest levels of the Democratic Party and unknown figures within the Russian government. The scheme was then directly propped up and spread by the mainstream media.

As Nolte so aptly notes, “If purchasing misinformation from Kremlin official as a means to manipulate media coverage and sway public opinion is not colluding with the Russians to rig an election, nothing is.”

By Alex Thomas | Shit Hit The Fan Plan

FBI Uncovered Russian Bribery Plot Before Obama Approved Uranium One Deal, Netting Clintons Millions

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user230519/imageroot/2017/10/17/2017.10.17%20-%20Clinton%20Cash_0.JPG

As the mainstream media continues to obsess over $100,000 worth Facebook ads allegedly purchased by Russian spies in 2016 seeking to throw the presidential election, we’re almost certain they’ll ignore the much larger Russian bombshell dropped today in the form of newly released FBI documents that reveal for the very first time that the Obama administration was well aware of illegal bribery, extortion and money laundering schemes being conducted by the Russians to get a foothold in the atomic energy business in the U.S. before approving a deal that handed them 20% of America’s uranium reserves…and resulted in a windfall of donations to the Clinton Foundation.

As we pointed out last summer when Peter Schweizer first released his feature documentary Clinton Cash, the Uranium One deal, as approved by the Obama Administration, netted the Clintons and their Clinton Foundation millions of dollars in donations and ‘speaking fees’ from Uranium One shareholders and other Russian entities.

Russian Purchase of US Uranium Assets in Return for $145mm in Contributions to the Clinton Foundation – Bill and Hillary Clinton assisted a Canadian financier, Frank Giustra, and his company, Uranium One, in the acquisition of uranium mining concessions in Kazakhstan and the United States.  Subsequently, the Russian government sought to purchase Uranium One but required approval from the Obama administration given the strategic importance of the uranium assets.  In the run-up to the approval of the deal by the State Department, nine shareholders of Uranium One just happened to make $145mm in donations to the Clinton Foundation.  Moreover, the New Yorker confirmed that Bill Clinton received $500,000 in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank, with ties to the Kremlin, around the same time.  Needless to say, the State Department approved the deal giving Russia ownership of 20% of U.S. uranium assets 

Now, thanks to newly released affidavits from a case that landed one of the Russian co-conspirators, Vadim Mikerin, in jail, we learn that not only was the Obama administration aware the Russians’ illegal acts in the U.S. but it may have also been fully aware that “Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow.”  Per The Hill:

Before the Obama administration approved a controversial deal in 2010 giving Moscow control of a large swath of American uranium, the FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business inside the United States, according to government documents and interviews.

Federal agents used a confidential U.S. witness working inside the Russian nuclear industry to gather extensive financial records, make secret recordings and intercept emails as early as 2009 that showed Moscow had compromised an American uranium trucking firm with bribes and kickbacks in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, FBI and court documents show.

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill.

Of course, when Schweizer’s book first made Uranium One a political hot topic in 2015, both the Obama administration and the Clintons defended their actions and insisted there was no evidence that any Russians or donors engaged in wrongdoing and there was no national security reason for anyone to oppose the deal.  That said, we now know that the FBI was aware of wrongdoing going back to at least April 2009 even though the deal wasn’t approved until October 2010.

But FBI, Energy Department and court documents reviewed by The Hill show the FBI in fact had gathered substantial evidence well before the committee’s decision that Vadim Mikerin — the main Russian overseeing Putin’s nuclear expansion inside the United States — was engaged in wrongdoing starting in 2009.

The first decision occurred in October 2010, when the State Department and government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States unanimously approved the partial sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom, giving Moscow control of more than 20 percent of America’s uranium supply.

In 2011, the administration gave approval for Rosatom’s Tenex subsidiary to sell commercial uranium to U.S. nuclear power plants in a partnership with the United States Enrichment Corp. Before then, Tenex had been limited to selling U.S. nuclear power plants reprocessed uranium recovered from dismantled Soviet nuclear weapons under the 1990s Megatons to Megawatts peace program.

And guess who ran the FBI’s investigation into this particular Russian plot?  As The Hill notes, the Mikerin probe began in 2009 under Robert Mueller, now the special counsel in charge of the Trump case, and ended in late 2015 under the controversial, former FBI Director James Comey who was relieved of his duties by President Trump.

Ironically, when the DOJ finally arrested Mikerin in 2014, following 5 years of investigations in a massive international bribery and money-laundering scheme, rather than publicly celebrate, they seemingly swept it under the rug.  In fact, there was no public release concerning the case at all until a full year later when the DOJ announced a plea deal with Mikerin right before labor day.

Bringing down a major Russian nuclear corruption scheme that had both compromised a sensitive uranium transportation asset inside the U.S. and facilitated international money laundering would seem a major feather in any law enforcement agency’s cap.

But the Justice Department and FBI took little credit in 2014 when Mikerin, the Russian financier and the trucking firm executives were arrested and charged.

The only public statement occurred an entire year later when the Justice Department put out a little-noticed press release in August 2015, just days before Labor Day. The release noted that the various defendants had reached plea deals.

By that time, the criminal cases against Mikerin had been narrowed to a single charge of money laundering for a scheme that officials admitted stretched from 2004 to 2014. And though agents had evidence of criminal wrongdoing they collected since at least 2009, federal prosecutors only cited in the plea agreement a handful of transactions that occurred in 2011 and 2012, well after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States’s approval.

The final court case also made no mention of any connection to the influence peddling conversations the FBI undercover informant witnessed about the Russian nuclear officials trying to ingratiate themselves with the Clintons even though agents had gathered documents showing the transmission of millions of dollars from Russia’s nuclear industry to an American entity that had provided assistance to Bill Clinton’s foundation, sources confirmed to The Hill.

Perhaps this is what the “most transparent” President in history meant when he told Medvedev that he would have “more flexibility” after his 2012 election.

Below are the affidavits released today:

https://www.scribd.com/document/361782806/Indictment-Affidavit#from_embed

https://www.scribd.com/document/361783782/Mikerin-Plea-Deal#from_embed

https://www.scribd.com/document/361783782/Mikerin-Plea-Deal#from_embed

https://gunnyg.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/obamaputinlaughgangsterpix.jpg?w=585&zoom=2

https://gunnyg.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/650-101717-obama-and-the-clintons.jpg?w=640&zoom=2


BREAKING NEWS: Senate Judiciary OPENS PROBE into Clinton-Obama era Russian nuclear bribery case …


The Obama Administration’s Uranium One Scandal

https://i0.wp.com/c5.nrostatic.com/sites/default/files/styles/original_image_with_cropping/public/uploaded/uranium-one-deal-obama-administration-complicit-not-just.jpg

Source: ZeroHedge

Clinton // Obama Silence Signals Support For Weinstein [VIDEO]

Harvey Weinstein’s “Heart Broken” Wife Says She’s Leaving Him

 

How NBC ‘Killed’ Ronan Farrow’s Weinstein Exposé

Hollywood Actors Who Condemn Trump but Were Silent on Weinstein

Creepiest Audio You Will Ever Hear: Harvey Weinstein Fed Off Of The Fear Of Women He Abused!

https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.cdn.cnn.com%2Fcnnnext%2Fdam%2Fassets%2F171009105637-harvey-weinstein-hillary-clinton-2012-full-169.jpg&sp=1d36f50225d6bde2c86ffe629aa59be8

 

Hillary Frightens Ryan Into Killing Gun Suppressor Deregulation Bill

Two days after an attacker opened fire on concert goers in Las Vegas, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc) announced he was shelving legislation to deregulate suppressors.

After the Vegas attacker killed at least 59 and wounded over 500, Hillary Clinton tweeted:

https://tomfernandez28.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/screen-shot-2017-10-03-at-4-14-40-pm.png?w=1024

Clinton’s tweet ignores the reality of the tactical superiority of the attacker’s position–he was on the 32nd floor shooting down on people who were trapped in a concert venue. To escape they had to funnel through exit areas, which further highlighted the attacker’s superior position. Yet Clinton thinks it would have been worse if his gun had had a “silencer”–i.e., a suppressor–on it.

Ryan has now shelved the Hearing Protection Act, which was introduced into Congress on January 9; it is the legislation containing suppressor deregulation. The Act does not legalize suppressors–as they are already legal–rather, it removes the burdensome process for acquiring them and erases the federal tax that must be paid in order to receive permission to posses one.

According to the Tribune, Ryan said of the legislation “is not scheduled right now. I don’t know when it will be scheduled.”

After tweeting against suppressors, Hillary Clinton tweeted against the NRA, blaming the group for the Las Vegas attack. Ironically, the legislation that Ryan shelved is backed by the NRA.

Neither Ryan nor Clinton suggest suppressors had anything to do with the Las Vegas attack.

Source: tomfernandez28’s Blog

Male Prostitute Found Dead At Home Of Hillary Clinton Aide

https://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/clinton-donor-prostitute-death-678x381.jpg

A young male escort has been found murdered at the West Hollywood home of a prominent Hillary Clinton aide.

Gemmel Moore worked as a gay prostitute to the elite, including his regular client and major Clinton donor, Ed Buck.

Moore was found dead in Buck’s home on July 27th, with investigators quickly and quietly ruling his death as “accidental.” However, Mr. Moore’s friends and family say they suspect foul play.

The LA Coroner’s Office claim that Moore died of an accidental methamphetamine overdose, despite friends and family describing him as being “very anti-drugs”. His mother, LaTisha Nixon, claims that Ed Buck killed her son and has used his “friends in high places” to help cover up the murder.

https://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/clintons.jpg

A story on a local blog about the death of a young man from a drug overdose in the apartment of a well-known West Hollywood resident has gotten international coverage after having been promoted or republished in right-wing media such as the Drudge Report, Independent Journal Review and TruNews and on the website of the sensationalist Daily Mail. Theblackloop.com reports: As reported by author Henry (Hank) Scott;

Here’s What Happened:

LaTisha Nixon, the mother of Gemmel Moore, was worried about her son’s involvement with Ed Buck, a wealthy supporter of Hillary Clinton. Moore was spending a lot of time with Buck that he often traveled back and forth to see him. She wondered who this man was that her son was spending so much time with that she asked one of his friends.

“I called one of my son’s friends and was like, ‘Who the hell is Edward Buck?’ And my son’s friend was like, ‘Oh my God, that’s that white guy, that wealthy white politician guy ….’ He was like, ‘Oh my God.’ When he calmed down, he told me that Ed Buck was one of my son’s clients and that Ed Buck was one of his clients as well, Nixon told WeHo Times.

According to her son’s friend, Buck was into young black men and into a term called “slamming”. Slamming involves injecting meth into a person. Apparently, Buck allegedly was aroused by seeing other men high.

Nixon recalled a time where her son had calling her crying one day after being involved with Buck and she was worried. Gemmel told his mother that Buck allegedly injected him with something but he didn’t know what it was. Whatever it was, the drug was causing Moore to be in pain.

https://rasica.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/prince-charles-jimmy-savile.png

Charlie & Jimmy: Prince Charles Paedophile Buddy Jimmy Savile Chauffeur Dave Smith: Bailed Out October 26th. 5 Days Latter Dead Morning Of Scheduled Court Testimony!

“He called me crying. Three minutes on the phone hollering and I’m like, ‘What the hell is going on?’ He said, ‘This man, he shot me up with something I don’t even know what it is.’ And I’m like, my son is having a breakdown or episode. But he sent me pictures of his arm, his arm was red.”

That particular incident didn’t stop Moore from seeing Buck. According to Nixon, Buck used Moore to allegedly recruit other gay black males to party with them on Santa Monica Boulevard. Buck would reportedly take pictures with the males after allegedly injecting them with meth.

On July 27, 2017, Moore was found dead in Buck’s home. The LA Coroner’s Office stated that Moore died of an accidental methamphetamine overdose, but Moore’s family members are not convinced it was an accident. When police officers arrived to Buck’s home, no drugs or drug paraphernalia was found at Buck’s residence. Because of that, the powerful Democratic party donor is not under investigation at this time. However, Nixon believed that Buck is responsible for her son’s death and she recorded a video that she posted to You Tube.

The family has set up a GoFundMe account to cover funeral expenses for Moore that has raised $3,465 of a $5K goal.

Source: Political Vel Craft

Welcome To Blue Islands

Map Of Blue Islands

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/blueislands.png


King Of Blue Islands

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/sorosmayhem.jpg


Queen Of Blue Islands

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/unnamed-56.jpg?w=625


Director Of Club Orgy Island

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/349f8-billandyo-png.jpg


Average White Blue Islander

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/02c4b-serveimage.jpg


Average Purple Blue Islander

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/niglooting.jpg?w=625


Blue Islands Affordable Health Care

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/865f2-serveimage.jpg?w=625

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/cf495-serveimage.jpg?w=625


Blue Islands Industry

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/war-is-good-biz.jpg?w=625


Blue Islands Motto

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/by-any-means.jpg

Look What Bahrain Prince Got After Giving Hillary $32 MILLION

Explosive information has come to light involving Hillary Clinton’s illegal activity while she was Secretary of State. Sheikh Salman, who is also the Crown Prince of Bahrain, is a big donor to the Clinton Foundation, and leaked emails prove that he gave Hillary $32 million. What he got in return will blow your mind and should infuriate every American.

https://i1.wp.com/madworldnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/composite_14719818828436-620x326.jpg

Hillary Clinton with Sheik Salman.

Newly released Department of State documents reveals that the Crown Prince of Bahrain was given an audience with then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton after he donated $32 million to her foundation.

He also was given a huge weapons deal that would not have been made by any other Secretary of State. This goes back to 2009, and what is important to understand is that, as Secretary of State, Hillary was taking money from individuals and governments, selling them favors. The Clintons became billionaires by selling out all Americans and our national security.

These emails show the Clinton Foundation’s employee Doug Band telling Hillary’s aide Huma Abedin that Sheikh Salman wants an appointment with her right away.

The first email, dated June 23, 2009, shows Band interceding on behalf of the Crown Prince, noting he is a “good friend of ours.” Abedin replied that same day noting that Salman had asked to see Clinton through “normal channels.” [via Daily Caller]

https://i2.wp.com/madworldnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/composite_14719820728659-620x319.jpg

Hillary with Saudi Prince, another huge Clinton Foundation donor (left), Weapons stock photo (right)

The “normal channels” are the legal channels, which are through the State Department. Abedin knew that, legally, Hillary can’t see someone just because they gave $32 million to the Clinton Foundation. Doug Band, the Clinton Foundation employee knew this too, he just didn’t care. He pressed Abedin because this Sheikh is one of the big money men making Bill and Hillary super rich.

Finally, Hillary gave in, and two days later, she saw the Sheikh, but what did the Sheikh get for $32 million? Weapons. He got as many American made weapons as he wanted, and it’s safe to say some of those weapons could have ended up in the hands of the Islamic State.

As Bahrain money flowed into the Clinton Foundation, State Department documents showed that between 2010 and 2012 the Clinton-led State Department approved $630 million worth of direct commercial arms sales to Salman’s military forces in Bahrain. [via Business Insider]

So, Hillary sold our weapons to Bahrain, and in return, she got $32 million. If this is what she did as Secretary of State, what will she do as President of the United States? It seems everything is for sale with the Clintons, and if she becomes president, there is no doubt she will sell anything she likes in order to stay filthy rich, including our national security.

Hillary donations weapons

https://i1.wp.com/www.wnd.com/files/2016/08/Access-Hill-NRD-600.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/conservativedailypost.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Barack-Obama-Hillary-Clinton-ISIS-Getty-2.jpg

Did Leonardo DiCaprio ditch $33,400-a-head Clinton Fundraiser because of links between his charity and $3bn Malaysian Embezzlement Scam?

https://nyppagesix.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/leo.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=664&h=441&crop=1

Leo DiCaprio’s decision to pull out of hosting Tuesday’s Hillary Clinton fundraiser may not have been due his busy schedule after all, it has been suggested.

DiCaprio, 41, handed hosting duties for the $33,400-per-guest event over to Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel, saying he had to finish his latest film for the Toronto Film Festival in September.

But now some are speculating that he dropped the show because his foundation has been linked to a $3billion embezzlement scheme – at a time when Clinton’s own foundation is under scrutiny, Page Six reported.

https://i0.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/23/05/3780235900000578-0-image-m-59_1471925688913.jpg

Pulled out: Leonardo DiCaprio pulled out of a presenting job for a Hillary Clinton fundraiser Tuesday, saying he was too busy working on a film – but some doubt that claim.

https://i1.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/23/05/377F92EA00000578-3754030-Scrutiny_It_s_been_suggested_that_he_dropped_the_gig_because_his-m-64_1471926301229.jpg

Scrutiny: It’s been suggested that he dropped the gig because his foundation is under intense scrutiny – just as Hillary Clinton’s (pictured in California Monday) is at the moment.

On Wednesday The Hollywood Reporter published an article that revealed The Leonardi DiCaprio Foundation (LDF) had been linked to a massive Malaysian scam. 

Approximately $3billion has been embezzled from 1MDB, a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.

According to the Justice Department, Jho Low, 35, a Malaysian businessman and drinking buddy of DiCaprio’s, spent an entire third of that sum by himself.

Low is said to have helped the LDF by buying marked-up champagne bottles at the actor’s birthday party in 2013 and paying $1.1million for art at an LDF-funding Christie’s auction.

He’s also said to have donated a Lichtenstein sculpture worth $700,000 to the LDF for another auction.

This, the Justice Department argues, is how DiCaprio’s foundation – which last year announced it had given $15million to global conservation efforts – became a cog in the globe-crossing scam.

Malaysian money is also said to have funded DiCaprio’s pet project ‘The Wolf of Wall Street,’ having been funneled into its production company, Red Granite Pictures.

https://i1.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/23/04/3780234D00000578-0-image-a-38_1471924030049.jpg

Accused: Malaysian businessman and DiCaprio drinking buddy Jho Low, 35, is accused of siphoning billions in Malaysian assets and giving some of it to DiCaprio’s Foundation.

But DiCaprio isn’t the only one with a foundation under scrutiny; the Clinton Foundation, used by Hillary and Bill Clinton has long been a target for Republican criticism. 

It has taken donations from politically troublesome parties like Saudi Arabia and the private military contractor known as Blackwater (now Academi).

Questions were raised about whether some contributors to the foundation had been given preferential treatment during Clinton’s time as Secretary of State.

And just today Donald Trump demanded that the Clinton Foundation be investigated.

This, Page Six suggested, is the real reason DiCaprio won’t present the show Tuesday: To avoid questions about both Foundations at a crucial political time for Clinton.

https://i1.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/23/05/3780207000000578-0-image-a-43_1471925365918.jpg

Donations: Low is said to have spent $1.1million at a fund-raising auction for the foundation, among other expensive efforts to help it along.

However, it also quoted ‘a source close to DiCaprio’ who denied the claim.

‘Leo is stuck in New York until Wednesday to finish his current project in time for it to premiere at the Toronto Film Festival,’ the source said.

‘Not wanting to leave Hillary hanging, Leo called his friends Justin and Jessica and asked if they would host.’

DiCaprio’s documentary ‘The Turning Point,’ which chronicles his global warming awareness-raising efforts, will premiere at the Toronto Film Festival, which starts September 8.

Also on Saturday, DiCaprio and supermodel girlfriend Nina Agdal, 24, were involved in a minor car accident in the Hamptons. Neither was hurt.

https://i2.wp.com/i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/08/23/04/37802F4900000578-0-image-a-37_1471924017643.jpg

Pals: DiCaprio’s people say he was too busy working on new movie ‘The Turning Point’ ahead of September’s Toronto Film Festival, so gave the gig to Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel. 

https://i2.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/hill-stools1.jpg

Source: The Daily Mail

Hillary: “When I Win, We Will Start By Recalling All Rifles That Hurt People. We Must Stay Safe.”

https://i1.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/lawsfor.jpgLet this be as clear as day: Hillary Clinton will come for our guns. That is not a theory or a wild idea. She has said it, her aides have been caught on camera saying it, and she will do it if she is elected in November. We must never forget that.

When our Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, they specifically made the Second Amendment to give the people a guaranteed right to bear arms and protect themselves. If the Amendment wasn’t that important, it wouldn’t have been so close the beginning.

At the Democratic National Convention, Hillary Clinton said: “I’m not here to repeal the Second Amendment. I’m not here to take away your guns.” Well, she is a liar; just like Obama.

Come And Try To Take Our Guns AWAY!

Clinton lies to the public about her true plans to abolish the Second Amendment, but the centerpiece of her campaign will be gun reductions. This is just another example of Clinton not understanding the American people, civil liberties, and the rights afforded to us under the Constitution.

Clinton thinks it is a bigger deal to take our guns away rather than addressing a real issue: abortion. She should be forbidding people from aborting children unless there are extenuating circumstances like rape or incest.

In the 1994 congressional elections and the 2000 presidential contest, Democrats ran a pro-gun control platform, and it destroyed them. So, now they claim “out loud” that they respect the Second Amendment, but once elected, they try to ban our right to protect.

Every time a tragedy happens in this country, what do Obama and Hillary say? They argue we need to reduce and take away guns. How about they spend time trying to address people with mental illnesses rather than trying to take away law-abiding citizens rights?

The Second Amendment Is In Place To Protect Us From People Like Hillary Clinton

Last time I checked, it was jihadi terrorists or Black Lives Matter thugs that are shooting places up, not common, law-abiding Americans.

This year, Hillary Clinton has decided she will campaign on being anti-Second Amendment. This was a losing strategy in 1994 and 2000, so she can take that approach if she wants. Hillary is commonly on the wrong side of history.

Hillary’s 2016 platform mentions “the rights of responsible gun owners” but says nothing about the extent of those rights or the legal basis for them. There is no “half” or “partial” right to the Second Amendment—We The People control the entire part of.

We are legally allowed to protect ourselves from the government and any enemy when dictators like Hillary Clinton try to use the government to take away our protection.

Clinton’s Vision For Our Weapons

The Second Amendment’s excision from the Democratic platform is consistent with Clinton’s opinion that District of Columbia v. Heller, the 2008 case in which the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to armed self-defense, was “wrongly decided.”

At the very least, that position means Clinton thinks the Second Amendment doesn’t guarantee the right to use guns for self-defense in the home, since the law overturned in Heller made it impossible to exercise that right.

But Clinton’s disagreement with the Supreme Court seems to go even further. In an interview last June, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos pressed her to say whether “an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right.” She repeatedly dodged the question.

“If it is a constitutional right,” Clinton said, “then it, like every other constitutional right, is subject to reasonable regulation.” That is nothing more than political correctness. She is all but only admitting she does not believe people have a constitutional right to firearms but that even voters who do believe that should be OK with her gun-control proposals.

She wants to ban so-called assault weapons, repeal the federal law that shields gun suppliers from legal liability for criminal misuse of their products, create new categories of people who are legally disqualified from owning firearms, and extend the federal background check requirement to all gun transfers.

Imagine how unsafe we would all be if the criminals had guns but the law-abiding people didn’t? Or, now that we have 13 million illegal aliens in this country and more Syrian refugees are coming, do we not have the right to protect ourselves anymore? Hillary doesn’t think we need protection. Remember, she argues Islam is peaceful.

In other words, Clinton wants to restrict the kinds of guns Americans can legally buy, take away people’s constitutional rights without due process, and block gun purchases by consumers, people with nonviolent felony records, and anyone who was ever forcibly treated for suicidal impulses. These are not policies that someone who takes the Second Amendment seriously would favor.

Let me fill you in on a secret: a majority of the mass shootings that have occurred in this country would NOT have prevented under Hillary or Obama’s gun control legislation’s. Obama and Hillary are using these poor families’ situations to push for gun control measures.

If after all of this you still don’t believe me, here is a Clinton delegate admitting her grand strategy while being filmed. The delegate had no idea she was being recorded, so she spoke freely. She is close to the Clinton campaign, too, by the way. She knows what the real plan is.

The time is now, folks. We cannot allow this woman to take over our country and trample on the Constitution. If she wins, we will live in a country that allows 13 million more illegal aliens into this country, more Syrian refugees, and she will try to limit our Second Amendment. Share this everyone you know so that if she wants to come and take our guns, she’ll have to come down here and get them herself. We won’t go out without a fight!

https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fteapartystickerstore.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F05%2Fcopy-bitter-clinger-rectangle-copy-960-x-288.jpg%23bitter%2520clinger%2520960x288&sp=3afe6b715b7b8e0dc9ccb5024dedaed1

Source, NWO Report

 

SHOCKING PHOTOS Raise Questions About Hillary’s Health

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/screen-shot-2016-08-08-at-12-41-43-am.png?w=750&h=315

Photos of multiple staffers helping Hillary Clinton up stairs to a house were recently making the rounds on social media…these photos have raised questions about Clinton’s health. Twitter is all abuzz over the photos which show Clinton struggling to get up the stairs. What’s up with this or is it no big deal?

https://i1.wp.com/2ps46p2qeea548gs4x33cbdz.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/CpRnEWkUsAAoXV4.jpg

Hillary has a history of trip and fall…

https://i0.wp.com/2ps46p2qeea548gs4x33cbdz.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/hill-2.jpg

https://i1.wp.com/cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Clinton-doctor-death-700x350.jpg

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/13891947_1229940883692016_7230385633511061376_n.jpg?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/13872900_1230842136935224_3786083329246315965_n.jpg?w=750&h=608

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/13912654_1229978620354909_4698909799623798739_n.jpg?w=750&h=509

https://nteb-mudflowermedia.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/hillary-clinton-suffering-from-subcortical-vascular-dementia-unfit-for-office-lisa-bardack.jpg

https://i0.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/clintonpropped.jpg

by 100%FedUp.com

 

ANOTHER MYSTERIOUS DEATH: Sanders Supporter Who Served Papers to DNC on Election Fraud & Collusion Case Found Dead

On July 3, 2016, Shawn Lucas and filmmaker Ricardo Villaba served the DNC Services Corp. and Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz at DNC’s headquarters in Washington, D.C., in the fraud class action suit against the Democrat Party on behalf of Bernie Sanders supporters.

Shawn Lucas was thrilled about serving the papers to the DNC before Independence Day.

** This was before Wikileaks released documents proving the DNC was working against the Sanders campaign during the 2016 primary.

https://i2.wp.com/16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/shawn-lucas-dead-575x427.jpg

According to Snopes Lucas was found dead on his bathroom floor.

We contacted Lucas’ employer on 4 August 2016 to ask whether there was any truth to the rumor. According to an individual with whom we spoke at that company, Shawn Lucas died on 2 August 2016. The audibly and understandably shaken employee stated that interest in the circumstances of Lucas’ death had prompted a number of phone calls and other queries, but the company had not yet ascertained any details about Lucas’ cause of death and were unable to confirm anything more than the fact he had passed away.

An unconfirmed report holds that Lucas was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on the evening of 2 August 2016. Paramedics responding to her 911 call found no signs of life.

This follows the death of 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich who was murdered in Washington DC on July 8. The killer or killers appear to have taken nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone. Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.

https://i0.wp.com/16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/seth-rich-bloomingdale_02.jpg

And on June 22, 2016, former UN official John Ashe “accidentally” crushed his own throat and died a week before he was scheduled to testify against the Clintons and Democrat Party.

https://i0.wp.com/16004-presscdn-0-50.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/john-ashe-un-575x383.jpg

U.N. Official ‘Accidentally’ Crushes Own Throat Right Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/tumblr_o76ym8y2rk1rxxacmo1_1280.jpg?w=750&h=537

“How many more people must die before the country is forced to pretend to elect Hillary Clinton?”

by Jim Hoft | Gateway Pundit

Bill Clinton Got Millions From World’s Biggest Sharia Law Education Firm

https://s17-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.noticiassin.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F07%2FBill-Clinton.jpg&sp=6866ff182a413683cec92fab77724776

Former President Bill Clinton collected $5.6 million in fees from GEMS Education, a Dubai-based company that teaches Sharia Law through its network of more than 100 schools in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation investigation.

The company’s finances strictly adhere to “Sharia Finance,” which includes giving “zakat,” a religious tax of which one-eighth of the proceeds is dedicated to funding Islamic jihad.

The company also contributed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

The former president served as honorary chairman for GEMS Education from 2011 to 2014, according to federal tax returns he filed with his wife, 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

His biggest paycheck from the closely-held company — which is incorporated in the Cayman Islands — was in 2014 when he pocketed $2.1 million. It is unclear if Bill received income from the Middle Eastern firm in 2015, since Hillary has not yet released her tax return for that year.

Sharia law is the Islamic religious legal system that many in the West see as intolerant of human rights and other religions, as well as violating the rights of women and gays. Sharia law is considered by Muslims to be superior to all secular authorities. Islamic jihadis regularly call for the imposition of Sharia law and want to impose it on the West.GEMS boasted in a 2013 bond prospectus that it is the “only foreign group approved for educational services in Saudi Arabia.” The GEMS facilities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, taught 1,600 students in 2013.
Saudi Arabia is where Wahabism, the strictest form of Sharia, is observed. The Middle Eastern kingdom bars women from driving cars, requires women to wear the strictest form of the hijab, which covers everything but the eyes and hands. Gay men and women are persecuted in Saudi Arabia.

GEMS distributed a job notice in 2014 for a director of “Islamic and Cultural Studies” for its campuses in the Saudi Kingdom. The skills for the position included proficiency in Sharia to help develop a curriculum. The company also acts as an educational consultant in Egypt, Jordan, and Libya.

Clinton’s relationship with the Sharia-oriented education firm drew critical reviews from anti-terrorism experts.

“Why would Bill Clinton be participating in programs that teach Sharia in foreign countries where that is the specific objective of the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS and al-Qaeda,” asked counter-terror analyst Stephen Coughlin in an interview with TheDCNF.

GEMS is one of the most dominant educational programs in the Middle East, with 51 separate schools operating in the region. Globally, the for-profit company claims that 250,000 students are learning under its program in 170 countries.

Outside of the Middle East and North Africa, GEMS operates schools in Kenya, Uganda, Southeast Asia, and the United Kingdom.

GEMS even has two “international” schools in Chicago.

At the GEMS Jumeirah Primary School in Abu Dhabi, the website promotes Islam as a central tenet of its curriculum. “Our aim is teach all Muslim students the pillars of Islam, Islamic faith and morals, enabling them to efficiently apply them to their lives. To increase the knowledge of Islam we share with the children, the stories of prophets, manners of living a Muslim’s life, the five pillars of Islam.”

The Dubai firm has donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the foundation website. GEMS was an official sponsor of the 2013 and 2014 Clinton Global Initiative. Its Indian-born CEO Sunny Varkey attended both years.

And the Varkey Foundation, named after the CEO, contributed $250,000 to $500,000 to the foundation.

Varkey publicly claimed Bill was the “honorary chairman” of his foundation. But Bill and Hillary report in their joint federal tax returns the annual payments came from the for-profit GEMS Education company.

The company has raised funds through bonds and has openly broadcast its commitment to Sharia finance. In 2013, the company issued a $200 million bond prospectus and assured potential investors it relied on “Fatwa and Sharia” advisers to assure it was “compliant” with Sharia finance.

Coughlin said Sharia law on finance also includes money for “zakat,” a religious tax. “And if you read the law of zakat, one-eighth of that money goes to fund Jihad,” he says. “There are eight categories of zakat you must pay every year. And one of them is Jihad.”

Two of the banks — Emirates NB and Noor Bank — provided critical loans to GEMS in August, 2015, and were also accused of conducting illicit banking deals with Iran.

In a June 9, 2009, diplomatic cable made public by WikiLeaks, U.S. Ambassador to the United Arab Emirates Richard G. Olson slammed one of the lenders, Emirates NB Bank.

Olson told the Department of State that Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Stuart Levey “pointed out that Dubai-based Emirates NBD appears to remain out-of-step with other major international financial with respect to its sizable Iranian exposure.”

Olson reported the Emirates NBD Chairman “Ahmed al Tayer erratically dismissed Under Secretary Levey’s concerns about doing business for Iran with a mix of hostility, remorse and assurances of submission.”

Noor Bank, another bank which provided GEMS with financing, helped Iran process foreign currency receipts. MarketWatch reported that in 2012 “Dubai’s Noor Islamic Bank had been a primary conduit for returning foreign-currency oil receipts to Iran.”

GEMS is owned exclusively by billionaire Varkey and his family. Four of the five directors are Varkey family members.

The Varkey Group Ltd, the parent company of GEMS, and its shares are held “in a trust by a private trust company for the benefit of the members of the Varkey family,” according to the 2013 bond prospectus. Varkey’s net worth is estimated at $2.1 billion.

All of the Varkey group’s activities appear to be transacted by MaplesFS, the largest law firm in the Cayman Islands.

As stated by GEMS in its prospectus, “Under existing Cayman Islands laws will not be subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands.” It also tells potential investors, “The Cayman Islands currently have no income, corporation or capital gains tax and no estate duty, inheritance or gift tax.”

Bill has been a frequent visitor to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the trips often deal with money. As previously reported by TheDCNF, shortly after leaving the White House, Bill pocketed $15 million in an investment deal with the Dubai Investment Group that included as his business partner, the country’s authoritarian ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin-Rashid al-Marktoum.

Bill also collected $500,000 for a single speech he delivered in Abu Dhabi in 2011. He was paid by the UAE’s royal family. The United Arab Emirates is a monarchy where no elections are held and human rights abuses, especially of foreign laborers, are rampant.

TheDCNF contacted the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation about the GEMS Education relationship, but received no response.

TheDCNF also reached out to GEMS in Dubai but there was no reply by press time.

https://i2.wp.com/www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/varvel/art_images/cg57ad4d64c5399.jpg?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/theyre-with-me.jpg?w=945

 

Man Proves Rigged Software Gave Hillary Stolen Votes

A U.S. citizen has come forward offering conclusive proof of voter fraud in the recent Democratic primaries. 

Elliot Crown says that all of the NYC counties that Hillary Clinton won, were won using this special black box.

Democracyintegrity.org reports:

After delving into the investigations of mathematician and numerical control engineer Richard Charnin, FBI journalist investigator Greg Palast and election investigator and analyst Bev Harris, an Italian observer of American politics becomes persuaded not only that statistical methods can show when fraud has taken place, but that in fact the American electoral system is structured to allow it and hide it. He unpacks some statistical concepts to explain this to his brother, a naturalized American, and he in turn passes the information to us.

My brother Marcello and I have been talking about electoral irregularities for months. He’s an astronomer by training, a software engineer, and an avid follower of American politics. I’m a microelectronic engineer and a finance person living in the United States for the past 20 years. As Italians we both look at American politics with a great deal of curiosity and sometimes disbelief. As a naturalized American, I worry.

Recently, Marcello became interested in the sort of calculation that could actually detect electoral fraud having heard about so many indications of electoral rigging in these past democratic primaries. After delving into the investigations of mathematician and numerical control engineer Richard Charnin, FBI journalist investigator Greg Palast, and election investigator and analyst Bev Harris, among others, he is persuaded not only that statistical methods can show when fraud has taken place, but that in fact the American electoral system is structured to allow it and to hide it. He spent a few days unpacking a few statistical concepts for me regarding this proposition and I will try to convey them to you.

First we should be aware that exit polls, the polls of voters taken immediately after they have exited the polling stations, are the only way to check against fraud in elections while keeping the vote confidential. A discrepancy between the declared vote (recorded vote) and the vote extrapolated from the exit polls is an indication of fraud when it is above a margin of error of 2% within a confidence level of 95%.

https://bensbitterblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/giphy-62.gif?w=350&h=213

Here is how it works. When statisticians try to measure the ‘real vote’ they not only estimate the final vote count but they also analyze the entire distribution of the data they gathered from the exit poll voter sampling in order to determine the reliability of their final determination. When fluctuations in the data are due to randomness they will follow a statistical distribution that follows the shape of a bell curve, the Gaussian curve. The reliability or unreliability of the sample data doesn’t depend so much on the trustworthiness of those who collect the exit poll voter sampling, but it’s rather intrinsic to the shape of the distribution. From this shape an ‘interval of confidence’ is determined within which we can unquestionably claim our confidence that we got it right with a probability of 95% — always 95%. This interval of confidence is also called ‘margin of error’ (MoE).

Poorly informed ‘experts’ frequently argue that the statistical analysis of exit polls can be misleading because it assumes that real life data is randomly distributed (as in the Gaussian curve) when that’s not always the case. And here is where they are missing a central point. The expectation that sample data will be randomly distributed ALREADY takes into account all possible relevant factors in a practical observation in real life. When extraneous factors intervene, a discrepancy will make the recorded value fall outside of the interval of confidence signaling only one possibility: a systematic error. When this occurs statisticians make further analysis to determine the causes, and either remove the cause or include it into the ‘margin of error’. After 59 years of fine-tuning this process in countless elections around the world statisticians have reached a point where exit polls have become extremely reliable. If the final ‘Recorded Vote’ falls outside the interval of confidence one can assume with a high degree of certainty that the systematic error is intentional. This is why we say that we have a high probability of fraud.

The fact that such a high probability of fraud is so apparent in the comparison of exit polls and recorded vote is partially masked by the way electoral results are obtained in the United States. The results of most democratic elections around the world are obtained with a 95% confidence level within a margin of error of 2%. In fact, these are the parameters that the U.S. government normally uses to oversee elections in other countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_controversial_elections). But this is not true in the U.S itself — which nobody thinks of supervising.

Election results in the United States are obtained with a 95% confidence level within a 3-4% margin of error. This is because relatively recent laws in the United States have intentionally rendered reference data less reliable (HAVA, Bush 2002). By law exit polls must be adjusted to match the final recorded vote, which means that evidence of fraud is suppressed. Exit poll results, already partially manipulated, must disappear after a given election and become public only 5 years later. When such data has become available in its unadjusted complete form, it has been used to cross-check voting results with other independent methods. The results have not only shown that the numbers were internally coherent but also that they corroborated original suspicions of fraud.

In the 2016 democratic primary elections unadjusted exit polls show that Bernie Sanders has been robbed of the following percentage of votes: Alabama 6.1%, Arizona 22.1%, Georgia 5.5%, Massachusetts 4.0%, Mississippi 4.7%, Ohio 5.0%, South Carolina 5.2%, Texas 4.2%, Wisconsin 6.9%, West Virginia 6.0%, New York 5.9% (CNN New York exit polls indicated that Bernie Sanders may have done better than 48% there).

Although a discrepancy of -4.6% in Oklahoma turned out to be in favor of Bernie, it doesn’t affect our analysis because so far the discrepancies shown in all of the above final results have been consistently larger than the MoE in favor of Hillary in 11 of the 26 primaries. The probability of this happening without fraud is 1 in 77 billion (6.8-sigma). In other words, one can expect something this improbable to happen less than once since the extinction of dinosaurs — if elections were to be a daily event.

https://i2.wp.com/cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Sanders-primary-votes-stolen-based-on-exit-poll-discrepancies-65.png

Exit polls discrepancies: 24 out of 26 are in Hillary’s favor exceeding the margin of error in 11 primaries.

One can also search for trends to check for fraud. One of the most revealing methods, the Cumulative Vote Share Analysis, searches for a correlation between the size of a discrepancy (between recorded vote and exit polls) and the size of a precinct. When no fraud has taken place the trend tends to be quite regular. When the discrepancy tends to manifest as the size of the precinct becomes larger than a certain value, it is a strong indication of fraud, according to Richard Charnin. Roughly speaking the reason for this behavior is that electronic rigging is implemented strategically in order not to become obvious. The discrepancy caused by the rigging is “better” distributed between those precincts that are big enough to be worth the effort.

https://i0.wp.com/cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/cumulative-share-analysis-Utah-vs-Missouri-Yuma-Arizona-2016-90.png

Above a certain precinct size the vote share increases in favor of one candidate. There should be no correlation, like we see on the diagram on the left (Utah).

In fact, in the recent democratic primaries we can observe a noticeable divergence in trends between the Clinton and Sanders votes when the precincts are larger; the larger the size, the higher the percentage of the votes that go in favor of Clinton. This has been evident in Massachusetts (>10%), Michigan (>3%-10% according to the type of machines), Missouri (>0.05% the size is small but the trend unequivocal), New York (>10% and possibly >20%). Charnin’s diagrams (see below) are self-explanatory.

In Kentucky Hillary’s cumulative vote share increased by 7.4% (55.9% to 63.3%) after 85% of the smaller precincts were counted! The probability P of this vote spike occurring by chance is essentially ZERO.

All in all electoral anomalies have been apparent in New York, Massachusetts, Illinois, Arizona, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, Delaware, Wyoming, Wisconsin, Missouri, Michigan, Alabama, Tennessee, Georgia, Arkansas, Texas, Kentucky and Oregon. But electoral fraud has been particularly evident in strategic elections such as those in Arizona and New York. They were meant to kill the Bernie Sander’s momentum. And they did just that with the help of the media.

Disenfranchisement — widespread in New York and Arizona — has been more widely reported so I will not discuss it here. But in any case it must be added to other forms of electoral fraud.

According to the recorded vote the Sanders-Clinton competition is currently at 43.5-56.5% with a lead of 3 million votes in favor of Clinton. But actual votes in caucus states have not been included, and the fact that unadjusted exit polls have indicated that voting machines were hacked has not been considered. According to Charnin, if we take this into account we would have Sanders at 47.9 and Clinton at 52.1%, with a lead of 1.3 million votes in favor of Clinton. Furthermore, if we also take into consideration that voter rolls were manipulated and that long lines and severely shortened polling station hours reduced voter turnout in areas favorable to Sanders, we would need to add a 10% to Sanders’s votes and subtract 5% from Clinton’s. That would put Sanders in the lead at 51.5-48.5% with a lead of 780,000 votes in his favor.

Sanders’s supporters have barely begun to speak about electoral irregularities and already the DNC has started to accuse them and Sander’s campaign of inciting “violence” among supporters by promoting allegations that the primary process is rigged in favor of his opponent, Hillary Clinton.

https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwg2a.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F10%2Fseiuvotingmachines.jpg&sp=0c50b1b19aaa5e0120976a81211a3df2

There’s much more to say. This is only a piece of the larger story of how fraud has become part and parcel of American elections, which has been at work since the 1960s, reaching extraordinary highs after the year 2000. Most notable have been the elections stolen from Al Gore by 6 million votes, from Kerry by more than 10 million and the landslide vote margins stolen from Obama both in 2008 and 2012. But if until now the biggest share of electoral rigging has come from the Republicans by far, it looks like the Democrats are more than willing to step up to the plate if an un-corrupt candidate dares to challenge their establishment.

by Sean Adl-Tabatabai | Your News Wire

 

 

Trump: “I’m Afraid The Election Is Going To Be Rigged”

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn2-b.examiner.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fimage_content_width%2Fhash%2Fba%2Ff9%2Fbaf9687e8ff9b0ab6b68651076ed04cc.jpg%3Fitok%3DQUGK8cMF&sp=141bea4f6aa16f896d5a7e6229341566

Single Most Important Issue Leading Up To November 8th

Following Trump confidant Roger Stone’s allegation that Hillary Clinton might “steal this election” using the Supreme Court, and the Reuters’ poll “tweaks” which sent her to a 7-point lead, Donald Trump is raising the alarm that he “is afraid the election is going to be rigged.”

Just last week, before the Reuters polls were ‘tweaked’, Stone told Milo Yiannopoulous of Breitbart that if there is an “illegitimate” election, then there will be “widespread civil disobedience” and “it will be a bloodbath.”

“I think your audience knows, I think we all know, that in this day and age, a computer can do anything. These voter machines are essentially a computer. Who is to say they could not be rigged?”

“I think we have widespread voter fraud, but the first thing that Trump needs to do is begin talking about it constantly,” Stone said.

“He needs to say for example, today would be a perfect example: “I am leading in Florida. The polls all show it. If I lose Florida, we will know that there’s voter fraud. If there’s voter fraud, this election will be illegitimate, the election of the winner will be illegitimate, we will have a constitutional crisis, widespread civil disobedience, and the government will no longer be the government.”

“So, I mean the dream here, the ultimate ideal is that he wins by such a significant margin nationally that this is unnecessary,” Yiannopoulos concluded. “But it’s interesting to hear you say this, and it’s funny also, because Trump will go there. He will go to the places other politicians wont, and he’s probably the only person to run for president within the last fifty years who would dare to do this, and might even get away with it. It’s remarkable isn’t it how he’s just sort of re-injected reality into politics”.

And now Donald Trump, speaking today in Columbus, Ohio, raised the concern of a rigged election directly… “Bernie shouldn’t have made a deal but he lost [because] it’s rigged… and I am afraid the [national] election is going to be rigged.”

“I think my side was rigged. If I didn’t win by massive landslides, think about what we won in New York, Indiana, California, 78 percent, that’s with other people in the race.”

Trump made similar complaints about a “rigged” process during the Republican primaries. As Roger Stone concluded,

“If you can’t have an honest election, nothing else counts,”

Warning that…

“I think he’s gotta put them on notice that their inauguration will be rhetorical, and when I mean civil disobedience, not violence, but it will be a bloodbath. The government will be shut down if they attempt to steal this and swear Hillary in. No, we will not stand for it. We will not stand for it.”

Just in case you thought things could not get any more obvious among the riggers, does this look ‘normal’?

July 25: Trump was at 48%, Clinton at 45% in CNN/ORC poll.

Today: Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump 52% to 43% in CNN/ORC poll.

Perhaps the biggest swing in a week in US election history?

Source: ZeroHedge

What Did They Cut Out Of Hillary’s Tongue?

The people trying to say ‘what’s there isn’t actually there’, are starting to look more than a little silly.   It’s beyond obvious something was removed (cut out) from Hillary Clinton’s tongue.  It’s clear in the before and after pictures.

What was it?

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/clinton-tongue-1.jpg?w=639&h=299

Picture at the DNC Convention in Philadelphia:

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/hillary-tongue.jpg?w=640

hillary neck 2

by Sundance | The Conservative Treehouse

Anyone Know This Guy?

https://maddmedic.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/image001.jpg?w=474

He is Edward “Ed” Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937.
Then you’ll probably say, “Who is Ed Mezvinsky?”;

Well, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented
Iowa’s 1st congressional district in the United States House
of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977.

He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided
the fate of Richard Nixon.

He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to
politics and the nation and should be impeached.

He and the Clintons were friends and very politically
intertwined for many years.

Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue
Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.

In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in
Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton’s
controversial tax package through the House of Representatives.

In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty
to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.

Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people
via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams.

He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison.

After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in
April 2008 and remains on federal probation.

To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims.

About now you are saying, “So what!”;

Well, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.

https://maddmedic.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/image002.jpg?w=474

That’s right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton’s father-in law.

Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased
a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment (after being married in George Soros’ mansion).

Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media?

If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush’s, or better yet, Sarah Palin’s daughter’s father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and every detail would be reported over and over.

And yet say there are no double standards in political reporting.

And people are talking about Hillary as our next President!

And then there is possibly Chelsea for president in our future!

The cycle never ends!

Lying and corruption seem to make Democrat candidates more popular.

 

And The Beat Goes On
Sonny and Cher 1971

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Mezvinsky

Black Votes Matter But The Clinton Foundation Criminal Conspiracy Investigation Does Not?

https://i2.wp.com/comicincorrect.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/DNC-Sell-Job-NRD-600.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/comicincorrect.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Stay-Home-600-CI-578x280.jpg

Clinton Foundation Criminal Conspiracy Investigation

How much money has the Clinton Foundation raised globally? Wall Street financial expert Charles Ortel says it’s a “$100 billion criminal conspiracy”.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes on a One-on-One, MUST WATCH interview with Clinton Foundation investigator Charles Ortel.

Source: Rifleman III Journal

Tim Kaine Promoted The Muslim Brotherhood

https://counterjihadnews.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/tim-kaine-630x351.jpg?w=584&h=325

It’s important to note that the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy for North America is about performing a “grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated.” The Brotherhood’s ultimate goals are to re-establish the Islamic caliphate and implement Sharia law.

Click here to read all about how Kaine is doing his part for the Muslim Brotherhood

Allahu Snackbar Tim Kaine !

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/36abc-poli-3.jpg

CCCP ★ November 8th, 2016

★ ★ ★ Clinton Crony Criminal Party ★ ★ ★

https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwallpoper.com%2Fimages%2F00%2F36%2F56%2F70%2Fcccp-communist_00365670.png&sp=130148ee4c129330cdaf033b24f1d5c9

It’s now been totally exposed the Democratic National Committee (DNC) rigged the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton. This is a turning point that says no way Clinton can be elected without nearly half the Democrat voters that supported Bernie Sanders.  A WikiLeaks email dump at the beginning of the CCCP, Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia showed clear evidence the DNC committed fraud and collusion against all candidates and rigged the Primary in favor of Hillary Clinton.  Outraged and disenfranchised Sanders voters are protesting by the thousands, and yet, the mainstream media, by and large, will not cover the protests taking place outside the DNC convention.  These are mostly young people who voted or worked diligently for the Sander’s campaign.  Greg Hunter says Clinton will get only a small percentage of Sander’s voters, and the rest will vote for Donald Trump, another candidate or simply say home.  Hillary is toast and will not become the President of the United States.

https://disturbeddeputy.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/postpone-suicide.jpg?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

A big part of the fraud and rigging of the DNC Primary, which it repeatedly denied, came with the help of the disgraced mainstream media (MSM).  The WikiLeaks email dumped from the DNC servers showed collusion with many MSM outlets.  The Washington Post was trying to do a fundraiser for Clinton.  A Politico reporter was getting script approval from the DNC before his own editors looked at it.  Both NBC and CNN were taking suggestions and direction from the DNC to get favorable coverage for their candidate, Hillary Clinton.  In short, the entire Democrat Party Primary process was rigged from the beginning with the help of the MSM.  This is shameful conduct from groups that tout they are “news organizations” that are supposed to be fair and objective—NOT.

Watch Greg Hunter summarize this weeks CCCP in America Presidential Convention here

https://tensmiths.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/politicians.jpg?w=420

https://reclaimourrepublic.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/hillary-obama-3rd.jpg?w=640&h=656

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/theyre-with-me.jpg?w=945

 

 

Clinton Guaranteed To Win By Tens of Millions of Votes

Democrats manipulate polling numbers to make it easier to steal elections without the public realizing the voting machines were rigged.

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/e861a-serveimage.png

If the Democrats are able to make the voting public believe that the Republican candidate for President trailed the Democrat from the Conventions to Election Day, the public will easily be suckered into believing that the Democrat—in this case, the most despised and mistrusted liar in America, Hillary Clinton—somehow pulled 35 to 40 million more votes than her opponent, Donald Trump in the Nov. 8, 2015 general election. That, after all, is how the American people were conned into thinking that first term US Senator and civil rights huckster Barack Obama [D-IL] won in 2008 when 96,822,000 lawfully registered voters theoretically cast the 132,618,580 ballots which were stored in the voting machines across the nation, and counted as valid votes even though there were 35,626,580 more votes than voters. (This data was taken from the FEC election return which the Obama Administration arrogantly posted, as a a rebuttal to Orly Taitz‘s Quo Warranto lawsuit against him, on the White House website where I found it on Nov. 28, 2009). The form was removed sometime between Nov. 30 and Dec. 9—as was the official filing from the FEC website. The one page form, which is required by federal law, was replaced with a multi-page document which merely showed the numbers of votes counted in each State for Congressmen, Senators and Obama and Sen. John McCain [R-AZ].)

In 2008 the leftwing media hype declared that Barack Obama was more popular than Muhammad Ali and Harriet Tubman combined. He wasn’t. The leftwing media also claimed that Obama generated the largest young vote in history. They lied. What the vote thieves love about electronic voting machines is that they leave no trace of where the votes were stolen from. They only record totals, not trails. But when you have 35 million more votes than voters the one thing you do know is that the overages are votes by theft. But later, as Obama planned for the Election of 2012, journalists noted that Obama hoped to attract the minority votes who failed to materialize in 2008.

Without going into detail, the same thing happened in 2012. Federal law requires the conspicuous posting of the following: the number of registered voters in the country; the number of registered voters who voted; the percentage of registered voters who voted, and, finally, the number of votes cast.

In 2012 Obama used his own made-up FEC election returns form so you could not look at it and see the vote fraud. The data which was required by law to be conspicuously posted, now appeared to be spread out, and reported separately in different media, concealing—as best they could—the fraud. In 2012, 90,682,968 registered voters somehow delivered 126,985,809 ballots. Of them, 36,302,841 were fraudulent votes. Obama won by 6 million votes. The Democrats datamined 6 million GOP votes in 2012. What that means is that, in 2012, even by dismissing the 36.3 million stolen votes, had the Democrats not illegally voted 6 million American voters, stealing their right to vote by casting that person’s ballot before election day. Obama would still have lost the election by well over 6 million votes (i.e., taking 6 million off Obama‘s total and adding that amount to Romney‘s.

By the way, thanks to Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the political shyster who masterminded the art of datamining both Democrat and Republican voters when he was Chairman of he Democrat National Committee during the Clinton years, used datamining in 2012 to early vote Republicans, casting those ballots for Obama. While I don’t think datamining the Republican voting history is illegal, I know that posing as someone else and early voting their name is a felony. Now, thanks to a Washington State grandmother and Democrat voting advocate, we now know for a fact that the voting machines triggered massive electronic vote fraud in 2008 and 2012.

On July 21 California-based attorney Dr. Orley Taitz cited that there has been a noticeable shift in polling positions since April when twice as many people polled said they would most likely vote for Clinton over Trump. On July 13 the Rasmussen Poll showed Trump leading Clinton 44% to 37%. The LA Times-USC poll (the third most liberal newspaper in the country, puts the July 13 poll as Trump-43%, Hillary 42%. Imagine that. Even in La-La land, Hillary loses.RealClear lies.jpg

Lawyer Taitz noted in her “Defend Our Freedom Foundation” website that Fox News contributor, left-leaning RealClearPolitics.com collaborator, and one of the founders of left-leaning Wikipedia, Larry Sabato (who Fox News considers to be the guru of polling averages) was caught removing polls from the RealClearPolitics.com website which showed Trump leading Clinton. Taitz said Sabato was observed removing the July 19 LA poll from the site.

Taitz said she personally wrote to RealClearPolitics.com and demanded that they add the LA Times poll (which shows Trump leading) back on the site. If Orly is correct (and she does her due diligence very well) and RealClear is deleting or failing to acknowledge every poll that favors Trump, then it’s easy to see why every major media company in the United States is fostering the falsehood about how good Hillary is doing and, conversely, how bad Trump is doing.) According to Taitz, the website put the LA Times poll up—for all of 24 hours. The following day, she understood, someone “…leaned on them…” and the poll was taken down.

Today, according to the Quinnipaiac University Poll (7/13) Trump held a 3% lead in Florida (42 to 39%); a 2% lead in Pennsylvania (43% to 41%) and tied with Clinton in Ohio with 41% each. Peter Brown of the Quinnipaiac University Poll noted that Trump went into the Republican Convention with a slight lead in three of the most important swing States in the race. But, you aren’t hearing that on Lie TV (not Li”v”e TV—leftwing TV) where tongue-in-cheek spinmeisters believe you are buying their garbage rhetoric when they tell you how bad Trump is doing and how well the “Queen Liar” is doing.

The top 25 liberal newspapers together with the ground-based TV networks and satellite systems owned by the major TV brands: ABC-TV, CBS-TV, CNBC, CNN-TV, MSNBC-TV, NBC-TV, are owned or controlled by America’s princes of industry and barons of banking and business. Like the New York Times which carries the brand as a trademark—“We print the news that’s fit to print,” which, translated, means “we print or broadcast the news we want you to hear and we bury the rest.”

The liberal media will never give a non-liberal candidate unbiased coverage. Trump‘s much maligned (by the Washington Post) acceptance speech surprised the left. They felt—and hoped—that presidential nominee Trump would pepper his acceptance speech with the anti-establishment and anti-competitor rhetoric used by challenger Donald Trump. When he didn’t, Trump frightened the Washington Post‘s editorial team that’s already having a hard enough time ignoring Clinton‘s sins and crimes, knowing that when Trump returns to campaign mode the Trump rhetoric will once again slice and dice his opponent, forcing the media to examine the sins and crimes of Hillary Clinton—or discover that not even Jeff Bezos‘ vast Amazon.com fortune can keep them alive without readers.

Interestingly, when the Justice Department announced it was not going to prosecute Hillary Clinton for violating 12 federal laws dealing with mishandling federal documents (18 USC § 371, 18 USC § 641, 18 USC § 793. 18 USC § 798, 18 USC § 1031, 18 USC § 1343, , 18 USC § 1346, 18 USC § 1505, 18 USC § 1519, 18 USC § 1924 and 18 USC § 2071 which prohibits anyone convicted of this crime from ever holding any job in the federal government—including the job as President of the United States) Hillary‘s standing in the polls in Florida dropped when that news report hit the small screen. This suggests some Florida Democrats who likely want to believe she’s innocent, also felt she should face a federal court judge and show why she’s not guilty of the allegations from the GOP leadership in Congress. It will likely drop even more based on how the leftwing print media handles the early CNN and Fox News story on Wikileak’s release of some 20 thousand emails between the Clinton campaign hierarchy and the Democratic National Committee and from the DNC to Clinton campaign managers on strategies to undercut Bernie Sanders and torpedo his campaign.

As the Republican and Democratic Campaign of 2016 ramps up, the media will highlight the sins of Donald Trump as it conceals the crimes of Hillary Clinton. In doing so, they will also erase any poll which shows The Donald is leading so when they use labor union controlled electronic voting machines in about 82% of the polling places in the country, and steal 40 million or more votes through rigged voted machines, they can tell the American people the vote turned out the way the polls said it would. Nothing happened that the polls didn’t predict, particularly the liberal media fraud.

by Ryter Report

Trump Could Win: Obama advises Hillary to “run scared”

https://s14-eu5.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fearloftaint.files.wordpress.com%2F2015%2F08%2Fdemocrat-20161.jpg&sp=94da487a27c1aaa9d1718b5e9852d584

President Barack Obama has admitted for the first time that Donald Trump could succeed him and advised Hillary Clinton to “run scared” as she prepared to become the first female nominee of a major US political party.

Mr Obama had previously maintained Mr Trump would never reach the White House but, as the billionaire led in polls, he said it was now “possible” the Republican nominee may win.

The warning came as Mrs Clinton was due to make history at the Democratic Party convention in Philadelphia on Thursday night.

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/349f8-billandyo-png.jpg?w=625

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fearloftaint.files.wordpress.com%2F2015%2F09%2Fdrip-drip-drip.jpg&sp=21af514261ea0b6cc8c395acbd34557c

Source: Rifleman III Journal

 

 

 

Bizarre Hillary Behavior Caught on Camera (VIDEO)

Hillary Clinton goes into convulsions during interview, then appears to try to play it off as a joke afterward. Is it possible she has some sort of illness, or thinks it is funny to mock people with seizures?

According to pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli, footage of Hillary Clinton exhibiting bizarre behavior is proof that the presidential candidate is suffering from Parkinson’s disease.

Citing his “15 year background in drug discovery and pharmaceuticals,” Shkreli asserts that the videos of Hillary’s strange facial movements and her difficulties with walking are “pretty unmistakable signs of Parkinson’s disease.”

Explaining that a stroke or a concussion wouldn’t explain the symptoms, Shkreli says that Hillary’s walking difficulties are a “cardinal symptom of Parkinson’s disease” and what is known as “freezing gait”. Shkreli adds that he helped develop a drug to treat the problem.

Hillary’s “on-off episodes” are a result of dopamine depletion, according to Shkreli, which is impacting Hillary’s movement.

“We’ve all seen the videos of her kind of making these perplexed facial movements,” says Shkreli, noting that Hillary’s over-reaction to balloons at the DNC was “unusual” because it betrayed an “inability to control her facial movements”.

However, Hillary’s seizure-like behavior in response to reporters asking questions in another clip was even more odd because she “made this involuntary movement for about ten seconds which was truly unusual,” states Shkreli, identifying the condition as a form of Parkinson’s-induced dyskinesia.

“This ia classic symptom….if you showed someone that symptom and said ‘name the disorder’ it’s not a seizure….that is simply involuntary movement, it’s PD-LID, no doubt about it in my mind,” adds Shkreli, concluding that when matched with Hillary’s “freezing gait,” it “explains everything.”

Shkreli emphasizes the fact the he is non-partisan and has given more money to Democrats than Republicans.

Despite his controversial background (Shkreli was once labeled the “most hated man in America” for raising the price of the drug Daraprim by 5556 per cent), his voice adds to the innumerable health experts and doctors who have been asking serious questions about Hillary’s ill health.

We highlighted Hillary’s bizarre behavior and her health problems in a video last week that has since gone viral and received well over a million views.

Suspicions over Hillary’s health have raged in recent days, with the Drudge Report running a series of headlines highlighting her numerous falls and difficulties walking.

Other questions continue to swirl, including claims that one of Hillary’ “handlers,” who calmed her during the recent interruption of one of her speeches, carries around a an auto-injector syringe for the administration of the anti-seizure drug Diazepam.

According to Shkreli, the syringe “may be an Apokyn pen, used to treat Parkinson’s,” noting that it was the same color.

Pharmaceutical Exec: Hillary Clinton Has Parkinson’s Disease

https://i0.wp.com/static.infowars.com/politicalsidebarimage/clintonpropped.jpg

FBI Director Comey was board member of HSBC – Clinton Foundation & Drug Cartel ‘bank of choice’

https://i1.wp.com/21stcenturywire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/3-FBI-CLINTON-EMAILS.jpg

Much has been made recently about the FBI and the Department of Justice letting off favored presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for admittedly mishandling classified information and using her own private email servers to do state business during her time as US Secretary of State. FBI Director James Comey was manning the key choke-point in the decision to not hold Clinton accountable for what so many before her have received convictions for. What many are not aware of is the political and financial links between Hillary Clinton and James Comey behind the curtain

An argument can be made that FBI Director James Comey has multiple conflicts of interest when it comes to interfacing with the great and the good, and the Clintons in particular. Based on the evidence available to hand – one could easily flag-up Comey’s relationship and past and present involvement with questionable banks, and the Clintons – as a conflict of interest, if not an accessory to  institutional corruption, where Comey’s role as a top-level ‘fixer’ is self evident – fixing outcomes for those members of an elite international club of high finance and organized crime.
Many are unaware that Comey’s served on the board of banking giant HSBC (‘international drug money clearing house’) before parachuting softly into the head of the FBI in 2013. That’s only the beginning…

It appears that James Comey (who is actually a lawyer by trade) also has long history of cases ending favorable to Clintons, including the case of Sandy Berger, a former Clinton Administration aid. During the Berger probe, Comey said publicly that ‘we take issues of classified information very seriously’, all the while seeming to undermine the scope of the investigation – presumably to protect the Clintons:

“In 2004, Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration officials who may have coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to the 9/11 terrorist attack.”

“Curiously, Berger, Lynch and Cheryl Mills all worked as partners in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson, which prepared tax returns for the Clintons and did patent work for a software firm that played a role in the private email server Hillary Clinton used when she was secretary of state.”

“Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent trademark request on May 19, 2004, for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has observed that employees of MX Logic could have had access to all the emails that went through her account.

In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated [Loretta] Lynch for the first of her two terms as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position she held until she joined Hogan & Hartson in March 2002 to become a partner in the firm’s Litigation Practice Group.” (Source WND)

Many will also be unaware that before Comey was installed by the Obama Administration as FBI Director, he was on the board of Director at HSBC Bank – a bank implicated in international money laundering, including the laundering of billions on behalf of international drugs and narcotics trafficking cartels.

Good qualification to be FBI Director? Not really…

Investment Watch Blog

It seems that our beloved FBI Director is or until very recently was a director and board member of HSBC, which is tightly connected to the Clinton Foundation. Check out some of these links:

http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight/2013/former-us-deputy-attorney-general-joins-hsbc-board
“Mr. Comey’s appointment will be for an initial three-year term which, subject to re-election by shareholders, will expire at the conclusion of the 2016 Annual General Meeting.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/10/hillary-clinton-foundation-donors-hsbc-swiss-bank
“Clinton foundation received up to $81m from clients of controversial HSBC bank”

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/search/node/HSBC
It’s like a revolving door of money and special projects that the bank and the CF are involved in.

This is the same HSBC that was accused of laundering drug cartel money, was heavily involved in the LIBOR scandal, and who knows what else, and all while our esteemed FBI Director James “she didn’t intend it” Comey was part of the senior leadership.

by 21st Century Wire | Blacklisted News

“Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire U.S. Government” – FBI Source

The Clinton Foundation is a “massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” according to an anonymous insider who revealed why the FBI stopped short of indicting Hillary Clinton.

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/theyre-with-me.jpg?w=945

 

Saudi Arabia: Panel of Scientists Admits Women are Mammals, yet ‘Not Human’

Riyadh | In an unprecedented ruling, a panel of Saudi scientists has concluded that women are actually mammals, granting them the same rights as other mammal species such as camels, dromedaries and even goats.

https://i2.wp.com/worldnewsdailyreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/saoudien-science.jpg

The verdict, which fell just hours before the International Women’s Day, is considered “historic” by some experts and advocacy groups for women’s rights.

“This is a great leap forward for women’s rights in Saudi Arabia,” concludes Jane Austin, spokeswoman for the Women’s Liberation Action Network. “It may seem too little, too late, but it is truly a milestone event for all women in the region,” she says, visibly excited. “From now on, women will be considered as members of the mammal class, whereas before women shared the legal status of an object, similar to that of a home appliance,” she admits.

Jillian Birch, spokeswoman at Amnesty International, said she is optimistic about the future as women will no longer be considered as “soulless objects” but as fully fledged mammals.

“Soulless objects”

The recent verdict could completely upset all laws currently enforced in Saudi Arabia believes Jillian Birch, spokeswoman at Amnesty International.

“This verdict shows the incredible progress the women’s rights movement has made in the past 50 years,” she admitted in a press conference this morning. “Finally, women will no longer be simply considered as objects without souls, but as full-fledged mammals, with the same rights as other animals of their species such as camels and goats,” she said, visibly emotional. “Women are still far from being considered 100% human, but their condition will improve drastically with this decision,” she firmly believes.

Unprecedented Verdict

The verdict, which fell like a ton of bricks on the Saudi state, has clearly not found unanimous support among religious authorities and the political elite, concede experts.

“It could create significant turmoil in the current legal state of affairs and the judiciary system of Saudi Arabia,” says political analyst specialized in the Middle East, Anthony Bochstein. “If before women had the same rights as a chair or a table and were seen more as individual property, they now have an equivalent status to certain animal species, and thus must receive, at the very least, feeding, watering and be conferred a minimum of attention and respect, which was not the case previously,” he explains.

According to the expert panel that ruled on the matter, women are still devoid of a soul but have been shown to possess qualities common to the mammal species, which would explain their ability to procreate and breastfeed, as well as why they are equipped with seven cervical vertebrae, a characteristic unique to the mammal species.

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/theyre-with-me.jpg?w=945

Source: World News Daily

How The FBI And DOJ Criminalize Honest Citizens While Allowing The Criminals In Washington To Get Away With Treason

https://i0.wp.com/www.naturalnews.com/gallery/640/Business/Business-People-Puppets-String.jpg

(NaturalNews) Regardless of your political affiliation, this is a must-read article because it describes in raw, naked detail how the FBI / DOJ justice scam really operates in America. Remember, thanks to the absolute corruption of Washington D.C., “justice” really means “just us.” In other words, the politically connected elite write laws and carry out the selective prosecution of laws solely to serve their own self-interest.

And if you’re not part of the politically connected elite, you’re automatically guilty and will sooner or later be prosecuted under some wildly exaggerated, arcane rendition of a law that’s never applied to people like Hillary Clinton.

Here’s exactly how the FBI and DOJ carry out their “justice theater” that’s essentially nothing more than gross injustice that exists in violation of the rule of law.

Step 1: Generate hundreds of thousands of laws and regulations that ensnare anyone who might be targeted for scrutiny

The first step in achieving selecting prosecution is to pass so many laws that no human being can possibly be innocent of them all.

Read the book Three Felonies a Day to learn the startling truth that the average American unknowingly commits three felony crimes each day (thanks to all the insane laws on the books).

The point is that no ordinary person can survive scrutiny without being arrested, prosecuted and jailed.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/screen-shot-2016-07-05-at-10-46-50-pm.png?w=750&h=464

Step 2: Practice selective prosecution to target your political enemies while looking the other way for your political friends

Since everybody is guilty of three felonies a day, the job of the politically-motivated FBI or DOJ simply becomes one of choosing whom to target.

Since every person in America can be brought up on criminal charges if their actions are sufficiently scrutinized, the goal of criminalizing the government’s enemies is achieved in the simplest manner possible: Focusing surveillance and scrutiny on those individuals the political regime wants to imprison.

And now that the federal government has all your financial records, email records, search engine queries, web surfing activities and even your careless social media posts, they can easily easily link you to any number of crimes you unknowingly committed by violating the multitude of confusing laws you didn’t even know existed.

While people like Hillary Clinton get away with treason by claiming they “didn’t mean to do it,” when the FBI comes knocking on your door, they’ll calmly explain to you that “ignorance of the law is no excuse.”

See, laws are for the little people like you and me… not for the Washington elite.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/13615355_1206202882732483_7249814043789875030_n.jpg?w=750&h=485

Step 3: If your political friends happen to get caught breaking the law, refuse to prosecute them… problem solved!

Despite the best efforts of the corrupted mainstream media to cover up the criminal behavior of the political establishment, every once in a while some member of the political elite gets caught engaging in a violation of law that’s so heinous, it can’t be swept under the rug.

What to do in such situations? Just “pull a James Comey” and announce to the world that you refuse to prosecute the person who violated those laws. After all, prosecutorial discretion means that “career prosecutors” who work for DOJ can decide to ignore the criminality of all their friends.

And who are their friends? Remember that all the prosecutors who work for DOJ are paid by the government. They know where their paychecks come from, and they fully realize that if they ever attempted to prosecute someone with sufficient power in government, their own careers would be destroyed.

Thus, the primary function of the DOJ becomes one of suppressing the sheeple while protecting the criminal class of Washington political operatives.

Step 4: Arm up all federal departments with military weapons while calling for the complete disarmament of the population

Another important step in accelerating the FBI / DOJ war against the American people is to call for the mass disarmament of the citizenry while ramping up the paramilitary wings of every major government agency with a huge influx of military weapons.

Today, right now, the EPA runs its own paramilitary organization, complete with weapons of war to be trained upon U.S. citizens. From Circanews.com:

The U.S. Agriculture Department’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service doesn’t seem like a Wild West sort of federal agency since its biologists mostly check on the human health impact of animal and plant species.

But it reported buying $4.7 million in high-powered weapons, ammunition and military gear during the last decade, including shotguns, night vision goggles, and propane cannons, according to federal purchasing records reviewed by the nonpartisan government spending watchdog openthebooks.com.

It turns out that U.S. federal agencies are spending between $150 million and $200 million per year on military gear and weapons. While this is happening, the very same government criminals who are granted selective immunity against prosecution for treasonous acts are all over the mainstream media calling for the complete disarmament of the population.

All the guns in America, it turns out, belong solely in the hands of the government… according to government. Funny how that always leads to genocide and tyranny, isn’t it?

Step 5: To sweep up even more citizens into prosecutions, plot acts of domestic terrorism, then recruit low-IQ citizens who you then “catch” in the act

Here’s an irrefutable fact about the FBI that very few people realize is true: The agency routinely plans domestic terrorism attacks and draws up the plans and equipment to carry them out. FBI agents then run around the bad parts of town, recruiting hapless (and sometimes even HOMELESS) victims to carry out those acts of terrorism so they can be conveniently “caught in the act.”

Right before the bomb goes off, the FBI swoops in and declares victory for “stopping domestic terrorism.” Yet, in all these cases, it was the FBI that masterminded the acts of terror in the first place.

We have extensively documented this fraudulent phenomenon here on Natural News, including in this article review of the book “The Terrorist Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terror.” The New York Times has ever covered the FBI’s fake terror plots, believe it or not.

Also, check out these stories: FBI intercepts its own terrorist plot against US Capitol, Pentagon and FBI halts terror plot dreamed up by the FBI, then claims victory against terrorism.

Like almost everything else done by the fraudulent federal government in America, the FBI is mostly a theatrical production company engaged in elaborate street theater. We now know that most of the so-called “crimes” that are halted by the FBI actually consist of drugged-out patsies who were recruited by the FBI to carry out FBI-inspired terror attacks. Meanwhile, any actual criminals who commit actual crimes — like Hillary Clinton — are given a free pass even when their crimes violate national security.

The FBI, much like the DOJ and every other federal agency, has become a joke… a hollow shadow of its former self and the laughing stock of informed citizens everywhere. The public perception now is that the only crimes the FBI seems to be able to stop are those crimes its own agents dreamed up in the first place. Yet the agency can’t seem to nail the worst criminals of all… the ones in power in Washington who commit the most heinous crimes against the entire nation by selling out the White House to foreign interests.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/torches-and-pitchforks.jpg?w=500

Why the citizens are nearing REVOLT

This is how it all works today in the corrupt America we are all desperately trying to save from sinking into despotism. The rule of law has been abandoned everywhere in Washington, and now the agencies of the federal government clearly exist for no other reason than to consolidate power in Washington, no matter what methods of tyranny and totalitarianism must be unleashed against the citizenry.

Those citizens, it turns out, are nearing a state of mass revolt. The obvious criminality in Washington has gone too far. The cover-ups are too numerous. The weaponization of government against innocent people is modeled after totalitarian regimes that almost always end in genocide. Today in America, there are journalists who sit in prison for no reason other than the fact that the government did not like what they reported. There are ranchers in prison who were convicted of the same “crime” the BLM carries out routinely (accidentally burning too much acreage in a controlled burn of rural ranch land). There are whistleblowers in prison who tried to warn the public, but the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all the other presidential administrations combined… across the entire history of America.

The last straw is now the government’s brazen attempt to completely disarm the citizenry — an effort aided by the truly retarded verbal grunts of Hollywood morons like Matt Damon (who now insists that only government officials should have guns, not citizens). This effort will be accelerated in the near future with larger and more numerous false flag shootings, staged by the same theatrical production agencies that already stage fake terror plots to claim victory for “stopping terrorism.” Do you think you know the real story of the Sandy Hook massacre? Watch this video to learn about the ACTORS who played key roles as both parents and FBI swat team members (yes, the same guy plays both roles in all the media coverage).

Elaborate theater to weave a prison for your mind

It’s all theater, friends. The media, the FBI, the DOJ, the U.S. Senate, the Federal Reserve and even the rule of law. It’s all elaborate theater carried out as a prison for your mind, to keep you occupied, confused and manipulated so that you never figure out the greater truth that threatens the entire corrupt establishment.

What greater truth is that? The simple fact that all government power is granted by the People and can be instantly taken away by the People with nothing more than a consensus decision. Government and the rule of law exist as nothing more than consensus mental constructs — structural delusions of the mind that are widely shared and thus believed to be real. But government can collapse in an instant when the fraudulent promises of government suddenly collapse in the minds of the populace. Hence the need for drastic, elaborate financial theater to create the illusion of a booming economy even as we teeter on the verge of global, systemic economic collapse.

(By the way, “faith” in fiat currency is also a mental construct that can be shattered in an instant. The only reason another person accepts your green paper dollars as money is because you both share a false believe in the agreed-upon underlying value of the digits printed in cheap ink on near-worthless fiber. If that illusion of value is shattered in both your minds, dollars immediately collapse into worthlessness because they have no tangible value. All fiat money systems are run entirely on FAITH… and faith is fleeting when it comes to money.)

The illusion of government power depends on the continued indoctrination and intimidation of the enslaved masses

Those who run government fully realize that they are a tiny minority who rule only by fiat. Their rule depends entirely on the masses believing in the delusions played in for their minds by the ruling elite. If that delusion were to ever be shattered and the people realized how they were being fraudulently manipulated and exploited, the political elite wouldn’t survive even 24 hours (and there would be a dire shortage of rope in the D.C. area in particular).

That’s the bigger, deeper picture of what’s really happening around you right now. You are living in a nation that’s run by a corrupt, criminal elite who carry out campaigns of elaborate delusion to enslave and manipulate the clueless masses who keep robotically voting for their very own slave masters. Any person who attempts to free the slaves is deemed an enemy of the state and is subjected to selective prosecutorial scrutiny to have them imprisoned (as described above).

In fact, the only reason I am still allowed to function as a relatively free citizen in this nation is because my articles simply aren’t popular enough to warrant the effort of oppression. I’m relatively safe, in other words, because my reach is so tiny compared to the mainstream media. Interestingly, that also means that you who are reading this are among the top 1% of the most informed individuals in the world. You are reading and learning about these eye opening, fundamental truths that 99% of the population will never encounter (partly because the 99% don’t have the mental fortitude to even face reality in the first place, since believing in popular fairy tales requires no real effort… and besides, there are Oreo cookies that need licking, right?).

As long as the system can continue to censor my message and keep it restricted to less than 1% of the population — via Google and Facebook censorship, mostly — then I will be “allowed” to continue my work because it doesn’t legitimately threaten the establishment in any serious way. But if my message ever somehow explodes in popularity and breaks through 10% of the population, then I would be in serious danger and would be silenced in one way or another. Remember, selective prosecution can target ANYONE and indict them for unknowingly committing three felonies a day.

Have no fear, however: My message of truth is not of much interest to 99% of the population. They are far too happy in their Golden Corral, GMO-infested junk food eat-a-thon fairy tale illusions to ever bother investigating reality. There is virtually zero risk to the establishment that my words will ever be embraced by more than a tiny fraction of the population. Deep truth, it seems, has never really been that popular in delusional societies.

You may now return to your regularly scheduled programming…

by Mike Adams | Natural News

BREAKING: Romanian Hacker ‘Guccifer’, With Access To Clinton Emails Found Dead

Christian Times Newspaper has learned that Guccifer, the Romanian hacker currently being held on charges for hacking Hillary Clinton’s personal email server, has been found in his Virginia jail cell, dead of an apparent suicide.

Guccifer, also known as Marcel Lazar Lehel, was extradited to the United States to face charges after openly admitting to repeatedly hacking Hillary Clinton’s email server.  This claim occurred in the midst of an FBI probe that was concluded this morning by Director Comey.

Lehel claimed that the server was “like an open orchid on the Internet” and that it “was easy … easy for me, for everybody.”

After the FBI cleared Clinton of any charges Tuesday morning, a rumor began circulating that Guccifer was missing from his jail cell.  Tuesday night, reports began spreading that the Romanian hacker was found after the evening’s dinner hanging from a rope in his personal cell.

Comey, in his statement Tuesday morning, alluded to the fact that American enemies and individual actors most likely accessed Hillary Clinton’s emails, but Guccifer was the only person to come forward with knowledge of their contents.

Reports are still developing, and CTN is waiting on statements from authorities.

It is worth noting that the Clinton White House faced allegations that Hillary and her aides were involved in the questionable suicide of White House employee Vince Foster in 1995.

Source: Christian Times Newspaper ((satire))


two days prior … ((really happened))

U.N. Official ‘Accidentally’ Crushes Own Throat Right Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton

https://whiskeytangotexas.com/2016/07/03/u-n-official-accidentally-crushes-own-throat-right-before-testifying-against-hillary-clinton/

https://i0.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/07/01/20160702_ashe.jpg

 

U.N. Official ‘Accidentally’ Crushes Own Throat Right Before Testifying Against Hillary Clinton

Call it conspiracy theory, coincidence or just bad luck, but any time someone is in a position to bring down Hillary Clinton by testifying they wind up dead. In fact, there’s a long history of Clinton-related body counts, with scores of people dying under mysterious circumstances.

Perhaps the most notable is Vince Foster. Foster was a partner at Clinton’s law firm and knew the inner workings of the Clinton Machine.  Police ruled that death a suicide, though it is often noted that Foster may have been suicided.

Now, another official has found himself on the wrong end of the Clintons. That John Ashe was a former President of the United Nations General Assembly highlights the fact that no one is safe once in their sights.

https://i1.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/2016/07/01/20160702_ashe.jpg

And as you might have guessed, there are major inconsistencies with Ashe’s death. It was not only conveniently timed because Ashe died just a few days before being set to testify against Clinton in a corruption case, but official reports indicated he died of a heart attack.

The problem, however, is that police on the scene reported Ashe died when his throat was crushed during a work-out accident.

The New York Post’s Page Six reported that after Ashe was found dead Wednesday, the U.N. claimed that he had died from a heart attack. Local police officers in Dobbs Ferry, New York, later disputed that claim, saying instead that he died from a workout accident that crushed his throat.

Adding to the mysterious nature of Ashe’s death was the fact that he had been slated to be in court Monday with his Chinese businessman co-defendant Ng Lap Seng, from whom he reportedly received over $1 billion in donations during his term as president of the U.N. General Assembly.

And then there was this: During the presidency of Bill Clinton, Seng illegally funneled several hundred thousand dollars to the Democrat National Committee.

Source: The Conservative Tribune via The Daily Sheeple

It must be coincidence, right?

If former Secret Service agent Gary Byrne is to be believed, this is business as usual for the Clintons. Excerpt via Zero Hedge:

BYRNE: I feel so strongly that people need to know the real Hillary Clinton and how dangerous she is in her behavior. She is not a leader. She is not a leader.

SEAN: She does not have the temperament?

BYRNE: She doesn’t have the temperament. She didn’t have the temperament to handle the social office when she was First Lady, she does not have the temperament.

SEAN: She’s dishonest.

BYRNE: She’s dishonest, she habitually lies, anybody that can separate themselves from their politics and review her behavior over the past 15 years…

Byrne is the author of the newly published book Crisis Of Character – a first-hand Clinton exposé.

by Mac Salvo | ZeroHedge

Russians Hack Clinton Foundation Server – Release Hillary Sex Tape

hillary hacked a


Meanwhile, USA.gov Finally Admits That Obama’s State Department Disabled Security Software To Allow Hillary’s Private Server Emails

Emails released under court order Wednesday to Judicial Watch show that in December 2010, State Department technical staff had to disable software on their systems intended to block phishing emails that could deliver dangerous viruses. The reason: The State Department was trying to resolve delivery problems with emails sent from Hillary Clinton’s private server.

Deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin and Hillary both used Clinton’s private server, and as AP reports, both had complained that emails each sent to State Department employees were not being reliably received.  “This should trump all other activities” Ken LaVolpe, a senior technical official told other IT employees in a December 17, 2010 email. Days later another email was sent by State Department official Thomas W. Lawrence saying that Abedin was personally asking for an update about the repairs.

After technical staffers turned off security features at the State Department, Lawrence cautioned in an email “we view this as a band-aid and fear it’s not 100 percent fully effective.” State Department spokesman John Kirby clarified that the emails describe “a series of troubleshooting measures to the department’s system, not Secretary Clinton’s system, to attempt to remedy the problem.”

On January 9, 2011, a personal aid with no security clearance was forced to shut down Clinton’s server because he believed “someone was trying to hack us.” The worker then went on to write “we were hacked again so I shut (the server) down for a few min” in what was one of several occasions where email access to Clinton’s blackberry was disrupted because the private server was down according to the documents.

AP went on to add that last year it reported that on August 3, 2011, Clinton received infected emails disguised as speeding tickets from New York. The emails instructed recipients to print the attachments, however opening any attachment would have allowed hackers to take over control of the victim’s computer.

* * *

So to recap, Clinton’s private server was being hacked, and the State Department decided that it was a good idea to disabled security software on its government systems just to allow Hillary and Huma’s emails through. This begs the question of how far the hacking goes, did the State Department just allow hackers unlimited access when it disabled security software to accommodate Hillary?

As a reminder, the State Department did release a report slamming Hillary for ignoring internal guidance that her email set up broke federal standards. Alas, it is clearly too little, too late at this point. Also of note, although Judicial Watch is making headway in gaining access to email documents such as AP reported on above, no further answers will be revealed in the sworn testimony of Brian Pagliano, the man believed to have set up and maintained Clinton’s private server. In a deposition as part of one the civil cases involving Judicial Watch, Pagliano invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination more than 125 times.

Source: ZeroHedge


Breaking: FBI Will Make A HUGE Move Against Hillary Rodham Clinton

This is bombshell announcement! Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) just shared damning news for Hillary Clinton on The Steve Malzberg Show just now:

The FBI is ready to indict Hillary Clinton and if its recommendation isn’t followed by the U.S. attorney general, the agency’s investigators plan to blow the whistle and go public with their findings, former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV.

“I have friends that are in the FBI and they tell me they’re ready to indict,” DeLay said Monday on “The Steve Malzberg Show.”

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”

Clinton is under FBI investigation for her use of a private server to conduct confidential government business while she was secretary of state. But some Republicans fear any FBI recommendation that hurts Clinton will be squashed by the Obama administration.
DeLay, a Texas Republican and Washington Times radio host, said:

“One way or another either she’s going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another she’s going to have to face these charges.”

Team Hillary is already admitting this will likely happen. Amazingly, the Clinton campaign has been busy accusing Obama’s intelligence Inspector General, Charles McCullough, of coordinating releases of information to help Republicans. (!) McCullough’s investigations found Clinton was sharing documents which were “beyond top secret”… a crime that should not only disqualify Hillary Clinton from the White House, but should carry a lengthy prison sentence!

Here is Tom DeLay sharing the major news:

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/88d40-serveimage.jpg

 

 

Ex-Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood President Mohamed Morsi Sentenced To Life In Prison…

An Egyptian court has sentenced former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi to life in prison while simultaneously passing down death sentences for six co-conspirators.

Those who followed the 2011 Islamic uprising in Egypt saw the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton support the Muslim Brotherhood and their candidate Mohamed Morsi.

morsi-clinton

President Obama was thrilled with the Morsi election and immediately called him with congratulations.  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton flew to Cairo to express the administration sentiments and well wishes personally.

Unfortunately it did not take long before Morsi began deconstructing the secular social constructs, disbanding the Egyptian court system, and attempting to institute Sharia Law.

Thousands of Coptic Christians were slaughtered after Morsi took control and empowered the Muslim Brotherhood to attack his political enemies.

As president, Mohamed Morsi opened the Egyptian jails releasing hundreds of Muslim Brotherhood terrorists, including Mohamed Al Zawahiri the brother to al-Qaeda’s leader in Afghanistan Ayman Al Zawahiri.

Morsi Clintonmorsi with imadinnerjacket August 20th 2012

After a year of brutal dictatorship within Egypt, and with thousands of Egyptians killed as a result of the Islamic terrorists within the Muslim Brotherhood, the people of Egypt reached out to the widely respected General Fattah el-Sisi to restore order and bring peace.

The Egyptian army responded to the call of the citizenry and removed Morsi from power.

Morsi protestHandout picture of al-Sisi kissing the mother of an army officer, who was killed during the recent Egypt uprising, during the graduation ceremony of a new batch of non-commissioned officers at the NCOs' Institute in Cairo

Six months after the re-stabalization of Egypt elections were held and el-Sisi won the presidency with over 75% of the vote.  It took President Obama over six weeks before he would call el-Sisi and make contact with the moderate leader.  Sisi remains a widely popular leader (82% support) who was able to bring peace and stability along with a more secular outlook.

The Obama administration continues to belittle the efforts of Fattah el-Sisi but lets take a look at what Fattah el-Sisi has accomplished:

◾Disbanded the Muslim Brotherhood as a political terror entity. (link)  (link)
◾Arrested those who burned churches and attacked Coptic Christians. (link) (link)
◾Jailed or banished the extremist forces.  (link)
◾Supported Israel’s right to exist and defend it’s borders.  (link)  (link)
◾Defeated Hamas in the border region. (link)  (link)
◾Destroyed the border terror tunnels used by Hamas  (link) (link)
◾Pressured Hamas and the PA to negotiate the ceasefire, and forced the PA and Hamas to assemble ONE negotiating group for their interests. (link)  (link)
◾Fought extremism in the Sinai region, and fought against ISIS infiltration.
◾Fought the Libyan new al-Qaeda network “Libyan Dawn”.  (link)
◾Charged and prosecuted the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood, who fled to Qatar.  (link)
◾Followed the MB to Qatar and initiated sanctions against Qatar until they stopped financing and harboring terror.  (link)

◾Formed a coalition against Qatar including the UAE and Saudi Arabia who withdrew their ambassadors and isolated Qatar in the region.  (link)  (link)
◾Won reelection with almost 70% of the vote. (link)  (link )   (link)
◾Holds an 80%+ job approval rating among ALL Egyptians. (link)
◾Shut down Qatar financed Al Jazerra propaganda machine.  (link)
◾Supported framework for a new constitution with minority protections.  (link)
◾Won a victory against Qatar as they finally conceded and stopped safeguarding terrorists. Sending the MB leadership to the new safe harbor of Turkey.  (link)
◾United the moderate (non violent) Arab coalition, the Gulf Security Council, and constructed a unity principle that supports the safety of Jordan and formed a coalition to defend if needed.  (link)
◾Faced down and quietly defeated Turkey’s bid for a security council seat in the United Nations.  (link)  (link)
◾Negotiated a safe passage coalition for Israel and Greece to form an energy based economic trade agreement.
◾Continues to fight the Islamist extremists inside Libya.  (link)  (link)
◾Continues to fight ISIS in the Northern Sinai region.  (link)  (link)  (link)
◾Expanded the border safety zone with Gaza to insure greater control and protection from weapons smuggling. (link)

el sisi with copts 2el sisi with copts

The Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic terrorist networks including ISIS, have been attempting to regain power ever since el-Sisi brought peace to Egypt.  Five leaders within The Brotherhood fled Egypt and took refuge in Qatar.  Those terrorist leaders aligned in abstention with the Islamic State or ISIS.

Eventually the Qatari government came under pressure from the six Gulf Council states to stop providing safe refuge for the Muslim Brotherhood terrorist leaders.  President Recep Erdogan of Turkey gave them safe harbor, and it is believed they remain in Turkey today while coordinating ISIS political advocacy.

Because of the coordinated spying and connected activity to radical jihadists, Egypt was also forced to confront the Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers within Al Jazerra the primary media.  Several Salafist-minded journalists were arrested while engaging in communication and promotion for the Brotherhood against the Egyptian government.  Al Jazerra is also based in Qatar.

Cairo is considered the intellectual epicenter of Muslim scholarship and religion.  President Fattah el-Sisi made a historic plea to the leadership within the Muslim community to stop allowing the promotion of radical Islam.  –SEE HERE

President Obama and Hillary Clinton remain widely despised within Egypt as they are seen as the cause of almost a year of brutality, terrorism, and bloodshed brought upon them by the rise of Mohamed Morsi and the advocacy of the Obama administration.

The last time Secretary Clinton attempted to visit Egypt her entourage was pelted with tomato’s and she experienced a gauntlet of hatred toward her by the victims of her short-sighted policies.

Egypt Freedom Loss 2

Egypt Freedom Loss 2 focus sign enlarged

https://i1.wp.com/blurbrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/egypt-pro-america.jpg

https://i2.wp.com/blurbrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/obama_clinton_muslim-brotherhood.jpg

by Sundance | The Last Refuge

 

Stunning Emails Reveal How Clinton Foundation Donor Bought Seat As Hillary’s Nuclear Weapons Advisor

Forget Hillary’s personal email server: this is what true cronyism and criminal corruption looks like, and this is the biggest threat from a Hillary presidency.

It has been widely speculated, if not proven, that donors to the Clinton Foundation who over the years have transferred hundreds of millions of dollars to the “charitable organization”, bought political favors with the Clintons in exchange for their generosity. That has now been confirmed thanks to a stunning ABC report which reveals how a major foundation donor – one who previously had practically no experience on intelligence matters – mysteriously ended up as a nuclear weapons advisor to Hillary during her tenure as Secretary of State.

https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marketswiki.com%2Fwiki%2Fimages%2Fe%2Feb%2FRajFernando.jpg&sp=7dbbbb678ee630d0768e7f14387e2172

Rajiv Fernando

Worse, the person in question Rajiv K. Fernando, had been the head of a high frequency trading company, Chopper Trading (recently acquired by HFT powerhouse DRW), which may explain the unprecedented pull of the HFT lobby throughout all ranks of the US political apparatus. In other words, Fernando bought a seat to not only have advance knowledge of all US foreign policy, but to directly shape it, something he could then parlay in the forms of massive policy front running profits thanks to his trading company.

In other words, the appointment qualified Fernando, a trader in the public markets, for one of the highest levels of top secret access.

Just as shocking was the aggressive retaliation with which the State Department tried to cover up the cronyism that literally “bought” Fernando’s seat as one of Hillary’s closest political advisors, and how – as a result of ongoing media pressure – Fernando just as mysteriously resigned only days after his appointment was announced when the State Department was unable to come up with a legitimate reason for him to stay on.

The full shocking story follows, courtesy of ABCRead more: ZeroHedge

https://earloftaint.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/auction.jpg?w=945

Meanwhile, the Clintons are also facing an obscene for-profit university scandal

Hillary Clinton said “Physical Barrier” Needed To Keep Mexicans Out in 2006

https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthemostimportantnews.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F06%2FIllegal-Immigration-Crossing-The-Rio-Grande2.jpg&sp=46c9bba8f0739ed235edc8355a73dc7b


Clinton Video Transcript:

“Mexico is such an important problem. Mexican government’s policies are pushing migration north. There isn’t any sensible approach except to do what we need to do simultaneously.  You know secure our borders with technology personnel physical barriers. If necessary in some places and we need to have tougher employer sanctions and we need to product incentivize Mexico to do more if they’ve committed transgressions of whatever kind they should be obviously deported.”

But today, it’s only “racist” when Trump says it?

https://riflemaniiijournal.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/screen-shot-2016-06-10-at-12-06-49-pm.png?w=720&quality=80&strip=info

Obama Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton TPP Emails Until After The Election

https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstevechabot.com%2Fblog%2Fadmin%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F06%2FClinton_TPP.jpg&sp=19330d5a8e78c211c91afd2d3259589c

Trade deals are the hottest issue in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign because millions of American jobs are at stake. But correspondence from Hillary Clinton and her top State Department aides about a controversial 12-nation trade deal will not be available for public review — at least not until after the election. The Obama administration abruptly blocked the release of Clinton’s State Department correspondence about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) he’s trying to push through, after first saying it expected to produce the emails this spring.

Watch President Okey Doke choke on intellectual stammer when he campaigns for Hillary Clinton.

by David Sirota | International Business Times

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton Posted Names of Hidden Intelligence Officials On Her Personal Email

BOWLING GREEN, KY - MAY 16: Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton addresses the crowd during a campaign rally at La Gala May 16, 2016, in Bowling Green, Kentucky. Clinton is preparing for Kentucky's May 17th primary. (Photo by John Sommers II/Getty Images)

Hillary Clinton posted and shared the names of concealed U.S. intelligence officials on her unprotected email system.

Federal records reveal that Clinton swapped these highly classified names on an email account that was vulnerable to attack and was breached repeatedly by Russia-linked hacker attempts. These new revelations — reminiscent of the Valerie Plame scandal during George W. Bush’s tenure — could give FBI investigators the evidence they need to make a case that Clinton violated the Espionage Act by mishandling national defense information through “gross negligence.”

Numerous names cited in Clinton’s emails have been redacted in State Department email releases with the classification code “B3 CIA PERS/ORG,” a highly specialized classification that means the information, if released, would violate the Central Intelligence Act of 1949.

Bush administration Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence General Jerry Boykin said that Hillary Clinton posting the names of CIA-protected intelligence agents on her private email server means that she must be indicted.

https://reclaimourrepublic.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/hillary-prison-2016.jpg?w=297&h=300

by Patrick Howley | Brietbart

First “Shocking” Deposition In Clinton Email Case Reveals She Did Not Use A Password

https://i1.wp.com/www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2016/05/13/lewis%20lukens.jpg

U.S. Ambassador Lewis Lukens’s sworn testimony in the case of Hillary Clinton’s privatization of the U.S. Secretary of State’s email is the first evidence to be released in the Clinton email cases, and it was published on May 26th at the website of Judicial Watch, the organization that originally brought the suit. Headlining “First Deposition Testimony from Clinton Email Discovery Released”, it reported that:

Judicial Watch today released the deposition transcript of Ambassador Lewis Lukens, former deputy assistant secretary of state and executive director of the State Department’s executive secretariat.  The transcript is available here.  Amb. Lukens was deposed last week as part of the discovery granted to Judicial Watch by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in response to its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unsecured, non-government email system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

Lukens is the first of seven depositions of former Clinton top aides and State Department officials that Judicial Watch has scheduled over the next four weeks.  Also to be deposed are Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, as well as top State Department official Patrick Kennedy, and former State IT employee Bryan Pagliano.

In his testimony, Lukens described his State Department role:

I’ve been a Foreign Service officer for 27 years. I’ve served in Southern China; in the Ivory Coast; in Sydney, Australia; in Dublin, Ireland; in Baghdad; Vancouver, British Columbia; Dakar, Senegal; and three tours in Washington, D.C., as well as my current position in San Francisco.

While Clinton was Secretary of State, his role was heading “logistics and management support” and he had “roughly 110 employees working for me” including the “IRM” or Information Resource Management team. Also, during his questioning, he was asked “You traveled with Mrs. Clinton on all of her foreign travel?” while he was employed there, and he answered: “Yes.”

Representative excerpts from his testimony will be presented here:

While Clinton’s office was being prepared for her:

Q: Do you know if Mrs. Clinton — if the IRM office set up an e-mail address for Mrs. Clinton?
A: I don’t believe they did.
Q: Do you know why they didn’t?
A: I don’t think it was asked for.
Q: Would Mrs. Clinton have — was it required for Mrs. Clinton to ask for an e-mail address for one to be assigned to her?
A: Yes.
Q: Was it unusual — at the time did you think it was unusual that Mrs. Clinton didn’t want an e-mail address assigned to her?
A: No.
Q: Why not?
A: I’m not aware of former Secretaries of State having e-mail addresses on our system.

In other words: her having an e-mail address assigned to her was “required,” but the custom at the U.S. Department of State was to ignore this ‘requirement’.

(AUTHOR’S NOTE: Regardless of whether violating the regulations or even the law has been ignored in the past, violations are supposed to be punished or prosecuted. Prior refusal to prosecute does not constitute legal excuse for continuing refusal to prosecute: it instead constitutes a government in which some persons who are supposedly in the service of, and who are definitely being paid by, the public, are, in practice, above the regulations or even the laws — in other words, a dictatorship. However, this aspect of the questioning was not pursued.)

Lukens then said that her violation on that matter was ignored and that a “BB” or Blackberry account was instead requested by “HRC’ Hillary Rodham Clinton. Lukens’s notes indicated that he had asked HRC’s agent, “On the BB for HRC, can we chat this morning?” and “I may have thought of a workaround [to evade the State Department’s regulations] but need more info on her BB use.” He explained during this questioning of him: “So the crux of the issue was that BlackBerrys and iPhones are not allowed in the Secretary’s office suite, so the question was, how is the Secretary going to be able to check her e-mails if she’s not able to have the Blackberry at her desk with her.”

Q: And so what did you — did you propose a solution at that point?

A: So my proposal was to set up a computer on her desk, a standalone computer [not part of the State Department’s system], for her to be able to access the Internet to check her e-mails [privatized — and therefore not subject to FOIA requests or historians’ investigations].

However, Clinton’s agent insisted on a private computer also being set up “across the hall” “for her to check her BlackBerry” even though no private BlackBerry was allowed on the premises. This was to be the “workaround.”

In an email, Lukens had written, and the questioner referenced it:

Also think we should go ahead, but will await your green light, and set up a standalone PC in the Secretary’s office connected to the Internet, but not go through our system, to enable her to check her e-mails from her desk.

That proposal was accepted and was done. Then:

Q: Do you know if this setup would have been any different from the setup of other employees?
A: Yes, this would have been different.
Q: How would it have been different?
A: My understanding is that most of the employees’ computers in the State Department are connected through the State Department’s OpenNet e-mail system …
Q: So this would have been separate from the OpenNet system?
A: Correct.

He was asked why he had proposed this solution, and he said it was “For ease of access” and, “as far as I knew, there was no requirement for her to be connected to our system” (even though he had earlier said that her having an email address assigned to her in the State Department’s system, the OpenNet system, was “required”). He said that the “ease of access” would be because of there being “fewer passwords.”

He was asked whether doing things this way was necessary in order for her to be able to access the Internet from the State Department, and he said, ”the Internet is available” to employees at the office, just as anywhere.

He was asked about the inconvenience of the State Department’s passwords system, and he said that he eliminated her need for any passwords:

A: She wouldn’t have had a password.
Q: So the computer would have just been open and be able to use without going through any security features?
A: Correct.

Though he was paid by U.S. taxpayers, apparently his only concern was to please his superiors, whom he trusted unquestioningly despite their evident unconcern about “security” etc.

In further questioning of Mr. Lukens, it became clear that he never gave any thought to what the purpose behind the State Department’s regulations was: he didn’t even notice that Hillary Clinton’s buddy and top aide Huma Abedin at the Department was also using only a private email account — even though he regularly had been communicating via email with her.

* * *

And then the Daily Caller adds the following:

Shocking Deposition: Hillary Clueless On Using Computer Emails

As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton never used a password to protect her computer emails, and she was clueless about how regular emails work on a conventional computer, according to a deposition of a foreign service officer at the State Department.

She also continued to push for the use of her personal Blackberry phone in the Secretary’s highly-secured government suite even though National Security Agency (NSA) regulations barred its use in that office.

The revelations came as part of a May 18 deposition released Thursday by Judicial Watch, the nonprofit government watchdog group, of Lewis A. Lukens, a veteran 27-year foreign service officer at the State Department who served as the deputy executive secretary and executive director of the Office of the Secretariat from 2008 to 2011.

From the start of her term in January 2009, State Department officials grappled with Clinton’s ignorance of the use of basic computers.  In a January 24, 2009 email from Lukens to the department’s Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy, the foreign service officer said Clinton didn’t know how to use a computer for emails.

Citing a conversation Lukens had with Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, he wrote, “She says problem (sic) is HRC does not know how to use a computer to do emails — only Blackberry.”  HRC refers to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Judicial Watch attorney Michael Bekesha asked Lukens if State Department policy barred the use of personal cell phones in the Secretary’s official office suite, which is one of the most tightly secured facilities in government. Lukens explained the prohibition: “So the crux of the issue was that BlackBerrys and iPhones are not allowed in the Secretary’s office suite, so the question was, how is the Secretary going to be able to check her emails if she’s not able to have the Blackberry at her desk with her.

The NSA rebuffed multiple attempts  by Clinton to carry her Blackberry into her  office.

Lukens also said Clinton did not use a password to protect her stand-alone computer from unwanted intruders such as hackers. During the deposition, Lukens volunteered that the stand-alone computer adjacent to her suite did not have a password for protection  “She wouldn’t have had a password.”

Bekesha asked, astonished, “So the computer would have just been open and be able  to use without going through any security features?

“Correct,” Lukens replied.

He added that to the best of his knowledge, Clinton never received a waiver to use the Blackberry in the State Department headquarters.

“Do you know if — do you know if waivers or exceptions were made for State — or employees of the Office of the Secretary to use their State Department BlackBerrys within the executive suite within the office of the Secretary,” Bekesha asked.

“I’m not aware of any waivers that were made,” Lukens replied.

Mills eventually was able to set up a room “adjacent” to her secure office to allow her to look at her unsecured Blackberry emails.  But it appears that Clinton rarely used the room.

Instead, the Secretary of State would go into a hallway to use her blackberry.

Lukens said in the deposition he saw Clinton using her blackberry in the hall “maybe a half dozen times.”

The official said that he thought Clinton wanted to use the Blackberry “to stay in touch with family and friends,”

He said he didn’t know if she was conducting official business on a private server or with a non-governmental email address. Clinton used an email domain address “clintonemail.com.”

As late as 2011, State Department officials were still trying to get Clinton to use a government-issued blackberry.  But Huma Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, shot it down, saying in an August 30, 2011 email “let’s discuss the State Blackberry, [it] doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.”

Bekesha, asked Lukens if Abedin also used a non-state department email address.

“Do you recall if Ms. Abedin used non-state.gov e-mail accounts to correspond with you,” Bekesha asked.

“Well, the answer is yes,” he replied.

Lukens displayed a great lack of curiosity about Clinton’s use of prohibited electronic devices.

“Did you ever think about whether or not she was going to use that equipment to conduct official government business,” asked the Judicial Watch attorney.

“I did not,” he replied.

Judge Sullivan, the State Department’s Inspector General and the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community have expressed deep dissatisfaction with the State Department’s examination of the Clinton emails, as well as its failure to identify classified materials on her server.

The inspector generals, unlike State Department officials, found at least two dozen emails contained either “Top Secret” designation or the highest government classification called “Special Access Programs,” or SAP.  They found up to 1200 emails contained some form of classification material.

Lukens, as executive director of the executive secretariat for the State Department, said he was only trained once to handle documents under the Freedom of Information Act — in 1989 — when he first joined the department. He’s never had a refresher course in the years since that first training.

“Do you know if any point after 1989 you received updated guidance or training about the use of email as it related to federal records and the Freedom of Information Act,” Bekesha asked.

“Not that I recall,” replied Lukens.

The State Department official also revealed that he routinely deleted official emails “to clear out space in my inbox.

He said he “kept files for various trips and things where I would keep e-mails until trips were over, but after trips were over I would often delete the files to clear — to clear out space in my inbox.”

Source: ZeroHedge


Meanwhile, Crooked Clinton Rally Supporters Are Caught Sitting Down During National Anthem

Most Americans know it’s respectful to stand during the national anthem. Many supporters of Hillary Clinton apparently didn’t get that memo.

Prior to a rally with Bill Clinton in Edison, New Jersey on Friday, a high school choir attempted to lead the few hundred attendees in a rendition of the Star Spangled Banner.

But a video from the crowd shows many people sitting down, talking with their neighbors or staring at their phones — and completely ignoring the song.

https://dailycrusadernewsdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/hillary_clinton_24007578223.jpg?w=620&h=264&crop=1

https://i1.wp.com/a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3385/4743/original.gif

Source: The Crusader Journal

 

Signals Intelligence Indicates Wall Street Dropping Hillary Clinton…

FIRST, if you have not followed the “Tripwire Series” this update might take a while to fully digest.  There are key indications the real presidential decision-makers have shifted.

I would strongly suggest you watch this video before continuing, and remind yourself that Andrea Mitchell is Alan Greenspan’s wife (this is one of the “keys” moving forward).

The video is Mika Brezinski outlining the latest State Department report on the Hillary Clinton E-Mail Scandal:  “it feels like Hillary Clinton is lying”…

Last year, against tremendous opposition, we outlined what would happen if two specific occurrences took place:  #1) If Donald Trump secured the GOP nomination; and, #2) If Hillary Clinton crossed a particular threshold and appeared “unelectable”.

What we stated then, eerily remains today.

If Trump won (he has), and it appeared Clinton was too weak to defeat him (looking possible), the power-brokers who ultimately control U.S. elections (Wall street) would move to replace Clinton with an alternate candidate.  They’d have no choice.

Who the alternate candidate doesn’t really matter.  The reasoning we have continually evidenced within expanded explanations about the Congressional Legislative Agenda being dictated by Wall Street interests.

♦ The influences who control the legislative agenda have already put in place, convinced and paid for, the politicians needed to advance their interests (the legislative priorities).

♦ Those interests don’t care about who occupies the White House so long as that occupant is incapable of derailing their objectives.

♦ There is only one current candidate who is a risk to that Wall Street goal, Donald Trump.  The second candidate, be it Hillary or Bernie, does not represent the same risk.

♦ Bernie cannot disrupt the legislative agenda because he is external to the party structure who currently control the construct (Leader McConnell and Speaker Ryan).

♦ Only Donald Trump can disrupt the agenda because he would also carry an electoral mandate and allegiance with elements inside structure of the party apparatus.

In essence Trump can block them, Bernie cannot.

mcconnell ryan

trump mcconnelltom donohue dinner at saudi embassy

SIGNALS – What we are now seeing is a shift:

♦ Trump is polling equal to, or ahead of, Hillary Clinton.  That’s a bad indicator for those Legislative Priorities.

♦ Clinton is looking more and more weak.  Her failure to defeat Trump would eliminate the ability of the Legislative Priorities to advance.

♦ Clinton’s E-Mail scandal now looks toxic to her ability.

Globalists VS Nationalists.

♦ Last night on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel the question was raised about Donald Trump debating Bernie Sanders.  Why ABC? Who owns ABC?  Answer = Disney Corp., a specific corporate benefactor (and constructionist) of the Wall Street Legislative Agenda.

♦ MSNBC now questioning Hillary’s candidacy.  Specifically Andrea Mitchell (wife of former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan), a specific tool of the Wall Street Legislative Agenda.

♦ Alan Greenspan is antithetical to a Donald Trump candidacy.

greenspan

These signals are NOT disconnected.

Also, Senator Elizabeth Warren is attacking Donald Trump. When we outlined the risk to Clinton’s nomination, Elizabeth Warren was predicted to join the Bernie Sanders ticket as the Vice-President pick. They need a ticket which can defeat Donald Trump.

Remember, with republicans in control of the House and Senate, and with the hundreds of millions already spent to secure the agenda items, only Donald Trump represents the risk.

There are literally trillions of dollars at stake.

Do you really think Barack Obama is remaining in Washington DC in 2017/2018 because his kid needs to finish High School?

♦ Prior Reference and Resources – (links to internal MSM references are contained within prior outlines): RNC Rule Changes RNC Rule Battles

  1. Following The Money
  2. The GOPe Roadmap
  3. ♦ The Roles of The Players – “The Splitters
  4. ♦ How each candidate is aligned in the Roadmap
  5. ♦ Arrow #1 Trump Hits The Super-PACs – The GOPe Achilles Heel
  6. ♦ Arrow #2 Trump Hits Bush – Inside The Wall Street Fortress
  7. ♦ Arrow #3 Trump Cuts Off Rubio/Bush switch – The GOPe Switch
  8. ♦ The Rick Perry Tripwire Exposed – DC Super-Pac
  9. ♦ Jeb Bush Super-Pac Will immediately spend $10 Million
  10. ♦ Proving there is only one political party in Washington DC
  11. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part One (The GOPe Ruse)
  12. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Two (Stop being played)
  13. ♦ Why Support Trump – Part Three (Intellectual Details)
  14. ♦ How To Defeat the GOPe Road Map
  15. ♦ Current Polling Exposes – the Ohio, Florida, Texas, Virginia, New York Splitters
  16. ♦ Florida Polling Exposes – Donald Trump defeating Jeb’s Florida Strategy
  17. ♦ Rush Limbaugh Discusses/AffirmsThe “splitter strategy”
  18. ♦ The Biden/Sanders Paradox – Trump Winning Means Clinton Must Be Removed
  19. ♦ Salem Media Communications (GOPe Media Arm) Launches Attack
  20. ♦ Open Letter To GOPe – The Conservative Frustration
  21. ♦ Why The GOPe Will Never Stop Attacking Donald Trump
  22. ♦ Trump indicates he is well aware of the GOP Mississippi Trickery 2014
  23. ♦ GOPe (Stuart Stevens and Henry Barbour) recruit for a Mississippi style takedown
  24. ♦ Chris Christie Joins the insurgency – Christie Endorsement
  25. ♦ The Demonization of Donald Trump Begins – The Racial Onslaught Miss ’14 Redux
  26. ♦ Ben Carson Drops Out – Manipulators of his Campaign Exposed
  27. ♦ Mitt Romney admits the GOPe Road Map and Splitter Strategy
  28. ♦ The Agenda of Ted Cruz exposed – Splitter Fiorina joins forces with Cruz
  29. ♦ Team Trump begin leveraging sheer will – Paul Manafort negotiates.
  30. ♦ Paul Ryan (Wall Street Purchase) – Not Supporting Trump

trump lion

by Sundance | The Last Refuge

 

Bill Clinton’s Personal Aide — With No Security Clearance — Operated Hillary’s Email Server

Buried in a footnote and text of the scathing report by the State Department’s Inspector General (IG) about Hillary’s emails is evidence that the private email server that carried America’s top secret information to and from the Secretary of State was installed, maintained, and partially operated by a civilian aide to Bill Clinton who lacked any security clearance and did not even work for the government.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/ready-hillary-hangman.png?w=750&h=563

This extensive reliance on a close assistant to Bill Clinton raises questions about the handling of classified material by the Secretary of State. If General David Petraeus was held accountable to passing secret information to his biographer and mistress, what are we to make of the routine access to potentially all secret information granted to Hillary’s husband’s aide?

While not named in the report itself, the “non-Department” aide referred to is apparently Justin Cooper, longtime aide-de-camp to the former president. Cooper had no security clearance and no expertise whatsoever in safeguarding computers. He helped Bill Clinton research two of his books, frequently traveled with Clinton, was involved in Clinton Foundation fundraising, and, at the same time, worked for Teneo — the sprawling investment banking, political consulting, and PR firm that started on Hillary’s tenure. Teneo paid Bill Clinton, Huma Abedin, Doug Band, Justin Cooper. The firm was founded by two former State Department employees and then hired four more.

It was Cooper who initially opened and registered the private server and it was he who apparently maintained its security. But that wasn’t the end of it.

The Inspector General report indicates that on two occasions, Cooper suspected that the server had been hacked and that, on one of them, he actually took it upon himself to shut the entire server down. (Hillary’s aides deny that it was ever hacked, but emails from Cooper belie that assertion). Indeed, both hacking attempts came while Hillary was traveling abroad in locations of dubious security — the UAE, Bosnia, Serbia and Algeria. Her server was especially vulnerable to hacking on her foreign travels when she carried and used her Blackberry which was linked to her server.

The IG Report states that on Jan. 9, 2011, the Bill Clinton aide who registered the clintonemail.com domain — who was Justin Cooper — “notified the Secretary’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations [Huma Abedin] that he had to shut down the server because he believed ‘someone was trying to hack us and while they did not get in I didn’t [sic] want to let them have the chance to.’”

Cooper wrote another email to Abedin later in the day stating that, “We were attacked again so I shut [the server] down for a few min.” Abedin emailed another top Clinton aide the next day urging them to not email “anything sensitive” to Clinton. She also offered to “explain more in person.” Abedin did not report any of the hacking issues to anyone at the State department, as was required.

Cooper obviously had the authority, access, and ability to access and shut down the server used by State Department employees, diplomats, and ambassadors to communicate with the Secretary of State. And apparently the server was also used by Bill Clinton’s aides for his business, as we reported last September.

The Clintons are very interested in Cooper’s legal issues. Columnist Monica Crowley reported that the Clintons are now paying Cooper’s legal bills. That’s interesting, isn’t it?

The “all in the family” approach of the Clintons to the operation of the private server makes a mockery of security. Not only could anyone with even minimal levels of skill hack into her server through her Blackberry (that she carried with her into high risk countries despite the explicit warnings of security officials that she wrote about in her own books), but an aide who worked for a former president, who was aggressively courting foreign countries for donations and for a private consulting firm soliciting foreign governments as clients had access to the State Department email server.

 https://s16-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fraisedonhoecakes.com%2FROH%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F08%2FHillary-Prison.jpg&sp=a96aa3c2e7b3017686bbdfcd01a6bdea

But the broader implications of the IG Report about Cooper’s intimate connection with the Secretary of State’s email server suggest that the Hillary and the former president operated an off-the-shelf rogue operation out of Bill Clinton’s office — and possibly the Clinton Foundation — that had the potential access to all the government’s secrets that passed through the Secretary of State.

Hillary went to great lengths to keep the server secret and out of the reach of the State Department and the Freedom of Information Act.

What’s even more astounding is that Bryan Pagliano, who is obviously the second “technical adviser, “a political appointee” of the Secretary referred to in the Report, kept his work on the Secretary’s server a dark secret from his State Department bosses.

Remember, Pagliano was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in exchange for his testimony.

But whatever he actually did for Hillary was on the QT, because according to the Report, his direct supervisors said: “they did not know that he was providing ongoing support to the Secretary’s email system during working hours. They also told the IG that they questioned whether he could support a private client during working hours, given his capacity as a full time employee.”

Yet Hillary’s attorney, David Kendall, said that Pagliano performed technical assistance for the Clinton family and was compensated in various amounts at various times by wire or check.

So what was he doing?

This massive conflict of interest opens up an important new line of investigation: Did Cooper — or anyone else in the Bill Clinton orbit — access any of the actual emails, and, if so, did they share the content with Bill Clinton or anyone at Teneo? These are the kind of questions that the indiscriminate sharing of the email server with the Clintons’ entire official family invites.

The OIG Report raises lots of questions beyond its unequivocal conclusion that Hillary did not seek permission for the use of a private email server and would not have been granted permission in any event. Moreover, the Report certifies that she violated Federal Records requirements and failed to protect the server from cyber strikes.

The Report verifies what we already knew: Hillary is a chronic liar who deliberately lied about her email server cover-up.

Let’s hope the FBI picks up where the OIG left off.

By Dick Morris and Eileen McGann | The Hillary Daily

Rush: ‘Shocking’ reason to be cited when Hillary loses

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/hillary-for-prison.jpg?w=750&h=474

PALM BEACH, Florida – Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has received more than $21 million in just two years for giving speeches to large banks and corporations, and that could be the key factor in her potential political plunge, according to talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh.

“I think this is shocking,” Limbaugh declared on his Monday broadcast, citing a New York Post report on Sunday documenting the massive amount of money the former secretary of state raked in.

“I’m telling you, folks: $21 million over two years for 20 or 25 minutes? There’s nothing that screeches ‘out of touch’ more than that,” he said.

“I don’t think you’re gonna see this story in the New York Times or the Washington Post. I don’t think any of the nightly newscasts are gonna make a big deal of it. It’s gonna be the kind of thing that, if she loses, in their postmortems they’re gonna go back to and say, ‘You know what? We missed this when this happened, but the exit polling will show it, that people thought she was inexorably tied to corporate America.’”

The Post reported that from April 2013 to March 2015, Mrs. Clinton “collected $21,667,000 in ‘speaking fees,’ not to mention the cool $5 mil she corralled as an advance for her 2014 flop book, ‘Hard Choices.’ Throw in the additional $26,630,000 her ex-president husband hoovered up in personal-appearance ‘honoraria,’ and the nation can breathe a collective sigh of relief that the former first couple – who, according to Hillary, were ‘dead broke’ when they left the White House in 2001 with some of the furniture in tow – can finally make ends meet.”

Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh

Limbaugh noted that in recent years, many leftists in the U.S. have been voicing nothing but hatred for banks and large corporations, and that attitude cannot help Hillary politically:

You know how much they hate corporate America on the mainstream left, and the reason is the Democrat Party has made corporate America its number one enemies list. The Democrat Party, for as long as I’ve been alive, has been targeting “Big” this and “Big” that, and they have been drumming up hatred and suspicion and revulsion for all of these big corporations. That’s why Citizens United is so despised. That’s why you have leftists running around saying, “Corporations are not people!”

They hate them. Here’s Hillary Clinton: $21 million in two years. These Democrat voters? No way. Ten to 12 of ’em combined are never gonna earn $21 million in their lifetimes. And they’re gonna ask, “What is she doing that’s worth all that? I’ve seen her speak. I wouldn’t pay 10 cents for it. What?” People are gonna ask all these kinds of logical questions, and they’re gonna see all the banks. They hate the banks every bit as much as they hate corporations. They despise the banks. I mean, Occupy Wall Street was drummed up because of the banks. They hate ’em, folks. I mean, really hate. Not just dislike.

The Post itemized how much Mrs. Clinton was paid for her 2013-2015 speeches:

4/18/2013, Morgan Stanley, Washington, D.C.: $225,000
4/24/2013, Deutsche Bank, Washington, D.C.: $225,000
4/24/2013, National Multi Housing Council, Dallas, Texas: $225,000
4/30/2013, Fidelity Investments, Naples, Florida: $225,000
5/8/2013, Gap Inc., San Francisco, California: $225,000
5/14/2013, Apollo Management Holdings LP, New York, New York: $225,000
5/16/2013, Itau BBA USA Securities, New York, New York.: $225,000
5/21/2013, Verizon Communications Inc., Washington, D.C.: $225,000
5/29/2013, Sanford C. Bernstein and Co. LLC, New York, New York: $225,000
6/4/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Palmetto Bluffs, South Carolina: $225,000
6/6/2013, Spencer Stuart, New York, New York: $225,000
6/16/2013, Society for Human Resource Management, Chicago, Illinois: $285,000
6/17/2013, Economic Club of Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, Michigan: $225,000
6/20/2013, Boston Consulting Group Inc., Boston, Massachusetts: $225,000
6/20/2013, Let’s Talk Entertainment Inc., Toronto, Canada: $250,000
6/24/2013, American Jewish University, Universal City, California: $225,000
6/24/2013, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Company LP, Palos Verdes, California: $225,000
7/11/2013, UBS Wealth Management, New York, New York: $225,000
8/7/2013, Global Business Travel Association, San Diego, California: $225,000
8/12/2013, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Las Vegas, Nevada: $225,000
9/18/2013, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, Illinois: $225,000
9/19/2013, American Society of Travel Agents Inc., Miami, Florida: $225,000
10/4/2013, Long Island Association, Long Island, New York: $225,000
10/15/2013, National Association of Convenience Stores, Atlanta, Georgia: $265,000
10/23/2013, SAP Global Marketing Inc., New York, New York: $225,000
10/24/2013, Accenture, New York, New York: $225,000
10/24/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, New York, New York: $225,000
10/27/2013, Beth El Synagogue, Minneapolis, Minnesota: $225,000
10/28/2013, Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Chicago, Illinois: $400,000
10/29/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Tucson, Arizona: $225,000
11/4/2013, Mase Productions Inc., Orlando, Florida: $225,000
11/4/2013, London Drugs Ltd., Mississauga, Canada: $225,000
11/6/2013, Beaumont Health System, Troy, Michigan: $305,000
11/7/2013, Golden Tree Asset Management, New York, New York: $275,000
11/9/2013, National Association of Realtors, San Francisco, California: $225,000
11/13/2013, Mediacorp Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada: $225,000
11/13/2013, Bank of America, Bluffton, South Carolina: $225,000
11/14/2013, CB Richard Ellis Inc., New York, New York: $250,000
11/18/2013, CIIE Group, Naples, Florida: $225,000
11/18/2013, Press Ganey, Orlando, Florida: $225,000
11/21/2013, U.S. Green Building Council, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: $225,000
01/06/2014, GE, Boca Raton, Florida: $225,500
01/27/2014, National Automobile Dealers Association, New Orleans, Louisiana: $325,500
01/27/2014, Premier Health Alliance, Miami, Florida: $225,500
02/06/2014, Salesforce.com, Las Vegas, Nevada: $225,500
02/17/2014, Novo Nordisk A/S, Mexico City, Mexico: $125,000
02/26/2014, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Orlando, Florida: $225,500
02/27/2014, A&E Television Networks, New York, New York: $280,000
03/04/2014, Association of Corporate Counsel – Southern California, Los Angeles, California: $225,500
03/05/2014, The Vancouver Board of Trade, Vancouver, Canada: $275,500
03/06/2014, tinePublic Inc., Calgary, Canada: $225,500
03/13/2014, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, Orlando, Florida: $225,500
03/13/2014, Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies, New York, New York: $250,000
03/18/2014, Xerox Corporation, New York, New York: $225,000
03/18/2014, Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal, Montreal, Canada: $275,000
03/24/2014, Academic Partnerships, Dallas, Texas: $225,500
04/08/2014, Market° Inc., San Francisco, California: $225,500
04/08/2014, World Affairs Council, Portland, Oregon: $250,500
04/10/2014, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada: $225,500
04/10/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, San Jose, California: $265,000
04/11/2014, California Medical Association (via satellite), San Diego, California: $100,000
05/06/2014, National Council for Behavioral Healthcare, Washington, D.C.: $225,500
06/02/2014, International Deli-Dairy-Bakery Association, Denver, Colorado: $225,500
06/02/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, Denver, Colorado: $265,000
06/10/2014, United Fresh Produce Association, Chicago, Illinois: $225,000
06/16/2014, tinePublic Inc., Toronto, Canada: $150,000
06/18/2014, tinePublic Inc., Edmonton, Canada: $100,000
06/20/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, Austin, Texas: $150,000
06/25/2014, Biotechnology Industry Organization, San Diego, California: $335,000
06/25/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, San Francisco, California: $150,000
06/26/2014, GTCR, Chicago, Illinois: $280,000
07/22/2014, Knewton Inc., San Francisco, California: $225,500
07/26/2014, Ameriprise, Boston, Massachusetts: $225,500
07/29/2014, Coming Inc., Coming, New York: $225,500
08/28/2014, Nexenta Systems Inc., San Francisco, California: $300,000
08/28/2014, Cisco, Las Vegas, Nevada: $325,000
09/04/2014, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, California: $225,500
09/15/2014, Caridovascular Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.: $275,000
10/02/2014, Commercial Real Estate Women Network, Miami Beach, Florida: $225,500
10/06/2014, Canada 2020, Ottawa, Canada: $215,500
10/07/2014, Deutsche Bank AG, New York, New York: $280,000
10/08/2014, Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), Chicago, Illinois: $265,000
10/13/2014, Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers, Colorado Springs, Colorado: $225,500
10/14/2014, Salesforce.com, San Francisco, California: $225,500
10/14/2014, Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, California: $335,000
12/04/2014, Massachusetts Conference for Women, Boston, Massachusetts: $205,500
01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Winnipeg, Canada: $262,000
01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Saskatoon, Canada: $262,500
01/22/2015, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Whistler, Canada: $150,000
02/24/2015, Watermark Silicon Valley Conference for Women, Santa Clara, California: $225,500
03/11/2015, eBay Inc., San Jose, California: $315,000
03/19/2015, American Camping Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey: $260,000

Total: $21,667,000

A caller to Limbaugh’s show, a recent graduate from the University of Connecticut, affirmed the host’s position. He explained that during his commencement May 8, a speaker suggested there could be a Mrs. Clinton in the White House soon.

“The whole crowd, the whole gymnasium – Gampel Pavilion at the University of Connecticut – blew up, erupted in boos. It was the craziest thing. I couldn’t believe it happened,” the caller, Michael from Glastonbury, Connecticut, said.

“The whole crowd booed,” he continued. “I have a video of it on my Twitter page. I put it up; it got over a thousand retweets. The amount of messages I got … The whole place – student section and people watching – just erupted and booed. It was insane. … It only surprised me because it’s Connecticut, and the University of Connecticut. We’re by no means a conservative school.”

https://i1.wp.com/a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3385/4743/original.gif

by Joe Kovacs | WND

Hillary On Economy: “I Don’t Know. Leave It To Bill”

https://i1.wp.com/a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3385/5154/original.jpg

Nothing could better underscore Hillary’s lack of the proper base of knowledge to be president than her statement that she would assign the economy and job creation to her husband. That admission of economic ignorance essentially says that she will continue as the de facto Secretary of State and let Bill resume his duties as president. But, this time, it is not Bill who is running for president.

Hillary’s intention to delegate the essential work of managing the economy, stands in sharp contrast to Bill’s 1992 commitment to “focus like a laser” on fixing the economy. Could you imagine a candidate for president who says, in effect, that running the economy is not her thing, but don’t worry, her husband will take it over?

The fact is that Hillary is right — she has no credentials to show any real knowledge of the economy. Her work on the problems effecting women and children — providing stoves to African families — is as skew to economic policy as it is to foreign policy.

The complexities of interest rates, bond trading, derivative regulation, deflation and inflation, long term unemployment, and the migration of our labor force to the ranks of the welfare dependent, are all terra incognito for this presidential candidate. To the extent that she addresses economic concerns at all, she approaches them as social justice questions. Ask her about equal pay for equal work or family friendly workplace policies or health care benefits and she is in her element. But about job creation, international competition, protecting our industrial secrets, the business cycle, automation, the erosion of our manufacturing base, and trade deals she is at sea.

Send for Bill.

Even if it were legitimate for a candidate for president to have such blind spots in her knowledge base, what a slender reed Bill Clinton would be to rely on! In his currently depleted physical condition and seemingly limited energy level, the Bill Clinton of 2016 is not the man we elected in 1992. He has aged faster and more tragically than his wife. And most of his ideas have aged as well.

by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann | The Hillary Daily

Hillary Clinton Vows New Gun Grab in Secret Recording

“The Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment”

“So I’m going to speak out. I’m going to do everything I can to rally people against this pernicious, corrupting influence of the NRA,” Clinton asserts.

“And we’re going to do whatever we can. I’m proud when my husband took them on and we were able to ban assault weapons but he had to put a sunset on it so, 10 years later, of course, Bush wouldn’t agree to reinstate them.”

“We’ve got to go after this,” Clinton urged.

“Here again, the Supreme Court is wrong on the Second Amendment and I am going to make that case every chance I get.”

“The location and date of the recording are unknown. It sounds like an intimate room and was likely recorded on a cell phone or similar device. The Republican National Committee, which posted the clip on YouTube, has not provided additional details,” writes Kyle Olsen.

Hillary’s appetite for gun control has cropped up on the campaign trail numerous times.

Last month during an event in Philadelphia, Clinton vehemently agreed with a supporter who urged her to use executive orders to restrict the Second Amendment.

During a round table discussion in New York, the former Secretary of State nodded along vigorously as a member of the panel described gun owners as terrorists.

“Citizens are the terrorists, right?” the woman states as Hillary nods multiple times. “We’re so worried about terrorism but we have terrorism on our own soil,” she continued.

Hillary’s daughter Chelsea also gave a speech following the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia urging Democrats to exploit his absence to pass strict new gun control laws.

https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/communism.jpg?w=750&h=599

by Paul Joseph Watson | Prison Planet

Hillary Clinton Suppressed Minimum Wage In Haiti To 31 Cents

https://i2.wp.com/www.snopes.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/12472717_10208801409891333_1439168462430371580_n.jpgToday, child labor and trafficking are endemic in Haiti, particularly in the country’s manufacturing sector, which is outsourced to foreign companies.

In June 2009, the Haitian Parliament unanimously passed a law requiring that the minimum wage be raised to $0.61 an hour, or $5 a day. (The average cost of living is estimated to be the equivalent of about $23 a day.) This pay raise was staunchly opposed by foreign manufacturers who had set up shop in the country, and the United States Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development backed those manufacturers.

Read the rest at Snopes.com

 

Clinton Emails Reveal Google Partnering With The White House & Al Jazeera To Help Overthrow Assad

Color From Judge Napolitano’s Chambers In January, 2016

Color From Judge Napolitano’s Chambers In February, 2016

Color From Judge Napolitano’s Chambers In March, 2016

  Hillary Clinton Likely to Be Indicted by May 2016 for Breach of National Security

FBI – INDICT HILLARY CLINTON | CAMPAIGN 2016 – GAME OVER | FULLY EXPOSED

If Hillary Isn’t Indicted, The Rule Of Law & The Republic Are Dead

Once the Oligarchy is above the law, the Republic is already dead.

https://i2.wp.com/theeconomiccollapseblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Hillary-Clinton_Testimony_to_House_Select_Committee_on_Benghazi-Public-Domain-460x280.png

To paraphrase Ernest Hemingway: How did you lose your Republic? Two ways, gradually and then suddenly. The Romans experienced this when their Republic was extinguished by Empire.

The erosion of the Republic was gradual: slowly but surely, the lower classes’ representation in governance was curtailed; the Oligarchy of the wealthy and powerful cemented their privileges at the expense of the many; Oligarchs rose above the laws that were supposed to apply to all, and executive power was consolidated in top administrators and the wealthy at the expense of the Senate.

When Caesar crossed the Rubicon with his army to seize control of Rome, the Roman Republic ceased to exist. Gradually and then suddenly: this is how Republics become Empires.

We find ourselves in a parallel moment in history: the American Republic has been hollowed into a shell that is maintained for PR purposes. Beneath the propaganda, the Establishment runs the nation for its own benefit. The people are ignored, because they are powerless in this hollow shell of democracy: their only role is to provide bodies, talent and blood for the Imperial armed forces, pay taxes if they have any money, and be content with their food stamps if they don’t.

Here’s the proof:

Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens

Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no independent influence.

Here are two articles in the same vein:

America the Banana Republic

The Quiet Coup

The United States has reached a crossing the Rubicon moment: either Hillary Clinton is indicted for knowingly violating statutes regarding State Department security, or the rule of law and the Republic are dead. This is a binary moment: we either let Hillary evade the laws that were established to protect the security of the nation and confess there is no rule of law now for the Oligarchy, or the agencies tasked with defending the nation indict her.

There is no middle ground. If Hillary isn’t indicted, the rule of law, i.e. no one is above the law, is dead.

If you believe Hillary that she didn’t really do anything to violate the spirit or the letter of security laws, please review these statutes:

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 12 – Diplomatic Security
12 FAM 531.1 Top Secret Storage
12 FAM 531.1-1 Domestic
(CT:DS-185; 01-31-2012)
(Uniform State, USAID, OPIC, TDP)

2 FAM 558 CRIMINAL LAWS
(TL:DS-70; 10-01-2000)

Incidents involving intentional or grossly negligent release or mishandling of classified information may be subject to criminal penalties. An illustrative list of criminal statutes establishing penalties of fine and imprisonment for the release of classified information is set forth in 12 FAM 558 Exhibit 558.

Once the Oligarchy is above the law, the Republic is already dead. Once the people have lost the ability to influence the central state’s policies and decisions, the Republic is dead. Once the elected officials can no longer impose the nation’s statues on the Oligarchy (or have lost interest in doing so because they are all corrupted cronies), the Republic is dead. Once the nation’s agencies of law enforcement are stayed from indicting, prosecuting and jailing members of the Oligarchy, be they super-wealthy politicos like Hillary or super-wealthy Wall Street bankers, the Republic is dead.

The Democratic Party bosses and special interests have already selected Hillary as their shoo-in candidate for the Presidency, and these Oligarchs and special interests won’t let any pesky details like laws protecting the security of the nation stand in the way of their Not So Quiet Coup.

The nation’s Deep State, which I have covered extensively, has at least grudgingly approved Hillary as the next neo-conservative (never met an Imperial entanglement or drone strike she didn’t like), neo-colonial (we’re going to put the “little people” in their rightful place, i.e. under our management) Imperial President.

A vote for Hillary, unindicted Oligarch, is a vote in favor of the destruction of the rule of law and the Republic. This is the Rubicon every voter must decide to cross or refuse to cross: vote for Hillary (destroy the Republic and surrender to Imperial Oligarchy) or refuse to vote for an unindicted Imperial Oligarch.

https://whiskeytangotexas.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/76eef-fff_phixr2.jpg

 

by Charles Hugh Smith | Of Two Minds

LISTEN: Leaked Hillary Audio Reveals Her REAL Plan for Guns Once Elected

https://i2.wp.com/conservativetribune.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Hillary-Clinton-and-concealed-carry-1-592x331.jpg

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is coming for your guns.

Oh, don’t expect her to say that during a campaign speech covered by the media or in an op-ed in The New York Times. But when she’s among friends and doesn’t realize she’s being recorded, she’s apparently a little more open about her plans.

The Washington Free Beacon recently obtained an audio recording of Clinton’s remarks to what was obviously a liberal, anti-gun crowd at a “small private fundraiser in New York” — which is the only kind of crowd to be found at a Clinton fundraiser in New York, most likely.

Clinton told donors that the Supreme Court was “wrong on the Second Amendment.”

“And I am going to make that case every chance I get,” she added.

Clinton must have felt right at home with the enthusiastic crowd and her Greenwich Village host, convicted felon John Zaccaro. Perhaps after her remarks she sought his advice as to which minimum security federal prisons had the best cafeterias, but that’s only speculation.

Clinton has expressed support in the past for a ban on “assault weapons” similar to the largely ineffectual ban passed by Congress and signed into law by her husband, President Bill Clinton. That ban was allowed to expire under President George W. Bush.

“I was proud when my husband took (the National Rifle Association) on, and we were able to ban assault weapons, but he had to put a sunset on so 10 years later, of course, Bush wouldn’t agree to reinstate them,” said Clinton.

That’s because Bush knew that such bans do little more than impinge upon the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans — something Clinton, despite her constant claims to be the “experienced” candidate for president, doesn’t appear to have figured out yet.

Clinton also criticized the NRA and promised to work to counter the lobbying influence of the organization.

“I’m going to speak out, I’m going to do everything I can to rally people against this pernicious, corrupting influence of the NRA,” she said. “And we’re going to do whatever we can.”

“The idea that you can have an open carry permit with an AK-47 over your shoulder walking up and down the aisles of a supermarket is just despicable,” Clinton added.

What she didn’t explain was “why.” Why, exactly, is this idea “just despicable”? How many gun owners have legally carried an AK-47 or similar weapon into a supermarket and committed a crime? Have there been 100 such crimes? A dozen?

Even one?

And if the answer is none — and one would think she’d be spouting examples left and right if she had any examples to spout — then what exactly would the point of a ban on such behavior be?

I think we all know the answer to that question, but you can listen to her comments here (if you can stand it) and decide for yourself:

Source: Conservative Tribune

 

Clinton False Flag in Chicago Right Out of Alinsky Playbook

https://i2.wp.com/hw.prisonplanet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/clinton-alinsky-pp.jpg

On Sunday former presidential candidate Ben Carson told Fox News the disruption at Donald Trump’s Chicago rally last week is a tactic right out of Saul Alinsky’s playbook.

https://html1-f.scribdassets.com/30burohmbk41lzfo/images/2-87913fb337.jpg

“If you read some of the left-leaning writings of people like Saul Alinsky, you understand exactly what they’re doing. This is part of the plan,” Carson said.

Alinsky’s infamous “Rules for Radicals” does not explicitly encourage violence. However, according Alinsky protégé Nicholas von Hoffman, in private “he would say that violence has its uses.”

Clinton was a follower of Saul Alinsky and met the Chicago community organizer several times in 1968 while writing a Wellesley college thesis (“An Analysis of the Alinsky Model”).

“Clinton’s relationship with Alinsky, and her support for his philosophy, continued for several years after she entered Yale law school in 1969,” writes Alana Goodman for The Washington Free Beacon.

Alinsky was fond of the young law student Clinton. “Since I know [Alinsky’s] feelings about you I took the liberty of opening your letter because I didn’t want something urgent to wait for two weeks,” replied Georgia Harper, Alinsky’s secretary, in response to a letter (see below) Clinton sent inquiring about his book, “Rules for Radicals.”

Shortly after Bill Clinton was elected the White House instructed Wellesley to bury Hillary’s thesis. “After the call from the White House, Wellesley’s president, Nannerl Overholser Keohane, consulted with lawyers and closed access to any thesis written by a U.S. president or first lady, a rule affecting only Hillary D. Rodham’s thesis,” writes Bill Dedman for NBC News.

On Saturday political insider Roger Stone told Alex Jones the disruption and violence at the Trump rally was a false flag staged by Hillary Clinton to discredit rival Bernie Sanders.

“The entire conflagration in Chicago is a Hillary Clinton operation,” Stone said during a phone interview. “Frankly, I can’t see Bernie Sanders having anything to with it this is not his handiwork.”

In addition to Clinton, Stone implicated George Soros, MoveOn, David Brock and Media Matters for America and “the reclusive millionaire, Jonathan Lewis.”

By Kurt Nimmo for Prison Planet

Dr Ben Carson identifies Hilary Clinton as a follower of Lucifer and as an associate of Jesuit trained Saul Alinsky

imrsDr Ben Carson is a retired neurosurgeon and Presidential candidate who recently dropped out of the elections. Carson made some amazing comments recently while endorsing Donald Trump at a press conference. 46 minutes into the conference embedded below, Carson explained to the media that he was backing Donald Trump because Hilary Clinton was a cohort of a communist named Saul Alinsky. Saul Alinsky was a Jesuit trained communist, who was instructed by the Jesuit’s on how to overthrow America by infiltrating the political system. The Jesuit’s have been infiltrating and overthrowing governments for centuries, and they were banned from multiple nations over the years for political intrigue and assassinations. President Obama was trained in Saul Alinsky communist tactics by a Jesuit named Greg Galuzzo. Galuzzo was the director of the Saul Alinsky group called The Gamaliel foundation.

Saul Alinsky wrote a book called ‘Rules for radicals’ that was dedicated to Lucifer (the true god of the Jesuit Order). The book ‘Rules for radicals’ is a blueprint on how to destroy the US constitution and bill of rights, and turn the country into a fascist dictatorship. Rules for radicals is also a training manual for hardcore leftists (the left is controlled by the Jesuit Order) who are now aiding and abetting the Islamic invasion of Europe. The left are being used by the Jesuit Order to destroy the Judaeo-Christian nations of Europe and they want to do the same thing to America. Rules for radicals instructs leftists on how to use hardcore and extreme tactics, to defeat their opponents and force their agenda on people. The UAF (United against fascism) in the UK use these kind of tactics to shut down any criticism of Islam in the UK. The UAF has been linked to a number of radical Islamic terrorists, and it also recieves funding from radical Islamic groups in addition to government funding. Most of the UAF members are college aged communists with some Muslim members. The UAF is in fact a UK government protected and funded street army that violently attacks any group that disagrees with left wing policies and Islam.

All these violent, extreme and aggressive left wing communist groups are controlled by the Jesuit Order. The Jesuit’s are using the left to destroy nations within so they can orchestrate their Islamic invasion of Judaeo-Christian nations and fascist agenda without any opposition. Donald Trump wants to preserve America’s constitution and defend it from an Islamic invasion, so the Jesuit’s are using their Saul Alinsky trained communists (Hilary Clinton and violent protest groups) to stop him. The tactics of the Jesuit controlled extreme left communists is the same in all Western countries. Anyone who opposes: mass Islamic immigration, collapsed borders (for a world government) and financial looting of wealthy Protestant nations; is attacked with violence and intimidation. The well funded extreme left will manufacture hysteria and lies, while shutting down their political opponents with organized violence so their free speech is shut down. Saul Alinsky trained communists are trained in community organizing, which involves shutting down their opponents with organized violence and mass hysteria. President Obama was a Jesuit trained Saul Alinsky community organizer, just like the community organizers who organized the recent violent protest at a Donald Trump rally which resulted in the cancellation of the event. According to my research the chaotic protest which resulted in the cancellation of a Donald Trump event, was organized by Jesuit Saul Alinsky trained community organizers. The extreme leftists involved in the Donald Trump protests are paid to do this according to my research, because the hardcore left are a very well funded movement. The leftists in Europe who violently shut down any protest against radical Islam are also paid to do this as well. In conclusion the extreme left wing communist movement which is funded to defend Islamic domination and a world government is a major tool of the Jesuit Order to ensure the destruction of wealthy Protestant/Judaeo-christian nations.

Carson’s comments sited in this article occur at 46:00

Source: Reptilian Dimension

How the Jesuit’s use the Jews to disguise the fact that the Jesuit’s control and lead the New World Order and Illuminati

If you do a search on the internet the majority of conspiracy researchers believe that Jews and Zionists are the leaders of the New World Order and Illuminati. Researchers claim that wherever you look in politics and big business there is a Jew who is in control. To the untrained eye Jews seem to be in very important positions of power.

Casino_(1995)_Soundtrack-FrontBut if you wish to understand the Illuminati and New World Order you need to look at how the Italian Mafia operates. Have you ever seen the movie ‘Casino’ with Robert DeNiro and Joe Pesci? This movie is based on true events. In the movie; the Italian Mafia secretly controls the Tangiers casino in Las Vegas. The Mafia orders a union boss to invest one hundred million dollars into a casino the Mafia controls, as the Mafia are the real controllers of the casino. The Mafia employs academic Jews to manage and direct the casino’s day to day operations (Phillip Green and Frank Rosenthal). On the surface it seems as if the casino is owned and controlled by Jews, but this is not the case at all. In reality these Jews are managing the casino for an Italian crime syndicate, and if they don’t obey the orders of the Mafia they will be shot. The Mafia uses the casino as a money laundering operation and skims millions of dollars from the casino as they truly own it. It has been proven that the Italian Mafia have owned businesses in other people’s names for years. Basically the Mafia gives someone money and tells them to buy a business so that it seems that; that person owns it, but in reality the Mafia owns the business and completely controls it.

Phillip Green was the Mafia and Jesuit front man

Above: An actor in the movie Casino plays the role of a Jew who was made CEO of a Casino that was controlled by the Mafia and Jesuit Order. The Jew is put in the spotlight while the true owners and controllers hide in the shadows.

frank rosenthal show with robert conrad at the stardust hotel 8/22/77

Above: The Jew Frank Rosenthal hosts his Casino based TV show. Rosenthal was also a senior director of the Tangiers Casino which was owned and controlled by the Mafia and Jesuit Order. Rosenthal was just another educated business manager managing a piece of the Vatican’s empire.

Many conspiracy researchers have pointed to the current US president Barak Obama and his communist training. It is clear that Obama is implementing a communist/fascist revolution in the United States, as his executive orders and desired policies seem to contradict the US constitution. Obama’s executive orders and programs seem to mirror those of communist countries, so it’s clear Obama is following a communist model. Many conspiracy researchers point to Obama’s Saul Alinksy communist training. Saul Alinksy was a famous communist Jew from Chicago who worked for the Jesuits. It has been proven that Obama was politically trained with Saul Alinsky’s communist doctrines, but most people don’t know that Alinsky worked for the Jesuits. Saul Alinksy was just another Papal court Jew who wrote Jesuit communist teachings in books, which were used to train future political leaders who would man the world Jesuit empire. The Jesuits would never put their own names on their communist training books as they hide in the shadows behind others. As discussed; the Jesuits first choice of person to hide behind is a Jew, as it’s the Jesuits intention to blame the Jews for everything.

Jesuit Priest, Greg Galluzzo. Director of the Alinsky communist Gamaliel Foundation

From 1986 Greg Galluzzo (a Jesuit Priest) was the director of the communist Gamaliel foundation where both Saul Alinksy (until his death in 1972) and President Obama worked. Obama worked as a trainer and consultant at the Gamaliel foundation where he learned Alinky’s communist Jesuit teachings. While Obama worked at Gamaliel it was directed by a Jesuit. It is clear that Obama had some kind of Jesuit training while he worked at the communist Gamaliel foundation from 1985-1988. For at least two years Barak Obama was trained and in submission to a Jesuit (Greg Galluzzo). This is extremely important as this clearly proves the current US President who is doing more damage to the US than any other in history; was trained in politics by a Jesuit (Greg Galluzzo). It is clear that the Jesuit’s at a minimum taught Obama how to destroy the US through: immigration, executive orders and communist ideologies. It is my contention through extensive research that the Jesuits continue to control Obama and most of the world today, as the Jesuits are the leaders and controllers of the New World Order.

The Gamaliel foundation says this about its goals, “Gamaliel’s goal is “to assist local community leaders to create, maintain and expand independent, grassroots, and powerful faith-based community organizations” that have the power to influence political and economic decisions that impact cities and regions.” (Wikipedia)

The Gamaliel foundation was clearly a powerful organization with much political power and it was run by a Jesuit and

A Jesuit communist book with a Jews name on it. Classic Jesuit misdirection.

trained future Presidents and political leaders, it also was a place littered with communists who were Jesuit trained. Obama was in fact trained by a Jesuit controlled organization before becoming President. But notice how Obama is always connected to the well-known communist Jew; Saul Alinsky. Alinsky is very well known and even famous as a communist and Marxist. Well known musician Ted Nugent has appeared on radio shows such as Infowars a number of times, and has explained how Obama was trained in communism and Marxism by Saul Alinksy doctrines, but what people like Ted don’t know is that it is the Jesuit’s who controlled Alinksy. Alinksy is merely a Papal court Jew. A Papal court Jew is an academically bright Jew who the Jesuit’s and Vatican would employ to manage their finances and businesses. Jews have historically been very good accountants, and the Vatican and Mafia have used them over the years to manage their finances and businesses. But make no mistake; the Jesuit’s and Mafia are in control, if a Jew does not do as he is told, he is simply assassinated or punished. Alinsky worked directly for the Jesuit’s and the Jesuits trained Obama in Marxism and communism as ordered by the Jesuit Greg Galluzzo. The relationship between Galluzzo, Alinksy and Obama, shows us how the Jesuit controls nations and political leaders by using the Jew as a buffer to disguise their control of nations. The Jesuits are extremely cunning and intelligent and they rarely make mistakes, but by placing the Jesuit Greg Galluzzo as director of the Gamaliel foundation, they clearly showed that they controlled both Alinsky, Obama and the Gamaliel foundation. The protocols of the learned elders of Zion are also a Jesuit created book. The protocols were originally written as a book called, ‘The secret instructions of Borg Fontaine.’ The instructions of Borg Fontaine were written by the Jesuit Order as instructions on how to take over the world, however the book was later re-formatted, edited, renamed and put in public circulation to further blame the Jews for what the Jesuit’s were doing. I’m certain Saul Alinksy’s communist books were written by the Jesuit’s (and Alinksy maybe helped with the publication and editing), and the Jesuits then put these books in circulation to train political leaders such as Obama. When citizens get angry about what is happening to their country they would connect  Alinsky with Obama and then blame the Jews on everything (This is what the Jesuits want you to think). Fortunately we can link the Jesuit’s to Obama and Alinsky through Greg Galluzzo and the Gamaliel foundation, and we can know it is the Jesuit’s who are behind America’s political turmoil.

Above: Jesuit communist training that Obama undertook under the supervision of Greg Galluzzo (a Jesuit Priest)

The Jesuit’s need someone to take the blame if the New World Order and Illuminati is ever exposed and attacked, and that’s why the Jesuit’s create the illusion that Jews are in control when this is not the case. Most Jews are great citizens and are not involved in any New World Order conspiracy, and even many of the Jews working for the Jesuits are just trying to make a living by working in: business, politics and banking. Many of these Jews have worked hard in school and are just trying to make a living with their University degree and education, and because these Jews perform well in University, they are picked out by the Jesuits (who control and own many of the top Universities in the USA and abroad), and they are employed to man the Jesuit world empire. Obama was definitely picked out by the Jesuit’s to control the United States for the Jesuit Order. According to former Jesuit, Alberto Rivera, the Jesuits controlled the communist political party in Spain, and it seems they are implementing a full communist revolution through Obama; to gain even more control over the USA.

One Jewish name constantly accused of controlling the New World Order is the Rothschild family, but if you actually study the history of the Rothschild’s and observe their historical titles in old encyclopaedia’s, you will see that the Rothschild’s have merely been accountants and bankers for the Vatican and Jesuits. The Rothschild’s have been known historicall